Hodad Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 Maybe those who believe in Greek mythology should be offended instead. Or maybe those who believe in Christian mythology and managed to work themselves into a tizzy should try reading a book other than the Bible. 🙄 Jeebus, this is the dumbest game culture war "scandal" yet. 1 Quote
Matthew Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 1 hour ago, Hodad said: It must be farking exhausting. That french song and dance production for a sporting event made me soo mad! 🙄 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 1 hour ago, Matthew said: That french song and dance production for a sporting event made me soo mad! 🙄 Yet i imagine you're the first foaming at the mouth when someone is misgendered Here's the thing. If you have no respect when it's someone else being offended, then you can't complain if nobody respects your concerns. This is a serious problem on the left - they cannot possibly understand HOOOOOWWWWW anyone could suggest that maybe the residential schools weren't THAT bad or maybe drug addicts share some of the responsiblity - yet they've got no problem mocking people's religious freedoms and dividing people. And they're too dumb to realize that the pushback for that kind of thing is trump. Or someone like him. People get fed up and look for the 'anti-woke' Ahh well. They aint' bright - but at least they're consistent 1 Quote There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data
Chrissy1979 Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 8 hours ago, User said: OK, what makes someone a Christian? It isn't love. Anyone can love others. Jesus preached on a great deal of things and love doesn't mean acceptance of deviant behavior. It's love. 1 Quote
gatomontes99 Posted July 29, 2024 Author Report Posted July 29, 2024 19 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: It's love. User is correct, and so are you. Love thy neighbor as yourself is the top commandment. However, love doesn't mean accepting sin. The old saying love the sinner, hate the sin is absolutely correct. We are supposed to be improving as people. We can't do that if we don't try to stop sinning. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Chrissy1979 Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 3 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: User is correct, and so are you. Representing the last supper isn't a sin. Quote
Rebound Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 26 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said: User is correct, and so are you. Love thy neighbor as yourself is the top commandment. However, love doesn't mean accepting sin. The old saying love the sinner, hate the sin is absolutely correct. We are supposed to be improving as people. We can't do that if we don't try to stop sinning. “I am the Lord your G-d” is the top commandment. It is Commandment One. You should know your religion better than that. Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
gatomontes99 Posted July 29, 2024 Author Report Posted July 29, 2024 36 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: Representing the last supper isn't a sin. Who said it was? But flaunting your sin, as if you are proud of it, while pretending to be the only perfect man is blasphemy. Quote The Rules for Liberal tactics: If they can't refute the content, attack the source. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition. If they are wrong, blame the opponent. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa. If all else fails, just be angry.
Chrissy1979 Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 They did nothing sinful, but using Christ's teachings to attack them is very sinful. 1 Quote
User Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 1 hour ago, Chrissy1979 said: It's love. No, it isn't. The single most defining characteristic of being a Christian is being a follower of Christ. It is what the name means: CHRISTian. And by being a follower, that means you accept Christ as the son of God, who died for our sins. Love is part of what a Christian does, not what makes someone a Christian. 48 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: They did nothing sinful, but using Christ's teachings to attack them is very sinful. Who is using Christs teachings to attack them? We are pointing out that they are being insulting with their mockery. That is a true observation regardless of Christs teachings. Quote
Chrissy1979 Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 Christ's teachings were love, love, love. To be a follower of Christ, you must, first and foremost, love your fellow man. Saying they are unworthy of representing the last supper is the polar opposite of what Christ taught Quote
Rebound Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 (edited) 9 minutes ago, User said: No, it isn't. The single most defining characteristic of being a Christian is being a follower of Christ. It is what the name means: CHRISTian. And by being a follower, that means you accept Christ as the son of God, who died for our sins. Love is part of what a Christian does, not what makes someone a Christian. Who is using Christs teachings to attack them? We are pointing out that they are being insulting with their mockery. That is a true observation regardless of Christs teachings. It’s a minuscule part of what you do as a Christian. Not nearly as big as the “judging others and being hateful of them” part. Edited July 29, 2024 by Rebound Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
User Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 1 hour ago, Rebound said: “I am the Lord your G-d” is the top commandment. It is Commandment One. You should know your religion better than that. Jesus was asked this question and he was close, he was getting at what Jesus said here when asked, and this was what he said the greatest commandment was: "You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind." The next was to love your neighbor as you love yourself. Quote
User Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 6 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: Christ's teachings were love, love, love. To be a follower of Christ, you must, first and foremost, love your fellow man. Saying they are unworthy of representing the last supper is the polar opposite of what Christ taught To be a follower of Christ you must first believe in Christ... do you? Love != acceptance It is the same reason why you reprimand your children when they do something stupid or dangerous. You still love them even though you correct them. Jesus did this daily with his disciples. Yet, you would have us believe that we can't criticize mockery? Give me a break. Jesus was not some hippie from the 70's smoking pot going around holding up the peace sign saying "come on bro, love man, just love" Quote
Chrissy1979 Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 Yes, he criticized people like you who try to use his words to denigrate others. He also had no time for the money changers who exploit the poor to further their own wealth. Otherwise, he preached love. Quote
Deluge Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 (edited) 11 hours ago, Chrissy1979 said: Why is the last supper offensive? Sounds like you just hate the people representing the last supper and therefore think they shouldn't be allowed to represent it. And if you think some people shouldn't be allowed to make Christian representations, guess what? You ain't a Christian. Not even close. The last supper isn't offensive. What IS offensive is queers and weirdos making a mockery of the last supper. Sure, wokejobs are certainly allowed to do that, but sponsors and Christians are also allowed to pull their sponsorships and boycott the Wokelympics. My question is, why do you care? Aren't you interested in freedom of expression/ freedom of choice? Or are you only interested in freedom of expression for the woketards? Edited July 29, 2024 by Deluge Quote
Hodad Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 (edited) Obviously, this fake scandal is factually incorrect. It's clearly NOT meant to be the last supper. The craziest thing is that none of the crazies who were freaking out about this will absorb that information and unwind their outrage. "Yeah, I overacted. Sorry." Won't happen. Instead, the whole thing will be calcified and added to the list of phony grievances to be recited ad nauseum in the liturgy of victimhood. Edited July 29, 2024 by Hodad Quote
CouchPotato Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: Christ's teachings were love, love, love. To be a follower of Christ, you must, first and foremost, love your fellow man. Saying they are unworthy of representing the last supper is the polar opposite of what Christ taught I did not really want to weigh into this debate, because I really don't enjoy things like the Olympic opening anyways. But I really do not think they were merely "representing" the last supper. I think it was done to mock it. I think it was deliberately done to be provocative. I can't read their minds, however. But that seems the most likely explanation for me. Yes, Christ taught love. Christ taught forgiveness. But the New Testament makes it clear that Christ's grace is not permission or justification of sin. For instance, there is the story of the adulteress who was about to be stoned. Jesus pointed out to the men who wanted to stone her that they were sinners, too. But then he also tells the woman to sin no more. The New Testament is pretty clear about what constitutes sexual immorality. That does not make it unforgivable. God can forgive anything. The most vile criminal could be worthy to participate in the last supper if he is aware of what he is. But, in my opinion, these people are showing a complete disregard for the last supper. If they wanted to respect the last supper they would not be in drag. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1 Corinthians 6&version=NIV 9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men[a] 10 nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God. 11 And that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were sanctified, you were justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God. Edited July 29, 2024 by CouchPotato Quote
Deluge Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Hodad said: Obviously, this fake scandal is factually incorrect. It's clearly NOT meant to be the last supper. The craziest thing is that none of the crazies who were freaking out about this will absorb that information and unwind their outrage. "Yeah, I overacted. Sorry." Won't happen. Instead, the whole thing will be calcified and added to the list of phony grievances to be recited ad nauseum in the liturgy of victimhood. Obviously you're full of shit, because what's even crazier is pulling all the videos and walking the shit back, after claiming that wasn't a depiction of the Last Supper. You see pervert, if the Last Supper wasn't even a thing with these degenerates, then the right thing to do would've been to stick to their guns and tell the critics to f*ck off. Do you understand now? Edited July 29, 2024 by Deluge Quote
User Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 38 minutes ago, Rebound said: It’s a minuscule part of what you do as a Christian. Not nearly as big as the “judging others and being hateful of them” part. Not interested in your bigotry. 16 minutes ago, Hodad said: It's clearly NOT meant to be the last supper. What do you base this on? The creators have not clearly said this. The appearance was taken to be exactly that by a lot of people too. But sure, Hodad is here to tell us we can't all believe our own lying eyes! Quote
User Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 32 minutes ago, Chrissy1979 said: Yes, he criticized people like you who try to use his words to denigrate others. He also had no time for the money changers who exploit the poor to further their own wealth. Otherwise, he preached love. Otherwise he preached love... Seriously, are you even a Christian? Yes or No? You are clearly unaware of what Jesus was spending his time doing with his disciples and what he commanded they go do as well. Where am I using his words to denigrate others? Where? Lets see it. Quote
Chrissy1979 Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 31 minutes ago, CouchPotato said: I did not really want to weigh into this debate, because I really don't enjoy things like the Olympic opening anyways. But I really do not think they were merely "representing" the last supper. I think it was done to mock it. I think it was deliberately done to be provocative. I can't read their minds, however. But that seems the most likely explanation for me. Yes, Christ taught love. Christ taught forgiveness. But the New Testament makes it clear that Christ's grace is not permission or justification of sin. For instance, there is the story of the adulteress who was about to be stoned. Jesus pointed out to the men who wanted to stone her that they were sinners, too. But then he also tells the woman to sin no more. The New Testament is pretty clear about what constitutes sexual immorality. That does not make it unforgivable. God can forgive anything. The most vile criminal could be worthy to participate in the last supper if he is aware of what he is. But, in my opinion, these people are showing a complete disregard for the last supper. If they wanted to respect the last supper they would not be in drag. https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1 Corinthians 6&version=NIV 9 Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Representing the last supper isn't a sin. Neither is dressing in a style you like to wear. They may have been mocking you, but they certainly weren't mocking Christ Quote
CouchPotato Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 1 minute ago, Chrissy1979 said: Representing the last supper isn't a sin. Neither is dressing in a style you like to wear. They may have been mocking you, but they certainly weren't mocking Christ 5 “A woman shall not wear a man’s garment, nor shall a man put on a woman’s cloak, ufor whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God. https://biblia.com/bible/esv/deuteronomy/22/5 It's not me they are mocking. Quote
Chrissy1979 Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 16 minutes ago, CouchPotato said: 5 “A woman shall not wear a man’s garment, nor shall a man put on a woman’s cloak, ufor whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God. https://biblia.com/bible/esv/deuteronomy/22/5 It's not me they are mocking. If a man buys a pretty dress, it's a man's dress. Now what about those who cut their hair? Are they an abomination? Quote
Nationalist Posted July 29, 2024 Report Posted July 29, 2024 LOL... All these Libbies, trying to excuse an obvious insult to Christianity. Too comical. The bottom line is this: The Paris Olympics will rate as one of the biggest failures in sport history. Thanks for that Libbies. It makes it so much easier to dispise you and dispose of you. Have a nice day... Quote Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.