Tucker's Interview With Putin

[WestCanMan]

13 hours ago, Black Dog said:

They're your guys! You believe the same stuff! Name on thing you disagree with them about other than "Putin should get to f**k Ukraine." Just one.

STFU you God-damned loser. 

You're the one who supports Nazis, don't try to drag me down to your level, scumbag. 

[WestCanMan]

22 hours ago, robosmith said:

And yet there is at least one Jew posting here (that I know of) defending Ukraine's fight for freedom.

I never know if you're just here to prove how stupid you are or if you're an actual leftard.

FYI no one denies that Ukrainians have a right to fight for their freedom. I'll state my open admiration for people who join the military to protect Pakistan, Iran, NoKo, China, Botswana, Peru, New Zealand or any other place on earth. 

If Ukrainians feel like their best long-term option moving fwd is to join NATO then that's exactly what they should strive to do I guess. Just know that Russia has every right to fight to prevent that if that's what they think is right. 

There's no international law that says "you have to wait to be attacked in order to lawfully be involved in a war". It makes perfect sense for Russia to do what they can to prevent NATO from arriving on their doorstep. I understand exactly what that means for Russians even I can't explain it to a CNN sycophant like you. 

Your refusal to acknowledge that is just a reflection of your own basic stupidity, credulity and ignorance. If you agreed with me I'd honestly question everything I thought I knew. 

[OftenWrong]

23 hours ago, robosmith said:

And yet there is at least one Jew posting here (that I know of) defending Ukraine's fight for freedom.

Maybe the Azov's are not advocating Hitler's NAZI policies. 💡

Unlike the neo-NAZIS here in America.

You are keeping track of the Jews here now?

[Black Dog]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

STFU you God-damned loser. 

You're the one who supports Nazis, don't try to drag me down to your level, scumbag. 

LOL I don't support Nazis, I share none of their beliefs. The Venn digram between you and these neo Nazis is practically a circle.

[Black Dog]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

I never know if you're just here to prove how stupid you are or if you're an actual leftard.

FYI no one denies that Ukrainians have a right to fight for their freedom. I'll state my open admiration for people who join the military to protect Pakistan, Iran, NoKo, China, Botswana, Peru, New Zealand or any other place on earth. 

If Ukrainians feel like their best long-term option moving fwd is to join NATO then that's exactly what they should strive to do I guess. Just know that Russia has every right to fight to prevent that if that's what they think is right. 

There's no international law that says "you have to wait to be attacked in order to lawfully be involved in a war". It makes perfect sense for Russia to do what they can to prevent NATO from arriving on their doorstep. I understand exactly what that means for Russians even I can't explain it to a CNN sycophant like you. 

Your refusal to acknowledge that is just a reflection of your own basic stupidity, credulity and ignorance. If you agreed with me I'd honestly question everything I thought I knew. 

LMAO you truly have pudding for brains.

Article 2(4) of the UN Charter states “all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court holds the crime of aggression as one of its four core crimes along with genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes.Granted Russia is not party to the Rome Statutes, but the crime obviously exists under international law.

[Aristides]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Well that's not really true.  That's not a journaists job. They ask questions.  And they may ask follow up questions but they don't decide the truth and then tell the interviewee what the answer is.  I think you're thinking of "jeopardy".

 

Then why have an interviewer at all, just hand Putin the mic and come back in a couple of hours when he is finished.

If an interviewer doesn't question inaccuracies he is validating them himself.

Edited February 11, 2024 by Aristides

[WestCanMan]

10 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

LOL I don't support Nazis, I share none of their beliefs. The Venn digram between you and these neo Nazis is practically a circle.

The Nazi symbol is probably carved into your chest.

[WestCanMan]

16 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

LMAO you truly have pudding for brains.

It's ironic that you say than, and then go on to prove that you have sh1t for brains.

Quote

Article 2(4) of the UN Charter states “all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

Just out of curiosity, what does the first part of that sentence mean to you, halfwit?

Do you think it means: "“all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State"?

Is the "threat of" part silent? Or do you think it's there for a reason, dummy?

Do you think it means that they're not supposed to threaten force? 

If Canada told the USA at 8am tomorrow that we're just about to sign a military pact with Russia, NoKo, Iran and China, do you think that would - in any way - constitute a threat to the USA? 

Should the USA just be cozy with the knowledge that all of those countries could put military bases along the 49th parallel?

I can promise you that Canada - as a sovereign state - would instantly become a memory. We would have to have all of our flags down by noon. 

Edited February 11, 2024 by WestCanMan

[Hodad]

1 hour ago, WestCanMan said:

It's ironic that you say than, and then go on to prove that you have sh1t for brains.

Just out of curiosity, what does the first part of that sentence mean to you, halfwit?

Do you think it means: "“all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State"?

Is the "threat of" part silent? Or do you think it's there for a reason, dummy?

Do you think it means that they're not supposed to threaten force? 

If Canada told the USA at 8am tomorrow that we're just about to sign a military pact with Russia, NoKo, Iran and China, do you think that would - in any way - constitute a threat to the USA? 

Should the USA just be cozy with the knowledge that all of those countries could put military bases along the 49th parallel?

I can promise you that Canada - as a sovereign state - would instantly become a memory. We would have to have all of our flags down by noon. 

One's neighbor joining a defensive alliance opposed to one's own objectives constitutes a geopolitical setback, not a threat. 

What you're saying is that if your nextdoor neighbor joins the neighborhood watch and you don't like that (because you might want to commit a few crimes), it's right and fair for you to burn his house down. That's bullshit. 

Ukraine simply joining NATO--which it hasn't even done--would make it part of a defensive pact. The ONLY way that inconveniences Putin is that the country he planned to attack anyway would have allies to come to its defense.

NATO is not a threat to Russia, Russians, their territory or sovereignty. There is no offensive alliance. It's a "threat' to Putin's expansionist ambition. And nowhere outside of conspiracy fever-brained Putin ass kissers does that provide a moral or legal justification to attack Ukraine.

Edited February 11, 2024 by Hodad

[CdnFox]

38 minutes ago, Hodad said:

One's neighbor joining a defensive alliance opposed to one's own objectives constitutes a geopolitical setback, not a threat. 

Says who?  Will they be asking you your opinion do you think?

"This alliance will put miltiary arms directly on our northern border and as we in this room all agree that is an existential threat that we cannot.....  wait.... wait just a moment, we're just now hearing from Hodad. He's advising that everything's fine, it's just a setback.  Stand down men!

While i disagree with @WestCanMan with regards to a number of issues with the ukraine war, there can be no doubt that depending on the nature of the agreement the US would see it as an immediate and existential threat.  Look at how they reacted to cuba, and that's a tiny bit of land with a sea in between.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

One's neighbor joining a defensive alliance opposed to one's own objectives constitutes a geopolitical setback, not a threat. 

🤣 Was it a threat when Russia put 120,000 troops on Ukraine's order, or a threat? 

Quote

What you're saying is that if your nextdoor neighbor joins the neighborhood watch and you don't like that (because you might want to commit a few crimes), it's right and fair for you to burn his house down. That's bullshit. 

^That^ was bullshit, stupid. 

Quote

Ukraine simply joining NATO--which it hasn't even done--would make it part of a defensive pact. The ONLY way that inconveniences Putin is that the country he planned to attack anyway would have allies to come to its defense.

OHhhhhhhh, that's just an aggressive defence. My bad. 

Quote

NATO is not a threat to Russia, Russians, their territory or sovereignty. There is no offensive alliance. It's a "threat' to Putin's expansionist ambition. And nowhere outside of conspiracy fever-brained Putin ass kissers does that provide a moral or legal justification to attack Ukraine.

How stupid are you, really? 

Are you sure that there's nothing that you can add to make that sound dumber?

Maybe say "NATO wants to go there to trade perogy and cabbage roll recipes between Poland and Ukraine."

 

 

v

[Hodad]

27 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

🤣 Was it a threat when Russia put 120,000 troops on Ukraine's order, or a threat? 

^That^ was bullshit, stupid. 

OHhhhhhhh, that's just an aggressive defence. My bad. 

How stupid are you, really? 

Are you sure that there's nothing that you can add to make that sound dumber?

Maybe say "NATO wants to go there to trade perogy and cabbage roll recipes between Poland and Ukraine."

 

 

v

If you were half as interested in thinking through an issue as you are at (ironic) insults, you might learn a thing or two. Instead, you'll just parrot Putin's propaganda like a good little bot. 

"Aggressive defense"? That's nonsense. NATO doesn't "go" anywhere. 

There's probably no amount of repeating that will penetrate your conspiracy fever brain, but NATO is a defensive alliance. If Finland suddenly decided to attack Russia, it would not trigger any NATO help. 

Again, the ONLY way that NATO is a "threat"  to Putin is that it's an impediment to his expansionist ambitions.

Edited February 12, 2024 by Hodad

[CdnFox]

9 minutes ago, Hodad said:

 

"Aggressive defense"? That's nonsense. NATO doesn't "go" anywhere. 

.

wellll......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NATO_operations

Most are peacekeeping but there's a few hostiles in there as well and nato often works 'unofficially' in wars like iraq or afghanistan as 'allies'.

My favorite is "Operation Deliberate Force"     I mean, what a giveaway

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, QuebecOverCanada said:

We all know WMD were a false pretext to enter the war. Jean Chretien and Jacques Chirac saw through the bullsh*t propaganda.

Everyone knew it when the WMD was not found. Duh

How did anyone KNOW before the invasion?

Having suspicions or GUESSING is NOT KNOWING.

Unless you're a host on FOS LIES. 🤮

[robosmith]

7 hours ago, QuebecOverCanada said:

He's got his ideas of journalism from watching CNN, pardon his ignorance.

Maybe he would be anti-war if the host of his morning show displayed in his old-age residence TV changed sides.

You don't know WTF you're talking about, which is why you're talking out of your ass and spreading BULLSHIT.

Thanks for demonstrating your COMPLETE IGNORANCE.

 

[OftenWrong]

6 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Everyone knew it when the WMD was not found. Duh

How did anyone KNOW before the invasion?

Having suspicions or GUESSING is NOT KNOWING.

Unless you're a host on FOS LIES. 🤮

Colin Powell already knew. I saw it in the movie 'Dubya'...

[CdnFox]

35 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

Colin Powell already knew. I saw it in the movie 'Dubya'...

The shadow knew. The shadow always knows.

[August1991]

You Americans remind me of Shirley Valentine.

I talk of spring, and they talk of autumn.

And then, you're no longer talking of seasons. You're talking about what they want.

====

Clueless.

 

[Black Dog]

17 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

It's ironic that you say than, and then go on to prove that you have sh1t for brains.

Just out of curiosity, what does the first part of that sentence mean to you, halfwit?

Do you think it means: "“all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State"?

Is the "threat of" part silent? Or do you think it's there for a reason, dummy?

Do you think it means that they're not supposed to threaten force? 

If Canada told the USA at 8am tomorrow that we're just about to sign a military pact with Russia, NoKo, Iran and China, do you think that would - in any way - constitute a threat to the USA? 

Should the USA just be cozy with the knowledge that all of those countries could put military bases along the 49th parallel?

I can promise you that Canada - as a sovereign state - would instantly become a memory. We would have to have all of our flags down by noon. 

So to be clear: you believe anyone can decide that something is a threat to them by their own definition of the term, regardless of any concrete, demonstrable danger and instigate a military conflict accordingly. The brave freedom fighters of Khamas thank you for your endorsement!

[Aristides]

13 hours ago, robosmith said:

Everyone knew it when the WMD was not found. Duh

How did anyone KNOW before the invasion?

Having suspicions or GUESSING is NOT KNOWING.

Unless you're a host on FOS LIES. 🤮

UN inspectors were saying there were no WMD's right up to the day the war started. I can understand going into Afghanistan after 9/11 but the Iraq invasion was manufactured, but then so is Putin's invasion of Ukraine.

[Hodad]

30 minutes ago, Aristides said:

UN inspectors were saying there were no WMD's right up to the day the war started. I can understand going into Afghanistan after 9/11 but the Iraq invasion was manufactured, but then so is Putin's invasion of Ukraine.

All true. -- My position at the time was that even if Iraq was developing or in possession of WMDs, it was improper grounds for an invasion rather than working through a more formal international process. Sure, nobody wanted Iraq to have WMDs, but if you can rationalize simply invading anyone who does something you don't like/want then there is no international order.   

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Black Dog said:

So to be clear: you believe anyone can decide that something is a threat to them by their own definition of the term, regardless of any concrete, demonstrable danger and instigate a military conflict accordingly.

No, not at all.

Just realize that anything you read will be filtered through your hapless little brainwashed noodle before it oozes back out, therefor it will inevitably be twisted into unrecognizable garbage.

FYI there are two recent historical examples of what happened in other modernized countries when they were in Russia's situation:

1. When Kennedy found out that there were missiles 1,400km away, across the Atlantic, in little Cuba, he almost started WWIII: he put a naval blockade around a sovereign nation and depth-charged Russian subs in international waters. By comparison Ukraine is 0 km away and shares a 3,000-km border with Russia and Belarus. Russia faces a far greater threat from all of NATO being 0 km away in Ukraine than the US faced from distant, tiny Cuba 🤣.
2. When NATO and Warsaw Pact faced each other in E & W Germany there were over 10M soldiers along that fault line. Thousands of tanks, fighters, artillery pieces and choppers, plus massive stockpiles of WMDs were jammed into that small area. German students growing up at that time received more NBCD (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical Defence) training by the time they were in grade 3 than members of the Canadian military would receive in their whole careers. If NATO moves into Ukraine then Russian children will grow up facing the spectre of being gassed or infected or nuked for generations. Only a huge a-hole like you could be oblivious to something like that. 

Everything you say is just really ignorant and uninformed, little doggy. You just embarrass yourself here. You should just keep your mouth shut and make people guess how stupid you are. Honestly, you'd be better off just posting this:

Black Dog wuz heer!

[Black Dog]

11 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

No, not at all.

Just realize that anything you read will be filtered through your hapless little brainwashed noodle before it oozes back out, therefor it will inevitably be twisted into unrecognizable garbage.

FYI there are two recent historical examples of what happened in other modernized countries when they were in Russia's situation:

1. When Kennedy found out that there were missiles 1,400km away, across the Atlantic, in little Cuba, he almost started WWIII: he put a naval blockade around a sovereign nation and depth-charged Russian subs in international waters. By comparison Ukraine is 0 km away and shares a 3,000-km border with Russia and Belarus. Russia faces a far greater threat from all of NATO being 0 km away in Ukraine than the US faced from distant, tiny Cuba 🤣.
2. When NATO and Warsaw Pact faced each other in E & W Germany there were over 10M soldiers along that fault line. Thousands of tanks, fighters, artillery pieces and choppers, plus massive stockpiles of WMDs were jammed into that small area. German students growing up at that time received more NBCD (Nuclear, Biological, Chemical Defence) training by the time they were in grade 3 than members of the Canadian military would receive in their whole careers. If NATO moves into Ukraine then Russian children will grow up facing the spectre of being gassed or infected or nuked for generations. Only a huge a-hole like you could be oblivious to something like that. 

Everything you say is just really ignorant and uninformed, little doggy. You just embarrass yourself here. You should just keep your mouth shut and make people guess how stupid you are. Honestly, you'd be better off just posting this:

Black Dog wuz heer!

Neither of those situations are remotely analogous to Russia's you ******. No missiles within striking distance, no troop build ups, nothing but the prospect of Ukraine putting pen to paper.

The day your family finally puts a pillow over your face and holds it there will be a great one for all of us.

Edited February 12, 2024 by Black Dog

[WestCanMan]

29 minutes ago, Black Dog said:

Neither of those situations are remotely analogous to Russia's you ******. No missiles within striking distance, no troop build ups, nothing but the prospect of Ukraine putting pen to paper.

The day your family finally puts a pillow over your face and holds it there will be a great one for all of us.

Thanks, stupid.

I'm sure that Russians will sleep easier knowing they have Black Dog's guarantee that NATO won't put any extra troops or missiles in Ukraine. 

That's way better than having America's assurance that NATO won't move east past Germany. Your word carries more weight than that of the US gov't. 

[Black Dog]

29 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Thanks, stupid.

I'm sure that Russians will sleep easier knowing they have Black Dog's guarantee that NATO won't put any extra troops or missiles in Ukraine. 

That's way better than having America's assurance that NATO won't move east past Germany. Your word carries more weight than that of the US gov't. 

Oh you're one of those dummies. One question: how does Putin's dick taste?