Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
3 hours ago, Rebound said:

No, you are not allowed to have sex with a woman because she models underwear. 
 

On the basis of what you’re saying, Trump sexually assaulted this woman. 

No, on the basis of you don't like trump he sexually assaulted this woman.  In the real world that isn't what happened NOR is it what was claimed.
 

But in your world -  Trump must have raped her while selling secrets to the russians and planning an insurrection all at the same time. YEash.

Posted
6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

No, on the basis of you don't like trump he sexually assaulted this woman.  In the real world that isn't what happened NOR is it what was claimed.
 

But in your world -  Trump must have raped her while selling secrets to the russians and planning an insurrection all at the same time. YEash.

But he could have...right? You aren't limiting Trump to the intellectual level of these who followed him to the Capitol and despite him gearing them up and egging them on, even ordering them to attack the Capitol building guards with weapons and injuring many so he could stop the Peoples Vote in the Electoral college from officially telling him and the world he LOST even though he knew he lost and has even admitted he knew it and still kept up the PRETENSE ..letting more be hurt, even killed for WHAT!?! His damn bruised ego?  No...because he saw himself as a Dictator and promised his followers pardons and rewards if they helped him get there!  That's a CON MAN. A Crook , and yes, A Terrorist.  And if you are fool enough to still follow him, go ahead. Be that kind of fool. But just in case you think he thought of all this on his own...its obvious he doesn't have the brains to.  Its very obvious what his real plans were and who put him up to it. And...who funded a lot of it and is just waiting to see if those fools Trump calls his followers keep buying into the charade or his best puppet in America finally loses his strings for good. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Caswell Thomas said:

But he could have...right?

He could have therefore he's guilty?  Did you hit your head at all in the last 24 hours?

The rest of your gibberish was an incoherent run on sentence that lost it's cohesion in the first inch or two so i didn't bother replying to that.

In any case you seem to be pretty confused. Maybe have a sit and a think before you compose your next one. And if you find any one of your sentences is spanning more than 3 lines, might want to dial that back a bit.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Caswell Thomas said:

 But just in case you think he thought of all this on his own...its obvious he doesn't have the brains to.  Its very obvious what his real plans were and who put him up to it. 

Please enlighten

Posted
4 minutes ago, Legato said:

Please enlighten

Think about it....who would gain if our most top secret war plans were knowledgeable to them? Then, remember that Trump did not return all the classified highest level of documents even when his place was raided. Some are still missing. Who has tried for over 40 years to break through Americas strategic defenses?

Posted
3 minutes ago, Caswell Thomas said:

Think about it....who would gain if our most top secret war plans were knowledgeable to them? Then, remember that Trump did not return all the classified highest level of documents even when his place was raided. Some are still missing. Who has tried for over 40 years to break through Americas strategic defenses?

That's just in your head. You must be still looking for the Horcruxes

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Legato said:

That's just in your head. You must be still looking for the Horcruxes

You really need to post more. I've really been enjoying your stuff lately :)   some great humour in there

Posted
9 hours ago, CdnFox said:

You really need to post more. I've really been enjoying your stuff lately :)   some great humour in there

What’s your excuse for stacks and stacks of stolen ultra-classified nuclear secrets piled in cardboard boxes in a bathroom? 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Rebound said:

What’s your excuse for stacks and stacks of stolen ultra-classified nuclear secrets piled in cardboard boxes in a bathroom? 

What's your excuse for trying to change the subject?  I notice that you lefties do tend to do that.  "HE DID THIS!"  There's no proof of that.  "WELL HE ALSO DID THIS!"  There's insufficient proof of that as well, "BUT WHEN YOU PUT THE TWO TOGETHER...."

Yeah. not how law or logic works.  Trump's already facing charges for the documents, so we'll see what his defense is when it gets to court. I don't have an "excuse" to offer - making shit up instead of waiting and seeing what the facts are is a LEFTIES game, not mine.

However - in this case there's really next to no evidence to go on. So far anyway perhaps an investigation will produce more.

And i love how "Person makes unsubstantiated claim about trump = trump guilty whereas person makes fairly credible and demonstrable claims about biden = biden is totally innocent and those right wing conspiracy nuts are crazy!"  :) 

Posted
3 hours ago, Rebound said:

What’s your excuse for stacks and stacks of stolen ultra-classified nuclear secrets piled in cardboard boxes in a bathroom? 

Cmon man who doesn't have backup when one runs out of Royale Velour.

Posted
1 hour ago, CdnFox said:

What's your excuse for trying to change the subject?  I notice that you lefties do tend to do that.  "HE DID THIS!"  There's no proof of that.  "WELL HE ALSO DID THIS!"  There's insufficient proof of that as well, "BUT WHEN YOU PUT THE TWO TOGETHER...."

Yeah. not how law or logic works.  Trump's already facing charges for the documents, so we'll see what his defense is when it gets to court. I don't have an "excuse" to offer - making shit up instead of waiting and seeing what the facts are is a LEFTIES game, not mine.

However - in this case there's really next to no evidence to go on. So far anyway perhaps an investigation will produce more.

And i love how "Person makes unsubstantiated claim about trump = trump guilty whereas person makes fairly credible and demonstrable claims about biden = biden is totally innocent and those right wing conspiracy nuts are crazy!"  :) 

Actually, it’s not changing the subject at all. 
Trump STOLE AND REVEALED HIGHLY CLASSIFIED INFORMATION.  
 

So Trump didn’t simply retain classified information by accident. He retained it and he disclosed it to foreign nationals, who then disclosed it to others.  

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
Just now, Rebound said:

Actually, it’s not changing the subject at all. 

You totally changed the subject. The subject was trump's alleged giving of specific submarine secrets to a specific business individual. Secrets he would have had lawful access to.

You realized you lost that one and rather than be some sort of man about it you decided to go the weasel route and try to turn it into a discussion about him holding on to documents illegally.  Which has nothing to do with him verbally telling a businessman something, As you well know.

Pathetic. This is why fewer and fewer people take you anti-trump grumps seriously.  There isn't an honest bone in your bodies.

Posted
43 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

You totally changed the subject. The subject was trump's alleged giving of specific submarine secrets to a specific business individual. Secrets he would have had lawful access to.

You realized you lost that one and rather than be some sort of man about it you decided to go the weasel route and try to turn it into a discussion about him holding on to documents illegally.  Which has nothing to do with him verbally telling a businessman something, As you well know.

Pathetic. This is why fewer and fewer people take you anti-trump grumps seriously.  There isn't an honest bone in your bodies.

No, Trump disclosed these secrets after he left office. Trump did not have the legal authority to possess any classified documents and he didn’t have the legal authority to disclose classified information to anyone once he left office. 
 

Why is this so hard for you? 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Rebound said:

No, Trump disclosed these secrets after he left office.

There's no real evidence of that with regards to this case.  As i said - i know you lefties have a habit when you're losing of trying to push mulitple unproven things togethter to try to say it proves something but that's not how laws work

45 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Trump did not have the legal authority to possess any classified documents and he didn’t have the legal authority to disclose classified information to anyone once he left office. 
 

there's no evidence he had any documents regarding this case anything like that. It says"

"It does not appear that Mr. Trump showed Mr. Pratt any of the classified documents that he had been keeping at Mar-a-Lago. "

SO the accusation is that trump said something.  He may not have even had any documents involving submarines. IT may have been knowledge he got while president

The guy isn't named in the indictment or anything.

Quote

Why is this so hard for you? 

Sorry - i've never been great at understanding lying sacks of crap who can't get their story straight  so i find communicating with you difficult :)

Don't hate me just because the facts don't support your personal bias :) 

 

Posted
20 hours ago, Legato said:

That's just in your head. You must be still looking for the Horcruxes

Um..no...that's why we have U. S. Military on Ready Alert 24/7/365.  No imagination. Only Congress thinks we are in something they call The Peacetime. They call it that so they can con the Public into thinking they are all safe and secure, but actually, that isn't the case. Any veteran or active duty person  from an Operational Unit* ( *meaning the military member is not in a non combat unit)  can tell you there IS no Peacetime... America is only enjoying ( if you can call it that ) relative security because we have a strong military, aren't afraid to fight...and the entire U. S. Military since 27 January 1973 - are 100% All Volunteers. 

Posted
2 hours ago, Caswell Thomas said:

Um..no...that's why we have U. S. Military on Ready Alert 24/7/365.  No imagination. Only Congress thinks we are in something they call The Peacetime. They call it that so they can con the Public into thinking they are all safe and secure, but actually, that isn't the case. Any veteran or active duty person  from an Operational Unit* ( *meaning the military member is not in a non combat unit)  can tell you there IS no Peacetime... America is only enjoying ( if you can call it that ) relative security because we have a strong military, aren't afraid to fight...and the entire U. S. Military since 27 January 1973 - are 100% All Volunteers. 

Did you garner that information from the documents?

Posted
22 hours ago, Legato said:

Did you garner that information from the documents?

I can see from your response this subject disturbs you. My sources in this are from veterans organizations, some of which.might surprise you inasmuch as they are based in heavily leaning Far Right states. 

Posted
14 hours ago, Caswell Thomas said:

I can see from your response this subject disturbs you. My sources in this are from veterans organizations, some of which.might surprise you inasmuch as they are based in heavily leaning Far Right states. 

Oh look you're an expert at something else too.  :)

You understand why you've already got a major credibility problem right? So - if all you can offer is "i talked to secret people in blue states so you have to trust me on that"....  yeah, you're going to have to do a little better than that.

Posted
6 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Oh look you're an expert at something else too.  :)

You understand why you've already got a major credibility problem right? So - if all you can offer is "i talked to secret people in blue states so you have to trust me on that"....  yeah, you're going to have to do a little better than that.

Funny how you Trumpians all think you are the only ones with expert knowledge and backgrounds. Whatever *claimed * credibility problem you think I have will be easily debunked by reading my topics and responses,  and ignoring your drivel disparaging remarks which merely shows how will dried you are that your phoney baloney conspiracy stories won't fly against still another poster here on this Forum and that must be so troubling you, you resort to the Trumpians fallback position of insults and name calling. Well, that fallback position isn't helping Donald in Court, and for his railing outside of the Courtroom, no one believes him and no matter how hard he stamps his feet, no matter how he glares at people, no matter how loud and insulting he is, he knows The Jig is Up, he's been caught, his attempted coup dailed, his co conspirators and his civilian army of human drones failed to get him back in the White House and no matter what he says or does now...he's going to federal prison and he knows it, as will his co conspirators.  

Posted

Just had to put a towel under my monitor tp catch the heavy flow of TDS dripping down.

Posted
On 10/9/2023 at 7:21 PM, CdnFox said:

He could have therefore he's guilty?  Did you hit your head at all in the last 24 hours?

The rest of your gibberish was an incoherent run on sentence that lost it's cohesion in the first inch or two so i didn't bother replying to that.

In any case you seem to be pretty confused. Maybe have a sit and a think before you compose your next one. And if you find any one of your sentences is spanning more than 3 lines, might want to dial that back a bit.

O M G I wondered where the "Written English Nazi's"  moved to after Facebook and Twitter users ignored them....

Posted
2 hours ago, Caswell Thomas said:

Funny how you Trumpians all think you are the only ones with expert knowledge and backgrounds.

Actually none here so far have cliamed to be - YOU are the only one claiming to be an expert, and in many fields it would seem.

ANd it's funny how you lower thinkers believe that anyone who points out when you're lacking credibility is a 'trumpian'.  Oh well, at least you didn't call me a nazi i guess.

And your responses are what's causing your credibility gap.

Get your head together .

Posted
20 hours ago, CdnFox said:

Actually none here so far have cliamed to be - YOU are the only one claiming to be an expert, and in many fields it would seem.

ANd it's funny how you lower thinkers believe that anyone who points out when you're lacking credibility is a 'trumpian'.  Oh well, at least you didn't call me a nazi i guess.

And your responses are what's causing your credibility gap.

Get your head together .

Actually I don't have to call myself an expert very often inasmuch as I have numerous certificates stating same from relevant authorities in multiple fields, I did mention it in one if those fields ( insurance fraud defense and litigation prosecution) to show you that your line of thought in that area wouldn't stand up in court and all your railings wouldn't change that. If however you think that means I should now teach you how to use a Law Library and how to find applicable cited law and case law in any jurisdiction federal, state, municipal, burroughs, or other area, that you will have to study for yourself. Its a requirement in certain fields as well. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,855
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Hannani
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...