The Leftard Cultist Talking Point of the Century

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

Well you proved my point on having no interest in rational conversation.

But now I realize you're just CUCKoo for coco puffs 

You just proved that you're as much of a leftard cultist as robo and eyeball. 

[SkyHigh]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You just proved that you're as much of a leftard cultist as robo and eyeball. 

And yet you've been challenged to provide any instance of a time that I have advocated for any position that your "leftard cultists" support and have failed.

Again proving you're not interested in actually participating in a good faith conversation.

[WestCanMan]

16 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

And yet you've been challenged to provide any instance of a time that I have advocated for any position that your "leftard cultists" support and have failed.

Again proving you're not interested in actually participating in a good faith conversation.

Read your previous post, dipshit. 

You just glanced at all of those salient points I made about leftard delusions and brushed them off as if it wasn't rational. 

What part of this isn't rational:

1. It's not healthy to say "mostly peaceful protest" while you're standing in front of burning buildings and actually mean it.
2. It's not healthy to pretend that the Biden economy was just ducky and Trump's economy was horrible.
3. It's not normal to pretend that Kamala Harris is pro-law-enforcement, pro-border, pro-fracking, and that her tenure as AG and VP were successful.
4. People have eyes. People took money out of their wallets to buy food and gas. They see the homelessness and crime in San Francisco and in their own cities. They know wtf is going on and they can't be told to feel safe in their neighbourhood when they know that they are not
5. They saw her on TV promoting a bail fund to put the most violent rioters in Minnesota back on the streets. 
6. It's not healthy to pretend Kamala is something that we all know she isn't.
7. And even she can't go in front of reporters or sit down for a real interview and say it to America's face.
8. She runs from reporters, only takes the most brief, favourable interviews, and when she does she never really answers any questions.
9. She's been the Dem Candidate for over two months and still hasn't really said anything aside from reveal a few policy gimmicks that she could do right now if she really cared to do them for people. 

Go ahead and find a fault with something there, Sky High.

Even the NYT and CNN are accusing Kamala of dodging the media and not giving actual answers to the questions that she is asked. They are 100.0% on her side when they can be, they even lie to fact-check Trump and ignore Kamala's lies. Those propagandists give coverage of Trump that 95% negative and it was 100% positive for Kamala until they had no choice but acknowledge what EVERYONE in NA (who isn't already a Demi cultist) was saying. 

FYI CNN and NYT normally just preach to the cultist choir, but during election time they can't alienate unregistered voters to the extent of pretending that Kamala is giving enough to voters to make them choose her. If that's their position, the center will walk. They had to address the issue that 100% of undecided voters are talking about. It would be political suicide not to. 

[SkyHigh]

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Read your previous post, dipshit. 

You just glanced at all of those salient points I made about leftard delusions and brushed them off as if it wasn't rational. 

What part of this isn't rational:

1. It's not healthy to say "mostly peaceful protest" while you're standing in front of burning buildings and actually mean it.
2. It's not healthy to pretend that the Biden economy was just ducky and Trump's economy was horrible.
3. It's not normal to pretend that Kamala Harris is pro-law-enforcement, pro-border, pro-fracking, and that her tenure as AG and VP were successful.
4. People have eyes. People took money out of their wallets to buy food and gas. They see the homelessness and crime in San Francisco and in their own cities. They know wtf is going on and they can't be told to feel safe in their neighbourhood when they know that they are not
5. They saw her on TV promoting a bail fund to put the most violent rioters in Minnesota back on the streets. 
6. It's not healthy to pretend Kamala is something that we all know she isn't.
7. And even she can't go in front of reporters or sit down for a real interview and say it to America's face.
8. She runs from reporters, only takes the most brief, favourable interviews, and when she does she never really answers any questions.
9. She's been the Dem Candidate for over two months and still hasn't really said anything aside from reveal a few policy gimmicks that she could do right now if she really cared to do them for people. 

Go ahead and find a fault with something there, Sky High.

Even the NYT and CNN are accusing Kamala of dodging the media and not giving actual answers to the questions that she is asked. They are 100.0% on her side when they can be, they even lie to fact-check Trump and ignore Kamala's lies. Those propagandists give coverage of Trump that 95% negative and it was 100% positive for Kamala until they had no choice but acknowledge what EVERYONE in NA (who isn't already a Demi cultist) was saying. 

FYI CNN and NYT normally just preach to the cultist choir, but during election time they can't alienate unregistered voters to the extent of pretending that Kamala is giving enough to voters to make them choose her. If that's their position, the center will walk. They had to address the issue that 100% of undecided voters are talking about. It would be political suicide not to. 

Still waiting on an actual quote directly from me 

[WestCanMan]

8 minutes ago, SkyHigh said:

Still waiting on an actual quote directly from me 

You've had every opportunity to engage in factual dialogue and you're choosing to fixate on every but. 

We both know why. You can't address those facts. 

I'll post them for you again right here, and you can blow by them, and just pretend that I'm the one being irrational:

1. It's not healthy to say "mostly peaceful protest" while you're standing in front of burning buildings and actually mean it.
2. It's not healthy to pretend that the Biden economy was just ducky and Trump's economy was horrible.
3. It's not normal to pretend that Kamala Harris is pro-law-enforcement, pro-border, pro-fracking, and that her tenure as AG and VP were successful.
4. People have eyes. People took money out of their wallets to buy food and gas. They see the homelessness and crime in San Francisco and in their own cities. They know wtf is going on and they can't be told to feel safe in their neighbourhood when they know that they are not
5. They saw her on TV promoting a bail fund to put the most violent rioters in Minnesota back on the streets. 
6. It's not healthy to pretend Kamala is something that we all know she isn't.
7. And even she can't go in front of reporters or sit down for a real interview and say it to America's face.
8. She runs from reporters, only takes the most brief, favourable interviews, and when she does she never really answers any questions.
9. She's been the Dem Candidate for over two months and still hasn't really said anything aside from reveal a few policy gimmicks that she could do right now if she really cared to do them for people. 

 

[SkyHigh]

23 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

You've had every opportunity to engage in factual dialogue and you're choosing to fixate on every but. 

We both know why. You can't address those facts. 

I'll post them for you again right here, and you can blow by them, and just pretend that I'm the one being irrational:

1. It's not healthy to say "mostly peaceful protest" while you're standing in front of burning buildings and actually mean it.
2. It's not healthy to pretend that the Biden economy was just ducky and Trump's economy was horrible.
3. It's not normal to pretend that Kamala Harris is pro-law-enforcement, pro-border, pro-fracking, and that her tenure as AG and VP were successful.
4. People have eyes. People took money out of their wallets to buy food and gas. They see the homelessness and crime in San Francisco and in their own cities. They know wtf is going on and they can't be told to feel safe in their neighbourhood when they know that they are not
5. They saw her on TV promoting a bail fund to put the most violent rioters in Minnesota back on the streets. 
6. It's not healthy to pretend Kamala is something that we all know she isn't.
7. And even she can't go in front of reporters or sit down for a real interview and say it to America's face.
8. She runs from reporters, only takes the most brief, favourable interviews, and when she does she never really answers any questions.
9. She's been the Dem Candidate for over two months and still hasn't really said anything aside from reveal a few policy gimmicks that she could do right now if she really cared to do them for people. 

 

Nope.

Until you can support your assertions towards me, I have no reason to even consider your opinions. If you have to blatantly lie about my views why should I care about the vitriol you spout.

Dude you saying I don't want to engage "factual dialogue" , when this whole conversation was me saying using words like leftard excluded you from being taken seriously and your response was, but they're Leftards is absolutely insane.even for your diminished mental health.

Not interested in even entertaining your partisan foolishness, until you can either defend your claim I'm a leftard cultist or admitt it's simply a tool you are , I mean use ,because you can't actually engage in a nuanced discussion (or anything even resembling rational dialogue) with anyone not soley planted on one extreme or the other and I sir am neither.

Edited September 28, 2024 by SkyHigh

[WestCanMan]

7 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

Nope.

Until you can support your assertions towards me, I have no reason to even consider your opinions. If you have to blatantly lie about my views why should I care about the vitriol you spout.

Dude you saying I don't want to engage "factual dialogue" , when this whole conversation was me saying using words like leftard excluded you from being taken seriously and your response was, but they're Leftards is absolutely insane.even for your diminished mental health.

Not interested in even entertaining your partisan foolishness, until you can either defend your claim I'm a leftard cultist or admitt it's simply a tool you are , I mean use ,because you can't actually engage in a nuanced discussion (or anything even resembling rational dialogue) with anyone not soley planted on one extreme or the other and I sir am neither.

All you're doing by trying to steer away from the facts of the matter is proving that leftards are cultists. 

I don't really care about you, personally. I don't need to prove anything about 1 lame internet poster. I'm just talking about the laundry list of reasons why Dem supporters qualify as cultists. 

[SkyHigh]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

All you're doing by trying to steer away from the facts of the matter is proving that leftards are cultists. 

I don't really care about you, personally. I don't need to prove anything about 1 lame internet poster. I'm just talking about the laundry list of reasons why Dem supporters qualify as cultists. 

Nope 

You accused me of something that was not true, going off on our of your tangents is just you trying to avoid admitting you are a liar.

[WestCanMan]

11 hours ago, SkyHigh said:

Nope 

You accused me of something that was not true, going off on our of your tangents is just you trying to avoid admitting you are a liar.

I didn't "accuse you" of anything, I just would have said something about you that was demonstrably true, which I don't even remember now, Sky High.

I just don't care about you. You're just one little cultist dipshit among millions.

[eyeball]

On 9/28/2024 at 11:09 AM, WestCanMan said:

You just proved that you're as much of a leftard cultist as robo and eyeball. 

Your cult says the pandemic is a case of premeditated mass murder.

What exactly is it that's retarded about disbelieving that?

[CdnFox]

On 9/24/2024 at 9:35 AM, Rebound said:

No.

To be honest, the people on the side of, “Let’s keep the Confederate generals memorialized” are not “very fine people.”

 

In fact lots of them are.

Here's what the left needs to get over. At any point in history there are things that are socially acceptable which will not be socially acceptable at a later point in history. This has been the case many many times.

That does not mean that the people of the day who grew up with an accepted the social norms of the time are bad people or didn't achieve incredible things. Sure, Lincoln owns slaves. But that does not mean he was not an incredible person or that he didn't fight and free slaves as well

It is entirely possible to look back at a historical figure and acknowledge that some of the things he thought or did were entirely wrong by the standards that we judge things today, and still acknowledge the incredible achievements and things that he did.

It is wrong to try and erase history just because in history things were not the same as they were today. In fact it's not just wrong it's pretty much criminal. Libraries in history have been burnt with this excuse, populations slaughtered with this excuse, rich histories and cultures lost because of this excuse.

It is the ideology of the Vandals. 

You can idolize the positive elements of Robert E lee and still recognize that slavery was wrong and needed to be destroyed.

 

[Nationalist]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

In fact lots of them are.

Here's what the left needs to get over. At any point in history there are things that are socially acceptable which will not be socially acceptable at a later point in history. This has been the case many many times.

That does not mean that the people of the day who grew up with an accepted the social norms of the time are bad people or didn't achieve incredible things. Sure, Lincoln owns slaves. But that does not mean he was not an incredible person or that he didn't fight and free slaves as well

It is entirely possible to look back at a historical figure and acknowledge that some of the things he thought or did were entirely wrong by the standards that we judge things today, and still acknowledge the incredible achievements and things that he did.

It is wrong to try and erase history just because in history things were not the same as they were today. In fact it's not just wrong it's pretty much criminal. Libraries in history have been burnt with this excuse, populations slaughtered with this excuse, rich histories and cultures lost because of this excuse.

It is the ideology of the Vandals. 

You can idolize the positive elements of Robert E lee and still recognize that slavery was wrong and needed to be destroyed.

 

Libbies are simpletons.

Thus they just believe what they are told. Hell these flakes still think Ukraine can regain the land Russia has annexed. Their blind obedience forces them to hate whoever they're told to hate. They can't even bring themselves to respect a foe. Thus they constantly underestimate any perceived enemy.

[Deluge]

On 9/23/2024 at 9:21 PM, WestCanMan said:

Leftards think that "the Trump economy lost a record number of jobs in 2020" 🤣 

No real reason, just "Trump's economy failed". I promise I'm not joking. 

These cultist retards pretend to have completely forgotten about a little thing called covid.

The Biden administration even cites the return of those jobs as some kind of "Bidenomics" success.

Bottom line: The only metric by which the cultists can find fault with the Trump economy is that "Jobs were lost during the covid lockdowns". 

Leftards think that their idea of jobs IS the economy. To hell with society crushing debt and reckless spending, if they can just prop up a few bullshit jobs, then everything is right in the world. lol

[CdnFox]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Libbies are simpletons.

Thus they just believe what they are told. Hell these flakes still think Ukraine can regain the land Russia has annexed. Their blind obedience forces them to hate whoever they're told to hate. They can't even bring themselves to respect a foe. Thus they constantly underestimate any perceived enemy.

That's true but what their real driving force seems to be is that if we DAAAARREEE to suggest that ANYTHING about the us or it's history or it's former leaders is considered "great" or "worthy of respect", then people won't want to tear it down and accept communism and or severe statism as an acceptable alternative. 

The 'outrage' is faked.  All they really care about is convincing people that america is a no good very bad evil place that must be destroyed so that their new socialist utopia can flourish 

[Nationalist]

48 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

That's true but what their real driving force seems to be is that if we DAAAARREEE to suggest that ANYTHING about the us or it's history or it's former leaders is considered "great" or "worthy of respect", then people won't want to tear it down and accept communism and or severe statism as an acceptable alternative. 

The 'outrage' is faked.  All they really care about is convincing people that america is a no good very bad evil place that must be destroyed so that their new socialist utopia can flourish 

If it's so bad, as far as they're concerned...couldn't they leave? I hear Venezuela is welcoming socialists.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

If it's so bad, as far as they're concerned...couldn't they leave? I hear Venezuela is welcoming socialists.

Well that's their other little trick, you see Venezuela isn't "REEEAAAAAALLL" socialism they say.  And they say that because it failed. Anything that fails isn't REAAAAAAAALLLLL  socialism.  REEEAAAALLL socalism works you see so the fact it didn't proves it wasn't. 

So all these different socialist models from communism to market socialism etc  have been tried and they all failed, but if we finally.... FINALLLYYYYYY ....  try REAAAAAALLL socialism then it'll work brilliantly and we'll all be happy. 

See ... the fact you don't know that just goes to show they need to take over so that they can make your decisions FOR you, you're obviously not qualified or you'd want to try REAAAAAALLLLL socialism already!! 

Edited September 30, 2024 by CdnFox

[Nationalist]

20 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Well that's their other little trick, you see Venezuela isn't "REEEAAAAAALLL" socialism they say.  And they say that because it failed. Anything that fails isn't REAAAAAAAALLLLL  socialism.  REEEAAAALLL socalism works you see so the fact it didn't proves it wasn't. 

So all these different socialist models from communism to market socialism etc  have been tried and they all failed, but if we finally.... FINALLLYYYYYY ....  try REAAAAAALLL socialism then it'll work brilliantly and we'll all be happy. 

See ... the fact you don't know that just goes to show they need to take over so that they can make your decisions FOR you, you're obviously not qualified or you'd want to try REAAAAAALLLLL socialism already!! 

These twits have no idea what REAAAAAALLLLL socialism is.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

These twits have no idea what REAAAAAALLLLL socialism is.

These twits have no idea how to do multiplication without downloading an app. It's the world we live in. 

[impartialobserver]

On 9/28/2024 at 7:37 AM, SkyHigh said:

I think voter apathy is one of the biggest issues facing democracy. Unfortunately today those that make the most noise are almost exclusively on the extreme end of both sides (right and left) which dissuades the average (rational) voter from wanting to participate in political discourse.

This forum and the conversation I'm having with this simpleton is the perfect example. I speak on the need for civility, the need to reach across political lines in order to effectuate change and he calls people perverts. 

Honestly sad

Some folks are all about emotion, passion, and the need for affirmation (for us or against us). They come here because out in the open they get sanctioned (if it is a legal or workplace setting) or ignored. In daily life.. I see an extremist, I can walk around them and tune them out. 

[Michael Hardner]

22 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

  I see an extremist, I can walk around them and tune them out. 

You can do that on here with the IGNORE feature.  It works like earplugs, and the Chuds and Maniacs hate it.

 

They will even still respond to your posts like a crazy person...

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

You can do that on here with the IGNORE feature.  It works like earplugs, and the Chuds and Maniacs hate it.

 

They will even still respond to your posts like a crazy person...

Please define chuds and maniacs.

[User]

1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

You can do that on here with the IGNORE feature.  It works like earplugs, and the Chuds and Maniacs hate it.

 

They will even still respond to your posts like a crazy person...

No, just calling you the pr1ck you are. 

And you definitely are one. I know we still get to you because you have to go cry to the admin about it. 

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Please define chuds and maniacs.

The guy is one of the biggest hypocritical a$$holes on here. 

[Nationalist]

14 minutes ago, User said:

No, just calling you the pr1ck you are. 

And you definitely are one. I know we still get to you because you have to go cry to the admin about it. 

The guy is one of the biggest hypocritical a$$holes on here. 

But...he's "conservative"...lol...

[User]

4 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

But...he's "conservative"...lol...

Its comical. Most all of the people he cries about having on ignore and trying to get others to ignore are on the right while he is constantly engaged with, liking and palling around with the posters on the left here... nevermind his positions on the issues. 

But yeah, he is "conservative," all right. 

Edited October 1, 2024 by User

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

Please define chuds and maniacs.

Anyone who disagrees with him with facts  

And what kind of !diot brags about his skills at sticking his head in the sand to avoid ideas he thinks is scary to hear?