Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
23 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Yes it's a bad comparison and a stupid point. One wouldn't tell a black man no be upset over being called the n-word because racial slurs are almost universally acknowledged to be beyond the pale. No such consensus exists for mocking Christians.

Oh... I see, so it is you who is going to play the only some people get to be offended game...

 

 

 

 

Posted
59 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Except in this case, neither one is c)nt.

LOL - well that's what you'd expect someone who coudn't understand and rewrote what they said to say :)

 

Quote

It's just another example of you being illiterate and then lying about it. Many such cases.

Uh oh - back to your signature insults when you know you're wrong i see :)  You're a bit of a broken little person arent you :)  

 

Quote

I don't want what you use to whack off to kiddie porn dude.

And back to your kiddie porn fetish. Boy you sure spend a lot of time thinking about kiddie porn 

Quote

You cried over a painting, peasant.

Still crying i see.  did you want me to get you a jello or something? 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

LOL - well that's what you'd expect someone who coudn't understand and rewrote what they said to say :)

Uh that's what I expect from someone who lies constantly. Last week I was re-writing other people's posts and now I'm re-writing mine, but you're too big a pu$$y and a liar to pony up any evidence for either, which is what to be expected from a pedo like you.

Posted
1 hour ago, User said:

Oh... I see, so it is you who is going to play the only some people get to be offended game...

You're allowed to be offended but and other people are allowed to have opinions about whether it's justified, just like you think it's ok to mock someone for crying over Trump's election.

Posted
Just now, Black Dog said:

You're allowed to be offended but and other people are allowed to have opinions about whether it's justified, just like you think it's ok to mock someone for crying over Trump's election.

You gonna stop your stupid "crying" game then? Or nah?

 

 

 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

No because I think acting like a medieval peasant who heard a blasphemy is absurd.

So, you are going to keep crying. 

 

 

Posted
42 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Uh that's what I expect from someone who lies constantly.

Well that's what you'd expect a liar like yourself to say  :) 

Quote

Last week I was re-writing other people's posts and now I'm re-writing mine,

Yeah.  Maybe stop doing that.  I know you're not fond of honesty but give it a try and see if you can make it work for you. 

10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Pointing-mirror-guy-meme-1otri4.jpg

You realize every time you post that we know you're crying :) 

  • Like 2

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted (edited)

I found some of those baseless, hate-filled attacks.

 

Edited by gatomontes99
  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Well that's what you'd expect a liar like yourself to say  :) 

Yeah.  Maybe stop doing that.  I know you're not fond of honesty but give it a try and see if you can make it work for you. 

You realize every time you post that we know you're crying :) 

With his emotional support teddy. th-1746846680.thumb.jpg.fce546b72a069748f00fe540231db21a.jpg

  • Haha 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted

Here is another baseless attack on Camela

Fact checked false. She will not take action at 100 days in office, in violation of the Constitution or your rights, loke unreasonable search and seizure and bare weapons.

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.
Posted
2 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Here is another baseless attack on Camela

Fact checked false. She will not take action at 100 days in office, in violation of the Constitution or your rights, loke unreasonable search and seizure and bare weapons.

well that's probably the election lost right there.  She won't get out a tonne of dem voters with that, but she'll get out almost all of the republicans. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
12 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

well that's probably the election lost right there.  She won't get out a tonne of dem voters with that, but she'll get out almost all of the republicans. 

Good lord...ya know...I'm sure she's been warned about taking Brandon's medication.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Good lord...ya know...I'm sure she's been warned about taking Brandon's medication.

Taking his medication is bad enough but she seems to be washing it down with his kool-aid as well. 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
31 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Is that what you squeeze when you watch the Olympics, snowflake?

Haven't watched them, but if I squeeze anything it is my wife's boobs and ass.

  • Like 1

The Rules for Liberal tactics:

  1. If they can't refute the content, attack the source.
  2. If they can't refute the content, attack the poster.
  3. If 1 and 2 fail, pretend it never happened.
  4. Everyone you disagree with is Hitler.
  5. A word is defined by the emotion it elicits and not the actual definition.
  6. If they are wrong, blame the opponent.
  7. If a liberal policy didn't work, it's a conservatives fault and vice versa.
  8. If all else fails, just be angry.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,919
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Milla
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...