reason10 Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 On 8/3/2023 at 12:05 PM, West said: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/devon-archer-hunter-used-joe-biden-as-defensive-leverage-to-send-right-signals-to-foreign-biz-partners Point to note Burisma had pro Russian ties. Corrupt Joe. Very sad The unelected son of a bitccch admitted it in this video. 1 Quote
West Posted August 28, 2023 Author Report Posted August 28, 2023 15 minutes ago, reason10 said: The unelected son of a bitccch admitted it in this video. No. Joe was saying that his son was there to clean up burisma and the Ukraine and Joe was just helping it along because he's actually the good guy and anyone who questions what his son was doing on the board of an energy firm know for bribing politicians while daddy was the US point man for the Ukraine is just crazy for suggesting Joe isn't a good guy. Quote
Rebound Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 3 hours ago, West said: Lol.. still denying reality and defending a senile old crook I see. Still no f-cking evidence from you. None. Zero. I’m not trying to defend criminal activity. You conservatives are utterly corrupt and devoid of morality. There is a LOT of very clear and obvious evidence, based in fact, that Donald Trump committed many felonies. Yet you deny that. There is no actual evidence at all of Biden crimes. Just the fact that Hunter was paid a lot for his prestigious name. That is not a crime. 1 1 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
taxme Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 On 8/26/2023 at 4:02 PM, robosmith said: FOS LIES to the tune of $800M penalty. No one agrees to pay that kind of money to settle a frivolous lawsuit. Their credibility is DESTROYED. Why do you keep bringing up that $800 million nonsense all the time? Is that all you have left to argue with? Look lefty, everybody phks up. I am pretty sure that you have fkd up a million times or so in your useless lefty liberal life. So, do you have something better to show? Probably not. LOL. Quote
taxme Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 On 8/26/2023 at 5:59 PM, Rebound said: Hmm.. The Democrats beat Trump in 2020 Nearly every Trump-backed candidate in the 2020 midterms lost. The Dems held the Senate and the GOP barely holds the House. I’d say the GOP is faring very poorly right now. Not according to what I have heard lately. If an election were held today, Joey boy would lose the election. It is quite obvious that the Demonrats know that and that is why they are trying to nail Trump's butt on something. So far. those commie Demonrats have gone nowhere and never will. All these indictments are being used against Trump in the hopes of trying to nail Trump on something and try and put Trump in the American commie gulag. They will never find anything to lay on Trump. Just a bunch of desperate commie losers trying to stay alive. It will not work. And I am looking forward to the day when Trump does become President where he will get his revenge on those commie Demonrats. I can see Biden wearing an orange prison suit one day along with Hitlary Clinton. The problem is that I have to wait for another year and a half to watch that happen. Dam. ? Quote
robosmith Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 The TITLE of this thread is FALSE AKA a LIE. Devon Archer said the OPPOSITE. It is OBVIOUS that the OP never READ the TRANSCRIPT. Quote Page 102 18 So based on your own knowledge and experience -- your relationship with Hunter 19 Biden, your time on Burisma's board, and the entirety of your knowledge and 20 experience -- do you have any basis to disagree with the conclusion that, quote, "Vice 21 President Biden did not alter U.S. foreign policy to benefit his son Hunter Biden"? 22 A I have no basis to know if he altered. I have no basis to know if he altered 23 policy to benefit his son. 24 Q So you have no knowledge -- 25 A I have no knowledge. Sorry. 103 1 Q -- of him -- 2 A Yes, I have no knowledge. 3 Q -- altering U.S. policy to benefit his son. 4 A I have no knowledge. 5 Q You -- do you have any basis to disagree with the conclusion that "Hunter 6 Biden's presence on the board of the Ukrainian gas company Burisma had no effect on 7 U.S. foreign policy"? 8 A Not directly. You mean like making laws? I don't -- I don't think so. 9 Mr. Goldman. Foreign policy. 10 Mr. Archer. No -- no -- no on foreign policy. 11 12 Q No basis to disagree with that conclusion. 13 A No. 14 Q Do you have any basis to disagree with the conclusion that "Hunter Biden's 15 role did not influence U.S. foreign policy decisions"? 16 A I have -- yeah, I have no basis. 17 Q Do you have any basis to disagree with the conclusion that "Vice President 18 Biden carried out U.S. foreign policy in the interest of the United States"? 19 A I have no basis to judge. 20 Q Or to disagree with that. 21 A Or disagree. 22 Q You have no knowledge -- nothing based on your knowledge or experience 23 contradicts this conclusion. 24 A No. 25 Q Does anything in your knowledge or experience contradict the conclusion 104 1 that "there was no corruption, wrongdoing, or impropriety on the part of Vice President 2 Biden"? 3 A I have no basis to know. 4 Q The report also found, quote, "No --" 5 Mr. Goldman. I'm sorry. You have no basis to know or is that a no? 6 Mr. Archer. I have -- I have -- I would have no idea. 7 Mr. Goldman. No basis -- 8 Mr. Schwartz. Are you aware of any wrongdoing by Vice President Biden? 9 Mr. Archer. No, I'm not aware of any. 10 11 Q So based on your knowledge and experience, you have no evidence that 12 would contradict any of these conclusions I just read. 13 A No. 14 Q The report also found, quote, "No evidence that any action of the U.S. 15 Government or any U.S. official was taken to benefit Burisma or Hunter Biden." 16 Do you have any evidence or knowledge that contradicts this conclusion? 17 A No. 18 Q So based on everything you saw, heard, and observed, did you have any 19 knowledge of Joe Biden having any involvement with Burisma? 20 A No -- not direct, no. 21 Q No involvement of Joe -- 22 A No. 23 Q -- Biden with Burisma. 19 minutes ago, taxme said: Why do you keep bringing up that $800 million nonsense all the time? Is that all you have left to argue with? Look lefty, everybody phks up. I am pretty sure that you have fkd up a million times or so in your useless lefty liberal life. So, do you have something better to show? Probably not. LOL. Nothing better to prove destroyed credibility than paying $800M penalty. That is SERIOUS SHIT to swallow. LMAO 1 1 Quote
taxme Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 On 8/27/2023 at 7:45 AM, Rebound said: The Democrats know that Donald Trump is the easiest candidate for Biden to beat. Trump lost his own midterms, his re-election and the midterms after that. Trump is a loser for the GOP. Only time will tell as to who will win the next election. My money is on Trump. Every time the Demonrats try and nail something on Trump, is ratings go up. Trump is way ahead of the other GOP candidates who are trying to defeat Trump. Trump would have won the last election, if it were not for Demonrat fraud. Sorry loser, but you lose again. Make sure that you have some hankies nearby you after the next election. You will need them, lefty. PS: I will never understand why people like you hate Trump? You do not know Trump personally, yet you believe that he is one big crook. No doubt, CNN or the CBC got you to believe that crap. Just remember that nobody is perfect in this world. And that includes you and me along with Trump, lefty. ? Quote
taxme Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 9 minutes ago, robosmith said: The TITLE of this thread is FALSE AKA a LIE. Devon Archer said the OPPOSITE. It is OBVIOUS that the OP never READ the TRANSCRIPT. Nothing better to prove destroyed credibility than paying $800M penalty. That is SERIOUS SHIT to swallow. LMAO Is anybody talking about it still? I do not think that too many people could careless by now. You seem to be the only lefty loser here that loves to repeat himself over and over and over again to the point that I keep asking myself, is this guy really that dumb. So, what makes lefty liberals like you so dumb anyway? Were people like you born that way or are you working on trying to become a big dummy? Just wondering. You appear to be swallowing a lot of lefty liberal shit yourself. But what else is new with lefty liberal losers like you. ? 1 Quote
robosmith Posted August 28, 2023 Report Posted August 28, 2023 12 minutes ago, taxme said: Is anybody talking about it still? I do not think that too many people could careless by now. You seem to be the only lefty loser here that loves to repeat himself over and over and over again to the point that I keep asking myself, is this guy really that dumb. So, what makes lefty liberals like you so dumb anyway? Were people like you born that way or are you working on trying to become a big dummy? Just wondering. You appear to be swallowing a lot of lefty liberal shit yourself. But what else is new with lefty liberal losers like you. ? It is quite telling that all you have to post in this LIE OF A THREAD is ^THIS BULLSHIT. Duh Of course, you right wingers care NOTHING ABOUT THE TRUTH. LMAO 2 Quote
Rebound Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 5 hours ago, taxme said: Only time will tell as to who will win the next election. My money is on Trump. Every time the Demonrats try and nail something on Trump, is ratings go up. Trump is way ahead of the other GOP candidates who are trying to defeat Trump. Trump would have won the last election, if it were not for Demonrat fraud. Sorry loser, but you lose again. Make sure that you have some hankies nearby you after the next election. You will need them, lefty. PS: I will never understand why people like you hate Trump? You do not know Trump personally, yet you believe that he is one big crook. No doubt, CNN or the CBC got you to believe that crap. Just remember that nobody is perfect in this world. And that includes you and me along with Trump, lefty. ? The GOP only has one candidate with national name recognition. Most Americans cannot name any candidate besides Biden and Trump. The campaign season hasn’t really started and most people aren’t thinking about it. 1 1 Quote @reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”
CdnFox Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 1 minute ago, Rebound said: The GOP only has one candidate with national name recognition. Most Americans cannot name any candidate besides Biden and Trump. The campaign season hasn’t really started and most people aren’t thinking about it. I bet about 75 percent of them would recognize desantis. 1 Quote
WestCanMan Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 14 hours ago, Rebound said: In your mind, Hunter Biden illegally influenced the U.S. government. In reality, he did not. Is that honestly what you think? After all this time you think that this is about whether or not Hunter influenced the US gov't? GD you're stupid. 1 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
WestCanMan Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 10 hours ago, Rebound said: Still no f-cking evidence from you. None. Zero. I’m not trying to defend criminal activity. You conservatives are utterly corrupt and devoid of morality. There is a LOT of very clear and obvious evidence, based in fact, that Donald Trump committed many felonies. Yet you deny that. There is no actual evidence at all of Biden crimes. Just the fact that Hunter was paid a lot for his prestigious name. That is not a crime. You're so full of s it's insane. You'll defend the BS collusion, Ukrainian collusion, vax mandates, vax efficacy and every other vax lie out there, you still can't fess up on any of that after all this time, and you also can't see anything unusual about Hunter making $11M and a big fat diamond with the Communist Bank of China and their one belt one road group? You don't think it's weird that Joe was involved with Burisma, using a pseudonym for an email account, and then denied knowing anything at all about Hunter's overseas businesses? Isn't it a bit weird that Hunter was hired 3 weeks after Joe's first visit to Ukraine? https://nypost.com/2023/08/04/viktor-shokin-was-threat-to-burisma-says-hunter-biden-partner-devon-archer/ Quote Shokin’s office won a court order to seize Zlochevsky’s property on Feb. 2, 2016, the Kyiv Post reported at the time. Shokin was fired on March 29, purportedly due to his own corruption. Shokin didn't even keep his job for two months after he won a court order against Burisma's owner - Biden had him fired. Obviously it's a lie when leftards say that Shokin was fired for inactivity, winning a court order against Zlochevsky is the opposite of that. After Shokin was fired, and replaced by a guy who Joe Biden unilaterally selected (according to his own boast which was caught on camera), Zloch was back in the country, a free man, less than 2 years later. So a brief summary goes like this: -Joe visited Ukraine for the first time -Hunter, the guy who was recently dishonorably discharged from the navy for narcotics abuse, got a cushy job for $80K/mo on the board of Burisma 3 weeks later. -Joe was directly involved via dozens of conference calls and an email address under a pseudonym, -Shokin messed with the Biden family's money train and got a court order against its CEO, -Biden unilaterally fired Shokin less than 2 months after the court order, -Biden unilaterally selected the old prosecutor's replacement -Biden repeatedly lied about having any knowledge of Hunter's overseas business -the prosecutor (the "solid guy") that Joe selected Joe Biden's guy let Zloch off the hook. You think all of that's nothing? You still see no evidence that the Bidens were influence peddling? WTF more would you have to see? Video of Biden telling Zlochevsky to hire his son? Video of Biden telling the new prosecutor to wind down the Burisma/Zlochevsky investigation? It's funny because your threshold for believing Wushin cowusion was so much lower, and even after knowing that the FBI committed serious crimes in that investigation you're not sour on it at all. 2 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
robosmith Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 35 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: You're so full of s it's insane. You'll defend the BS collusion, Ukrainian collusion, vax mandates, vax efficacy and every other vax lie out there, you still can't fess up on any of that after all this time, and you also can't see anything unusual about Hunter making $11M and a big fat diamond with the Communist Bank of China and their one belt one road group? You don't think it's weird that Joe was involved with Burisma, using a pseudonym for an email account, and then denied knowing anything at all about Hunter's overseas businesses? Isn't it a bit weird that Hunter was hired 3 weeks after Joe's first visit to Ukraine? https://nypost.com/2023/08/04/viktor-shokin-was-threat-to-burisma-says-hunter-biden-partner-devon-archer/ Shokin didn't even keep his job for two months after he won a court order against Burisma's owner - Biden had him fired. Obviously it's a lie when leftards say that Shokin was fired for inactivity, winning a court order against Zlochevsky is the opposite of that. After Shokin was fired, and replaced by a guy who Joe Biden unilaterally selected (according to his own boast which was caught on camera), Zloch was back in the country, a free man, less than 2 years later. So a brief summary goes like this: -Joe visited Ukraine for the first time -Hunter, the guy who was recently dishonorably discharged from the navy for narcotics abuse, got a cushy job for $80K/mo on the board of Burisma 3 weeks later. -Joe was directly involved via dozens of conference calls and an email address under a pseudonym, -Shokin messed with the Biden family's money train and got a court order against its CEO, -Biden unilaterally fired Shokin less than 2 months after the court order, -Biden unilaterally selected the old prosecutor's replacement -Biden repeatedly lied about having any knowledge of Hunter's overseas business -the prosecutor (the "solid guy") that Joe selected Joe Biden's guy let Zloch off the hook. You think all of that's nothing? You still see no evidence that the Bidens were influence peddling? WTF more would you have to see? Video of Biden telling Zlochevsky to hire his son? Video of Biden telling the new prosecutor to wind down the Burisma/Zlochevsky investigation? It's funny because your threshold for believing Wushin cowusion was so much lower, and even after knowing that the FBI committed serious crimes in that investigation you're not sour on it at all. Read the effing Archer TRANSCRIPT if you really want to KNOW WHY Hunter was hired for the Burisma Board. If you don't read it, you don't want to know the truth. His SWORN testimony DEBUNKS all your LIES. 1 Quote
West Posted August 29, 2023 Author Report Posted August 29, 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Read the effing Archer TRANSCRIPT if you really want to KNOW WHY Hunter was hired for the Burisma Board. If you don't read it, you don't want to know the truth. His SWORN testimony DEBUNKS all your LIES. The transcript proves that Hunter Biden was hired by Burisma for access to his father who was the US point person for Ukraine. Ukraine had to pass all their affairs by Joe Biden including their judicial picks. We know shokin fired up an investigation into Burisma in 2014/2015. Two weeks later he was fired. Joe Biden hand selected the Ukrainian prosecutors who then dropped this case.. this is factual timelines Now of course leftist sycophants at the new York times will tell you it's all just a giant conspiracy theory, don't believe your eyes, and claim without evidence shokin was corrupt. Of course this is just to cover for mob boss Joe who appears to be at least a part of a large criminal enterprise who abuses public office for financial gain Edited August 29, 2023 by West Quote
CdnFox Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 2 minutes ago, West said: The transcript proves that Hunter Biden was hired by Burisma for access to his father who was the US point person for Ukraine. Ukraine had to pass all their affairs by Joe Biden including their judicial picks. We know shokin fired up an investigation into Burisma in 2014/2015. Two weeks later he was fired. Joe Biden hand selected the Ukrainian prosecutors who then dropped this case.. this is factual timelines Now of course leftist sycophants at the new York times will tell you it's all just a giant conspiracy theory, don't believe your eyes, and claim without evidence shokin was corrupt. Of course this is just to cover for mob boss Joe Yes but what you fail to realize is that's ONLY BECAUSE TRUMP WAS COLLUDING WITH THE RUSSIANS!!! - some daft leftie nutbar, probably. Quote
robosmith Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 10 hours ago, West said: The transcript proves that Hunter Biden was hired by Burisma for access to his father who was the US point person for Ukraine. Ukraine had to pass all their affairs by Joe Biden including their judicial picks. We know shokin fired up an investigation into Burisma in 2014/2015. Two weeks later he was fired. Joe Biden hand selected the Ukrainian prosecutors who then dropped this case.. this is factual timelines Now of course leftist sycophants at the new York times will tell you it's all just a giant conspiracy theory, don't believe your eyes, and claim without evidence shokin was corrupt. Of course this is just to cover for mob boss Joe who appears to be at least a part of a large criminal enterprise who abuses public office for financial gain Quote the part of the Archer transcript which says ^this. You cannot because it doesn't say it and you have NO EVIDENCE for your fantasies aside from believing Shokin's LIES. Quote
robosmith Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 10 hours ago, CdnFox said: Yes but what you fail to realize is that's ONLY BECAUSE TRUMP WAS COLLUDING WITH THE RUSSIANS!!! - some daft leftie nutbar, probably. You just keep on illuminating your infantile naivete. AKA believing anything posted here which serves your agenda. Quote
CdnFox Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 27 minutes ago, robosmith said: You just keep on illuminating your infantile naivete. OOOOOO - look who's mommy gave him a new word-of-the-day calendar Now you'll be able to misuse all kinds of new words! (ps - you don't illuminate infantile naivete. But - gosh you were close to getting it right. You keep trying little guy!!!!) 2 Quote
WestCanMan Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 Trump colluded with Russians and Nick Sandman to get Jussie Smollett lynched in a mostly peaceful way but the vax saved him. We would never have known about any of this if the FBI didn't stumble across it while they were busy not investigating gymnast molestations in between their BSL4 lab robberies. 1 Quote If CNN gave an infinite number of monkeys an infinite number of typewriters, leftists would believe everything they typed. If you missed something on the Cultist Narrative Network, don't worry, the dolt horde here will make sure everyone hears it. "If it didn't come from CNN, it's heresy!" - leftist "intellectuals"
West Posted August 29, 2023 Author Report Posted August 29, 2023 1 hour ago, robosmith said: Quote the part of the Archer transcript which says ^this. You cannot because it doesn't say it and you have NO EVIDENCE for your fantasies aside from believing Shokin's LIES. This has been shown to you multiple times. All the things you call conspiracy theories are facts. Here's another fact. You are defending a criminal. Sad Quote
robosmith Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 46 minutes ago, CdnFox said: OOOOOO - look who's mommy gave him a new word-of-the-day calendar Now you'll be able to misuse all kinds of new words! (ps - you don't illuminate infantile naivete. But - gosh you were close to getting it right. You keep trying little guy!!!!) You're right. *I* don't illuminate infantile naivete; YOU DO, every time your ^infantile posts are displayed on my screen. LMAO Quote
robosmith Posted August 29, 2023 Report Posted August 29, 2023 14 minutes ago, West said: This has been shown to you multiple times. All the things you call conspiracy theories are facts. Here's another fact. You are defending a criminal. Sad The FACT displayed ^here is you got BUPKIS. I quoted Archer's answers that completely contradict your THREAD TITLE. Duh Quote
West Posted August 29, 2023 Author Report Posted August 29, 2023 On 8/4/2023 at 11:28 PM, West said: https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1686799149109256192/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1686799149109256192¤tTweetUser=TuckerCarlson "Obviously the brand of Biden adds alot when your dad is vice president". "They were going to deal with regulatory issues" "He was an expert in knowing the guy" "Understanding the regulatory climate means selling access at the end of the day" How many times would Joe Biden call in when business associated were on the phone "about 20" "At particular dinners or meetings he knew there were business associates" (Joe lied) https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1687436522625159168/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1687436522625159168¤tTweetUser=TuckerCarlson In speaking about Burisma "I brought hunter on board so that there would be a firm looking out for Burismas interests in Washington" "We've got the former president of Poland on board for regulatory reasons, we've got a few Ukrainians and now we can get the vice presidents son on board" Burisma to Hunter "we urgently need your advice on how you can use your influence" Re SHOKIN: "Issues with a visa... issues with money being tied up in London... this is what "strategic advisory" firms were hired for" "Big push by the European Union and the Atlantic council to fire shokin because he's corrupt... it's hard to decipher who was actually corrupt" "Shokin was considered a threat to the business (Burisma)" "Shokin was fired and Burisma was let off the hook" "Joe Biden was involved in the firing of Shokin" "Looking back at the rear view it looks like there was something there... I was told shokin was taken care of" Re Burisma "At one point the bursima guys told Hunter to call his dad?" "Yes... there was constant pressure to 'send signals' to leverage his dad, the Biden brand to help burisma survive" "He brought The ability to keep burisma out of trouble on the geopolitical stage.. keep them out of investigations, unfreeze assets.." "When asked to call his dad did he" "Vadim met with his dad at Cafe Milano" "I wasn't privied to the conversation". Hunters wages: "83,000 per month" "The second his father left the vps office his wage went down" Play dumb if you'd like. There's far more evidence that hunter sold access to his father than any of the dozens of conspiracy theories you've put out about Donnie. Quote
West Posted August 29, 2023 Author Report Posted August 29, 2023 2 minutes ago, robosmith said: The FACT displayed ^here is you got BUPKIS. I quoted Archer's answers that completely contradict your THREAD TITLE. Duh You've been shown multiple times. I'm not just going to keep wasting time on an imbecile who refuses to read. "It's a conspiracy theory that Hunter made millions while his dad abused his office even though all the evidence shows he did" 2 minutes ago, West said: @robosmith Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.