robosmith Posted October 6, 2023 Report Posted October 6, 2023 13 minutes ago, Deluge said: Leftism is cancer. Say, what are you dipsh*ts doing with all those windmill blades when they expire? They will be RECYCLED. And they are WIND TURBINES. Duh Quote Are wind turbine blades recycled? They can mostly be recycled at the end of this working life and have increasingly been made from reused materials that have already been recycled. The blades are made from different materials, most of which is fibreglass. The average blade on a typical onshore wind turbine measures around 165ft (50m) in length. Quote
Aristides Posted October 6, 2023 Report Posted October 6, 2023 Expect this guy to be called to testify and probably some of the people he told. This might not have relevance to these particular charges but will demonstrate that Trump cannot be trusted with classified information. Obviously Biden did the right thing when he removed Trump from the WH briefing list. Quote
CdnFox Posted October 6, 2023 Report Posted October 6, 2023 2 hours ago, Rebound said: Yes, this is true. But unforgivable conduct for a guy who ran for President on a platform of protecting classified information. Trump never ran on that platform. I think he did say he woudln't run a mail server or the like, which he didn't. You kids just make up whatever as you go don't you Quote
herbie Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 Did you know that a dog can obtain more real information just by sniffing another dog's ass than a Republican can watching four years of Fox News? 2 Quote
Aristides Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 7 minutes ago, CdnFox said: Trump never ran on that platform. I think he did say he woudln't run a mail server or the like, which he didn't. You kids just make up whatever as you go don't you So he ran on a platform of not protecting classified information? If so, that is one campaign promise he kept. Quote
CdnFox Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 15 minutes ago, herbie said: Did you know that a dog can obtain more real information just by sniffing another dog's ass than a Republican can watching four years of Fox News? Sounds more like you're trying to excuse your ass sniffing fetish with trump Were you hoping to learn state secrets or something? 12 minutes ago, Aristides said: So he ran on a platform of not protecting classified information? If so, that is one campaign promise he kept. So, your knowledge of politics is that if someone DOESN"T run on something then he automatically runs on the opposite? Actually - that explains a lot about you LOL Quote
Deluge Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 4 hours ago, robosmith said: They will be RECYCLED. That's what ALL the liars say. Check this out, pronouns: Quote
Deluge Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 4 hours ago, robosmith said: I am honored by the attention you've given me, but it is rendered meaningless by ^this STUPIDITY. You keep demonstrating why you have NO CREDIBILITY. :applause: You should be honored. I'm helping see how stupid the left really is. Stay tuned; there is SO much more to come. Quote
CdnFox Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 4 hours ago, robosmith said: I am honored by the attention you've given me, but it is rendered meaningless by ^this STUPIDITY. So your stupidity renders meaningless his attention? I disagree - it's always fun to point and laugh at you and honestly you're extreme stupidity makes it even funnier. Quote
BeaverFever Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 17 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Are you trying to say Biden nuked someone? Was it an enemy at least? Please tell me he didn't nuke Germany or Japan... he knows WWII is over, right? Even in his worst senior moments, Biden is a “stable genius” compared to the unhinged and petulant simpleton Trump that you worship. 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 3 hours ago, BeaverFever said: Even in his worst senior moments, Biden is a “stable genius” compared to the unhinged and petulant simpleton Trump that you worship. There is no moment when biden is stable or a genius in his worst moments he's basically a brick. 1 Quote
Aristides Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 Let me get this straight. According to the Trump cult, anything their hero didn't run on is acceptable, including blabbing classified information to his guests. Sound about right? Quote
CdnFox Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 3 minutes ago, Aristides said: Let me get this straight. According to the Trump cult, anything their hero didn't run on is acceptable, including blabbing classified information to his guests. Sound about right? And yet again we see how fast the left is prepared to lie to defend their position. This poster is legendary for making up bullshit. The left - "TRUMP RAN ON THAT!!!" sane people - "no, he didn't." The left - "SO THAT MEANS YOU"RE SAYING IT"S OK?!?!?!" Nobody said anything like that. But the claim he ran on it is false. He didn't run on "Promising not to rape anyone while in office" either and nobody would say it was ok if he did - like clinton did But if you claim he ran on it, you would be told ' no, he didn't' Quote
Aristides Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 (edited) 8 minutes ago, CdnFox said: And yet again we see how fast the left is prepared to lie to defend their position. This poster is legendary for making up bullshit. The left - "TRUMP RAN ON THAT!!!" sane people - "no, he didn't." The left - "SO THAT MEANS YOU"RE SAYING IT"S OK?!?!?!" Nobody said anything like that. But the claim he ran on it is false. He didn't run on "Promising not to rape anyone while in office" either and nobody would say it was ok if he did - like clinton did But if you claim he ran on it, you would be told ' no, he didn't' So, yes. https://www.courthousenews.com/donald-trump-loses-civil-rape-trial-ordered-to-pay-5-million/ Edited October 7, 2023 by Aristides Quote
WestCanMan Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 3 hours ago, BeaverFever said: Even in his worst senior moments, Biden is a “stable genius” compared to the unhinged and petulant simpleton Trump that you worship. TBH, I don't even know if you're dumb enough to believe that or if you're just lying like a good little leftist stooge again. The "unhinged and petulant stooge" that you're talking about got through 4 years of his presidency without starting any wars (first president since Carter - you're probably too young to even remember him), hardly any US servicemen died, he brought stability to the ME that that we had never seen in our lifetimes, and the American economy was booming until the left's covid fiasco. In Biden's "worst senior moments" he doesn't know where he is and he can't speak English. In a room full of politicians and friendlies, he talks to curtains. There's a person at the WH now whose job description is "Interrupt and abruptly end press conferences when the president forgets what he's talking about mid-sentence, or goes into mumble mode and can't recover". Don't you want to just say one intelligent, decent, honest thing in your life? It doesn't even make sense that you're "a concerned citizen from the western world" anymore. The only thing that makes sense now is if you're an agent provocateur from a hostile nation, just trying to push as many destructive narratives as you can. Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
CdnFox Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 33 minutes ago, Aristides said: So, yes. https://www.courthousenews.com/donald-trump-loses-civil-rape-trial-ordered-to-pay-5-million/ So no, And as it turns out you're once again up to your old tricks of lying. Why can't you just learn to tell the truth? https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-donald-trump-found-guilty-rape-1799935 The civil claim is for battery, not rape," he added. "The jury found that Donald Trump battered E. Jean Carroll. And Ms. Carroll was able to fit within the new statute of limitation even without proving rape." So, we can establish that Trump was not found "guilty" of rape as he was not criminally charged, nor was he found liable for rape. Further, the civil claim was on a battery tort but brought forward using an extension of the statute of limitations for crimes including rape. Sigh. If you have to lie to make your point, you haven't got a very good point. And now that i've shown that you were completely full of shit with your accusation, i imagine your next step will be to claim that this proves i'm pro rape or some equally stupid thing. Quote
Aristides Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 The jury found he sexually abused and defamed her. But this is the kind of hair splitting the Trump cult is forced to resort to in order to justify any abuse he commits. Quote
CdnFox Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 49 minutes ago, Aristides said: The jury found he sexually abused and defamed her. But this is the kind of hair splitting the Trump cult is forced to resort to in order to justify any abuse he commits. Sure - defamation is the same as rape right? But that's the kind of lie the Trump Haters are forced to resort to. You lied. Trump was never accused of or convicted of rape. Period. Ever. Once again you prove to be a lying sack of shit and for no better reason than you can't control your hatred of a person who doesn't affect your life and who hasn't done or even been charged with a quarter of the things you lunatics insist has. I thought i was on your ignore list? Go back to playing with your barbie dolls troll. Quote
Aristides Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 (edited) He was convicted of sexual assault in a civil case. "Grab them by the pu ssy" isn't rape but it is sexual assault. Edited October 7, 2023 by Aristides Quote
WestCanMan Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 10 minutes ago, Aristides said: The jury found he sexually abused and defamed her. But this is the kind of hair splitting the Trump cult is forced to resort to in order to justify any abuse he commits. It was beyond their scope to say that "he raped her", it wasn't a criminal trial. Also, your article falsely claims that the incident happened in 1996: Caroll doesn't actually recall what year the incident allegedly happened. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/07/02/what-you-need-know-e-jean-carroll-allegation-new-book-out/1621645001/ Quote While leaving Bergdorf Goodman, a posh Manhattan department store, in either the fall of 1995 or the spring of 1996, Carroll wrote that she encountered Trump. FYI that's not "1996". I don't know if she changed her story for the anti-Trump audience, trial rather, but she did not accuse Trump of raping her "in 1996". Here's more: Quote He told her that he was looking to buy a present for a "girl" and asked for the advice columnist to advise him, she wrote. She pointed out handbags and hats, but Trump pointed out lingerie and asked Carroll to try on a piece, she said. After going into a dressing room, Carroll claimed, Trump forced himself on her. Was she going into the dressing room to try on "handbags and hats"? I don't know anyone who'd do that, so by her own admission she was going to the change room to model lingerie for him. And who was he, again? Quote She said she greeted him as "that real-estate tycoon," and he greeted her as "that advice lady." He was just "that real-estate tycoon": she didn't even know him. Yet there she was modelling lingerie for him in a dept store. Quote "The moment the dressing-room door is closed, he lunges at me, pushes me against the wall, hitting my head quite badly, and puts his mouth against my lips," Carroll wrote. So he came in there with no objections from her, then he got aggressive...? It just keep getting better. E Jean Caroll is at the very best a self-confessed ho who went into the change room to model lingerie for a guy that she didn't even know 20 minutes earlier, who may have had her flytrap grabbed. If you just met a girl and twenty minutes later she was modelling lingerie for you, wouldn't you think that her cooter was up for grabs? Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
CdnFox Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 16 minutes ago, Aristides said: He was convicted of sexual assault in a civil case. "Grab them by the pu ssy" isn't rape but it is sexual assault. No ,he was not 'convicted' of sexual assault. He was found to be LIABLE for BATTERY. He wasn't convicted of ANYTHING and certainly not sexual assault. Obviously you don't think what he did was very wrong, otherwise you'd be fine with just pointing out what he ACTUALLY did - but instead you feel the need to lie and make up false 'Convictions" for things he was never charged with.. Where the hell were your parents when you were growing up? 1 Quote
Aristides Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 Quote On Tuesday, the Manhattan jury of nine men and three women found the former president liable for sexually abusing and defaming Carroll and awarded Carroll $5 million in damages. From the link WestCanMan posted. Those hairs you keep having to split keep getting finer. Quote
CdnFox Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 4 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: It was beyond their scope to say that "he raped her", it wasn't a criminal trial. Dude - she never even claimed he did in court. The only reason 'rape' or 'sexual assault' even was raised was so that they could take advantage of the new exemption for the statute of limitations. You lefties can say it with us.... never accused of rape or sexual assault. What the lawsuit found was that he was LIABLE for (not convicted of) a 'Battery" tort and defamation - not a sexual assault. I swear WestCanMan - i'm not even that much of a trump supporter but it seems lately like every day you and I have to spend our time correcting these nutbars who keep coming up with bullshit lies about what trump has said or done or what he was charged with. And they wonder why people don't believe them when they say "But THIS time he's REALLY guilty! Honest! We're super-cereal-serious this time!!! For realzies!!! 1 Quote
CdnFox Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 27 minutes ago, Aristides said: So, yes. https://www.courthousenews.com/donald-trump-loses-civil-rape-trial-ordered-to-pay-5-million/ So no, And as it turns out you're once again up to your old tricks of lying. Why can't you just learn to tell the truth? https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-was-donald-trump-found-guilty-rape-1799935 The civil claim is for battery, not rape," he added. "The jury found that Donald Trump battered E. Jean Carroll. And Ms. Carroll was able to fit within the new statute of limitation even without proving rape." So, we can establish that Trump was not found "guilty" of rape as he was not criminally charged, nor was he found liable for rape. Further, the civil claim was on a battery tort but brought forward using an extension of the statute of limitations for crimes including rape. Sigh. If you have to lie to make your point, you havent got a very good point. And now that i've shown that you were completely full of shit with your accusation, i imagine your next step will be to claim that this proves i'm pro rape or some equally stupid thing. Quote
CdnFox Posted October 7, 2023 Report Posted October 7, 2023 Just now, Aristides said: From the link WestCanMan posted. Those hairs you keep having to split keep getting finer. From the link i posted correcting that: So, we can establish that Trump was not found "guilty" of rape as he was not criminally charged, nor was he found liable for rape. Further, the civil claim was on a battery tort but brought forward using an extension of the statute of limitations for crimes including rape. The media (no shock) intitially reported it as rape and sex assault but that was NOT what the finding was for NOR was it what the suit alledged. And i showed you that - but you just have to continue to lie don't you. Here you go - CNN https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/09/politics/carroll-trump-jury-deliberations/index.html a federal jury finding the former president liable for battery and defamation You see the words sexual assault in there? No? Do you see the word 'convicted' in there? No? Are you going to try to claim cnn is a right wing website? Better not. Once again - you lie to try to support your position. You should have known the truth to begin with - you were then SHOWN the truth and you STILL continue to lie, Trump has NEVER been convicted of sexual assault and Carroll NEVER CLAIMED THAT in her suit. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.