TUCKER CARLSON AND THE JAN. 6 VIDEO

[robosmith]

3 hours ago, Nationalist said:

You sure are a strange person.

I'll take that as a compliment considering the mental problems you display here.

Clear demonstration that Carlson is LYING TO YOU with his OWN private communications and you just double down on HIS LIES. Like Trump, NO SHAME.

[Deluge]

On 3/10/2023 at 2:16 PM, CrakHoBarbie said:

.....

 

[reason10]

1 hour ago, robosmith said:

I'll take that as a compliment considering the mental problems you display here.

Clear demonstration that Carlson is LYING TO YOU with his OWN private communications and you just double down on HIS LIES. Like Trump, NO SHAME.

You're the only one with a mental problem. At least that's what liberals would cause your condition. Those of us with brains would conclude you're just uneducated and stupid.

Carlson is not lying. He's more honest than ANY goose stepping liberal from ANY of your fcking fake news sources.

[WestCanMan]

57 minutes ago, reason10 said:

You're the only one with a mental problem. At least that's what liberals would cause your condition. Those of us with brains would conclude you're just uneducated and stupid.

Carlson is not lying. He's more honest than ANY goose stepping liberal from ANY of your fcking fake news sources.

Dude, you gotta put people like that on ignore. 

He's never going to add anything to the conversation, all he's good for here is lying and name-calling. 

It seems like the leftists here only have one goal, and that's to stop this thread from being overloaded with evidence. As long as you're talking to guys like that about who's a poopyhead, the conversation isn't moving fwd.

None of those clowns will ever address the video of Chadsley's lawyer saying that the DOJ withheld exculpatory evidence.  

They're here to talk about anything but that. So let's have conversations about things like that. 

Find some other interesting video and post that.

[Hodad]

17 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

OMG dude, you're making a mountain out of a molehill. 

This story is about women who had sex with a married man and then set out to make hundreds of thousands of dollars from it. 

The length and breadth of Tucker's "lie" is saying that they "approached Trump" when they actually just went to some media outlets to get big dough for their stories. Big deal.

That's not even comparable to MSM outlets (including ours in Canada) saying "This guy is a gentle giant ? who was murdered by police for nothing" and then continuing to say that while riots were destroying entire communities. 

Do you understand the difference between 1) being wrong about whether or not two women approached Trump to extort money from him or whether they just sold their stories to the MSM, and 2) MSM outlets lying to incite violent rioting? 

Isn't it really bad for media outlets to fabricate reasons for rioting? 

Did you hear all that on FOX News?   As usual, you want people to grant your false narrative as a premise and then debate some other topic for which it is a dependency. Sounds super fun.

You lying about the Michael Brown coverage is a pretty poor distraction from the explicit proof that FOX deliberately lies to and manipulates it's audience. This isn't news to the rest of us, but for FOX devotees it's surely jarring. This may help.

Edited March 12, 2023 by Hodad

[Rebound]

15 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

OMG dude, you're making a mountain out of a molehill. 

This story is about women who had sex with a married man and then set out to make hundreds of thousands of dollars from it. 

The length and breadth of Tucker's "lie" is saying that they "approached Trump" when they actually just went to some media outlets to get big dough for their stories. Big deal.

That's not even comparable to MSM outlets (including ours in Canada) saying "This guy is a gentle giant ? who was murdered by police for nothing" and then continuing to say that while riots were destroying entire communities. 

Do you understand the difference between 1) being wrong about whether or not two women approached Trump to extort money from him or whether they just sold their stories to the MSM, and 2) MSM outlets lying to incite violent rioting? 

Isn't it really bad for media outlets to fabricate reasons for rioting? 

Can you read?

the Federal judge ruled that Tucker Carlson’s viewers KNOW that he is lying to them. Just… read dude. READ.  Educate yourself from facts.  I linked to the actual written opinion of the judge, not from a news outlet or another talking head. Primary source. Read it for yourself. Tucker Carlson is not “the news.” He is an entertainment TV show who lies to his viewers.  Not only do you have his sworn deposition to that effect, you also have his text messages saying that he hates Donald Trump and he did not believe Trump’s claims of a stolen election at all. He knew them to be fake. He said so.  
 

Yet you still stare at the TV and believe the man. You only think he’s lying when he tells you he’s lying.  

Edited March 12, 2023 by Rebound

[robosmith]

4 hours ago, reason10 said:

You're the only one with a mental problem. At least that's what liberals would cause your condition. Those of us with brains would conclude you're just uneducated and stupid.

Carlson is not lying. He's more honest than ANY goose stepping liberal from ANY of your fcking fake news sources.

Another ^CULT member who cannot admit he's been DUPED. LMAO

[reason10]

7 hours ago, robosmith said:

Another ^CULT member who cannot admit he's been DUPED. LMAO

You don't even have the brains to discuss the topic. All you know how to do is retreat to dumbass stuff like CULT when you lose an argument. 

[reason10]

18 hours ago, robosmith said:

We KNOW YOU ARE.

The credibility of of Tucker Carlson has EVERYTHING to do with what he shows on HIS SHOW. Duh.

You don't speak for any WE, except for a few fellow retards.

[reason10]

[reason10]

[reason10]

[reason10]

[reason10]

[reason10]

[reason10]

[reason10]

[Nationalist]

14 hours ago, robosmith said:

I'll take that as a compliment considering the mental problems you display here.

Clear demonstration that Carlson is LYING TO YOU with his OWN private communications and you just double down on HIS LIES. Like Trump, NO SHAME.

It's sooo...stereotypical...of you...a common powder-puff...to find an example of a perceived "enemy" "lying", yet can completely ignore the following...

https://dailycaller.com/2018/08/31/cnn-list-bungled-reporting-fake-news/

A trait BTW...that has earned you rabid Liberals...pet names like "powder puff"..."Tweenkies"..."Libbies".

[Rebound]

19 hours ago, WestCanMan said:

Chadlsey's own lawyer went on national television and in no uncertain terms accused the DOJ of committing a crime (withholding exculpatory evidence).

This is a man whose livelihood depends on his license to practice law, either: 1) committing libel against the US Federal Gov't and putting his career and his freedom in jeopardy or 2) explaining that the DOJ had video evidence of Chadsley from inside capitol buildings which they refused to allow him access to for his trial.

If that lawyer is telling the truth, this completely upends the US criminal justice system. The precedent will now be set for district attorneys to withhold exculpatory evidence from the accused at will.

It means they can know beyond a shadow of doubt that the person that they have accused is innocent, and that evidence of that exists, and still put him on trial with a reasonable chance of getting a conviction.

If Schumer and his evil dolt horde have some video evidence of Chadsley being the man that he was accused of being, why don't they show it?

This was supposed to be a violent insurrection, aimed at overthrowing the gov't. They have all the evidence that they could possibly need at their fingertips, if it exists, so why don't they show it (with no sound effects added) instead of just alluding to it and saying "DON'T WATCH TUCKER!!!"

It's worth noting that there are lots of people who are stupid enough to listen to comments like: "Don't watch the videos for yourself, just believe our narrative without evidence!" @bcsapper for example. 

Exculpatory my ass. 
The man stood on the speaker’s podium of the US House of Representatives after violently forcing Congress to flee for their safety.  Gimme a break. 

[Aristides]

 

[WestCanMan]

16 hours ago, Hodad said:

Did you hear all that on FOX News?   As usual, you want people to grant your false narrative as a premise and then debate some other topic for which it is a dependency. Sounds super fun.

You lying about the Michael Brown coverage is a pretty poor distraction from the explicit proof that FOX deliberately lies to and manipulates it's audience. This isn't news to the rest of us, but for FOX devotees it's surely jarring. This may help.

I read about the accusations against Tucker in someone's link, earlier in the thread. Read it for yourself if you'd like to comment.

I never told a single lie about M Brown, and it's weird for you to just make that accusation as a blank statement, without even attempting to describe those 'lies'.

1) It's a fact that there was video of M Brown's violent crime on national TV right on the day he was shot

2) It's a fact that the MSM chose to ignore his crime, which was caught on video that they had access to, and instead chose to go all-in on the "gentle giant' narrative even though they knew it was false.

The media couldn't possibly be any more dishonest than that They essentially chose violent riots over the truth.  

 

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

Exculpatory my ass. 
The man stood on the speaker’s podium of the US House of Representatives after violently forcing Congress to flee for their safety.  Gimme a break. 

Show the video of it then.

The Dems had two years to make that case while they alone had access to the video, as no(actual) GOPers were on the witch hunt committee. 

And for your nformation - NOTHING that you said overrides the DOJ's legal responsibility to provide the defence with all the evidence against him. 

A crime was absolutely committed against the defendant, unless his lawyer chose to go on national TV and commit libel against the US gov't.

[WestCanMan]

23 hours ago, bcsapper said:

**He said nothing at all, just posted a meme to show his devotion to the cult**

[WestCanMan]

6 hours ago, reason10 said:

I saw this one:

 

[Hodad]

3 hours ago, Rebound said:

Exculpatory my ass. 
The man stood on the speaker’s podium of the US House of Representatives after violently forcing Congress to flee for their safety.  Gimme a break. 

Exactly. He's in prison for obstruction of official government proceedings. That description dramatically undersells the gravity of what happened that dark day, but the notion that excerpted footage is exculpatory is pure nonsense.