Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
55 minutes ago, Rebound said:

And yet, Fox cut a check Dominion for $787 million.  And they settled another suit with a Venezuelan businessman they smeared. And Smartmatic’s suit is coming up.  And Tucker got fired. 
 

So maybe, just maybe… you are wrong, and those words of his were lies. 

'

So far Murdoch's News Corp has paid out more than a billion over phone hacking in the UK and cases are still going through the courts 12 years after the first case. Get ready for a long haul, $787.5 million is just the beginning.

Posted
28 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

His honesty with his bosses seems to be a bit of a problem :)

It’s a strange move for a company to trash its cash cow.  It’s about ego and control though.  Fox sent a message that no one is beyond rebuke, if the top brass feels insulted or challenged by the help.  In the end it’s Murdoch’s money.  He can do as he likes with it.  

Posted
1 hour ago, Rebound said:

And yet, Fox cut a check Dominion for $787 million.  And they settled another suit with a Venezuelan businessman they smeared. And Smartmatic’s suit is coming up.  And Tucker got fired. 
 

So maybe, just maybe… you are wrong, and those words of his were lies. 

But he didn’t claim the election was rigged.  Identify the lie.  I don’t think he’s some super moral guy, but I appreciate his courage in saying what many people think but are afraid to say.  Most news is such cheerleading pablum.  

Posted
9 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

But he didn’t claim the election was rigged.  Identify the lie.  I don’t think he’s some super moral guy, but I appreciate his courage in saying what many people think but are afraid to say.  Most news is such cheerleading pablum.  

Why are people thinking that? Do you really think Carlson and FOX had nothing to do with feeding that narrative in order to profit from it?

Posted
33 minutes ago, Aristides said:

Why are people thinking that? Do you really think Carlson and FOX had nothing to do with feeding that narrative in order to profit from it?

Carlson is ON RECORD for demanding a fact checker be fired for telling the truth about Trump's LIES

Tucker Carlson Tried to Get Fox News Reporter Fired for Fact-Checking Trump

Quote

The most distraught figure was Carlson. “Do the executives understand how much credibility and trust we’ve lost with our audience?” he texted his producer. “We’re playing with fire, for real … an alternative like Newsmax could be devastating to us.”

On November 9, he told Scott, “I’ve never seen a reaction like this, to any media company. Kills me to watch it.”

In the following days, Carlson and his colleagues began to fixate on the financial risk the network faced if a rival competitor such as Newsmax stole its audience by catering more directly to election-fraud claims they knew to be false.

In a group text, Sean Hannity wrote to Carlson and Laura Ingraham on November 12: “In one week and one debate they destroyed a brand that took 25 years to build and the damage is incalculable.” Carlson replied, “It’s vandalism.” Contemplating a potential rival conservative network, Hannity mused, “Serious $$ with serious distribution could be a real problem. Imho they need to address but wtf do I know.” Carlson replied, “That could happen.”

Later that night, Carlson pointed Hannity to a tweet by Fox reporter Jacqui Heinrich, which fact-checked a tweet by Trump that mentioned Dominion voting conspiracy theories. “There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised,” she wrote.

“Please get her fired,” Carlson texted Hannity and Ingraham. “Seriously … What the f/ck? I’m actually shocked. It needs to stop immediately, like tonight. It’s measurably hurting the company. The stock price is down. Not a joke.”

Tucker Carlson Tried to Get Fox News Reporter Fired for Fact-Checking Trump

Posted
1 hour ago, Aristides said:

Why are people thinking that? Do you really think Carlson and FOX had nothing to do with feeding that narrative in order to profit from it?

I don’t lump people together and paint them with the same brush.  I look at individuals and their unique histories and acts.  Moreover, I don’t throw people out on the basis of a few things that they said or did unless they’re very serious, if I see value in other things that they’ve said or done.  

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, robosmith said:

Carlson is ON RECORD for demanding a fact checker be fired for telling the truth about Trump's LIES

Tucker Carlson Tried to Get Fox News Reporter Fired for Fact-Checking Trump

Tucker Carlson Tried to Get Fox News Reporter Fired for Fact-Checking Trump

Nope, he applied the rule that you don’t tear down your own colleagues, at least not publicly, which is what this “fact checker” attempted.

Edited by Zeitgeist
Posted
4 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

Nope, he applied the rule that you don’t tear down your own colleagues, at least not publicly, which is what this “fact checker” attempted.

That does appear to be the case.  And not really a serious attempt to get her fired either but more of a strong reaction to what she did, which was negatively impacting the company.

Other communcation shows that clearly Carlson knew that the claims were probably not true, but while he complained about sticking with it privately none of that made it to the public. And obviously he feels that's how it should be, don't air your dirty laundry in public.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, Nationalist said:

The truth? Beave...you and your little group of twits wouldn't know truth if it bit you.

How these fcks got ahold of Carlson's PRIVATE text messages is something I would be interested in. His personal beliefs and opinions should not have been used or exposed. I don't know that Carlson ever said he likes Trump on air. Perhaps you can show me that one?

In the meantime...you dumb shits have taken the other glove off. Its time the Republicans buried the fcking Biden family once and for all.!

His texts were Subpoenaed because it’s evidence in a lawsuit, dummy, that’s how. I love how you now resort to the typical criminal’s complaint: you don’t even deny he did the deed, you just complain he shouldn’t have gotten busted for it. 

Now you’re saying prove Carlson ever said he liked Trump Hilarious. 

Republican gloves have been on this whole time?  LMAO how much further can you extremists even go from here? I mean after your failed attempts to steal the election, attack the Capitol, kidnap governor, what’s left untried, nuclear terrorism?  

Posted
14 hours ago, Legato said:

The one all the lefties are frothing about. If you didn't see it, why the comment?. Yes I know Blackrock owns shares in Dominium Resources.

 

Hey Einstein Dominion Resources is an energy company totally unrelated to Dominion Voting Systems   Blackrock doesn’t own any shares of Dominion voting  Stop getting fooled by strangers on the internet already 

 

BlackRock doesn’t own stake in Dominion Voting Systems

 

https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-blackrock-dominion-fox-046024958724

  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

But he didn’t claim the election was rigged.  Identify the lie.  I don’t think he’s some super moral guy, but I appreciate his courage in saying what many people think but are afraid to say.  Most news is such cheerleading pablum.  

I already quoted his on air comments.  Your thinking is that he merely implied that it was rigged instead of outright saying so.  But the implication was there nonetheless, when he had privately said he knew the election had not been rigged.  He told his colleagues that Fox could not report the truth about the election fraud claims, because that would be bad for ratings.  And that is why Fox paid Dominion $787 million. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
3 hours ago, BeaverFever said:

His texts were Subpoenaed because it’s evidence in a lawsuit, dummy, that’s how. I love how you now resort to the typical criminal’s complaint: you don’t even deny he did the deed, you just complain he shouldn’t have gotten busted for it. 

Now you’re saying prove Carlson ever said he liked Trump Hilarious. 

Republican gloves have been on this whole time?  LMAO how much further can you extremists even go from here? I mean after your failed attempts to steal the election, attack the Capitol, kidnap governor, what’s left untried, nuclear terrorism?  

So you can't show where Carlson said he likes Trump. OK.

I'll tell ya what. This two-tiered justice is going to blow up in your faces. When it does, you will howl like a banshee. But it'll be exactly what you are begging for.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
7 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

It’s a strange move for a company to trash its cash cow.  It’s about ego and control though.  Fox sent a message that no one is beyond rebuke, if the top brass feels insulted or challenged by the help.  In the end it’s Murdoch’s money.  He can do as he likes with it.  

A cash cow that cost them a billion dollars is no cash cow. Fox will find someone to replace him who doesn’t get them embroiled in one lawsuit after another. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
8 hours ago, Rebound said:

And yet, Fox cut a check Dominion for $787 million.  And they settled another suit with a Venezuelan businessman they smeared. And Smartmatic’s suit is coming up.  And Tucker got fired. 
 

So maybe, just maybe… you are wrong, and those words of his were lies. 

I have a feeling FOX NEWS will suffer for their lack of support for their own people.

I also think this event only drives the wedge between conservative and liberal deeper and wider.

Where are Hunter's private texts? Joe Biden's? Dr. Jill's? Is this game gonna be played fairly?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
15 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

Carlson was one of a few voices making important critical points about the war in Ukraine, the collusion between government and big pharma (CNN, brought to you by Pfizer), and the virtual one party system that’s sometimes called Democrat, sometimes Republican, and that consistently props up the military industrial complex.

Being anti-vax isn’t being anti-big pharma. Republicans are pro big phaem amd pro big corporation in general. 
 

Being an unofficial a spokesperson for the Kremlin and cheering on Russia isn’t “making important critical points about the war in Ukraine”

He certainly never suggested anything about a “virtual one party system that’s sometimes called Democrat, sometimes Republican,” he’s a Republican mouthpiece

Ive never heard him complain about “the military industrial complex” like big pharma, Republicans love shilling for defence corporate welfare. Repeating the Kremlin’s anti-NATO propaganda is not standing yo to the military industrial complex 

Posted
49 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

I have a feeling FOX NEWS will suffer for their lack of support for their own people.

I also think this event only drives the wedge between conservative and liberal deeper and wider.

Where are Hunter's private texts? Joe Biden's? Dr. Jill's? Is this game gonna be played fairly?

I think that most Republican voters are sick and tired of Donald Trump.  
 

The Democrats are running Biden. How easily would Nikki Haley beat the pants off of him?  And what policy differences are there? None! She just doesn’t bring all the trash talk and hate. 

@reason10: “Hitler had very little to do with the Holocaust.”

 

Posted
4 minutes ago, Rebound said:

I think that most Republican voters are sick and tired of Donald Trump.  
 

The Democrats are running Biden. How easily would Nikki Haley beat the pants off of him?  And what policy differences are there? None! She just doesn’t bring all the trash talk and hate. 

Tough.

Personally, I don't care if Trump is the next POTUS or not. I care about this two-tiered justice system. The sheer and wanton destruction of society, economy and security.

If DeSantis does not enter the race, Trump will be the republican candidate. He may be regardless. 

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
2 hours ago, Rebound said:

I already quoted his on air comments.  Your thinking is that he merely implied that it was rigged instead of outright saying so.  But the implication was there nonetheless, when he had privately said he knew the election had not been rigged.  He told his colleagues that Fox could not report the truth about the election fraud claims, because that would be bad for ratings.  And that is why Fox paid Dominion $787 million. 

You’re putting words in his mouth.

 

42 minutes ago, BeaverFever said:

Being anti-vax isn’t being anti-big pharma. Republicans are pro big phaem amd pro big corporation in general. 
 

Being an unofficial a spokesperson for the Kremlin and cheering on Russia isn’t “making important critical points about the war in Ukraine”

He certainly never suggested anything about a “virtual one party system that’s sometimes called Democrat, sometimes Republican,” he’s a Republican mouthpiece

Ive never heard him complain about “the military industrial complex” like big pharma, Republicans love shilling for defence corporate welfare. Repeating the Kremlin’s anti-NATO propaganda is not standing yo to the military industrial complex 

’Clearly you haven’t listened to him.  He’s very critical of the Republican Party.  It doesn’t matter, you won’t listen.  You just believe everything you watch on MSM.  No critical thinking.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, CrakHoBarbie said:

 

Barb...its now obvious that the DOJ and FBI have been "slow walking" the Hunter Biden thing.

This should be a concern to you as an American citizen. Your justice system is lopsided and it shows. Would you be happy if the shoe were on the other foot?

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
2 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

You’re putting words in his mouth.

 

’Clearly you haven’t listened to him.  He’s very critical of the Republican Party.  It doesn’t matter, you won’t listen.  You just believe everything you watch on MSM.  No critical thinking.

Tucker clearly stated "the 2020 election was not fair". And he blamed mail in and electronic voting without one iota of evidence viable enough to be substantiated in a court of law. Period.

https://www.thewrap.com/tucker-carlson-trump-voting-machine-conspiracy-election-video/

Posted
2 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

You’re putting words in his mouth.

 

’Clearly you haven’t listened to him.  He’s very critical of the Republican Party.  It doesn’t matter, you won’t listen.  You just believe everything you watch on MSM.  No critical thinking.

Z don't expect too much from poor ol' Beave. He suffers greatly from TDS and is thus willing and able to lie constantly. His reputation doesn't matter. What matters is that his point of view be blasted all over the internet in endless tirades of hatred and panic.

Have some sympathy for the poor fool...geez... ;)

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted (edited)
9 hours ago, Zeitgeist said:

I don’t lump people together and paint them with the same brush.  I look at individuals and their unique histories and acts.  Moreover, I don’t throw people out on the basis of a few things that they said or did unless they’re very serious, if I see value in other things that they’ve said or done.  

You guys go on about the size of Tuckers audience. Do you honestly believe he and the other election fraud pedlars at FOX had no influence on how that audience thinks. Seriously? Seriously?

Edited by Aristides
  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

Barb...its now obvious that the DOJ and FBI have been "slow walking" the Hunter Biden thing.

This should be a concern to you as an American citizen. Your justice system is lopsided and it shows. Would you be happy if the shoe were on the other foot?

What bothers me is that alt-right extremists have found hunter guilty in the court of public opinion before any of the allegations against him have been proven. Y'all have even gone so far as to claim Donald lost the election because of unsubstantiated evidence on said laptop. Clearly, these alt-right advocates don't care whether the evidence has been substantiated or not. And that's an issue.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,852
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Wap75
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Wap75 earned a badge
      First Post
    • A Freeman earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • A Freeman earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...