Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
36 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

You're a miserable person, so we both know you're not glad about anything.

I'm a delight.

Quote

Rating comebacks is about as pathetic as your life. 😙

Yeah at least i'm not joylessly pumping away on someone I'm not interested in because I'm a sexual deviant 😘

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, I am Groot said:

You don't know but you've brought your kids to it five or six times? 

What do you feel is more important for kids normalizing drag queens or normalizing disabled people? Why aren't there any disabled people's story hours?

Twice, it has been for auxiliary purposes.. the drag queen story simply being in the same vicinity. 

My wife feels its important to acknowledge and accept the minority groups such as lgbtq, blacks, drag queens, etc. and so we go to support her. 

If there was a disabled story hour, we might go. As to why they do not have one... not sure. It is probably not nearly as interesting as your conspiratorial minds pretends it to be. 

 

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. To get paid.
2.To show everybody what progressive parents they are, if they're straight liberals.  If they're drag or gay people probably just to have a party with their friends... I don't get it myself.
3. Absolutely.  But at the extremes there are instances where the state trumps the parents.  These things are obvious and were not as controversial until the recent revolt of the populists.
4. I'm not posting inflammatory videos about how terrible everything is.  I don't post things saying they're FORCING people to be inclusive, or that GROOMERS are trying to f*** kids.  If people showed up and said "What's the point of this in schools exactly ?" I think you would have a better starting point for a point-to-point respectful discussion.
5. Many parents are ok with nudity.  I'm one of them.  If people have strap on dildos and such then I would hide that from my kid... that's my line on that.
6. And parents whose politics you absolutely detest will deploy their politics against yours.

7.  I talked about this with the wife last night.  Nick Wright of First Things First (Sports Show) covered the Caitlin Clark story by decrying the toxic politics that every story is draped in.  I think that's where I stand too.

1.  Well i think there's more to it than that.

2. Ok

3.  Well in certain instances yes you have to protect children from very harmful parenting.  Where that line is, it's debatable and tough sometimes, like all grey area.

4.  But there's also videos of drag story time where the hosts feature nutty or even outright sexual content, so it happens.  You should be adult about any protests you do about anything, especially around children.  I also don't want to live in a society where drag queens reading to kids is totally unchallenged.  The same sensationalist media has also made it look like everyone who disagees with these things are 4x4-driving hooligan nutbars.  And wait, drag story time is in schools???

5.  Ok.  For me, I have no issues with consenting adults doing anything.  I enjoy all sorts of profane content LOL.  For kids things are different, e.g. age appropriateness, and I do respect other people's differing limits on that...to a degree LOL.

6. Fair game.  That's politics.

7.  I've never heard of this story, so can't comment.

Edited by Moonlight Graham

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted
8 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

 It is probably not nearly as interesting as your conspiratorial minds pretends it to be.

I can think of ways in which disabled story time would be fascinating.  Like a stuttering or drooling clown maybe ?

And then people protesting that because they're on Government Pension and they hate the government.

Can we just put a fence around all these people ?  

Posted
Just now, Michael Hardner said:

I can think of ways in which disabled story time would be fascinating.  Like a stuttering or drooling clown maybe ?
 

Sure, but would kids be interested in a Biden speech? 

BWAAAAAHAHAHA!!!!  Sorry, the shot was there and i took it :) 

 

 

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
1 minute ago, Moonlight Graham said:

1.  But there's also videos of drag story time where the hosts feature nutty or even outright sexual content, so it happens. 
2. I also don't want to live in a society where drag queens reading to kids is totally unchallenged.  The same sensationalist media has also made it look like everyone who disagees with these things are 4x4-driving hooligan nutbars.  And wait, drag story time is in schools???

3.  I've never heard of this story, so can't comment.

1. Yeah... I suspect most parents would be against that anyway.
2. Driving 4X4s is legitimate transpo.  Practice intelligent media consumption.
3. It was on here the last week or so.  Another big yawn...

Posted
2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I can think of ways in which disabled story time would be fascinating.  Like a stuttering or drooling clown maybe ?

And then people protesting that because they're on Government Pension and they hate the government.

Can we just put a fence around all these people ?  

I would bring a kid to disabled story time.  Kids should learn about various types of people...if it's age appropriate 🙂

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

I'm

Translation, miserable and narssissistic. O_o

3 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Yeah

Difference is you're miserable. This is what gives your existence purpose. 

Enjoy putting in predictable replies with more of your Googled wisdom, proving my point.

The floor is yours. 

Posted
48 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

Drag Queen story hour is just such an absurd reach for the freaks of the Left to use. It's not inclusive and not designed to open kids eyes and be more inclusive. The parents do it because they want to give the middle finger to the Right, and preen about how virtuous and progressive they are. They don't give a damn about their kids being exposed to whatever. As someone or other pointed out, there's a minuscule amount of drag queens out there. Why is it necessary for children to think that's normal? There's tons of disabled people but nobody is having a 'disabled person story hour' to get kids to feel accepting of disabled people. 

Maybe it's just fun.

Quote

The liberals like to pretend all this outrage over drag queens being with children is an invention of the evil right, but it's merely them reacting in an utterly predictable way to deliberate provocation by the Left. Provoking the right is the ONLY reason people do this. And then they go "Hmph, why are you being so outraged? Drag queens are utterly normal! Bigot! Learn to be more open-minded like us!"

Have you considered trying not to be so easily triggered lol.

Quote

Except, of course, they're not the least bit open-minded. They're harshly judgemental and despise anyone who doesn't ahv the same ideological views as them.

And you don't?

4 minutes ago, Perspektiv said:

Translation, miserable and narssissistic. O_o

Difference is you're miserable. This is what gives your existence purpose. 

Enjoy putting in predictable replies with more of your Googled wisdom, proving my point.

The floor is yours. 

Buddy the only person putting predictable things in anywhere here is you in your wife.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

it's age appropriate 🙂

This should be key.

Posted
12 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

I would bring a kid to disabled story time.  Kids should learn about various types of people...if it's age appropriate 🙂

Yeah  - maybe not the 'erectile disfunction' disabled story time. :)  

There are two types of people in this world: Those who can extrapolate from incomplete data

Posted
On 6/13/2024 at 3:59 PM, Black Dog said:

They can send their kids to religious schools if they don't like the content of the public curriculum. Problem solved.

 

Thats a solution...more divisiveness...why not solve it by sending the gay kids to gay school, where being gay can be celebrated 365 days a year, provide them with mental health counseling, and treatment.  

  • Like 1

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Army Guy said:

Thats a solution...more divisiveness...why not solve it by sending the gay kids to gay school, where being gay can be celebrated 365 days a year, provide them with mental health counseling, and treatment.  

Well religious schools actually exist but I'd be open to turning all of those into gay schools.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Black Dog said:

Well religious schools actually exist but I'd be open to turning all of those into gay schools.

Sure if that is what it takes, as long as they are getting the metal health issues looked after , i think that would be problem solved. 

  • Like 1

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted
1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

And again - I would bring them to a nude beach.  Nudity should not be a hangup ...

Problem is nude beaches in North America are often filled with perverts, exhibitionists, pedophiles, and sometimes a lot of gay men.

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted
2 hours ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Problem is nude beaches in North America are often filled with perverts, exhibitionists, pedophiles, and sometimes a lot of gay men.

One of these things is not like the other? 

Also how do you know this? 🤔

To add.. we would also take them to church. 

 

But we don't send them there in a taxi either. We tend to be arm's length distance from them.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

One of these things is not like the other? 

Also how do you know this? 🤔

To add.. we would also take them to church. 

 

But we don't send them there in a taxi either. We tend to be arm's length distance from them.

The gay dudes arent just there to work on their tan, so no they aren't unlike the others.

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

You know this how? 

How do you know this about nude beaches? 

🤔

Because I'm nude and gay.  Jk.

Well for one, in your neck of the woods:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hanlan's_Point_Beach

"As is common for most public nudist-friendly venues, males make up a large percentage of the users of the beach, but women can make up to one quarter of the total on popular weekends. Recent years continue to see an increase in the number of families who attend. The beach is a popular destination for the city's gay community."

  • Confused 1

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted

The Devil is having a field day with all this garbage.  Sodom and Gomorrah all over again in many places and promoted by governments, activists, mainstream media, schools.  Totally sick.  

Yes, the Devil hates "bible thumpers" because it interferes with his agenda of perverting society and destroying the traditional God-fearing family.

"8  But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death. " 

Revelation 21:8

Posted
17 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

The parents are ok with it... parental rights remember ? 

there is no such thing as "parental rights",

individual rights are not transferable to other persons,

the children have rights, but those are not actually adjudicated by parents,

what is acceptable or not acceptable for children, is determined by the government,

child & family services and the courts,

and those institutions are extremely supportive of indoctrinating children into this ideology,

it's practically a state religion at this point,

so parents attempting to oppose this indoctrination,

would most likely be found to be violating their children's rights,

now I wouldn't trust the government therein,   see ; residential schools for example

but the law is what it is,

so the only way to be free of this indoctrination, is to not have children in the first place

this is the primary reason that I did not have any children

my father was a social worker, he was telling parents what they could or could not do, all the time,

any parent who tried to oppose it ; boom Police & CAS show up at your door.

so I knew I had no right whatsoever to oppose how the state decided that children had to be raised

I just didn't want the government to have that sort of leverage over me

those parents who think that they have "parental rights" are in fact deluded therein

Posted
2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

 

what is acceptable or not acceptable for children, is determined by the government,

...

I just didn't want the government to have that sort of leverage over me

those parents who think that they have "parental rights" are in fact deluded therein

I agree with this, to the point that it's true for all individuals. We don't have rights unless the government tells us we do. And children are no different. 

That said, there are things that parents can do that preclude government programming. This includes things like taking them out of certain education activities, homeschooling them if you want, and certain amounts of conscientious objection to health practices. 

 

Posted (edited)
48 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

I agree with this, to the point that it's true for all individuals. We don't have rights unless the government tells us we do. And children are no different.

I went an "alternative school" in downtown Toronto

so I was actually being indoctrinated into this ideology at the very beginning, in 1970's

I didn't reject the premise per se, don't discriminate against gay people ; okay, fine

I did however think it was weird that they were teaching this in school

I did sense that it was an indoctrination  program and there was no option to oppose it

that's when I told my parents ; "I think I'd rather just go to regular school"

at the time, gays were still being arrested for "public indecency"

I'd watch CityTV and Metro Police was hauling guys out of the bath houses in handcuffs

so one part of the government was saying this was criminal,

while my teachers were indoctrinating me against that

I just remember wanting to opt out of the whole thing, as a little kid

I didn't know how to explain it at the age, but I was actually clinging to childhood innocence

I was still playing with Star Wars action figures, and these people are talking about anal sex

I was definitely not comfortable with that, and neither were my classmates,

we were squirming in out seats, wanting to get out of there

and frankly, if they had brought in a Drag Queen ?

I would have got up and left, I would have just told mt dad "I'm not going to that class"

so I would suggest that it was inappropriate to be indoctrinating me at that age

Edited by Dougie93
Posted
15 hours ago, Black Dog said:

Buddy

Translation, "I have no argument, so will try to pick on women and your sexuality in the most irrelevant manner".

You're "sneak a fap session when mom goes out, using her panties, at 46 years of age" levels of pathetic. 

Welcome to ignore. Masturbate to that.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,915
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    MDP
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • MDP earned a badge
      First Post
    • DrewZero earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • BlahTheCanuck went up a rank
      Explorer
    • derek848 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...