Jump to content

Do right wingers here really believe that Trump's appointees (Gaetz, RFK, & Gabbard) are actually QUALIFIED for those offices?


Recommended Posts

Posted
18 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You were gonna vote for Kamala/Walz to run the entire country, dummy.

You just watched Biden mumble, stumble and bumble his way through 4 brain-addled years of fake presidency with nary a complaint. 

Now you're worried about Tulsi's ability to merely manage one aspect of the gov't? 🤣

You should just keep your mouth shut and make people guess how stupid you are,

Your IGNORANCE of US politics prevents you from understanding that Harris was already chosen to be NEXT IN LINE for POTUS due to her EXTENSIVE QUALIFICATIONS: State AG, Federal Senator, and Vice President.

You should keep your mouth shut cause every time you dispute what I say, you come out as pathetically and OBVIOUSLY  IGNORANT.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Your IGNORANCE of US politics prevents you from understanding that Harris was already chosen to be NEXT IN LINE for POTUS due to her EXTENSIVE QUALIFICATIONS: State AG, Federal Senator, and Vice President.

And she was raised in a middle class family.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, CouchPotato said:

And she was raised in a middle class family.

Yes, she has HUMBLE ROOTS, and that doesn't appeal to the MAGA CULT which idolizes a narcissistic BLOWHARD who went bankrupt 6 times. 🤮

Posted
3 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Yes, she has HUMBLE ROOTS, and that doesn't appeal to the MAGA CULT which idolizes a narcissistic BLOWHARD who went bankrupt 6 times. 🤮

Mhmm.

And she knows the importance of seeing the moment of time in which we exist.

 

  • Haha 2
Posted

Do you believe that chick with a dick or the homosexual who was appointed because he likes penis in the bum are qualified or did they get the job because of some weird sex fetish they have? 

Posted
6 minutes ago, West said:

Do you believe that chick with a dick or the homosexual who was appointed because he likes penis in the bum are qualified or did they get the job because of some weird sex fetish they have? 

^ Why do we let little children post on an adult political forum?

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, DUI_Offender said:

^ Why do we let little children post on an adult political forum?

The democrats made their selections based on meeting a quota of having enough men who wear fake boobs and wear skirts. Yet this guy is criticizing the choice of a woman who served as a high rank in combat and was the co-chair of a major political party? 

Very strange take 

Posted
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Your IGNORANCE of US politics prevents you from understanding that Harris was already chosen to be NEXT IN LINE for POTUS due to her EXTENSIVE QUALIFICATIONS: State AG, Federal Senator, and Vice President.

You should keep your mouth shut cause every time you dispute what I say, you come out as pathetically and OBVIOUSLY  IGNORANT.

She was not chosen. That would have involved the primary, and she never put her name forward. She was selected as the only person they could choose at the very end

And she was not hired for her qualifications. In fact even democrats thought she was an absolutely horrible choice when she did put her name forward in 2020. The interest in her was so low she backed out before even getting one vote.

Biden is clearly mentally incapacitated and you're excited and happy to have him ruling the country. I say that pretty much wipes out your credibility on the who is qualified front

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

She was not chosen. That would have involved the primary, and she never put her name forward. She was selected as the only person they could choose at the very end

She was chosen for VP. Duh

6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

And she was not hired for her qualifications. In fact even democrats thought she was an absolutely horrible choice when she did put her name forward in 2020. The interest in her was so low she backed out before even getting one vote.

And yet Biden chose her for VP due to her superior primary debate performance. She dropped out to get the future chance. You Canucks know nothing cause you only listen to FOS LIES.

6 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Biden is clearly mentally incapacitated and you're excited and happy to have him ruling the country. I say that pretty much wipes out your credibility on the who is qualified front

He has done an EXCELLENT JOB. A quick wit is ONLY necessary for campaigning. Strategy and relationships gets shit done.

  • Haha 1
Posted
13 minutes ago, West said:

The democrats made their selections based on meeting a quota of having enough men who wear fake boobs and wear skirts. Yet this guy is criticizing the choice of a woman who served as a high rank in combat and was the co-chair of a major political party? 

Very strange take 

Combat plays next to NO ROLE in Intelligence, strategy and leadership, assuming you're talking about Gabbard.

Maybe if you made points instead of cryptic nonsense, you might seem intelligent.

Posted
9 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Combat plays next to NO ROLE in Intelligence, strategy and leadership, assuming you're talking about Gabbard.

Maybe if you made points instead of cryptic nonsense, you might seem intelligent.

She's more qualified for that post than the guy selected to be transportation secretary because he's married to a dude.

 

Posted
30 minutes ago, robosmith said:

She was chosen for VP. Duh

Oh you mean appointed in an undemocratic process. Sure

Quote

And yet Biden chose her for VP due to her superior primary debate performance. She dropped out to get the future chance. You Canucks know nothing cause you only listen to FOS LIES.

No, Biden appointed her because he wanted a black woman. And she achieved nothing in office

Quote

He has done an EXCELLENT JOB. A quick wit is ONLY necessary for campaigning. Strategy and relationships gets shit done.

He has done a horrible job. His approval ratings were in the hole long before he got on stage and prove that he's also demented. His economy is horrible and Americans knew it. He wasted money left and right. He created divisions and put one person against another. He tried to reform the intersectional coalition which is by its very nature  Divisive and failed

He was a crap president that appointed a black woman because she was a black woman and they were both terrible at their jobs and America knew it.

It's pretty sad that you don't.

Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, DUI_Offender said:

^ Why do we let little children post on an adult political forum?

Don't complain. If that becomes the standard you are like the third to go.

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 3

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
7 hours ago, robosmith said:

Your IGNORANCE of US politics prevents you from understanding that Harris was already chosen to be NEXT IN LINE for POTUS due to her EXTENSIVE QUALIFICATIONS: State AG, Federal Senator, and Vice President.

So Harris was qualified to be Vice President because she was Vice President? Makes total since if you are a liberal.

This is why he "ignores me". Lol

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
10 hours ago, robosmith said:

They have one thing in common: ZERO experience of management at that level, and ZERO professional knowledge of those complex fields.

Zero experience?

Pete Buttigieg was hired because he is gay and likes choo-choo trains. 

That aside, the purpose of a cabinet-level position is to carry out and oversee the President's vision, not to be the expert in the field. 

That aside, I think Gaetz and RFK are awful choices. 

 

 

Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, robosmith said:

Your IGNORANCE of US politics prevents you from understanding that Harris was already chosen to be NEXT IN LINE for POTUS due to her EXTENSIVE 2 QUALIFICATIONS: State AG, Federal Senator, and Vice President.

You should keep your mouth shut cause every time you dispute what I say, you come out as pathetically and OBVIOUSLY  IGNORANT.

Fixed it for ya 😉

Only two qualifications, dummy:

  1. black
  2. female

Ohhh, snap! Right from CNN, hey? That's gonna leave a mark 😘

ScreenShot2024-11-15at7_28_56AM.thumb.png.ce47cfca16dfa3129ce03bc5da34d6a7.png

Your IGNORANCE of the politics IN YOUR OWN COUNTRY is not actually all that surprising on account of the fact that THE MSM IN THE US IS DESIGNED TO GROOM CULTIST MUPPETS LIKE YOU.

Edited by WestCanMan

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
23 minutes ago, User said:

Zero experience?

Pete Buttigieg was hired because he is gay and likes choo-choo trains. 

That aside, the purpose of a cabinet-level position is to carry out and oversee the President's vision, not to be the expert in the field. 

That aside, I think Gaetz and RFK are awful choices. 

I worry about Gaetz as well. But RFK I like in that he's going to disrupt the status quo. The FDA and NHS have become far to entangled with corporations. They should be separated by a firewall. I think RFK will be that firewall, for the time being.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
29 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

I worry about Gaetz as well. 

Gaetz is an intelligent, focused individual, and the US judiciary is suddenly on notice: lawfare just became illegal. 

Do you honestly think that the US judicial system could get any worse than it has been from the moment that the Wussian cowusion episode started, up until now? 

Is it time for Americans to have the right to choose a trial by:

  1. Jury
  2. Republican Judge
  3. Democrat judge?

Of course if you're a visible minority and you're guilty then you'd choose a Demi judge, and no one would ever choose a Republican judge unless they knew that they were innocent. 

If that didn't make sense then the US wouldn't US need Gaetz to be the next AG.

One last thing: currently impeaching judges is done the same way as governors, presidents, etc... It is done by congress and the senate. That means that elected (ie partisan) officials have the power to remove sitting judges from the bench. It then follows that removing judges has a nasty political odour to it, so it simply isn't done. 

Maybe it's time to add another layer to that, like either requiring a SC vote of no less than 6-3, or requiring a minimum of 60% total and 20% support from the minority party in congress and the senate. If the political nature of impeachment was removed then maybe judges would take integrity more seriously.

Maybe it's also time to make a rule that neither party can appoint more than 5 of the 9 SCJs. Honestly you might as well light the constitution on fire if you ever end up with 6 or 7 Demi judges there, but it's not fair to have 7 GOP-appointees either, because you never know what the GOP will be like in 50 years... Maybe they'll become the party of racism and crime by the 2070s. 

Edited by WestCanMan

If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. 

"If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"

Posted
11 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Gaetz is an intelligent, focused individual, and the US judiciary is suddenly on notice: lawfare just became illegal. 

Do you honestly think that the US judicial system could get any worse than it has been from the moment that the Wussian cowusion episode started, up until now? 

Is it time for Americans to have the right to choose a trial by:

  1. Jury
  2. Republican Judge
  3. Democrat judge?

Of course if you're a visible minority and you're guilty then you'd choose a Demi judge, and no one would ever choose a Republican judge unless they knew that they were innocent. 

If that didn't make sense then the US wouldn't US need Gaetz to be the next AG.

One last thing: currently impeaching judges is done the same way as governors, presidents, etc... It is done by congress and the senate. That means that elected (ie partisan) officials have the power to remove sitting judges from the bench. It then follows that removing judges has a nasty political odour to it, so it simply isn't done. 

Maybe it's time to add another layer to that, like either requiring a SC vote of no less than 6-3, or requiring a minimum of 60% total and 20% support from the minority party in congress and the senate. If the political nature of impeachment was removed then maybe judges would take integrity more seriously.

Maybe it's also time to make a rule that neither party can appoint more than 5 of the 9 SCJs. Honestly you might as well light the constitution on fire if you ever end up with 6 or 7 Demi judges there, but it's not fair to have 7 GOP-appointees either, because you never know what the GOP will be like in 50 years... Maybe they'll become the party of racism and crime by the 2070s. 

I agree that he has good skills and good plans. I'm just afraid he will shoot himself in the foot again and we will all pay the price.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted (edited)
11 hours ago, robosmith said:

They have one thing in common: ZERO experience of management at that level, and ZERO professional knowledge of those complex fields.

Yes. I know this because they will have the tools to fight the biggest liars & cheaters the world has ever known - the democrat party. 

This next four years may get ugly but it's the price we will have to pay for EVERYONE'S freedoms, not just the special interest groups. 

I for one, cannot wait. :D 

Edited by Deluge
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,894
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Dave L
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...