Harris and her husband face a stream of hate attacks in the right media

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_fake_electors_plot

That's not authoritarian. You need to always remember that millions of people believed...and still believe...that that election was "rigged". And there does happen to be a rule in place to accommodate such.

Next?

[Deluge]

23 hours ago, myata said:

There's this sort of folk some you can see right here. When they see things not going their way, and cannot present civilized and rational arguments for their cause they will resort to lies and hatred.

As cited by The Guardian:

"“Hahahaha, what a cuck,” said one anonymous user on 4chan, commenting on a photo of Harris and her husband posted on Monday, “[h]ow many dicks did she ride to get where she is?”

Misogynistic, antisemitic vitriol by the same herd whose Idol claims and cries to support Israel. Does it make any sense, to anyone with a working mind?

What a sad, worthless bunch of losers who really have nothing of any meaning to say.

Republican leaders urged their followers to avoid hate attacks. But will it work though? Are those the leaders who control the cult - or being run by it? Hard to tell these days. Having let go of the brain and integrity, where is the final bottom? Looks like someone has been busy searching for it.

She needs to toughen up. 

Trump swims right through shit like that. 

[myata]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Trump swims right through shit like that. 

Are you being dishonest? There's none, zero offense in stating or repeating objective facts. I can say that he admires dictator thugs and it will be true 100 times out of hundred because he said so himself, a fact. An alleged conspirator in overturning a democratic election? Check. Go ahead, continue.

What does it mean though when you advise an innocent person to "toughen up" to abuse, lies and offense thrown at them for no other reason than pure hate? Do you want to normalize or even encourage such behavior? So in the lowest bottom there's nothing at all of the substance left only dirt and abuse? Would that be the kind of politics you find normal and desirable for this country?

[User]

1 hour ago, myata said:

What does it mean though when you advise an innocent person to "toughen up" to abuse, lies and offense thrown at them for no other reason than pure hate?

There is zero offense in stating or repeating objective facts. 

Harris had an affair with Willie Brown, a man 30 years older than she was, while she was having that affair he put her on a commission and board. 

[Deluge]

3 hours ago, myata said:

1. Are you being dishonest?

There's none, zero offense in stating or repeating objective facts. I can say that he admires dictator thugs and it will be true 100 times out of hundred because he said so himself, a fact. An alleged conspirator in overturning a democratic election? Check. Go ahead, continue.

2. What does it mean though when you advise an innocent person to "toughen up" to abuse, lies and offense thrown at them for no other reason than pure hate?

 

1. Nope. Are you being a liar? I think you are, so let's run through the accusations: 

-- Trump admires dictator thugs: link up your sources and lets talk about it. 

-- An alleged conspirator in overturning an election: LOL! You can "allege" all you want, as that is your right as a safe spacing cuck, but the truth is, we both know that Trump is not an insurrectionist.  

2. It means Cackling Kamel gets the same treatment as Donald Trump. Hate has nothing to do with it. If the silly b*tch is stupid enough to run for president, then it's open season on her, and I'm here for it. 

 

 

 

[myata]

9 hours ago, Deluge said:

-- link up your sources and lets talk about it. 

No: don't even dream of it; it's been posted about a zillion times, can be found in one minute search and only a) hopelessly braindead or b) hopelessly lying would be making such outlandish requests.

9 hours ago, Deluge said:

An alleged conspirator in overturning an election:

"Just find me those votes"

Liar.

[User]

23 minutes ago, myata said:

"Just find me those votes"

Liar.

And? 

Are you opposed to finding all the votes?

[Perspektiv]

14 hours ago, myata said:

What does it mean though when you advise an innocent person to "toughen up" to abuse, lies and offense thrown at them for no other reason than pure hate?

You're the president of the most powerful country on the planet. Many will hate you. Heck, some will pray for your death. Show weakness, and many will gleefully pick it apart. Unravel, and many will be pining for your job. Politics is cut throat.

Its a male dominated position. She is coming in as a female. A minority.

She can play the victim card, which will make people question her toughness for the role, or plow right through it, and let her success and competence be her noise.

There is no place for someone who can't take the heat, in one of the hottest seats in the US government.

Feel sorry for yourself, and people won't think that a person like her will be able to handle the toughest leaders in the world.

[Perspektiv]

10 hours ago, Deluge said:

It means Cackling Kamel gets the same treatment as Donald Trump. Hate has nothing to do with it.

Exactly. If she was competent, she would silence it real quick with her body of work.

She was caught flat footed under immense pressure by Hawaii's governor, citing her horrible record as a prosecutor. Good intentioned moves that had disastrous results.

Couldn't take the heat then.

If she is going to get votes, she needs to show she can march through those flames.

[Rebound]

17 hours ago, Nationalist said:

That's not authoritarian. You need to always remember that millions of people believed...and still believe...that that election was "rigged". And there does happen to be a rule in place to accommodate such.

Next?

Over a billion people believe Allah is G-d, so does that make it true?

12 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

You're the president of the most powerful country on the planet. Many will hate you. Heck, some will pray for your death. Show weakness, and many will gleefully pick it apart. Unravel, and many will be pining for your job. Politics is cut throat.

Its a male dominated position. She is coming in as a female. A minority.

She can play the victim card, which will make people question her toughness for the role, or plow right through it, and let her success and competence be her noise.

There is no place for someone who can't take the heat, in one of the hottest seats in the US government.

Feel sorry for yourself, and people won't think that a person like her will be able to handle the toughest leaders in the world.

Kamala isn’t a victim, she’s a Prosecutor. 
Trump isn’t a victim, he’s a Convicted Felon.

[Nationalist]

9 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Over a billion people believe Allah is G-d, so does that make it true?

Kamala isn’t a victim, she’s a Prosecutor. 
Trump isn’t a victim, he’s a Convicted Felon.

1. For them...yes it does.

2. Kamala is a blithering id1ot.!

3. A conviction that is being ignored now by the NY Demo-court. Gee...imagine that. LOL!

[Deluge]

1 hour ago, myata said:

1. No: don't even dream of it; it's been posted about a zillion times, can be found in one minute search and only a) hopelessly braindead or b) hopelessly lying would be making such outlandish requests.

2. "Just find me those votes"

3. Liar.

1. That's not good enough. I want to see what makes YOU believe Trump is a lover of dictator thugs. If it's all the left-wing bullshit that's been spamming the Internet, then I'll know what level of a dupe you are. 

2. Yes, "find me the votes". In other words, "these a$$holes cheated; don't know how they got away with it, but let's see if I can find some of the votes that they stole." 

3. The REAL liars are the liberal leftoids. 

Edited July 26 by Deluge

[myata]

There's zero sense in wasting time on a conversation with someone who believes that they can suck the reality off their finger (or their idol's body parts). How is this not obvious?

[Deluge]

2 minutes ago, myata said:

There's zero sense in wasting time on a conversation with someone who believes that they can suck the reality off their finger (or their idol's body parts). How is this not obvious?

Don't be a little b*tch, Myata. We both know you're full of shit, so why not just come clean? 

[User]

5 minutes ago, myata said:

There's zero sense in wasting time on a conversation with someone who believes that they can suck the reality off their finger (or their idol's body parts). How is this not obvious?

What is obvious is that you have run away from more threads than I can count where you have been caught in a lie or pushing bogus crap... 

Just like you can't handle the truth here. 

[myata]

20 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Yes, "find me the votes". In other words, "these a$$holes cheated; don't know how they got away with it, but let's see if I can find some of the votes that they stole." 

A fine example as any of sucking the reality off the lying idol a$$. There's nothing to add here: all before our eyes. And no need to waste any further words. Zip straight down to your bizarre and twisted echo chamber. This is the world of sane reality though, so far at least.

[User]

8 minutes ago, myata said:

A fine example as any of sucking the reality off the lying idol a$$. There's nothing to add here: all before our eyes. And no need to waste any further words. Zip straight down to your bizarre and twisted echo chamber. This is the world of sane reality though, so far at least.

Run away!

 

[CouchPotato]

35 minutes ago, myata said:

There's zero sense in wasting time on a conversation with someone who believes that they can suck the reality off their finger...

I've often said the same thing myself.

[Perspektiv]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

Kamala isn’t a victim, she’s a Prosecutor. 
Trump isn’t a victim, he’s a Convicted Felon.

She seems like a tough cookie, I just feel the media will try victimizing her and using her V and race card, vs her merit. 

I do believe she is a legit threat. I have seen her grill people as a prosecutor. When she checks all her information meticulously, she is nasty. She will roast you, but with facts.

Quick on their feet, Trump is stronger. 

She will have to sell her strengths, and I feel in doing so will give Trump a run for his money.

[Deluge]

40 minutes ago, myata said:

A fine example as any of sucking the reality off the lying idol a$$. There's nothing to add here: all before our eyes. And no need to waste any further words. Zip straight down to your bizarre and twisted echo chamber. This is the world of sane reality though, so far at least.

81 million votes for a walking corpse, does not compute. The a$$holes cheated - there is no other valid explanation. 

[CouchPotato]

36 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

She seems like a tough cookie, I just feel the media will try victimizing her and using her V and race card, vs her merit. 

I do believe she is a legit threat. I have seen her grill people as a prosecutor. When she checks all her information meticulously, she is nasty. She will roast you, but with facts.

Quick on their feet, Trump is stronger.

I was just rewatching that interview she gave where she is asked about the border. You know the one. She says, "We've been to the border." And when it's pointed out that she hasn't been to the border, she says "and I haven't been to Europe, either" and laughs.  That's the kind of situation where she is weak. She starts to seem really nervous in that interview when she starts being challenged. I wonder if that is why she laughs sometimes.

In another thread, I compared her to Trudeau, but I think Trudeau would look more in control in these situations. He would just say, "Americans know that we have been there for them. Whether it's at the southern border or making sure people have adequate health care and delivering on climate goals, we have always stood up for Americans, from coast to coast to coast." It's not an answer, but Trudeau would say it without looking like a deer in the headlights.

Edited July 26 by CouchPotato

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, myata said:

A fine example as any of sucking the reality off the lying idol a$$. There's nothing to add here: all before our eyes. And no need to waste any further words. Zip straight down to your bizarre and twisted echo chamber. This is the world of sane reality though, so far at least.

You're too much of a coward to even directly address the people you're talking to.  You're a whipped little dog who spams the forum with nonsense and refuses to speak coherently. 

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

I was just rewatching that interview she gave where she is asked about the border. You know the one. She says, "We've been to the border." And when it's pointed out that she hasn't been to the border, she says "and I haven't been to Europe, either" and laughs.  That's the kind of situation where she is weak. She starts to seem really nervous in that interview when she starts being challenged. I wonder if that is why she laughs sometimes.

In another thread, I compared her to Trudeau, but I think Trudeau would look more in control in these situations. He would just say, "Americans know that we have been there for them. Whether it's at the southern border or making sure people have adequate health care and delivering on climate goals, we have always stood up for Americans, from coast to coast to coast." It's not an answer, but Trudeau would say it without looking like a deer in the headlights.

This is indeed a weakness of hers. The moment she is challenged or is forced Off Script she does poorly.

She also has a problem speaking directly and clearly and meaning what she says. She prefers vauge and airy crap like her 'Unburdend by what has been" bullshit which just doesn't appeal to anyone but that she's convinced makes her sound smart. 

And the problem is that a shocking number of americans don't know anything about her  and are about to be exposed to her for the first time and will be looking up interviews and clips of her online and they'll be watching how she handles interviews and such now.  She's not going to draw crowds like trump did. 

So her poor communication skills outside of scripted events is going to be a hurdle. 

[Nationalist]

On 7/24/2024 at 5:41 PM, Black Dog said:

So you are genuinely stupid and think trump talking about "highly talented" in scare quotes wasn't a innuendo? Do you have to have someone tell you how to put pants on in the morning or do you get on the bus with your junk hanging out?

Oh look, it's DumbFux, get West and nationalist in here and you guys can scrape together a braincell together.

OOPS...

Guys where do these sexually depraved poor sods come from? I mean really now...is there a segment of people who are hatched instead of born? There's gotta be a lab somewhere producing this mess. Its like watching chickens eat at each other in the coup.

As for you...pup...I don't know what Donny meant. perhaps it was innuendo. I would find his innuendo much more gentlemanly than the garbage I've seen and heard Democrats and their sad flock o' Libbies spew into the public daily.

So suck it up...pup.

Edited July 26 by Nationalist

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

OOPS...

Guys where do these sexually depraved poor sods come from? I mean really now...is there a segment of people who are hatched instead of born? There's gotta be a lab somewhere producing this mess. Its like watching chickens eat at each other in the coup.

 

I don't know, but they are the most sexually repressed people on the planet. I swear they can't go one freaking thread without getting mad and bringing up somebody else's penis or what they'd like to do to someone's ass or fantasizing about small children or the like.

It's like the democrat party is now the official home of the sexually repressed and deviant   (furries welcome!)