Step Aside, DUI. DEI is the Biggest Threat to Drivers Now...

[Legato]

3 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Sad that you have to create a web of lies about some person--about whom you know nothing--to try to advance your racist, sexist propaganda. 

It's not hard to be honest. You just say what's in evidence. You have to work so hard to lie though, and look so foolish doing it.

Not nearly as foolish as trying to defend the indefensible.

DEI hiring is a reality, nothing racist or sexist about pointing out the truth.

13 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Sorry, loser. Most of us saw the debates. I'm the first there were two muddled old men. In the second there was one muddled old fool and a woman who was clear and articulate at most times and played her opponent like a fiddle. 

"They're eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're eating the cats."

SpinDizzy.

[Nationalist]

38 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Sorry, loser. Most of us saw the debates. I'm the first there were two muddled old men. In the second there was one muddled old fool and a woman who was clear and articulate at most times and played her opponent like a fiddle. 

"They're eating the dogs, the people that came in, they're eating the cats."

Yup. I saw the debates. A lot of America saw them too. Hence Brandon is gone...and Kamala has been losing ground ever since she told us how she was brought up around folks who loved their lawns.

Edited October 13, 2024 by Nationalist

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

What you saw was a farce, where Kamala insisted that she would only do a debate if she got her own moderators and her own fact-checkers and the "fact-checkers" got caught lying for her. 

Lol. The moderators had nothing to do with Trump's rambling nonsense answers and inability to articulate coherent answers.

You want to mock Harris about the quality of thought and speech off prompter, when Trump is far, far worse.

But please, keep whining about moderators having the audacity to correct lies about pet-eating immigrants. Because, yeah, that's the problem, not the pathological liar who made the claim. How dare they point out basic reality? 🙄

1 hour ago, Legato said:

Not nearly as foolish as trying to defend the indefensible.

DEI hiring is a reality, nothing racist or sexist about pointing out the truth.

SpinDizzy.

Keep at it. Slandering a stranger with your made-up nonsense makes you look awesome. 

[Hodad]

45 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Yup. I saw the debates. A lot of America saw them too. Hence Brandon is gone...and Kamala has been losing ground ever since she told us how she was brought up around folks who loved their lawns.

You're not even a good liar. Harris opened up a significant lead after the debates. It's only narrowed again in the last two weeks. 

And yes, I think people loving their lawns is an appropriate contrast to lies about immigrants eating people's pets. Sane vs insane. Love vs hate. Harris vs Trump. --Glad you mentioned it.

[robosmith]

On 10/11/2024 at 5:50 PM, WestCanMan said:

... got offended and made a bunch of excuses, then went into 'we're all victims mode' with this insipid comment:

• "women in uniform were being abused in the street following the incident"

"Abused" 🤣 "Peepow mayd sum jokes that hurtid my feewings"

If you can't take the heat, get outta the kitchen. Or, back into the kitchen? 😘 

^Celebrating abuse of women for NO REASON as your OP has been completely discredited.

Take your misogyny and shove it.

[robosmith]

On 10/11/2024 at 6:59 PM, BeaverFever said:

The new (old) conservative mantra is that anyone who is not a straight white male is inherently unqualified for any job therefore if they are even remotely connected to anything bad happening and DEI is to blame 

Meanwhile straight white males can go around causing disasters left and right: Titanic, Hindenberg, Exxon Valdez, and so on…..and it’s “these things could happen to anyone”

Don't forget the ship which recently cause the destruction of a $2B bridge. 🤮

God forbid if a woman had been captain when the ship's power went out.

[robosmith]

On 10/12/2024 at 12:05 PM, Nationalist said:

Beave what did you expect?

Libbies make skin colour and sex a primary concern for advancement and are shocked when people identify it as purely racist and discrimination?

DEI will die as the public sees more and more of its ridiculous purpose.

MERIT...Beave...is what produces the best outcomes. Not feelings.

YOU'RE ASSuming the men making the decisions on "merit" are OBJECTIVE and never make MISTAKES.

Got news for you....

20 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Nice try, silly loser.

The conservative mantra is that merit matters.

It's a simple matter of "95% of the people in the military are straight males, so obviously 95% of the best candidates are straight males. Forcing the rest of the people up into top-tier jobs that they can't excel at gets people killed."

NO ^REASON for your ASSumption about what happens.

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, Legato said:

Sad yes that she was not a merit appointment. 

And how would you troll ^this?

And by troll, I mean know.

3 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

What you saw was a farce, where Kamala insisted that she would only do a debate if she got her own moderators and her own fact-checkers and the "fact-checkers" got caught lying for her. 

We know there's a REASON you have posted NO EVIDENCE to prove ^this.

Edited October 13, 2024 by robosmith

[Nationalist]

4 hours ago, Hodad said:

You're not even a good liar. Harris opened up a significant lead after the debates. It's only narrowed again in the last two weeks. 

And yes, I think people loving their lawns is an appropriate contrast to lies about immigrants eating people's pets. Sane vs insane. Love vs hate. Harris vs Trump. --Glad you mentioned it.

Proven success vs proven failure.

[Hodad]

16 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Proven success vs proven failure.

Trump is indeed a highly successful grifter. Not very good at actual business, but at long as there are suckers with money, he'll be fine.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

Trump is indeed a highly successful grifter. Not very good at actual business, but at long as there are suckers with money, he'll be fine.

Well he has to be, it's not like he can blow his way to Prosperity like Kamala did

[BeaverFever]

On 10/13/2024 at 1:03 AM, CdnFox said:

That's often the case actually. A lot of very wealthy people never graduated high school. Although it's not entirely relevant because the world has changed, my Dad never graduated high school and went on to become very wealthy in real estate.

That's the benefit of a meritocracy. If you have the skill and you have the willpower and you have the drive and you're willing to do the work you can succeed regardless of the fact that some ignorant elitists look down on anyone who doesnt have their level of indoctrination  education. 

I may have a university degree but i don't ever discount the skills and knowledge of people who get there a different way.

Westcan has never gotten there amd is mot wealthy. And your dad came of age in a much different time. 

[BeaverFever]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Who said anything about rank-and-file, dummy? I just said "military", period.

Also, who's to say that DEI stooges should even be elevated to lead straight men anyways?

Can you imagine the furore if 95% of the infantry was black women, and white men were just demanding that they needed to be in charge of them all? (In Canada that's what our infantry looks like, dummy: straight white men. Why do DEI minorities just need to be in charge?)

My god you are dumb. By definition the majority of a population ate rank and file and the minority are leaders

Next your idi0tic bigoted argument seems to be that not even ONE “minority” should ever be allowed to be in any leadership position which once again proves what a detestable scumbag you are. 
 

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Holy f, that's basic math, stupid, and you just got it so wrong it unfathomable. 

Try to understand this: if 95% of the people in a group have orange hats, then chances are that 95% of the best candidates for promotion are orange-hat-wearers. It doesn't mean that 100% of the other 5% aren't qualified, and I never said it does.

You just proved that you have no understanding whatsoever of basic mathematical principles.

No you just once again proved your absolute stupidity on a whole range of subjects from math to military knowledge. The majority of the military is enlisted personnel. Senior Officers aren’t made up of enlisted personnel who got promoted, nearly all join the military as officers after completing university and the ones promoted to the senior leadership often have even higher education and university women attend university at rates slightly higher than men. It is a fact that across many NATO countries there are higher proportion of women in the officer corps than enlisted, with women making up around 15% to 20% of all officers. 
 

And again your asinine logic here is that even ONE female officer over-representation because you believe straight white males should have 100% of the leadership positions. For the record dumbass in the New Zealand navy women are 20% of the enlisted ranks 25% of the commissioned ranks. 
 

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Look dummy: the NZ navy has 9 ships. 9. What are the chances that 11% of the best candidates to command a naval vessel are lesbian women? 

Why would the fact that she’s a lesbian woman lessen the chance that she would be qualified?  NZ only has 15-20 personnel at the rank of captain in their entire Navy. The entire senior officer corps all the way up to rear admiral is only 50-70 people. Which means regardless of whether someone is a woman or a lesbian or a straight white male with a freckle on his left ear has pretty good chance of a ships command. 
 

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

You and I both know, 100%, that she was promoted based on her DEI status and not based on her ability.

Nope and you haven’t produced one single fact about her to prove it. You’re doing that thing that uneducated and unintelligent people like you do “I don’t need facts or evidence, I just know”. Intelligent people don’t operate that way. 
 

 

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

She's the captain. It was her fault unless the perfect scapegoat is found, but that hasn't happened yet. 

At the end of the day, it's the captain's fault that the Titanic sank. Even though he wasn't on the bridge when they hit the iceberg, it was his decision to allow the ship to travel that fast in those conditions. You can talk about faulty rivets and the height of watertight compartments or pressure from the shipping company to cross in 6 days, all day long, but at sea, the captain is God, and the buck stops there. 

You have no idea what happened  if the ship got hit by a meteor from outter space would it be her fault?  There’s no evidence that anyone on the ship did anything wrong much less the captain  Remember your argument here is that if a qualified straight white male had been aboard them this would not have happened so you can’t just say “well she is the captain so she’s automatically to blame”.

 

[BeaverFever]

14 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

All you do is make juvenile, unsubstantiated insults here, dummy.

So where are the collusion-related convictions then, dummy?

Why do you constantly allude to all of this criminality against the backdrop of "zero convictions, and even zero evidence"? After all of their lies and crimes to run that investigation, the FBI didn't uncover any actual evidence of collusion. None. 

Their official explanation is still "We told all of those lies and committed all of those crimes without ever uncovering any evidence of collusion, but we're still gonna chime in with our opinion that he's probably guilty of something."

When was the last time you ever asked someone who was convicted of a felony, in the face of mounds of incontrovertible evidence, for their opinion of people that they didn't like? What would their opinion actually be worth to you?

"Bernie Madoff said that Timmy is probably a criminal, but he has never provided nor even found any evidence of it. He can't even say what that evidence might be." 

"Timmy is definitely guilty then!" - Beaveyboy

It was an aging, unreliable ship and she chose to operate in close proximity to those reefs in rough seas. 

No one made the decision to get that close to those reefs and that rough water aside from the captain. Whether that involved standing orders, normal procedure, or express permission on that day, it is the captain who is responsible for that unreliable ship being in that precarious position.  

Accepting responsibility is a key part of being a ship's captain.

See, that's just another perfect example of your woke-joke id10cy proving how stupid you are while you remain oblivious. 

How qualified is Trump, exactly? He already has a highly successful term as POTUS already under his belt, dummy. Who else has that? 

Do we want Dubya out starting bogus wars again?

Do we want another islamic state springing up under Obama? Do we want to see a POTUS incite another 4 years of racial rioting? The fact that he already served two terms has nothing to do with the determination that he's worse than just 'unqualified', he was an obamination as president. 

Maybe Bill Clinton, but he's not eligible because he has already served two terms. 

Joe's term was an absolute disaster, and Kamala was equally responsible for that disaster. Not only that, she's on record as being a defund policer, she has openly supported violent rioters and solicited funding of a bail fund to get riters back on the streets, she thinks walls are racist and useless but now she wants to build walls, she is too afraid to talk to the media and when she does it's a disaster. Can she talk face-to-face with Xi and represent the US properly? What if she's too afraid to do that? Does she send Walz to talk to China's president? That's wrong on ever level. 

Admit it: Kamala has been a complete failure every time she has talked without a teleprompter. If she was your sister, you'd be embarrassed for her. You'd say "Never talk to anyone without a teleprompter." I know you would.

Sorry, but that makes her 100% unqualified to be POTUS. She's not even close to being where she could learn on the job. 

Im not going to re-litigate all these old arguments but you exaggerate Trump’s success well as Obama and Biden’s shortcomings. Furthermore what successes did occur under Trump where despite not because of him with most of his senior staff from that first administration now confirming his unfitness for office and refusing to endorse him for another term, most outright opposing him. 
 

As for the NZ ship you’re just making shit up about what the captain decided or approved and you have no idea about the sea state or whether the ships operations were reasonable or not.  

[CdnFox]

7 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

Westcan has never gotten there amd is mot wealthy. And your dad came of age in a much different time. 

And you know this based on your long term friendship with him and the intimate details of his life he's shared with you?  

He may well be as successful and happy as he wants to be. 

Rich people tend to judge others based on how much money they have. athletes tend to judge based on how fit you are.  Academics tend to judge on how many degrees you have and bigots tend to judge based on your skin colour. 

It's human nature - but it's lowbrow thinking. 

Merit tends to judge based on how well you've achieved your goals, and if his goal was to be a happy healthy guy with a loving family and a good wife raising good children making enough money to get by and focusing on other things, that doesn't sound like a bad way to live and he's obviously comfortably achieved that. So he's be pretty successful if thats the case .

The beautiful thing about true success is you can define what you want and what your criteria for success are, and then whether you are successful or not depends on whether or not you achieve that. Whether it's a happy healthy home with loving children, or amassing a fortune, in a meritocracy you can set the goal you want and achieve it.

Your judgment of others demonstrates a level of bigotry and lack of thinking that is beneath you. Expand your horizons kid and don't judge others solely based on what's important to you

[Deluge]

On 10/11/2024 at 3:02 PM, Black Dog said:

You're literally retarded.

The entire left is retarded. In fact, you're woketarded.  

[Deluge]

On 10/11/2024 at 2:59 PM, WestCanMan said:

Not even a joke... https://notthebee.com/article/100m-navy-ship-with-diversity-hire-lesbian-captain-runs-aground-catches-fire-sinks/

$100M Navy Ship With Lesbian Captain Runs Aground, Catches Fire, Sinks

The country of New Zealand lost its first navy vessel since World War II after the HMNZS Manawanui - a $100 million survey and dive vessel commissioned in 2018 - ran aground, burst into flames, and sank off the coast of Samoa.

 

No word on whether or not she was appointed by Soros. 

 

Wow, that's a pretty stupid maneuver. I wonder what the silly b*tch was thinking while she drove such expensive equipment into the earth? Was she angry with her lesbian lover? 

[WestCanMan]

On 10/14/2024 at 2:43 AM, BeaverFever said:

Im not going to re-litigate all these old arguments

Wrong. 

You're not going to pretend that '13 people were convicted of Russian collusion' because I already proved you were lying, and there were zero. 

Quote

but you exaggerate Trump’s success well as Obama and Biden’s shortcomings. Furthermore what successes did occur under Trump where despite not because of him with most of his senior staff from that first administration now confirming his unfitness for office and refusing to endorse him for another term, most outright opposing him. 

Yeah, it's all just a huge coincidence that there was prosperity and world peace under Trump and everything went to sh1t under Biden. 🤣

Just remember that some of us were able to predict what you still can't understand with the benefit of hindsight. 

[WestCanMan]

On 10/14/2024 at 2:36 AM, BeaverFever said:

My god you are dumb. By definition the majority of a population ate rank and file and the minority are leaders

My God you are dumb. By definition everyone within a group is part of that group, so when I say DEI in the military that includes both officers and enlisted.

Quote

Next your idi0tic bigoted argument seems to be that not even ONE “minority” should ever be allowed to be in any leadership position which once again proves what a detestable scumbag you are. 

Here you are pretending not to notice how bigoted your comments are, which once again proves what a detestable scumbag you are. 

Quote

No you just once again proved your absolute stupidity on a whole range of subjects from math to military knowledge. The majority of the military is enlisted personnel. Senior Officers aren’t made up of enlisted personnel who got promoted, nearly all join the military as officers after completing university and the ones promoted to the senior leadership often have even higher education and university women attend university at rates slightly higher than men. It is a fact that across many NATO countries there are higher proportion of women in the officer corps than enlisted, with women making up around 15% to 20% of all officers. 
 

I just proved how stupid you were, and now you're getting snotty, as always.

And Ironically, while you were trying to call me stupid, you were once again proving how stupid you are.

FYI it's not at all the case that "nearly all officers join after they've already graduated university", a large % of officers actually go through military colleges here, like every other western country that I know of.  

 

Quote

And again your asinine logic here is that even ONE female officer over-representation because you believe straight white males should have 100% of the leadership positions. For the record dumbass in the New Zealand navy women are 20% of the enlisted ranks 25% of the commissioned ranks. 

Again you're just proving how stupid you are.

One captaincy represents 11% of their entire navy. I'll break this down for you very slowly this time: they have 9 ships, and 1/9 =11%. Get it?

Lesbians definitely don't make up 11% of the navy, or even 11% of the officers. 

Even by your stat, 15% are women, and statistically speaking, 1 in 20 of them would be lesbians. So less than 1% of the navy are lesbians, but 11% of the captains are lesbians.

Let's just be honest, women aren't better than men at these kinds of things. In fact, they are much worse, on average. 

And this is something that you will never get official confirmation of, but when our west coast supply ship got notice that they were going to the ME during one of the gulf wars in the 1990s, about 30% of the women on that ship conveniently got pregnant within the 90-day period when they got notice they were heading over. 

Due to the fact that their berths were all in a women-only mess (not 'mess hall', where people eat, a 'mess' where they sleep), they couldn't put men in those berths, and due to the low number of women in the navy they couldn't find enough women to replace them all, so our ship went there shorthanded. 

That's just one really good reason why I don't take women in the military very seriously. Sure, a certain percent will be as dedicated as their male counterparts, but a far lower percent of men will Timmy Waltz their way out of going to a combat zone.  

Quote

Why would the fact that she’s a lesbian woman lessen the chance that she would be qualified?  NZ only has 15-20 personnel at the rank of captain in their entire Navy.

The rank of captain and captain of a ship are two different things.

On the 'destroyer' that I was on, the captain only had the rank of "commander", the xo was a "lieutenant commander", and the only person that had obtained the rank of "captain" in our squadron was in charge of the whole thing. 

[Fluffypants]

Our country is stupid

Garland is suing a police department because their written test to become a police officer is too hard for black people, part of the test is like 4 grade math. They are also suing them for their physical fitness test because it is too hard for women.

https://www.wndu.com/2024/10/11/us-justice-department-sues-south-bend-alleges-discrimination-against-black-female-police-officer-applicants/

These requirements aren't subjective they are objective. We need cops who can chase criminals and detain them and we need cops who can properly document things. They are demanding that they hire the black people and women who failed the tests and give them the benefits of seniority and back pay.

We can't get rid of Garland and Biden's DOJ fast enough, jeez these are the same people who cops to be more than human and yet they are going to force departments to hire stupid and weak people.

Edited October 15, 2024 by Fluffypants

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Fluffypants said:

Our country is stupid

Garland is suing a police department because their written test to become a police officer is too hard for black people, part of the test is like 4 grade math. They are also suing them for their physical fitness test because it is too hard for women.

I clicked the laugh icon because there isn't a faceplant option.

Garland is a worthless f-tard. 

1. It sounds like they think black people are retarded: "lower the math requirements for people with black skin" 🤣
2. Geez, why would cops need to be strong? Can't they just shoot everyone that they can't wrestle with? 🤣

I'm 56, and I doubt that 1% of female MMA experts can win a no-holds-barred confrontation against me, or even one that is restricted to strikes/techniques from a specific discipline like judo, jiu-jitsu, wrestling or boxing. Even after Thanksgiving dinner. And all of those ones could pass the current physical fitness tests.