Canada just posted its fastest two-month immigration in history. This graph shows just how high it is.

[ExFlyer]

10 hours ago, I am Groot said:

Expressing a difference of opinion when talking about the rise of antisemitism in Canada would be something like disagreeing there is a rise of antisemitism in Canada, not laughing at the complaint.

Buddy, everything on this web site is rhetoric.

 

Ahh, there are different opinions based on how you feel about the other person statement? Seems quite discriminatory to me.

If everything is rhetoric, why do you take such exception to anything said that does not agree with you?

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Ahh, there are different opinions based on how you feel about the other person statement? Seems quite discriminatory to me.

If everything is rhetoric, why do you take such exception to anything said that does not agree with you?

Because while everything is rhetoric, not everything is stupid.  Whereas you're stupid.  Pretty simple.  Lots of people can make contrary arguments but make them well and it's easy to accept and disagree with that.  Then there's people like you -  you post ass-porn as your argument and pretty much everything else you say is dumber than a stump.  So people don't respect you and this is the result.

[I am Groot]

3 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Ahh, there are different opinions based on how you feel about the other person statement? Seems quite discriminatory to me.

If everything is rhetoric, why do you take such exception to anything said that does not agree with you?

The degree of exception I take to a statement depends on my perception of the statement, or what lies behind it. Like all Nationalists, I take particular exception to statements that I see as going against my country, or the cultural identity and values represented by it. Antisemitism goes against that cultural identity and values, and is thus not to be tolerated. 

[ExFlyer]

3 hours ago, I am Groot said:

The degree of exception I take to a statement depends on my perception of the statement, or what lies behind it. Like all Nationalists, I take particular exception to statements that I see as going against my country, or the cultural identity and values represented by it. Antisemitism goes against that cultural identity and values, and is thus not to be tolerated. 

I am not sure what you see is behind my comments except perhaps your perception?

I also cannot see where my comment goes against your country.

Discrimination, against others has been part of this country since we became a country and even before that. In the beginning we did not like some of the indigenous that did not do what we wanted or did not trade with us. Before that, the indigenous themselves fought one another because they did not like each other so, discrimination, by any name has been around forever.'

Just because the jewish people have a special name (antisemitism was coined by a German) for it changes nothing, it is discrimination against a peoples.

[I am Groot]

1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Just because the jewish people have a special name (antisemitism was coined by a German) for it changes nothing, it is discrimination against a peoples.

I'm aware of the historical nature of discrimination/prejudice/bigotry/racism and how it thrived throughout the world throughout history, and is still pretty much the norm in non-Western societies today. 

But the cultural norm of this country that I like is the absence of it. And as I wrote above, Jews are the canary in the coalmine given the long, long, long history of animus directed toward them since biblical times.

[ExFlyer]

15 minutes ago, I am Groot said:

I'm aware of the historical nature of discrimination/prejudice/bigotry/racism and how it thrived throughout the world throughout history, and is still pretty much the norm in non-Western societies today. 

But the cultural norm of this country that I like is the absence of it. And as I wrote above, Jews are the canary in the coalmine given the long, long, long history of animus directed toward them since biblical times.

The unfortunate thing is there is no and never has been an "absence of it".

Blacks have been N****rs. Indigenous have been red men, injuns and many other names. Germans have been  Nazis. Polish are polocks. Japanese have been slant eyes. All Indians have been Pakis....and on  and on.

Picking one group is being naive.

It would be nice if there is an "absence of it" but...

Edited March 24 by ExFlyer

[taxme]

On 3/22/2024 at 10:51 AM, CdnFox said:

https://www.forexlive.com/news/canada-just-posted-its-fastest-two-month-immigration-in-history-what-happens-next-20240321/

 

 

So - the bottom line is we have a growth problem.  And interestingly if you put the rise in housing prices up against this graph since 2015 they look pretty similar.

The housing problem is already severe but in 2023 housing starts went DOWN. And this immigration is going to continue at about this level for at least this year and most of next.

 

So by the end of 2024/2025 i bet we're still wrestling with serious inflation issues as well as severe shortages of housing and increasing rental rates.

It's like justin WANTS to destroy the liberal party AND canada

I thought that this liberal party was all about fighting climate change? How can the liberal party fight climate change when they keep bringing in approx. 500,000 new legal and illegal immigrants into Canada every year?

There will be more damage to the environment because of the need to build more new homes for all those new immigrants by cutting down more trees by the tens of thousands, and not to forget that there will be more roads that need to be built. There will be tens of thousands, if not more, of new vehicles on the road dosing out more carbon emissions into the air. The infrastructure in Canada will be under attack every day. 

S, just where is the logic and common sense to all of this? Well, there is no common sense and no logic being utilized in Canada anymore. You see, it was never about the environment and climate crisis change at all. It was all just plain bullshit, just like covid. If the liberal party were serious about the climate crisis, then the last thing that they would be wanting to do is bring in more new immigrants by the hundreds of thousands every year. 

And my personal conspiracy belief is that this is a part of the WEF globalists plan, with the help of WEF students Trudeau and Freeland, to eliminate as many white folk as they can here in Canada. I can believe it. Can you?  

[herbie]

[August1991]

On 3/23/2024 at 12:58 PM, CdnFox said:

No we didn't. You posted that before and i've posted information that says that's not accurate - i asked you then for your source.. Do you have one now?

Source? The federal census of 1891, 1901, 1911 and 1921.

1. Between 1890-1920, Canada received more immigrants than it has ever received in its history - both in absolute terms and in relative terms.

2. Australia is a large island. Immigrants to Canada frequently move south.

3. The larger question is how to bring humans into the modern world.  

 

[August1991]

Between 1880 and 1920, many foreigners were arriving in Canada.

But many Quebecers were moving south.

=====

Canada used to be the US immigration system. Australia is different.

[August1991]

On 3/22/2024 at 1:51 PM, CdnFox said:

....

It's like justin WANTS to destroy the liberal party AND canada

In 1896, Wilfrid Laurier was the sole francophone at the cabinet table.

But there was also Clifford Sifton. 

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, August1991 said:

Source? The federal census of 1891, 1901, 1911 and 1921.

 

that doesn't seem accurate. You appear to be in error. Post a link that shows what you're looking at and we'll go from there.

 

1 hour ago, August1991 said:

Between 1880 and 1920, many foreigners were arriving in Canada.

But many Quebecers were moving south.

=====

Canada used to be the US immigration system. Australia is different.

Again - not really useful.

1 hour ago, August1991 said:

In 1896, Wilfrid Laurier was the sole francophone at the cabinet table.

But there was also Clifford Sifton. 

Yes, we know you're an 1diot, there's no need to hammer it home.

[August1991]

Canada, North America, is a large place.

Of course, federal Canada would be a different place if Clifford Sifton had never been a minister.

====

In the 1800s, while Catholic French women were having numerous children, kids looking for a better place to live, Sifton forbid them to live in western Canada.

In the US New England nowadays, western Ontario, so many Quebec family names. 

Edited March 27 by August1991

[CdnFox]

16 minutes ago, August1991 said:

Canada, North America, is a large place.

Of course, federal Canada would be a different place if Clifford Sifton had never been a minister.

====

In the 1800s, while Catholic French women were having numerous children, kids looking for a better place to live, Sifton forbid them to live in western Canada.

In the US New England nowadays, western Ontario, so many Quebec family names. 

Cool story kid.

[August1991]

On 3/27/2024 at 12:33 AM, CdnFox said:

Cool story kid.

Successful (sustainable) societies do not have a chip on the shoulder.

[CdnFox]

2 hours ago, August1991 said:

Successful (sustainable) societies do not have a chip on the shoulder.

Intelligent sane people do not make rambling nonsense posts as you do .

So there you go.

[Goddess]

The rumor is that India emptied their prisons and sent them to Canada:

 

 

[CdnFox]

46 minutes ago, Goddess said:

The rumor is that India emptied their prisons and sent them to Canada:

 

 

Translation:  "We ALL know what we've been doing and relying on is stupid but we did it anyway and are shocked at the result". 

That's the liberals in a nutshell. 

[Five of swords]

On 3/22/2024 at 1:51 PM, CdnFox said:

https://www.forexlive.com/news/canada-just-posted-its-fastest-two-month-immigration-in-history-what-happens-next-20240321/

 

 

So - the bottom line is we have a growth problem.  And interestingly if you put the rise in housing prices up against this graph since 2015 they look pretty similar.

The housing problem is already severe but in 2023 housing starts went DOWN. And this immigration is going to continue at about this level for at least this year and most of next.

 

So by the end of 2024/2025 i bet we're still wrestling with serious inflation issues as well as severe shortages of housing and increasing rental rates.

It's like justin WANTS to destroy the liberal party AND canada

Sounds like you are just afraid of change.

[CdnFox]

4 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Sounds like you are just afraid of change.

Sounds like you are butthurt having wound up looking the fool for your hitler hero worship and now are making crap up to massage your ego. 

Where did i say anywhere that i'm afraid of change, or even comment on change in the slightest?

[Five of swords]

19 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Sounds like you are butthurt having wound up looking the fool for your hitler hero worship and now are making crap up to massage your ego. 

Where did i say anywhere that i'm afraid of change, or even comment on change in the slightest?

Well...in your op you suggested immigration will destroy Canada.

 

No, it will simply change canada.

 

Canada used to be a white country. Soon, it will not be a white country. Probably, thanks to immigration, we can look forward to a future where there will be no white people in canada at all.

 

Is that what you mean by 'destroying canada'? Or is it just a change? Perhaps a change that many people welcome...

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, Five of swords said:

Well...in your op you suggested immigration will destroy Canada.

No, i suggested high inflation and severe shortages of housing would  destroy canada.  Go read it again. .

If you're referring to destroying canada as being 'change', i'm not really 'afraid' of it, i just think it's a bad idea. 

Quote

Canada used to be a white country. Soon, it will not be a white country. Probably, thanks to immigration, we can look forward to a future where there will be no white people in canada at all.

Rrrrriiiiiigggghhhtttt....   this is going back to your 'hitler' stuff isn't it. 

I'd worry less about the colour of the people and more about what people are going to do when they can't eat and have no place to live. 

Quote

Is that what you mean by 'destroying canada'?

No i pretty much mean the starving and homeless thing. High inflation and a serious lack of housing will breed a huge number of very dangerous problems for Canada. Last i checked pretty much all the races of people had to eat and find shelter. 

 

Quote

Or is it just a change? Perhaps a change that many people welcome...

Racist people might. That's the only people i can think of who care that much about the colour of the people who can't eat or live more than the fact the people can't eat or live.  

I guess seeing as you brought that up we know where you're sitting  on the 'racist' thing. 

Edited July 17 by CdnFox

[Five of swords]

9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No, i suggested high inflation and severe shortages of housing would  destroy canada.  Go read it again. .

If you're referring to destroying canada as being 'change', i'm not really 'afraid' of it, i just think it's a bad idea. 

Rrrrriiiiiigggghhhtttt....   this is going back to your 'hitler' stuff isn't it. 

I'd worry less about the colour of the people and more about what people are going to do when they can't eat and have no place to live. 

No i pretty much mean the starving and homeless thing. High inflation and a serious lack of housing will breed a huge number of very dangerous problems for Canada. Last i checked pretty much all the races of people had to eat and find shelter. 

 

Racist people might. That's the only people i can think of who care that much about the colour of the people who can't eat or live more than the fact the people can't eat or live.  

I guess seeing as you brought that up we know where you're sitting  on the 'racist' thing. 

Well you are being hysterical, then. Market vacillarions will not destroy Canada. In fact there are winners with elevated housing costs. You should have invested in rental property 20 years ago...then you would be doing quite well. Besides, it is a bit silly to blame this entirely on immigration. There are also foreign investors such as China who have bought up huge swaths of real estate.

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Five of swords said:

Well you are being hysterical, then.

Riiighhhtt. 

Quote

Market vacillarions will not destroy Canada. In fact there are winners with elevated housing costs

This isn't a 'market vacillation'. Housing for both rental and ownership is quickly moving outside of affordability for a large part of the population and it's getting worse. If you're spending more than 30 percent of your income on housing you're in  real trouble financially.  The only way people are avoiding that is living at home longer and living in much more crowded circumstances with friends etc. And the problem is still getting worse.  And there's very few 'winners'. And because our overall economy suffers really everyone loses. 

I realize you're new. And stupid.  But a lot of stories and discussions and data have already been posted and had here regarding this.  We are currently at about  a million fewer homes than we should have as of about 2022 and the problem is getting worse at an accelerating speed.

Quote

You should have invested in rental property 20 years ago...then you would be doing quite well

Ummm... who told you i didn't?

But that doesn't change the fact that canada as a whole is facing a very real crisis. I personally am doing great but even so if the country goes to crap everyone suffers. You're kind of a short sighted little guy aren't you. 

Quote

Besides, it is a bit silly to blame this entirely on immigration. There are also foreign investors such as China who have bought up huge swaths of real estate.

makes no difference. 

Obviously you're not terribly educated on such investments but lets walk you through the basics. 

There are very very few vacant homes. This has been looked into across canada and some areas have even brought in taxes and such to discourage it.

There's a small amount of 'money laundering' purchases but those have diminished as well.

The vast majority of foreign purchases are for rental.  Which means investors are buying them thinking a) they can get high rent or b) they will go up in value substantially over time. 

The only reason they can rent them at high rates is there isn't enough. People will pay huge money just to have a place because places are very hard to find.  And the only reason they think the properties will go up in value is  there aren't enough homes to buy for the number of buyers.  People will pay every cent the can afford to get into a home because there's not enough. 

So if every single foreign owned home was suddenly owned by a Canadian - there would be  no difference. There still wouldn't be enough rental properties and that would keep prices high, and there still woudln't be enough for ownership which keeps those prices high and forces people to rent. 

So the percentage of foreign ownership makes absolutely zero difference to the cost of rent or owning a home. If we had enough homes, then the cost of rental and of purchase of housing would be substantially lower and it wouldn't matter where the ownership was. If a foreign investor bought a home and tried to charge too much rent then people would simply rent elsewhere or buy their own

Hope that cleared it up for you

[Five of swords]

10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Riiighhhtt. 

This isn't a 'market vacillation'. Housing for both rental and ownership is quickly moving outside of affordability for a large part of the population and it's getting worse. If you're spending more than 30 percent of your income on housing you're in  real trouble financially.  The only way people are avoiding that is living at home longer and living in much more crowded circumstances with friends etc. And the problem is still getting worse.  And there's very few 'winners'. And because our overall economy suffers really everyone loses. 

I realize you're new. And stupid.  But a lot of stories and discussions and data have already been posted and had here regarding this.  We are currently at about  a million fewer homes than we should have as of about 2022 and the problem is getting worse at an accelerating speed.

Ummm... who told you i didn't?

But that doesn't change the fact that canada as a whole is facing a very real crisis. I personally am doing great but even so if the country goes to crap everyone suffers. You're kind of a short sighted little guy aren't you. 

makes no difference. 

Obviously you're not terribly educated on such investments but lets walk you through the basics. 

There are very very few vacant homes. This has been looked into across canada and some areas have even brought in taxes and such to discourage it.

There's a small amount of 'money laundering' purchases but those have diminished as well.

The vast majority of foreign purchases are for rental.  Which means investors are buying them thinking a) they can get high rent or b) they will go up in value substantially over time. 

The only reason they can rent them at high rates is there isn't enough. People will pay huge money just to have a place because places are very hard to find.  And the only reason they think the properties will go up in value is  there aren't enough homes to buy for the number of buyers.  People will pay every cent the can afford to get into a home because there's not enough. 

So if every single foreign owned home was suddenly owned by a Canadian - there would be  no difference. There still wouldn't be enough rental properties and that would keep prices high, and there still woudln't be enough for ownership which keeps those prices high and forces people to rent. 

So the percentage of foreign ownership makes absolutely zero difference to the cost of rent or owning a home. If we had enough homes, then the cost of rental and of purchase of housing would be substantially lower and it wouldn't matter where the ownership was. If a foreign investor bought a home and tried to charge too much rent then people would simply rent elsewhere or buy their own

Hope that cleared it up for you

I don't see you saying anything which suggests canada is about to be destroyed, lol. So a lot of people are facing economic hardship. Why should I give a rat's fart about those people?

 

The bottom line is that without mass immigration, Canada might continue to be a majority white country. That is unthinkable to our elite. If there are growing pains involved with this transformation, then oh well.

 

It isn't going to destroy canada. Canada is doing a fine job performing its one job, which is a genocidal project against white people.