Devon Archer Transcript proves Joe had the Ukrainian prosecutor fired to help end the investigation into his son's energy firm Burisma

[WestCanMan]

It's funny how leftists can just BELIEVE BELIEVE BELIEVE when someone like E Jean Caroll makes a ridiculous rape accusation like "He raped me in a dept store in about 1988", or when the collusion investigation goes on for 3 years without a single piece of actual evidence ever being given out, but when Joe admits to firing a prosecutor for getting court orders against Hunter's boss, and then appointing a new one who lets him off the hook, they need more evidence than that. 

[WestCanMan]

On 8/5/2023 at 9:08 AM, reason10 said:

They should just lock him up for 18 months without a trial until they get to the bottom of it.

[reason10]

17 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's funny how leftists can just BELIEVE BELIEVE BELIEVE when someone like E Jean Caroll makes a ridiculous rape accusation like "He raped me in a dept store in about 1988", or when the collusion investigation goes on for 3 years without a single piece of actual evidence ever being given out, but when Joe admits to firing a prosecutor for getting court orders against Hunter's boss, and then appointing a new one who lets him off the hook, they need more evidence than that. 

Leftists aren't exactly the sharpest knives in the drawer.

[WestCanMan]

Just now, reason10 said:

Leftists aren't exactly the sharpest knives in the drawer.

Beach balls are sharper.

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, Rebound said:

You

Have

No

Evidence

I

Don't

Need

More

Than

There

Already

Is.

Joe is toast and anyone who can read, knows it already.

[CdnFox]

7 hours ago, Rebound said:

Do you seriously believe Hunter Biden will serve a single day in jail for lying on a gun application and filing his taxes late?  

Probably. But not many.

This feels like  a distraction.  There are other charges they have more than enough evidence to lay and should be investigating, but all of those involve Joe Biden as well.  I think their goal will be to try to focus everything on this prosecution, smak him on the wrist with a conviction and either a small amount of time in jail or maybe house arrest, and then just say "well he got punished no need to continue any other investigations" and see if the public goes for it.

[WestCanMan]

29 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Probably. But not many.

This feels like  a distraction.  There are other charges they have more than enough evidence to lay and should be investigating, but all of those involve Joe Biden as well.  I think their goal will be to try to focus everything on this prosecution, smak him on the wrist with a conviction and either a small amount of time in jail or maybe house arrest, and then just say "well he got punished no need to continue any other investigations" and see if the public goes for it.

Hunter's just a fall guy.

Bill Morneau did that for Trudeau in the SNC scandal, Kevin Clinesminth did it for Comey/Strzok and the FBI in general, etc. 

The statement goes something like this: "The real criminal was this small fry here. The people above him on the food chain are untouchable. I mean, pure as the driven snow."

[Rebound]

5 hours ago, Nationalist said:

I

Don't

Need

More

Than

There

Already

Is.

Joe is toast and anyone who can read, knows it already.

There “already” is no evidence.  

57 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Probably. But not many.

This feels like  a distraction.  There are other charges they have more than enough evidence to lay and should be investigating, but all of those involve Joe Biden as well.  I think their goal will be to try to focus everything on this prosecution, smak him on the wrist with a conviction and either a small amount of time in jail or maybe house arrest, and then just say "well he got punished no need to continue any other investigations" and see if the public goes for it.

Except there is no evidence of these other things.

 

”They” say Joe Biden received money from foreign entities but “they” have not produced any evidence of this. IOW, they made it up.  
 

Remember when the US said they had “evidence” that Saddam had WMD’s, but didn’t find them? That’s cause there was no evidence. Evidence, evidence, evidence. 

Edited September 15, 2023 by Rebound

[CdnFox]

39 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

Hunter's just a fall guy.

Bill Morneau did that for Trudeau in the SNC scandal, Kevin Clinesminth did it for Comey/Strzok and the FBI in general, etc. 

The statement goes something like this: "The real criminal was this small fry here. The people above him on the food chain are untouchable. I mean, pure as the driven snow."

It is a time honoured technique

[CdnFox]

37 minutes ago, Rebound said:

 

Except there is no evidence of these other things.

 

Except there's quite a bit.  There's certainly a LOT more than was the case when the FBI started the russian collusion investigation.

Now - that doesn't mean he's guilty for sure. But without a doubt there's grounds for investigation and probably more charges for hunter with a strong likelyhood that biden would be found to have been involved in influence peddling.

And they're trying to avoid that. Everyone believes hunter is guilty of some serious crimes and they suspect strongly biden was involved.  If this can end with just hunter being punished and that satisfies enough people then that's a win, and that looks like what they're doing.

They could have laid the gun charges anytime. The timing now suggests distraction.

 

[Nationalist]

2 hours ago, Rebound said:

There “already” is no evidence.  

Except there is no evidence of these other things.

 

”They” say Joe Biden received money from foreign entities but “they” have not produced any evidence of this. IOW, they made it up.  
 

Remember when the US said they had “evidence” that Saddam had WMD’s, but didn’t find them? That’s cause there was no evidence. Evidence, evidence, evidence. 

Giggle..." There "already" is no evidence"

So dumb...

[WestCanMan]

2 hours ago, CdnFox said:

It is a time honoured technique

Why not keep going back to it? Leftards fall for it every time. 

"Yup! I knew that sock-boy was innocent. He's SOOoooo dreamy, how could he ever be guilty of anything?"

[jbander1A]

On 9/2/2023 at 10:50 PM, CdnFox said:

Another 'boy who cried trump'.

We've been hearing the same bullshit for almost a decade now.  When he's convicted of a crime, we can talk.  But it's not for trump supporters or those of us who are actually NOT insanely invested in hating him to explain anything. that's for a jury and judge and we'll see what they say.

I still can't believe Hillary got off, so anything's possible.

Look at what this microbe is betting on, it's Obamas , Bidens Clintons fault.

[Rebound]

On 9/16/2023 at 3:17 AM, Nationalist said:

Giggle..." There "already" is no evidence"

So dumb...

There is no evidence that President Joe Biden committed a crime.  
 

There are, however, hundreds of pages of evidence of crimes committed by Donald Trump. Four grand juries have voted to indict him of 91 felonies.

Edited September 24, 2023 by Rebound

[CdnFox]

6 hours ago, jbander1A said:

Look at what this microbe is betting on, it's Obamas , Bidens Clintons fault.

Oh look, another incoherent inarticulate m0r0n who thinks that by displaying his stupidity in support of the dems he can somehow make them look better.

Isn't it past your bedtime'? I'm sure you've got show and tell at school tomorrow and you wouldn't want to be all tired for it.

6 hours ago, Rebound said:

There is no evidence that President Joe Biden committed a crime.  
 

 

Well there is evidence. In fact there's more than there was against trump when 'russian collusion' was claimed.

Evidence is not a conviction.  But there is evidence and lying about it just makes your argument look weak and desperate.

[Nationalist]

6 hours ago, Rebound said:

There is no evidence that President Joe Biden committed a crime.  
 

There are, however, hundreds of pages of evidence of crimes committed by Donald Trump. Four grand juries have voted to indict him of 91 felonies.

"Well son of a b1tch. He got fired."

Joe's toast. I know it, the majority of American people know it. And I bet you know it too.

But continue denying the obvious. The more level headed folks read your silly denials, the more obvious is Joe's demise.

As for Trump, he now leads Biden in the polls.

 

Edited September 25, 2023 by Nationalist

[Rebound]

25 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

"Well son of a b1tch. He got fired."

Joe's toast. I know it, the majority of American people know it. And I bet you know it too.

But continue denying the obvious. The more level headed folks read your silly denials, the more obvious is Joe's demise.

As for Trump, he now leads Biden in the polls.

 

Trump can lead any skewed poll he wants; he’s still going to prison.  

[CdnFox]

8 minutes ago, Rebound said:

Trump can lead any skewed poll he wants; he’s still going to prison.  

I'm sorry - was that quote from 2015?

[Nationalist]

9 hours ago, Rebound said:

Trump can lead any skewed poll he wants; he’s still going to prison.  

No he's not...if anywhere, he's going back to the Whitehouse. 

[Hodad]

7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

No he's not...if anywhere, he's going back to the Whitehouse. 

How do you go shopping and get things done around the house while griping those pom-poms so tightly? Don't they get in the way?

Maybe if you cheer hard enough you can make the evidence disappear?

Edited September 25, 2023 by Hodad

[CdnFox]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

How do you go shopping and get things done around the house while griping those pom-poms so tightly? Don't they get in the way?

Maybe if you cheer hard enough you can make the evidence disappear?

At this moment in time it would appear as tho you're the one dealing with denial.

For several months now trump has been growing stronger and biden has been growing weaker.  There's every reason to believe that if the election was held today trump would be president.

Now - Campaigns do matter and trump is not a great campaigner (contrary to common opinion). But then neither is biden.  So there is at least a healthy chance trump will get back in the white house in 2024

[Nationalist]

1 hour ago, Hodad said:

How do you go shopping and get things done around the house while griping those pom-poms so tightly? Don't they get in the way?

Maybe if you cheer hard enough you can make the evidence disappear?

What evidence? I see a lot of desperate Libbies panicking about Trump and indicting him for dumb-ass shit. But I don't see any evidence.

[Hodad]

4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

What evidence? I see a lot of desperate Libbies panicking about Trump and indicting him for dumb-ass shit. But I don't see any evidence.

Clearly, you haven't read the indictments. The federal indictments for his behavior around the stolen classified documents are particularly robust and damning. The Georgia case is also very good.

Your info-bubble may have told you that he's been indicted for "stupid shit," but it's simply not true. Those are strong cases.

In the exact same way that his first impeachment should have been an obvious conviction but was an acquittal for political reasons, he could escape justice again, but it won't be due to lack of evidence.

[CdnFox]

7 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Clearly, you haven't read the indictments. The federal indictments for his behavior around the stolen classified documents are particularly robust and damning. The Georgia case is also very good.

 

Clearly you don't know what an indictment is.  It is not proof, it's not even evidence.  Its' a claim of evidence and it will all still have to be tested in court.  A lot of it may not turn out to even be admissible.  And there's only one or two that seem to have real meat to them at all.

Frankly i think he's guilty of deliberately not turning over documents.  But then i think hillary is guilty.  It's you werdos on the left who SOMEHOW think hillary did no wrong  when she very clearly knew what she was doing and yet insist trump must be guilty that i don't get.

[Nationalist]

3 minutes ago, Hodad said:

Clearly, you haven't read the indictments. The federal indictments for his behavior around the stolen classified documents are particularly robust and damning. The Georgia case is also very good.

Your info-bubble may have told you that he's been indicted for "stupid shit," but it's simply not true. Those are strong cases.

In the exact same way that his first impeachment should have been an obvious conviction but was an acquittal for political reasons, he could escape justice again, but it won't be due to lack of evidence.

 The main indictments and charges...

Telling people he thinks the 2020 election was fraudulent...which we know it was. However...he can say what he thinks in a free society. The USA is still a free society...isn't it?

Having classified documents and not returning them all at once. An incredibly stupid charge that will fail as soon as this dumb-ass accusation of being a traitor with that espionage crap.

Paying a whore.

You're all gonna wind up with egg all over your faces...again.