‘Lock Them Up’ Is Now the Republican Party’s Highest Goal

[ironstone]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

Not really. Are you bothered by ALL the stunts that Trump stages like using donor money for his legal expenses?

They are mostly advisors to traditional conservatives who have probably fallen on hard times because of MAGA.

Donald Trump should not be using donor money to pay his legal bills. It's wrong, period.

I think the Lincoln Project conservatives are ultra lite rino's.

[I am Groot]

15 hours ago, CdnFox said:

The democrats are currently ONLY fixated on "lock him up".   Zero policy, zero thought - in many cases zero crime, they tried to string together enough misdemenors to somehow equal a felony, like pushing together slivers of left over soap trying to make a new bar. 

Trump's former White House lawyer.

“I think this original indictment was engineered to last 1,000 years and now this superseding indictment will last an antiquity,” Cobb said during an interview with CNN's Erin Burnett Thursday night.

“This is such a tight case, the evidence is so overwhelming," he added.

https://www.axios.com/2023/07/28/trump-classified-documents-evidence-ty-cobb

Also, his former loyal attorney general

After a 37-count criminal indictment against Donald Trump was unsealed Friday, Trump’s former Attorney General Bill Barr said there is trouble ahead for the 2024 Republican presidential hopeful.

“If even half of it is true, then he’s toast,” Barr told “Fox News Sunday.” “It’s a very detailed indictment, and it’s very, very damning. And this idea of presenting Trump as a victim here, a victim of a witch hunt, is ridiculous.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/11/trump-indictment-is-very-very-damning-his-former-attorney-general-says.html

[Rebound]

4 hours ago, ironstone said:

Donald Trump should not be using donor money to pay his legal bills. It's wrong, period.

I think the Lincoln Project conservatives are ultra lite rino's.

The Lincoln Project conservatives just don’t buy into the cult of Donald Trump or any of the MAGA nonsense.  
 

Turns out, you can advocate for conservative policies without resorting to continual lies and racism.  Many Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act.  They weren’t RINO’s.  
 

Sarah Palin said the GOP is run by RINO’s.  Uh… if they’re the leadership, they are by definition Republicans. 

Edited August 27, 2023 by Rebound

[CdnFox]

5 minutes ago, Rebound said:

The Lincoln Project conservatives just don’t buy into the cult of Donald Trump or any of the MAGA nonsense.  
 

Turns out, you can advocate for conservative policies without resorting to continual lies and racism.  Many Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act.  They weren’t RINO’s.  
 

Sarah Palin said the GOP is run by RINO’s.  Uh… if they’re the leadership, they are by definition Republicans. 

The GOP move to the 'cult' is simpy a response to the new socialist religions of the left. 

Obama created the 'intersectional coalition' and tried to turn every non while non hetero into a  little hate factory to earn votes (trudeau has largely tried to copy him.  Even bought election management software from the dems) 

Clinton was no better, calling anyone who disagreed with her part of the 'Basket of Deplorables".

The left started violently rioting to shut down free speech they didn't like, suddenly it was 'wrong to be white' and it became all about hatred.

Donald trump stepped into that world like he was made for it, and republicans sick of the democrat's attacks flocked to him.

Now they see him as their only defense against the left.

THIS WAS PREDICTABLE AND PREDICTED.   What did you THINK was going to happen.

"Darkness rises, and light to meet it".  Whenever one extreme becomes prevelant, the other will appear.  Hitler was  response to violent communist sentiment in germany.  Stalin was a response to the excessive elitism in Russia. 

Until the dems change - expect more trumps.

[Deluge]

On 8/26/2023 at 10:51 AM, robosmith said:

‘Lock Them Up’ Is Now the Republican Party’s Highest Goal

You stoopid dumbf*ckers are saying this after you're trying to move heaven and earth to imprison Trump for 600 years? lol

Edited August 30, 2023 by Deluge

[robosmith]

23 hours ago, Deluge said:

You stoopid dumbf*ckers are saying this after you're trying to move heaven and earth to imprison Trump for 600 years? lol

You're so stupid you don't understand the difference between EVIDENCE OF CRIMES and pure REVENGE based on DENIAL OF EVIDENCE.

[Deluge]

7 minutes ago, robosmith said:

You're so stupid you don't understand the difference between EVIDENCE OF CRIMES and pure REVENGE based on DENIAL OF EVIDENCE.

Easy dumbass, lol. 

What do you think all these indictments are really about? 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Easy dumbass, lol. 

What do you think all these indictments are really about? 

Have you even read them, dumbass?

IF you had, you MIGHT know what they're about: extensive EVIDENCE OF CRIMES. Duh

You can't just turn a blind eye and credibly claim nothing's there.

But you are Deluginal, so that's all you got.

[Deluge]

12 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Have you even read them, dumbass?

Go through the crimes, dumbass. One at a time. You and I are going to get granular. 

Pick your first "crime" and we'll start from there.

 

[robosmith]

2 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Go through the crimes, dumbass. One at a time. You and I are going to get granular. 

Pick your first "crime" and we'll start from there.

 

Read the entire indictments. I'm not going to spoon feed them to you.

Then you can google them and post Trump's lawyer's outlandish defenses (for the court of public opinion). LMAO

AKA, will never fly IN COURT.

[Deluge]

21 hours ago, robosmith said:

Read the entire indictments. I'm not going to spoon feed them to you.

Then you can google them and post Trump's lawyer's outlandish defenses (for the court of public opinion). LMAO

AKA, will never fly IN COURT.

You don't "spoon feed" anything. You just spray bullshit everywhere and then slither away. 

Very well, I will be the one to introduce the points.

The first thing we have to look at is MOTIVATION. What motivates you perverts to indict Trump? 

Well, Trump is a political threat to the democrat party, so you have to agree that keeping him out the presidential race is the PRIMARY if not ONLY reason you diaper dopers want to indict.

Do you agree? 

 

Edited September 1, 2023 by Deluge

[robosmith]

26 minutes ago, Deluge said:

You don't "spoon feed" anything. You just spray bullshit everywhere and then slither away. 

Very well, I will be the one to introduce the points.

The first thing we have to look at is MOTIVATION. What motivates you perverts to indict Trump? 

Well, Trump is a political threat to the democrat party, so you have to agree that keeping him out the presidential race is the PRIMARY if not ONLY reason you diaper dopers want to indict.

Do you agree? 

Nope. ONLY reason to indict was Trump's INTENTION and ACTIONS TAKEN to disrupt the EC vote count on Jan 6th.

It was the mob HE RECRUITED and ASSEMBLED in DC on Jan 6th that disrupted the count, according to the plan DETAILED by EASTMAN and agreed to by Trump.

IF you paid ANY ATTENTION to the SWORN TESTIMONY of WH INSIDERS at the Jan 6th hearings, you would not be so ignorant about what happened.

[Deluge]

58 minutes ago, robosmith said:

Nope. ONLY reason to indict was Trump's INTENTION and ACTIONS TAKEN to disrupt the EC vote count on Jan 6th.

It was the mob HE RECRUITED and ASSEMBLED in DC on Jan 6th that disrupted the count, according to the plan DETAILED by EASTMAN and agreed to by Trump.

IF you paid ANY ATTENTION to the SWORN TESTIMONY of WH INSIDERS at the Jan 6th hearings, you would not be so ignorant about what happened.

Nope. This is a witch hunt. Diaper rash democrats are so butt hurt that their warped, tiny brains don't have the bandwidth for someone like Donald Trump. 

"if you don't understand it, kill it - or just throw it in prison for 600 years". This is the way of the democrat party. 

Let's take a closer look: 

From CBS:

State indictment on business fraud charges in New York

Trump is accused of violating New York State law by allegedly agreeing to obscure a series of reimbursements to his former lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen, who is the key witness against Trump in the case. Cohen made a $130,000 alleged "hush money" payment to adult film star Stephanie Clifford, known as Stormy Daniels, days before the 2016 election, in exchange for her silence about an alleged affair with Trump. Trump denies the allegations and says there was no affair.

Prosecutors accuse Trump of illegally portraying the reimbursements to Cohen as legal expenses.

Where: Supreme Court of the State of New York

Judge: Judge Juan Merchan

 

Lead prosecutor: Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg

Defense attorneys: Todd Blanche, Susan Necheles, Joe Tacopina

Co-defendants: None

Indicted: March 30, 2023

 

Charges: 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree 

Arraigned: April 4, 2023

Plea: Not guilty 

Scheduled trial: March 25, 2024

 

1st Question: Is Trump guilty of these charges? 9.9 out of 10 democrats would tell you yes. 

2nd Question: Is Trump actually guilty of these charges? The answer is no, because the trial hasn't even started yet. 

3rd Question: Who are Jack Smith and Merrick Garland? What's their story? The answers are below:

https://www.conservapedia.com/Jack_Smith

https://www.conservapedia.com/Merrick_Garland

 

Now that we've established that this indictment was politically motivated, we will next go over the Mar-a-Lago bullshit that was exacerbated by the scumbag outfit we've come to know as the democrat party.  

Edited September 1, 2023 by Deluge

[myata]

Sad.. and scary. Entropy wins wherever the reason and will for constant checks and renewal has run out. No miracles.

[robosmith]

2 hours ago, Deluge said:

Nope. This is a witch hunt. Diaper rash democrats are so butt hurt that their warped, tiny brains don't have the bandwidth for someone like Donald Trump. 

"if you don't understand it, kill it - or just throw it in prison for 600 years". This is the way of the democrat party. 

Let's take a closer look: 

From CBS:

State indictment on business fraud charges in New York

Trump is accused of violating New York State law by allegedly agreeing to obscure a series of reimbursements to his former lawyer and fixer, Michael Cohen, who is the key witness against Trump in the case. Cohen made a $130,000 alleged "hush money" payment to adult film star Stephanie Clifford, known as Stormy Daniels, days before the 2016 election, in exchange for her silence about an alleged affair with Trump. Trump denies the allegations and says there was no affair.

Prosecutors accuse Trump of illegally portraying the reimbursements to Cohen as legal expenses.

Where: Supreme Court of the State of New York

Judge: Judge Juan Merchan

 

Lead prosecutor: Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg

Defense attorneys: Todd Blanche, Susan Necheles, Joe Tacopina

Co-defendants: None

Indicted: March 30, 2023

 

Charges: 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree 

Arraigned: April 4, 2023

Plea: Not guilty 

Scheduled trial: March 25, 2024

 

1st Question: Is Trump guilty of these charges? 9.9 out of 10 democrats would tell you yes. 

2nd Question: Is Trump actually guilty of these charges? The answer is no, because the trial hasn't even started yet. 

3rd Question: Who are Jack Smith and Merrick Garland? What's their story? The answers are below:

https://www.conservapedia.com/Jack_Smith

https://www.conservapedia.com/Merrick_Garland

 

Now that we've established that this indictment was politically motivated, we will next go over the Mar-a-Lago bullshit that was exacerbated by the scumbag outfit we've come to know as the democrat party.  

Charging false business records VIOLATIONS is ROUTINE in NYC. Bragg has prosecuted a hundred OTHERS in the last year.

So it would favoritism to NOT CHARGE the Trump Org. Duh

[Deluge]

19 hours ago, robosmith said:

Charging false business records VIOLATIONS is ROUTINE in NYC. Bragg has prosecuted a hundred OTHERS in the last year.

So it would favoritism to NOT CHARGE the Trump Org. Duh

Bragg has never charged a former President of the United States. 

So what you're really saying is that we need to break precedent and state that NO ONE is above the law, including former Presidents and government leaders. 

So what are you woketards doing to investigate Barack Obama, the Clintons, GWB and other high profile former government leaders? 

Edited September 2, 2023 by Deluge

[robosmith]

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

Bragg has never charged a former President of the United States. 

So what you're really saying is that we need to break precedent and state that NO ONE is above the law, including former Presidents and government leaders. 

Absolutely. No precedent broken, Mr. Nixon.

1 hour ago, Deluge said:

So what are you woketards doing to investigate Barack Obama, the Clintons, GWB and other high profile former government leaders? 

I'm not a government investigator. Duh

Besides, statute of limitations has EXPIRED on all ^these ex-government officials.

[Deluge]

On 9/2/2023 at 1:11 PM, robosmith said:

1. Absolutely. No precedent broken, Mr. Nixon.

2. I'm not a government investigator. Duh

3. Besides, statute of limitations has EXPIRED on all ^these ex-government officials.

1. Actually there is, woketard. Nixon was never brought up on charges AFTER his presidency. So once again, you are wrong.

2. Who said YOU, personally, were an investigator, you diapered psychopath? When I say "you" in this context, I'm referring to your entire godforsaken party - I'm referring to "you" collectively. Do you understand now, or would rather just go back to your homosexual coloring books from Target?  

3. Why weren't they investigated before that statute of limitations expired? (If there actually is a statute of limitations of course). Would you like me to tell you why, or would you rather just stoopidly fumble through another answer? 

 

Edited September 5, 2023 by Deluge

[robosmith]

39 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. Actually there is, woketard. Nixon was never brought up on charges AFTER his presidency. So once again, you are wrong. 

Only cause UNLIKE TRUMP, Nixon had enough sense to RESIGN so he could be pardoned by his successor.

Who paid a steep political price for that INJUSTICE.

Were you even born back then? That might account for your IGNORANCE.

39 minutes ago, Deluge said:

2. Who said YOU, personally, were an investigator, you diapered psychopath? When I say "you" in this context, I'm referring to your entire godforsaken party - I'm referring to "you" collectively. Do you understand now, or would rather just go back to your homosexual coloring books from Target?  

When you ASK ME and say YOU, it is YOU who is the psychopath. I DON'T ANSWER for the ENTIRE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. Duh.

39 minutes ago, Deluge said:

3. Why weren't they investigated before that statute of limitations expired? (If there actually is a statute of limitations of course). Would you like me to tell you why, or would you rather just stoopidly fumble through another answer? 

Because there was insufficient EVIDENCE of CRIMES, lDIOT.

When are you going to actually learn about the EVIDENCE against Trump instead of burying your head in the sand? LMAO

[WestCanMan]

It's bizarre how leftards can scream "THE 2016 ELECTION WAS ILLEGITIMATE!!!!!" for 3 years and then criminalize election skepticism the day that they win an election. 

It's bizarre that leftards can support calls for violence against the other political party for years and then whine about partisanship.

It's bizarre that leftards can run a 3-yr witch-hunt against a duly elected president, lie 100,000 times and get the weaponized FBI to commit crimes for them in their all-out war against democracy, and then cry foul when one of their actual criminals comes under scrutiny.

This thread is like The Rock accusing Tom Hanks of abusing steroids. 

[Deluge]

17 minutes ago, robosmith said:

1. Only cause UNLIKE TRUMP, Nixon had enough sense to RESIGN.

2. When you ASK ME and say YOU, it is YOU who is the psychopath. I DON'T ANSWER for the ENTIRE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. Duh.

3. Because there was insufficient EVIDENCE of CRIMES, lDIOT.

1. Nixon was guilty. Trump isn't. You're as much a liar as you are stoopid. 

2. Yes, dumbass, we understand that you don't answer for the entire democrat party. Perhaps it's you who doesn't understand that, as you keep referring to that ldiotic notion. 

Here's a piece of advice: If you don't know the answer to a question, you simply say "I don't know" and then you get back to your homosexual coloring books from Target. Do you understand? 

3. No, you stoopid f*cker. They weren't investigated or brought up on charges because they didn't have a rabid political party that was obsessed with destroying them. You anti-Trump cultists are unhinged, and there's no getting around that. 

Edited September 5, 2023 by Deluge

[robosmith]

30 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. Nixon was guilty. Trump isn't. You're as much a liar as you are stoopid. 

Wrong. You just don't know the EVIDENCE against Trump cause you're afraid to look at it.

30 minutes ago, Deluge said:

2. Yes, dumbass, we understand that you don't answer for the entire democrat party. Perhaps it's you who doesn't understand that, as you keep referring to that ldiotic notion. 

^Stupid response to the FACT that I just told you I do understand that.

30 minutes ago, Deluge said:

Here's a piece of advice: If you don't know the answer to a question, you simply say "I don't know" and then you get back to your homosexual coloring books from Target. Do you understand? 

If you want me to answer a question, stop posting DISHONEST PREMISES. 

30 minutes ago, Deluge said:

3. No, you stoopid f*cker. They weren't investigated or brought up on charges because they didn't have a rabid political party that was obsessed with destroying them. You anti-Trump cultists are unhinged, and there's no getting around that. 

Thanks for your  stoopid f*cker OPINION. Means NOTHING cause you won't even look at the EVIDENCE.

You can WHINE all you want but that won't change the FACT that Trump is INDICTED and will face STRONG EVIDENCE at his TRIAL.

Your INFANTILE name calling won't CHANGE ANYTHING.

 

[Deluge]

43 minutes ago, robosmith said:

1. Wrong. You just don't know the EVIDENCE against Trump cause you're afraid to look at it.

2. ^Stupid response to the FACT that I just told you I do understand that.

3. If you want me to answer a question, stop posting DISHONEST PREMISES. 

4. Thanks for your  stoopid f*cker OPINION. Means NOTHING cause you won't even look at the EVIDENCE.

5. You can WHINE all you want but that won't change the FACT that Trump is INDICTED and will face STRONG EVIDENCE at his TRIAL.

Your INFANTILE name calling won't CHANGE ANYTHING.

 

1. Wrong. You just can't accept that your party can't win unless it jails Donald Trump and cheats in elections. 

2. You're an ldiot for bringing it up in the first place. If you don't know the answer then simply stfu - it's easy.

3. The dishonesty is all on your side. It's why I'm still having to instruct you on the difference between truth and deception. 

4. You don't look at the motivation, which is to keep Trump out of the White House. Why you refuse to acknowledge this is the reason nobody trusts you a$$holes anymore. Leftism is a cancer. 

5. Trump will be your President in 2024 and no amount of screaming, gnashing of teeth or stamping of feet will change that fact. You and I will meet here often so that I can continue to rub that in your face. It will be glorious, don't you think? 

Edited September 5, 2023 by Deluge

[robosmith]

46 minutes ago, Deluge said:

1. Wrong. You just can't accept that your party can't win unless it jails Donald Trump and cheats in elections. 

Biden beat Trump last time and can do it AGAIN if the Republicans stop suppressing the vote.

46 minutes ago, Deluge said:

2. You're an ldiot for bringing it up in the first place. If you don't know the answer then simply stfu - it's easy. 

Then you do it, cause it's OBVIOUS you have NO ANSWERS; just BULLSHIT.

46 minutes ago, Deluge said:

3. The dishonesty is all on your side. It's why I'm still having to instruct you on the difference between truth and deception. 

I know deception. It's what YOU POST when you pretend your OPINIONS are "FACT."

46 minutes ago, Deluge said:

4. You don't look at the motivation, which is to keep Trump out of the White House. Why you refuse to acknowledge this is the reason nobody trusts you a$$holes anymore. Leftism is a cancer. 

Continually posting ^this fantasy won't make it true. We know it's a fantasy cause you're SO IGNORANT about the EVIDENCE.

46 minutes ago, Deluge said:

5. Trump will be your President in 2024 and no amount of screaming, gnashing of teeth or stamping of feet will change that fact. You and I will meet here often so that I can continue to rub that in your face. It will be glorious, don't you think? 

But getting out the vote WILL. Trump NEVER WON the POPULAR VOTE. LMAO

[Deluge]

29 minutes ago, robosmith said:

1. Biden beat Trump last time and can do it AGAIN 

2. Then you do it, cause it's OBVIOUS you have NO ANSWERS; just BULLSHIT.

3. I know deception. It's what YOU POST when you pretend your OPINIONS are "FACT."

4. Continually posting ^this fantasy won't make it true. We know it's a fantasy cause you're SO IGNORANT about the EVIDENCE.

5. But getting out the vote WILL. Trump NEVER WON the POPULAR VOTE. LMAO

1. Not without COVID and ballot fraud. lol

2. Now you're just foaming at the mouth. Calm down, stfu, and we'll continue with your other bullshit points. 

3. It's no opinion; you a$$holes are trying to get Trump removed from the presidential race. The good news is that it's not working - in fact, he's only getting stronger in the polls. 

4. There is no evidence. There's just manufactured bullshit. It's why you a$$holes are now trying to use the 14th Amendment to disqualify Trump. lol

5. Mail fraud is illegal. Trump is the true president of this country.

Edited September 5, 2023 by Deluge