Jump to content
A Note on Topic Titles – Be Clear & Descriptive!

RFK Jr. hints more big names to back Trump?

CouchPotato
 Share

Recommended Posts

myata Grand Master

myata

Posted
Posted

Such a credible source, "I'm promising you the third way", just three months on. The reality tells us everything, and it always catches up with a vengeance if ignored.

Bitter losers pretending to be having fun together. It could be funny in a ridiculous way if it weren't so repulsive.

  • Like 1

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

PROVE IT. You CANNOT.

How Democrats Could Disqualify Trump If the Supreme Court Doesn’t  Without clear guidance from the Court, House Democrats suggest that they might not certify a Trump win on January 6.

Biden said: "We just have to demonstrate that he will not take power by, if we, if he does run. I'm making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again."

They have been telegraphing their strategy all along. The left just lives on this fantasy world were the ends justify the means.

Edited by gatomontes99

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, myata said:

Such a credible source, "I'm promising you the third way", just three months on. The reality tells us everything, and it always catches up with a vengeance if ignored.

Bitter losers pretending to be having fun together. It could be funny in a ridiculous way if it weren't so repulsive.

spam spam spam spam......

15 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

How Democrats Could Disqualify Trump If the Supreme Court Doesn’t  Without clear guidance from the Court, House Democrats suggest that they might not certify a Trump win on January 6.

Biden said: "We just have to demonstrate that he will not take power by, if we, if he does run. I'm making sure he, under legitimate efforts of our Constitution, does not become the next President again."

They have been telegraphing their strategy all along. The left just lives on this fantasy world were the ends justify the means.

Yeah, I'm afraid that fake dossier's and FBI interference and bogus court cases were just the warm-up.

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted

I'm sure that he's attempting to line up all kinds of people. I like the unity party approach, I think it's good politics with a good chance to win (obama used a variant) But I'm actually a little surprised that he's buying into it. It's not really his style. I imagine his election team has pointed out that it's a solid angle against kamala and her far left woke approach.

We will see who he brings forth. But depending how he uses these assets it could be a very very valuable strategy

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, herbie said:

Gonna accept the endorsement by the CEO of the brain injured association next? To add to his worm infestation support?

No, that guy is joining the policy team so he can explain to them how Kamala thinks :) 

  • Haha 1

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

NAME REMOVED Grand Master

NAME REMOVED

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, myata said:

Such a credible source, "I'm promising you the third way", just three months on. The reality tells us everything, and it always catches up with a vengeance if ignored.

Bitter losers pretending to be having fun together. It could be funny in a ridiculous way if it weren't so repulsive.

RFK Jr is definitely the LaToya Jackson of the Kennedy clan. 

User Grand Master

User

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, myata said:

Such a credible source, "I'm promising you the third way", just three months on. The reality tells us everything, and it always catches up with a vengeance if ignored.

Bitter losers pretending to be having fun together. It could be funny in a ridiculous way if it weren't so repulsive.

And just over a month ago Biden said he was not going to drop out of the race and Harris was cheering him on... 

A lot has changed. 

 

 

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, DUI_Offender said:

RFK Jr is definitely the LaToya Jackson of the Kennedy clan. 

That's your reference? In a family with Michael, Joe, Tito and Gordon, you think LaToya is the weird one? She endured so much abuse and still managed to be very successful.

Are you saying, then, that RFK Jr. is the sane one?

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
NAME REMOVED Grand Master

NAME REMOVED

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

That's your reference? In a family with Michael, Joe, Tito and Gordon, you think LaToya is the weird one? She endured so much abuse and still managed to be very successful.

 

Nothing to do with weird. LaToya Jackson, whether fair or unfair, was always known as the "black sheep" of the family, for posing in Playboy and writing unflattering books about her family, and discussing her family  laundry with the media. Her husband certainly put her up to it, but unfortunately the label stuck.

Matthew Experienced

Matthew

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

They have been telegraphing their strategy all along

This would fly with authoritarian type republicans but not many democrats.

But, then again, according to the genius logic of the Supreme Court's conservative majority, Biden could right now just drop a nuke on mar-a-lago and call it an official act and he'd be safe from prosecution.

August1991 Grand Master

August1991

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, herbie said:

Gonna accept the endorsement by the CEO of the brain injured association next? To add to his worm infestation support?

Herbie,

I have no dog in this fight.

1. RFK Jnr could have just resigned. He didn't.

2. He chose to support Trump.

3. He chose to withdraw from certain States - but not all.

herbie Grand Master

herbie

Posted
Posted

Thx to their f*cked up system, he withdrew in swing states and remains on the ballot elsewhere.
Asides from backstabbing the party he and his family supported for almost a century, he endorsed a fellow traitor as well. Instead of doing the decent and honourable thing after gauging his poor support and quietly withdrawing altogether. Endorsing a fellow 'no shame whatsoever' candidate.

And it does affect you, DonOld will go out of his way to f*ck up Canada. We all know it.

CouchPotato Mentor

CouchPotato

Posted
  • Author
Posted
13 minutes ago, herbie said:

 Instead of doing the decent and honourable thing after gauging his poor support and quietly withdrawing altogether. Endorsing a fellow 'no shame whatsoever' candidate.

He said previously that he thinks the Democrats are the real threat to democracy. So, the decent thing for him is to unite with Trump against that threat.

Quote

And it does affect you, DonOld will go out of his way to f*ck up Canada. We all know it.

You actually believe that Donald Trump has evil designs against Canada?

CdnFox Grand Master

CdnFox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, herbie said:

Thx to their f*cked up system, he withdrew in swing states and remains on the ballot elsewhere.
Asides from backstabbing the party he and his family supported for almost a century, he endorsed a fellow traitor as well. Instead of doing the decent and honourable thing after gauging his poor support and quietly withdrawing altogether. Endorsing a fellow 'no shame whatsoever' candidate.

And it does affect you, DonOld will go out of his way to f*ck up Canada. We all know it.

This is the problem with you on the left. 

The idea that just because your parents were woke lefties that somehow you have an obligation to vote for the same party they did is morally bankrupt. 

It is nothing short of anti democratic.  Parties change, people change, nations change - and when you go to the polls you're SUPPOSED to give honest thought as to who's the best choice - NOT WHO YOUR GRANDPAPPY VOTED FOR. 

 I get it that you'd prefer it if we just had a socialist state and did away with democracy altogether but couldn't you PRETENED that you've got SOME sort of understanding of the concept?

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

gatomontes99 Grand Master

gatomontes99

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Matthew said:

This would fly with authoritarian type republicans but not many democrats.

But, then again, according to the genius logic of the Supreme Court's conservative majority, Biden could right now just drop a nuke on mar-a-lago and call it an official act and he'd be safe from prosecution.

That isn't what they said.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
User Grand Master

User

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, herbie said:

Thx to their f*cked up system, he withdrew in swing states and remains on the ballot elsewhere.
Asides from backstabbing the party he and his family supported for almost a century, he endorsed a fellow traitor as well. Instead of doing the decent and honourable thing after gauging his poor support and quietly withdrawing altogether. Endorsing a fellow 'no shame whatsoever' candidate.

And it does affect you, DonOld will go out of his way to f*ck up Canada. We all know it.

LOL, but of course Biden withdrawing from the primary was not any kind of betrayal of the Democrats who voted for him... and Democrats forcing him out was no betrayal...

 

 

 

West Grand Master

West

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Aristides said:

Accuse the other side of what your side tried to do. Typical.

Democrats havs been saying for years what Donnie did was legal when it benefits them but now they threaten jail time like communists 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!

  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,914
    • Most Online
      1,403
    MDP
    Newest Member
    MDP
    Joined

  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...