Bill Clinton Paid Paula Jones $850K to Drop a Sexual Harassment Suit. Is that Worse than $350k for an NDA?

[WestCanMan]

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/11/14/clinton-settles-sexual-harassment-suit-1998-983371

One guy had consensual sex with a porn star. The other was successfully sued for his inappropriate sexual conduct with an employee, and he has a court-documented history of being guilty of that.

Which is worse? 

[gatomontes99]

I mean, Paula was suing for harrassment where as Stormy was paid to be quiet. So I'm going to say Paula pay-off was morally more malicious than the sortid Stormy shush money

[Michael Hardner]

Clinton's worse but there are other cases for both.

 

And the current case is about campaign finance rules.

 

And... who cares...

[CdnFox]

11 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Clinton's worse but there are other cases for both.

 

And the current case is about campaign finance rules.

This is true.  The argument currently is not which sex act is worse or which pay off is worse - those are both legal things and up to the individuals involved.

The problem with trump is that they're claiming he did it to help win the election, in which case it should have been reported in his election spending. If he can show, for example, that he did it to keep his wife from finding out then he did nothing wrong,

Quote

And... who cares...

Ahhh one of your favorite dishonest debate tricks as i've pointed out    the  "Downplay anything i don't like" gambit   "Why are you making such a big deal of it!??!?"  -  well if it's no big deal why are they trying to prosecute him for it? Can't have it both ways big guy

[herbie]

Did Clinton write it off as a tax deduction or business expense?
Is Clinton running for President?

Does our sphincter sucking Russian troll think he can win over adults with common sense an minimal intelligence using a "Johnny shit on the carpet, I only peed on it" argument?

[CdnFox]

44 minutes ago, herbie said:

Did Clinton write it off as a tax deduction or business expense?

Yes.  But that's not illegal.

Writing off actual hookers like hunter biden did is over the top but hush money is a legit expense.

Quote

Is Clinton running for President?

He was.

Quote

Does our sphincter sucking Russian troll think he can win over adults with common sense an minimal intelligence using a "Johnny shit on the carpet, I only peed on it" argument?

Does our commie loving resident hypocrite think he can convince anyone by deflecting ?

From a point of view of moral behavior the clintons were worse by a hair - both of them knew about it and participated in the hush money - but it's not illegal.   So yes - it does address the issue of the dems claiming it's a moral issue. From a legal issue point of view if they can show that he woudlnt' have done it if it weren't for the election then he may get slapped for campaign finance violations.

Just like hillary did when she tried to hide the money that was used to buy the steel dossier    LOL

[Nationalist]

Let's face it...if ya want dirt...the Clintons wallow in mud.

[CdnFox]

2 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Let's face it...if ya want dirt...the Clintons wallow in mud.

For sure - but the problem they run into is that they pretend they're lilly white clean.

And when you wear a white shirt and get mud all over you it's pretty obvious.

Trump makes no such claims. And people expect him to be a bit of a muddy person. So when he gets mud on him everyone's like 'meh.'

the dems think they can win throwing mud at trump - but they just get themselves dirty and it doesn't make trump look worse.

[impartialobserver]

I would rather that Trump simply lose another election and hopefully go away. The legal stuff is just petty. I guess it gives somebody something to do 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, impartialobserver said:

I would rather that Trump simply lose another election and hopefully go away. The legal stuff is just petty. I guess it gives somebody something to do 

Is it really "petty" to charge business owners with crimes of a false business records to evade taxes or defraud voters?

According to DA Bragg, they are ROUTINE.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Is it really "petty" to charge business owners with crimes of a false business records to evade taxes or defraud voters?

According to DA Bragg, they are ROUTINE.

It really is, It's pretty much utter bullcrap. Ask hunter biden - he wrote off hookers and blow and the dems say THAT'S petty  

But the election financing accusation is a little different. But if we're being honest it's a bit of a stretch.

[ironstone]

3 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

I mean, Paula was suing for harrassment where as Stormy was paid to be quiet. So I'm going to say Paula pay-off was morally more malicious than the sortid Stormy shush money

Porn star Stormy Daniels, who has recently made headlines with reports that she had an affair with Donald Trump before he became president, has issued a statement denying that the affair took place.

In the statement, the authenticity of which has been verified with a representative of Daniels, states, “Over the past few weeks I have been asked countless times to comment on reports of an alleged sexual relationship I had with Donald Trump many, many, many years ago.”

The statement continues, “The fact of the matter is that each party to this alleged affair denied its existence on 2006, 2011, 2016, 2017 and now again in 2018. I am not denying this affair because I was paid ‘hush money’ as has been reported in overseas owned tabloids. I am denying this affair because it never happened.”

 

[robosmith]

17 minutes ago, ironstone said:

Porn star Stormy Daniels, who has recently made headlines with reports that she had an affair with Donald Trump before he became president, has issued a statement denying that the affair took place.

In the statement, the authenticity of which has been verified with a representative of Daniels, states, “Over the past few weeks I have been asked countless times to comment on reports of an alleged sexual relationship I had with Donald Trump many, many, many years ago.”

The statement continues, “The fact of the matter is that each party to this alleged affair denied its existence on 2006, 2011, 2016, 2017 and now again in 2018. I am not denying this affair because I was paid ‘hush money’ as has been reported in overseas owned tabloids. I am denying this affair because it never happened.”

 

You forgot to post ANY EVIDENCE for ^this OPINION.

Posts share old Stormy Daniels statement as new info

Quote

CLAIM: A newly released document shows porn actor Stormy Daniels admitting she never had an affair with former President Donald Trump.

AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. The signed statement with the denial was publicly released on Jan. 30, 2018. Not long after, Daniels recanted the statement and said that an affair had occurred. She said her denials were due to a non-disclosure agreement and that she signed the statement because parties involved “made it sound like I had no choice.”

THE FACTS: A grand jury has been weighing whether to indict Trump in a hush money case investigated by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office. The case has homed in on a $130,000 payment made to Daniels ahead of the 2016 election.

Amid those proceedings, Trump allies and others on social media are attempting to cast the old statement denying the affair as new information.

BUSTED!

Edited April 17, 2024 by robosmith

[gatomontes99]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

You forgot to post ANY EVIDENCE for ^this OPINION.

It wasnt an opinion, it was an article with facts. And you could have found that article with a simple web search.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/stormy-daniels-denies-affair-donald-trump-never-happened-010513645.html

Please learn the difference between an opinion and a fact.

[robosmith]

Just now, gatomontes99 said:

It wasnt an opinion, it was an article with facts. And you could have found that article with a simple web search.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/stormy-daniels-denies-affair-donald-trump-never-happened-010513645.html

Please learn the difference between an opinion and a fact.

Anything you post here without EVIDENCE is ONLY OPINION. Duh

[gatomontes99]

1 minute ago, robosmith said:

Anything you post here without EVIDENCE is ONLY OPINION. Duh

No. No it is not.

Nitrogen makes up 78.1% of the atmosphere. That's a fact. No link necessary.

 

[WestCanMan]

5 hours ago, CdnFox said:

This is true.  The argument currently is not which sex act is worse or which pay off is worse -

If I had to choose between paying $850k for sex with Paula Jones or $350 for sex with Stormy, I'd go with Stormy. 

[WestCanMan]

4 hours ago, herbie said:

Is Clinton running for President?

He did in 1996, two years after the initial lawsuit was filed. Was he stuck in a courtroom in 1996?

Quote

Does our sphincter sucking Russian troll think he can win over adults with common sense an minimal intelligence using a "Johnny shit on the carpet, I only peed on it" argument?

Did you renovate any more houses and triple their value lately? 😂

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, gatomontes99 said:

No. No it is not.

Nitrogen makes up 78.1% of the atmosphere. That's a fact. No link necessary.

 

78.1000003 % you mean, you fraudster!!!!!  

LOL well good luck getting him to see that.

Edited April 18, 2024 by CdnFox

[CdnFox]

21 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

If I had to choose between paying $850k for sex with Paula Jones or $350 for sex with Stormy, I'd go with Stormy. 

Honestly - i dont' find stormy all that attracive.  The plastic barbie doll look has never worked for me.  I sure as hell wouldn't be ponying up 350 k for her that's for sure

[WestCanMan]

3 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Honestly - i dont' find stormy all that attracive.  The plastic barbie doll look has never worked for me.  I sure as hell wouldn't be ponying up 350 k for her that's for sure

Fine. You get "Married to Hillary" then 😂.

Sex with Paula Jones for $850K makes way more sense all of a sudden. 

[CdnFox]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

Fine. You get "Married to Hillary" then 😂.

What is that, like, four sleepless nights i've had because of you lately?

Quote

Sex with Paula Jones for $850K makes way more sense all of a sudden. 

Yeah that's what you'd call a seller's market i think  

[herbie]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

Did you renovate any more houses and triple their value lately? 

Nope. Barely made double on the last one. Had to pay tax on that too!

Yew shud lurn how,,,

[CdnFox]

58 minutes ago, herbie said:

Nope. Barely made double on the last one. Had to pay tax on that too!

Yew shud lurn how,,,

Only double? Did your credit card rate change or something?    maybe the chip is wearing out, any decent credit card should triple the value of a home regularly so i'm told   

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, gatomontes99 said:

No. No it is not.

Nitrogen makes up 78.1% of the atmosphere. That's a fact. No link necessary.

In REALITY, ^this OPINION is not FACT without specifying the exact details of the sampling (to within half the significance of your stated (0.1%) tolerance).

Show us your sampling method and the printout of your analysis equipment.

Now you might pretend that "Nitrogen is between 75% and 80%" of the atmosphere is a FACT.....

That will help you getting around the FACT that the concentration of Nitrogen in the atmosphere is NOT THE SAME everywhere. under all different atmospheric parameters.