Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

I never made any mention of the fact that he was 'legally' in a marriage at the time. My own wife was separated when I met her, and for a lot less than 12 years. 

I'd consider it a bigger issue if he had a girlfriend living with him when they started dating. 

I have no problems whatsoever with Willy Brown's marital status at the time and I never claimed to.

I wouldn't have cared about her 'relationship' with Willy Brown if he didn't give her two lucrative political appointments that had absolutely nothing to do with her area of expertise.

Kamala was a lawyer who had only been out of school for 6 years when Willy Brown appointed her to the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and the Medical Assistance Commission. She had very little life experience and no professional experience in those areas whatsoever. 

Tell me this:

  1. were the people of California best served by having Kamala Harris sitting on the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board above all others? Was there no one else in that state of 30M people (population back in 1995) that was more qualified than her? What reason did Willy Brown have to appoint her there, aside from "She's blowing me"?
  2. were the people of California best served by having Kamala Harris sitting on the Medical Assistance Commission above all others? Was there no one else in that state of 30M people (1995) that was more qualified than her? What reason did Willy Brown have to appoint her there, aside from "She's blowing me"?

Gimme a break. THE ONLY REASON KAMALA GOT THOSE JOBS IS THAT SHE WAS SLEEPING WITH WILLY BROWN.

He used his influence to get a lot of things for a lot of people, thats how powerful people  go about things on politics and even often in the business world.  For Republicans also. You put “your people” on the chess board, the more chess pieces you have on the board the more powerful you are. 
 

It’s called cronyism, the US particularly notorious for it and you don’t have to look to far to find republicans doing the same thing, it’s how the game is played 

 

https://whyy.org/articles/top-pa-senator-appoints-colleagues-wife-to-lucrative-gaming-control-board-seat/amp/

 

https://www.gq.com/story/republican-party-nepotism
 

https://www.newsweek.com/democrats-also-pay-family-public-dollars-699548
 

 

Posted
On 10/26/2024 at 1:00 PM, WestCanMan said:

I'll give her credit, she does have the edge on Trump in that one area.

But you never know, maybe some women can get elected in foreign countries, and Trump can use his charms on them. 

If he can get a Playboy bunny to fall in love with him, he can get some good concessions from some Angela Merkel types.

She'll have to use blowjobs; otherwise world leaders will just laugh in her face. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Deluge said:

She'll have to use blowjobs; otherwise world leaders will just laugh in her face. 

You need to get laid, dude.
 

You’re way too repressed.  As long as it’s consensual, go out and f*ck it. I don’t care if it’s a man, woman, goat, just get your rocks off cause all you do is log in here and obsessively imagine  how other people are having sex. 

  • Haha 1

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
14 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Either they both are or neither is. And if you didn't speak out about one then you can't really morally speak out about the other.

No you don't get my point. Having an affair is not sexist remark because both sexes men or women can have an affair but giving a blow job can be only by a woman and remarks like a politician will use it in international negotiations because she is a woman is sexist.

Posted
14 hours ago, Aristides said:

Do you think his wife was celibate for those 12 years? Probably never occurred to you. 

OMG, what part of "Brown's marital status isn't a factor" don't you get? 

Quote

Trump, 3 years older than Ivana, 17 years older than Marla, 24 years older than Melania and 33 years older than Stormy. The older he gets the younger he goes and do you really think none of them used their youth and looks to get ahead? You support a pig.

If Trump was giving them political appointments that they weren't qualified for in exchange for sex then you would have a point

Quote

What counts is what she has accomplished since.

She prostituted herself, so it's ok to talk about her willingness to exchange sex for favours. 

Quote

To paraphrase one quote, if all it took to get ahead was sleeping with the right people, boardrooms would be full of female CEO's.

  1. Not all men sell out like that, nor all women. Speak for yourself.
  2. 25% of all board positions are held by females. So how do you feel about the fact that some women do sleep their way into those positions?
  3. The women like Kamala, who do trade sex for a spot on a board or a movie role or whatever else, make it so that other women have to do the same or get left behind.

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
12 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

No, the blow job Trump gave to Putin in Helsinki cannot be topped by anyone.  

Trump has zero charm, his mail-order brides including the current one never loved him and can’t stand even being in his presence, their relationships were purely transactional just like his encounter with Stormy Daniels. Merkel of all people particularly despised Trump 

If blowjobs were the key to his success then he must be prolific, because America was doing awesome when he was POTUS, and Kamala and Joe must be biting people or something. 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
11 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

He used his influence to get a lot of things for a lot of people, thats how powerful people  go about things on politics and even often in the business world.  For Republicans also. You put “your people” on the chess board, the more chess pieces you have on the board the more powerful you are. 

A blatant "sex for money" scheme isn't quite the same as cronyism. 

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

She'll have to use blowjobs; otherwise world leaders will just laugh in her face. 

Her mouth is good for one thing. 

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
28 minutes ago, Deluge said:

You need to stop pushing the queer agenda. It's gotten tiresome. 

Maybe he's one of the guys that dresses in lingerie to read stories to little children. 

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
1 hour ago, Rebound said:

You need to get laid, dude.
 

You’re way too repressed.  As long as it’s consensual, go out and f*ck it. I don’t care if it’s a man, woman, goat, just get your rocks off cause all you do is log in here and obsessively imagine  how other people are having sex. 

Come on, man. That's not fair to the goats.

Posted
1 minute ago, Hodad said:

Come on, man. That's not fair to the goats.

So that's what happens... you guys pass around your emotional support animals.

Now it makes sense that you were having such a hard time getting your hamster back from robo.  

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted

Maybe.. just maybe the OP can grow up. So juvenile but then its my guess that he vents on here and then acts like a respectable, civil, normal person with the rest of the world. However, the fact that he hides in the shadow and unloads this juvenile garbage is rather unbecoming. 

  • Sad 1
Posted
1 hour ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

No you don't get my point. Having an affair is not sexist remark because both sexes men or women can have an affair but giving a blow job can be only by a woman and remarks like a politician will use it in international negotiations because she is a woman is sexist.

Horseshit.

First off men can absolutely give blowjobs, that's one of the more popular ways for gays to have sex. And in fact in this VERY THREAD there's all kinds of talk about Trump giving blowjobs and not a peep from you about that. 

second BOTH sexes are quite capable of performing oral sex on the other.  I'm very very sorry for any girl you dated if you didn't know that. 

thirdly despite what clinton says an act of sex is an act of sex. Period.  If you're going to talk about trump having sex with a hooker for days on end then it's entirely fair to talk about kamala's sex acts as well. 

What you really mean is you don't think it's a problem when we talk about trump but you think it's terrible when we talk about harris. That is hypocrisy. If it's not sexist when we talk about trump then it's not sexist when we talk about harris. And you're obviously fine about us talking about trump giving bullshit so you have no room to argue against people talking about Kamala doing it.

The problem with many on the left is that their morals and principles only apply to people they don't like. You don't like republicans so you're going to yell at them for doing exactly the same thing that you let democrats get away with

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
5 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Horseshit.

First off men can absolutely give blowjobs, that's one of the more popular ways for gays to have sex. And in fact in this VERY THREAD there's all kinds of talk about Trump giving blowjobs and not a peep from you about that. 

second BOTH sexes are quite capable of performing oral sex on the other.  I'm very very sorry for any girl you dated if you didn't know that. 

thirdly despite what clinton says an act of sex is an act of sex. Period.  If you're going to talk about trump having sex with a hooker for days on end then it's entirely fair to talk about kamala's sex acts as well. 

What you really mean is you don't think it's a problem when we talk about trump but you think it's terrible when we talk about harris. That is hypocrisy. If it's not sexist when we talk about trump then it's not sexist when we talk about harris. And you're obviously fine about us talking about trump giving bullshit so you have no room to argue against people talking about Kamala doing it.

The problem with many on the left is that their morals and principles only apply to people they don't like. You don't like republicans so you're going to yell at them for doing exactly the same thing that you let democrats get away with

I did not read a single post in this thread (except your responses to mine) when I saw the title, so I don;t know about posts you are referring too. 

No, men don't give blow jobs to women only women do to men. As for gay men. I have no idea about them.

Funny some of you guys refer to me as leftist. I think you use every tool to discredit your opponents. In real life they some say I am extreme right. Strong supporter of Capital Punishment, promoting an end to third world immigration especially colored immigrants and demanding private health. May be on some aspects like being strong feminist and supporting doctor assisted suicide and abortion rights I am an the left but combined I am center!!.

Posted
3 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

I did not read a single post in this thread (except your responses to mine) when I saw the title, so I don;t know about posts you are referring too. 

So you literally came here Without understanding the topic, without understanding what was being discussed, and without knowing what the issues were or whether there was any validity to it and demanded that you are morally correct and everybody else is wrong.

I want you to think for a minute about how that makes you look and sound. Does that sound like the behavior of a rational individual making reasons judgments and applying a sensible moral code?

And it's disappointing that you didn't know that men give oral sex to women. My deepest condolences to any of your intimate partners

And I noticed you couldn't come back with any reasoning as to why it's okay to feel that way about harris but not Trump.

 

So basically what you demonstrated here is that you don't actually have moral values and that there's no point in listening to anything that you say because you're not coming at it from a position of reason or logic.

If you're going to hold yourself up as a moral example to others, you should do a better job of being a moral and reasonable individually yourself.

  • Like 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
9 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

So you literally came here Without understanding the topic, without understanding what was being discussed, and without knowing what the issues were or whether there was any validity to it and demanded that you are morally correct and everybody else is wrong.

I want you to think for a minute about how that makes you look and sound. Does that sound like the behavior of a rational individual making reasons judgments and applying a sensible moral code?

And it's disappointing that you didn't know that men give oral sex to women. My deepest condolences to any of your intimate partners

And I noticed you couldn't come back with any reasoning as to why it's okay to feel that way about harris but not Trump.

 

So basically what you demonstrated here is that you don't actually have moral values and that there's no point in listening to anything that you say because you're not coming at it from a position of reason or logic.

If you're going to hold yourself up as a moral example to others, you should do a better job of being a moral and reasonable individually yourself.

I said men don't give blow jobs to women. I am aware of oral sex.

I never claimed to be a moral example though moral standards vary from person to person. My views on some life topics may be considered as extreme though some may find them correct. I believe strongly that the West is now in danger of a new evil empire that is not Nazi Germany or Soviet Union anymore but the Islamic (or religious) tyranny. I am sorry if you find it immoral but that is my opinion and I see myself entitled to an opinion without being judged on public as immoral.

Posted
45 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

Maybe.. just maybe the OP can grow up. So juvenile but then its my guess that he vents on here and then acts like a respectable, civil, normal person with the rest of the world. However, the fact that he hides in the shadow and unloads this juvenile garbage is rather unbecoming. 

Grow up io. 

It's important to know who you're dealing with, and it's a fact that Kamala needed to use DEI status and give blow jobs to get to where she is. 

It should be enough to point out her dismal track record, but leftards look away and/or lie. 

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
13 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

I said men don't give blow jobs to women. I am aware of oral sex.

 

You are aware of the  theory I suspect

Quote

I never claimed to be a moral example though moral standards vary from person to person. 

Good. So what you're saying is it's perfectly reasonable to ignore your uninformed and amoral position

Done

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Grow up io. 

It's important to know who you're dealing with, and it's a fact that Kamala needed to use DEI status and give blow jobs to get to where she is. 

It should be enough to point out her dismal track record, but leftards look away and/or lie. 

You should grow up. The rest of us can discuss someone and not use "blowjobs" as objective criteria. You have no video evidence of this and so in short.. you are gossiping. If you have incontrovertible evidence.. why have you not put it forth yet? 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 10/26/2024 at 1:57 PM, WestCanMan said:

I thought that you came out a long time ago.

Your stupidity bubbles to the top in every post you make. Do you not even know vocabulary yet?

Posted
4 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

You should grow up. The rest of us can discuss someone and not use "blowjobs" as objective criteria. You have no video evidence of this and so in short.. you are gossiping. If you have incontrovertible evidence.. why have you not put it forth yet? 

Tell me how she got those appointments, in your own words then. 

  • Like 1

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
3 minutes ago, herbie said:

Your stupidity bubbles to the top in every post you make. Do you not even know vocabulary yet?

Oh the irony 🤣

2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

I will answer your questions if and only if you present video of these blowjobs. If its out there.. you should be able to present it in 5 minutes or less. 

Ok fine, I'll acknowledge that I have never borne witness to her world-famous blowjobs. 

So how did she get those appointments now? 

If the Cultist Narrative Network/Cultist Broadcasting Corporation gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed.

Bug-juice is the new Kool-aid.

Ex-Canadian since April 2025

Posted
55 minutes ago, CITIZEN_2015 said:

You can ignore my posts anytime you want and I thank you for that.

You can have a point anytime you like and we'd all be thankful for that :) 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,911
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...