Moonlight Graham Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 34 minutes ago, CdnFox said: No, that's what a loser who didn't want to cope with the truth would say. THere's nothing wrong with MSN. And the story is all over the media. ANd it's not speculative at all - the police contacted him and said "this is the guy, we need his stuff'. The truth doesn't change just because you don't like it. I don't support the GOP or Democrats since they're crap parties so I don't care in any way whatsoever what party the shooter did or didn't support, nor would it even matter. Even if he were a GOP supporter, one nutjob who supports either party doesn't reflect in any way whatsoever on the rest of the people who support the party. Your source isn't MSN, it's WION which is an Indian news site so i'm not even going to bother to read it. MSN just linked it, and MSN doesn't care about anything but clicks. Daily Mail is a rag and even their article is filled with words like "likely". If you want to behave like a toddler and throw tantrums and insults please continue, you're only embarrassing yourself in front of everyone who reads this site, which will make them take your posts less seriously. 1 Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
CdnFox Posted July 27, 2024 Author Report Posted July 27, 2024 9 minutes ago, Five of swords said: ...but if a 'nazi' did shoot somebody then you would just blame the democrats. No, i'd blame you. I'm pretty sure you're the last one A political figure on a political campaign got shot by a person who was opposed to him. That's relevant, sorry. Especially in light of the insane levels of rhetoric the dems have been throwing around, "If nobody stops trump this will be our last election ever", etc etc It's amazing to watch the dems sweep into denial mode tho. "he wasnt' REAALLYYY shot", 'The shooter wasn't REALLY a real democrat" blah blah. Quote
Five of swords Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 1 minute ago, CdnFox said: No, i'd blame you. I'm pretty sure you're the last one A political figure on a political campaign got shot by a person who was opposed to him. That's relevant, sorry. Especially in light of the insane levels of rhetoric the dems have been throwing around, "If nobody stops trump this will be our last election ever", etc etc It's amazing to watch the dems sweep into denial mode tho. "he wasnt' REAALLYYY shot", 'The shooter wasn't REALLY a real democrat" blah blah. They are right, though. Democrats don't post on gab. Democrats believe in elections, not assassination...in fact they always win the popular vote. The guy wasn't a democrat Quote
CdnFox Posted July 27, 2024 Author Report Posted July 27, 2024 4 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said: I don't support the GOP or Democrats since they're crap parties so I don't care in any way whatsoever what party the shooter did or didn't support, nor would it even matter. What a load of shit. If you didn't care you woudn't even be reading the story, never mind trying to deny it based on the source (which is beyond childish). Quote Even if he were a GOP supporter, one nutjob who supports either party doesn't reflect in any way whatsoever on the rest of the people who support the party. It speaks to the danger of the rhetoric the dems have been using, and many commented on that before the shooting. And it's funny how when a shooter who's believed to be republican kills someone the dems and the left media suddenly can't think of anything MORE important or relevant than his political leanings. Quote Your source isn't MSN, Go check out the links again stupid. You're very clearly a dem supporter. And pretending to be SOOOOOO Offended by the source (i included two just for asswipes like you) that you won't even read it proves absoltuely that you DO care about this crap and you KNOW it's relevant and denying it is the most important thing in your life right now. Quote
CdnFox Posted July 27, 2024 Author Report Posted July 27, 2024 2 minutes ago, Five of swords said: They are right, though. No, you'd have to be an utterly uneducated and politically inept dolt of the highest magnitude to believe th.... oh. Right. Sorry. Quote Democrats don't post on gab. Democrats are people. They're not some sort of singular entity, They post everywhere. People arent' some sort of collecitve machine like you'd pretend to believe. Can you show me which convention or vote was held outlining which social media they would or would not use? FFS could you go ONE DAY without being stupid? Quote Democrats believe in elections, not assassination.. They believe in elections they can win but not ones they're going to lose. And this is hardly the first republican to be shot at because he's a republican. Quote .in fact they always win the popular vote. The guy wasn't a democrat The guy was a democrat. He wrote in support of the democrats, he donated to the democrats, he shot a republican candidate that the democrats swore was as bad as satan. I know you're all about denial in your life but sadly that doesn't change the facts. Quote
Five of swords Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 59 minutes ago, CdnFox said: No, you'd have to be an utterly uneducated and politically inept dolt of the highest magnitude to believe th.... oh. Right. Sorry. Democrats are people. They're not some sort of singular entity, They post everywhere. People arent' some sort of collecitve machine like you'd pretend to believe. Can you show me which convention or vote was held outlining which social media they would or would not use? FFS could you go ONE DAY without being stupid? They believe in elections they can win but not ones they're going to lose. And this is hardly the first republican to be shot at because he's a republican. The guy was a democrat. He wrote in support of the democrats, he donated to the democrats, he shot a republican candidate that the democrats swore was as bad as satan. I know you're all about denial in your life but sadly that doesn't change the facts. Well I suppose you should label me a democrat Quote
Moonlight Graham Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 59 minutes ago, CdnFox said: What a load of shit. If you didn't care you woudn't even be reading the story, never mind trying to deny it based on the source (which is beyond childish). It speaks to the danger of the rhetoric the dems have been using, and many commented on that before the shooting. And it's funny how when a shooter who's believed to be republican kills someone the dems and the left media suddenly can't think of anything MORE important or relevant than his political leanings. Go check out the links again stupid. You're very clearly a dem supporter. And pretending to be SOOOOOO Offended by the source (i included two just for asswipes like you) that you won't even read it proves absoltuely that you DO care about this crap and you KNOW it's relevant and denying it is the most important thing in your life right now. I'm interested in discovering the motives of the shooter. Playing political team sports isn't very interesting to me, nor have I ever in my life supported any political party since they're generally all filled with terrible human beings. The occasional candidate can be an exception. So if I think Trump is a trash human being I'm automatically a Democrat? LOL. I do hope they win since as bad as the Democrats are they aren't Trump. Yes I agree some of the rhetoric on the Dem supporter side has been gross and even violent, and a lot of the media is just trash. Quote "All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.
robosmith Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 5 hours ago, Nationalist said: No Mike. Nationalism is exactly what the world needs right now. That you oppose making our nations self sufficient, successful and peaceful...makes you "chud chow". Nationalism is NOT KNOWN for being "peaceful." Duh Nazism | Definition, Leaders, Ideology, & History Britannica https://www.britannica.com › event › Nazism Nazism, totalitarian movement led by Adolf Hitler as head of the Nazi Party in Germany, characterized by intense nationalism, mass appeal, dictatorial rule, ... Quote
Five of swords Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 12 minutes ago, robosmith said: Nationalism is NOT KNOWN for being "peaceful." Duh Nazism | Definition, Leaders, Ideology, & History Britannica https://www.britannica.com › event › Nazism Nazism, totalitarian movement led by Adolf Hitler as head of the Nazi Party in Germany, characterized by intense nationalism, mass appeal, dictatorial rule, ... In that respect nationalism is no different from...oh yeah...literally every political ideology that ever mattered... Politics is violence. The two cannot be separated. Quote
Nationalist Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 19 minutes ago, robosmith said: Nationalism is NOT KNOWN for being "peaceful." Duh Nazism | Definition, Leaders, Ideology, & History Britannica https://www.britannica.com › event › Nazism Nazism, totalitarian movement led by Adolf Hitler as head of the Nazi Party in Germany, characterized by intense nationalism, mass appeal, dictatorial rule, ... You and your nazi fetish... 1 Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
robosmith Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 25 minutes ago, Nationalist said: You and your nazi fetish... Nazis "characterized by their INTENSE NATIONALISM." That's YOU gnat boy. LMAO You are mistaking hatred for "fetish," cause YOU'RE PROJECTING. Quote
User Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 3 minutes ago, robosmith said: Nazis "characterized by their INTENSE NATIONALISM." That's YOU gnat boy. LMAO You are mistaking hatred for "fetish," cause YOU'RE PROJECTING. The discussion was nationalism... not Nazism. 1 Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
Five of swords Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 5 minutes ago, User said: The discussion was nationalism... not Nazism. There is no such thing as nazism. That is a pejorative that English speakers use for national socialism. As you can probably tell from the name, it was nationalist. Quote
Nationalist Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 12 minutes ago, robosmith said: Nazis "characterized by their INTENSE NATIONALISM." That's YOU gnat boy. LMAO You are mistaking hatred for "fetish," cause YOU'RE PROJECTING. Yes dear... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
CouchPotato Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 1 minute ago, Five of swords said: There is no such thing as nazism. Do you know what he means by nazism? I think so, because you replaced it with national socialism. Do you know what the word pedantic means? 1 Quote
User Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 4 minutes ago, Five of swords said: There is no such thing as nazism. That is a pejorative that English speakers use for national socialism. As you can probably tell from the name, it was nationalist. It is a term correctly used to identify not just "national socialism" but, very specifically, the Nazi ideology of national socialism. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
CouchPotato Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 12 minutes ago, User said: The discussion was nationalism... not Nazism. If we had a thread on our favourite ice cream flavors, I am sure he'd find a way to steer the topic to nazism. It's almost like the leftists. 1 Quote
Five of swords Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 6 minutes ago, User said: It is a term correctly used to identify not just "national socialism" but, very specifically, the Nazi ideology of national socialism. National socialism is the brainchild of Adolf hitler Quote
Legato Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 2 hours ago, Five of swords said: ...but if a 'nazi' did shoot somebody then you would just blame the democrats. If it walks like a duck..... 1 Quote
Five of swords Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 11 minutes ago, CouchPotato said: Do you know what he means by nazism? I think so, because you replaced it with national socialism. Do you know what the word pedantic means? You don't have to be a pedant to know that 'national socialism' would be nationalist. Quote
Five of swords Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 11 minutes ago, CouchPotato said: If we had a thread on our favourite ice cream flavors, I am sure he'd find a way to steer the topic to nazism. It's almost like the leftists. Godwin's law is a thing precisely because national socialism is still the most important subject in politics. Quote
Nationalist Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 4 minutes ago, Five of swords said: You don't have to be a pedant to know that 'national socialism' would be nationalist. Or a communist...one or the other...eh? Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
User Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 5 minutes ago, Five of swords said: You don't have to be a pedant to know that 'national socialism' would be nationalist. And? That does not make all nationalism Nazism. Quote LOL, when people have to tell you they are ignoring you... From Robosmith: "IGNORE AWARDED DUE TO WORTHLESS POSTS. BYE."
Five of swords Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 (edited) 3 minutes ago, User said: And? That does not make all nationalism Nazism. In fact,no nationalism is nazism. Because nazism isn't a real thing...it is a pejorative used for national socialism and in practice it just means being mean for no reason...which is totally unrelated to what national socialism actually was. Regardless, the point being made was correct. National socialism was nationalist, and it also certainly was not pacifist. 4 minutes ago, Nationalist said: Or a communist...one or the other...eh? Communism is not nationalist. It is international socialism. Edited July 27, 2024 by Five of swords 1 Quote
CouchPotato Posted July 27, 2024 Report Posted July 27, 2024 1 minute ago, Five of swords said: Godwin's law is a thing precisely because national socialism is still the most important subject in politics. Well, yeah, I would say it's important. It happened less than a hundred years ago, and it's understandable that people bring it up. But people go overboard. National socialists don't hold the monopoly on nationalism, though. I would say nationalism is a pretty broad term. I think many people today would define themselves as nationalists in contrast to globalism and open borders. I suspect you might argue they are not real "nationalists", but then I think there could be an argument made that your guy wasn't a pure nationalist, either. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.