Tim Walz Lied About His Military Service

[Hodad]

2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I read the fcking bill Tweenkie. Funds used by schools comes from where? That's right...every citizen's pocket.

Now...may I suggest you take your seething lies and thin veil of denyability, and shove 'em where the sun don't shine?

This whole thing is just another in a long string of outright lies by you goofs.

Yes, everything funded by the state is funded by the citizens. 

But actual spending decisions are made at multiple levels throughout the government. 

You made the claim that Walz installed tampon machines in boys bathrooms. If that happens, it's simply not a decision that a governor makes. That's why you cannot provide citation for it.

If you want to say what Walz did or supported, just point to the bill. There is nothing in the bill about tampon machines in boys restrooms. So stop making that claim. 

Focus up and track the conversation. 

Edited August 14, 2024 by Hodad

[Nationalist]

7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Yes, everything funded by the state is funded by the citizens. 

But actual spending decisions are made at multiple levels throughout the government. 

You made the claim that Walz installed tampon machines in boys bathrooms. If that happens, it's simply not a decision that a governor makes. That's why you cannot provide citation for it.

If you want to say what Walz did or supported, just point to the bill. There is nothing in the bill about tampon machines in boys restrooms. So stop making that claim. 

Focus up and track the conversation. 

Lol...how about "Up Yours Tweenkie-Poo"?

Tampon Tim signed that childish bill into law. Are you gonna try to say he didn't know what it was all about? Yup...seems you are.

Well Tweenkie-Poo...Tampon Tim has been exposed as a virtue signaling little sh1t and a criminal who should be prosecuted in a military court for stolen valor.

By September, he'll be dog food.

[Hodad]

7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Lol...how about "Up Yours Tweenkie-Poo"?

Tampon Tim signed that childish bill into law. Are you gonna try to say he didn't know what it was all about? Yup...seems you are.

Well Tweenkie-Poo...Tampon Tim has been exposed as a virtue signaling little sh1t and a criminal who should be prosecuted in a military court for stolen valor.

By September, he'll be dog food.

Yes, Walz did know what the bill was all about. The problem is that what you claim he did is NOT IN THE BILL. 

And this "stolen valor" line of attack is just pure nonsense. And you're not even content with political mudslinging. You want him prosecuted? Great, what law do you propose he has broken, you loon?

Honestly you people are unhinged.

[Nationalist]

12 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Yes, Walz did know what the bill was all about. The problem is that what you claim he did is NOT IN THE BILL. 

And this "stolen valor" line of attack is just pure nonsense. And you're not even content with political mudslinging. You want him prosecuted? Great, what law do you propose he has broken, you loon?

Honestly you people are unhinged.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Valor_Act_of_2013

Enjoy...

[CdnFox]

11 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Valor_Act_of_2013

Enjoy...

This is why the left loses credibility as I said. They argue that obvious truths are not true and they do it with a completely straight face and expect others to treat them seriously.

Tim passed a law requiring tampons in bathrooms including men's bathrooms. That is the practical real world application. Taxpayers would have paid for those tampons and the tampons dispensers to go into those bathrooms. And the only point to the whole thing is to virtue signal.

So apparently if harris and waltz get elected instead of working on America's problems they will be working on things like getting the police defunded and getting more tampons in school washrooms. That is the kind of thing they consider to be a priority.

And the left can argue to its heart's content. But the truth is the truth no matter how much they want to run and hide.

[Nationalist]

7 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

This is why the left loses credibility as I said. They argue that obvious truths are not true and they do it with a completely straight face and expect others to treat them seriously.

Tim passed a law requiring tampons in bathrooms including men's bathrooms. That is the practical real world application. Taxpayers would have paid for those tampons and the tampons dispensers to go into those bathrooms. And the only point to the whole thing is to virtue signal.

So apparently if harris and waltz get elected instead of working on America's problems they will be working on things like getting the police defunded and getting more tampons in school washrooms. That is the kind of thing they consider to be a priority.

And the left can argue to its heart's content. But the truth is the truth no matter how much they want to run and hide.

Exactly.

[Hodad]

15 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_Valor_Act_of_2013

Enjoy...

Yes, I'm familiar with the law. 

You drop a naked link here as if it means something. We all know the law exists. You're proposing that we should prosecute a man. I'm asking you to articulate some way in which Walz has broken the law. 

It's like pulling teeth.

[Nationalist]

29 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Yes, I'm familiar with the law. 

You drop a naked link here as if it means something. We all know the law exists. You're proposing that we should prosecute a man. I'm asking you to articulate some way in which Walz has broken the law. 

It's like pulling teeth.

He claimed to be that which he was not AND claimed to do things he did not do.

And to see any Libbie complain about prosecution of an offense is just fcking laughable. 

[Hodad]

28 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

He claimed to be that which he was not AND claimed to do things he did not do.

And to see any Libbie complain about prosecution of an offense is just fcking laughable. 

This is you admitting you have no Earthly clue-- but he musta' done somethin' illegal! 

Whenever you people are asked to substantiate any of the things you see in your outrage bubble it's always the same result. 

[WestCanMan]

41 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

He claimed to be that which he was not AND claimed to do things he did not do.

Can you imagine a parallel universe where the leftards actually did all the things that they said, and everything they said was true, while conservatives were actually guilty of everything that leftards accused them of? 

The US would have "the most secure border ever" right now, Trump would be in jail for colluding with Russia, all the unvaxed would be dead, Walz would be a combat vet, Joe would still be president...

[robosmith]

48 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

He claimed to be that which he was not AND claimed to do things he did not do.

Verbal "claims" are not part of the law lDIOT.

Quote

United States

edit

In the United States, the Stolen Valor Act of 2005, which criminalized any false claim regarding military service, was struck down as violating the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment. Subsequently, the Stolen Valor Act of 2013, which makes it a federal offense to falsely claim to have received any of several major military awards with the intention of obtaining money, property, or other tangible benefits, was passed and remains in effect.^[42] There are additional laws criminalizing the altering or forging of discharge documents,^[43] and attempting to obtain veteran's benefits from the government.

48 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

And to see any Libbie complain about prosecution of an offense is just fcking laughable. 

Walz will never be prosecuted for "stolen valor," M0R0N.

12 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Can you imagine a parallel universe where the leftards actually did all the things that they said, and everything they said was true, while conservatives were actually guilty of everything that leftards accused them of? 

The US would have "the most secure border ever" right now, Trump would be in jail for colluding with Russia, all the unvaxed would be dead, Walz would be a combat vet, Joe would still be president...

Manafort was in jail until Trump pardoned him. Duh

[WestCanMan]

8 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Manafort was in jail until Trump pardoned him. Duh

1. Manafort was found innocent of all the bogus 'collusion' charges pressed against him, as was everyone else.
2. In addition to all of the lying and crimes that the FBI committed in relation to their collusion witch hunt, the FBI offered to reduce Manafort's sentence in exchange for false testimony against the president. 

[Hodad]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1. Manafort was found innocent of all the bogus 'collusion' charges pressed against him, as was everyone else.
2. In addition to all of the lying and crimes that the FBI committed in relation to their collusion witch hunt, the FBI offered to reduce Manafort's sentence in exchange for false testimony against the president. 

Oh, look. More lies. 

Not only was Manafort not "found innocent" (sic) he was not even acquitted. And he WAS not offered anything in exchange for "false testimony."

 

[robosmith]

9 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

1. Manafort was found innocent of all the bogus 'collusion' charges pressed against him, as was everyone else.
2. In addition to all of the lying and crimes that the FBI committed in relation to their collusion witch hunt, the FBI offered to reduce Manafort's sentence in exchange for false testimony against the president. 

You're wrong.

Quote

Manafort was charged with an additional seven counts in the District of Columbia, and pleaded guilty to conspiracy against the United States and to witness tampering in the D.C. case. As part of the plea agreement, Manafort also admitted his guilt on the remaining counts in his Virginia trial.

 

The Alleged Crime:

Manafort’s crimes center around his financial misdealings. Allegations against him include money laundering, tax evasion and bank fraud.

In D.C. Manafort was also charged with failure to register as a foreign agent and for making false statements about his foreign lobbying work.

These charges, which he avoided by accepting a plea deal, center around lobbying work that Manafort was doing for the since-toppled Ukranian President Viktor Yanukovych since 2006. It has been revealed recently in court filings that Manafort continued this work even while serving on President Trump’s campaign team.

 

The Response:

Manafort has been behind bars since June, after the judge in his D.C. case revoked his bail amid charges of witness tampering.

Sentencing dates in both courts have been set and delayed after the Office of Special Counsel alleged that Manafort breached his plea agreement by lying to FBI agents as part of his cooperation. Manafort’s defense team has contested these claims. The judge in Manafort’s D.C. case ruled that Manafort had breached his plea agreement, and the special counsel's office filed a sentencing memo for Manafort in Virginia.

 

[herbie]

The sheer pettiness of making an issue over the availability of women's products extends to the nonsense argument of insisting boys needing tampons too. so therefore.... like FFS. Obvious how some people are incapable of discussing a genuinely relevant issue as a political one.

Seems their main issue seems to be that you must somehow deny someone. somewhere, something, to please them at all. Women or minorities usually.

Small, petty people looking backwards over their shoulders for inspiration, in utter fear of addressing what's in front of them. The New Conservatives.

[User]

16 minutes ago, herbie said:

The sheer pettiness of making an issue over the availability of women's products

No, it is pointing out the stupidity of making them available in boys restrooms. 

[herbie]

3 minutes ago, User said:

No, it is pointing out the stupidity of making them available in boys restrooms. 

Stupider than insisting they must be in boys washrooms? If seeing a pad offends you why not tape one to your ear so you can show your colours without see it? Maybe you're scared your boy will be all confused seeing such things as you kept him out of Grade 6  Sex Ed?

[User]

13 minutes ago, herbie said:

Stupider than insisting they must be in boys washrooms? If seeing a pad offends you why not tape one to your ear so you can show your colours without see it? Maybe you're scared your boy will be all confused seeing such things as you kept him out of Grade 6  Sex Ed?

Oh, are you back to denying this is happening again?

Make up your mind. 

 

[CdnFox]

22 minutes ago, User said:

Oh, are you back to denying this is happening again?

Make up your mind. 

 

It is both there and not there at the same time. Schrodinger's pad. 

[Legato]

38 minutes ago, herbie said:

Stupider than insisting they must be in boys washrooms? If seeing a pad offends you why not tape one to your ear so you can show your colours without see it? Maybe you're scared your boy will be all confused seeing such things as you kept him out of Grade 6  Sex Ed?

Tampons and Timpani are not the same. One makes noise, the others a drum.

[WestCanMan]

43 minutes ago, herbie said:

Stupider than insisting they must be in boys washrooms? If seeing a pad offends you why not tape one to your ear so you can show your colours without see it? Maybe you're scared your boy will be all confused seeing such things as you kept him out of Grade 6  Sex Ed?

Seeing tampons isn't offensive, little dummy.

What's offensive is:

1. wasting money by putting tampons in boys' bathrooms
2. doing something stupid like put tampons in boys when you should be stopping Somali scammers from stealing $250M
3. Playing a fiddle, sniffing tire-fires with your wife, and making excuses for violent rioters instead of preventing the killing of your citizens and the burning of your cities. 

[Reg Volk]