Nationalist Posted March 11, 2023 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 6 hours ago, robosmith said: You are completely evasive and deflecting when you're cornered. Typical cognitive dissonance. LMAO No. That's cognitive dissonance. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mako Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) 15 hours ago, robosmith said: I am an apologist for the COP DOING HIS JOB of PROTECTING Capitol employees from MOB INVADERS. The thing you DON'T UNDERSTAND is if she's not shot, the MOB FOLLOWS Babbitt into the House chambers. The it's too late for the handful of cops and any Congress people inside and many more would DIE. You really don’t know what would happen. The protesters didn’t kill anyone. Anyway Babbitt could have been stopped by arresting her. Why couldn’t the cops have arrested her? Why are you so desperate to murder an unarmed woman who never threatened anyone? Isn’t it better to use zip ties against protesters than to kill them? Normal people: Violence should only be used as a last resort. robosmith: Blood! Blood! I want more blood! I want to kill those I disagree with. Edited March 11, 2023 by Mako 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 9 hours ago, WestCanMan said: Cite You didn’t know this? “The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' " “The Federal Judgr wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes." Judge Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable." https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2019cv11161/527808/39/ 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mako Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) Bottom line: Only one person was intentionally killed on Jan. 6. A cop panicked and killed an unarmed woman who never threatened anyone. A woman killed for trespassing. Only a storm trooper would defend that. Of course the election was stolen! The corporate media and social media lied to the people again and again. They lied Biden into the presidency. https://nypost.com/2022/03/30/media-avoided-the-ties-between-joe-biden-and-hunters-laptop/ https://tippinsights.com/shock-poll-8-in-10-think-biden-laptop-cover-up-changed-election/ Edited March 11, 2023 by Mako Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) 2 hours ago, Mako said: Bottom line: Only one person was intentionally killed on Jan. 6. A cop panicked and killed an unarmed woman who never threatened anyone. A woman killed for trespassing. Only a storm trooper would defend that. Of course the election was stolen! The corporate media and social media lied to the people again and again. They lied Biden into the presidency. https://nypost.com/2022/03/30/media-avoided-the-ties-between-joe-biden-and-hunters-laptop/ https://tippinsights.com/shock-poll-8-in-10-think-biden-laptop-cover-up-changed-election/ Not one single precinct anywhere in the US changed the outcome of their Presidential vote. If you truly think the election was stolen, you are a true fool. Fox News: “We Are Lying to You!!!” Fox Viewers: “No, You’re Not!!!” Fox News has sworn under oath to a Federal Judge that they lie to their viewers and the judge agreed that Fox viewers should realize they’re lying. How much more proof could you possibly need? Edited March 11, 2023 by Rebound 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rebound Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 13 hours ago, Nationalist said: Lol...ur so boringly monotone. Truth boring you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted March 11, 2023 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 1 hour ago, Rebound said: Truth boring you? No. The whining is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mako Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 4 hours ago, Rebound said: Not one single precinct anywhere in the US changed the outcome of their Presidential vote. If you truly think the election was stolen, you are a true fool. Fox News: “We Are Lying to You!!!” Fox Viewers: “No, You’re Not!!!” Fox News has sworn under oath to a Federal Judge that they lie to their viewers and the judge agreed that Fox viewers should realize they’re lying. How much more proof could you possibly need? You just ignored all the lying from the corporate media. Why are you their dupe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aristides Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 16 minutes ago, Mako said: You just ignored all the lying from the corporate media. Why are you their dupe? FOX is not corporate. Too funny. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reason10 Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 22 hours ago, Rebound said: For starters, Tucker Carlson defended himself Iawsuit by declaring under oath that he does not tell the truth during his segments on Fox and that his viewers know he’s lying. Guess you aren’t in on the joke. That has nothing to do with the subject of this thread. Are you REALLY that stupid? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 8 hours ago, Nationalist said: No. That's cognitive dissonance. No, IT'S NOT, lDIOT. What is cognitive dissonance? Quote Cognitive dissonance occurs when a person holds two related but contradictory cognitions, or thoughts. The psychologist Leon Festinger came up with the concept in 1957. In his book A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Festinger proposed that two ideas can be consonant or dissonant. Consonant ideas logically flow from one another, while dissonant ideas oppose one another. For example, a person who wishes to protect other people and who believes that the COVID-19 pandemic is real might wear a mask in public. This is consonance. If that same person believed the COVID-19 pandemic was real but refused to wear a mask, their values and behaviors would contradict each other. This is dissonance. The dissonance between two contradictory ideas, or between an idea and a behavior, creates discomfort. Festinger argued that cognitive dissonance is more intense when a person holds many dissonant views, and those views are important to them. YOUR cognitive dissonance occurs when you receive INFORMATION which contradicts YOUR BIASED BELIEFS. It is that dissonance which causes you to arbitrarily REJECT that INFORMATION, even when it comes from the SAME SOURCE (FOX) as YOUR BELIEFS. That is what makes YOUR rejection ARBITRARY. Share on Pinterest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robosmith Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) 44 minutes ago, reason10 said: That has nothing to do with the subject of this thread. Are you REALLY that stupid? We KNOW YOU ARE. The credibility of of Tucker Carlson has EVERYTHING to do with what he shows on HIS SHOW. Duh. Edited March 11, 2023 by robosmith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
reason10 Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 7 minutes ago, robosmith said: We KNOW YOU ARE. The credibility of of Tucker Carlson has EVERYTHING to do with what he shows on HIS SHOW. Duh. Considering that he is kicking the asses of the Gestapo stations (CNN, PMSNBC, etc) I'd say he's the most credible talking head of his time slot. And IT'S A FCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCKING VIDEO, shit for brains. That video has made LIARS out of Nazi Pelosi and the rest of her fellow Democrat FELONS. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nationalist Posted March 11, 2023 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 22 minutes ago, robosmith said: No, IT'S NOT, lDIOT. What is cognitive dissonance? YOUR cognitive dissonance occurs when you receive INFORMATION which contradicts YOUR BIASED BELIEFS. It is that dissonance which causes you to arbitrarily REJECT that INFORMATION, even when it comes from the SAME SOURCE (FOX) as YOUR BELIEFS. That is what makes YOUR rejection ARBITRARY. Share on Pinterest You sure are a strange person. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 17 hours ago, bcsapper said: It's weird that you have no comment about the fact that CNN, MSNBC et al lied about Michael Brown just to keep riots going... Are you really that enamoured with them that you can't even talk about their lies? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: It's weird that you have no comment about the fact that CNN, MSNBC et al lied about Michael Brown just to keep riots going... Are you really that enamoured with them that you can't even talk about their lies? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 8 hours ago, Rebound said: You didn’t know this? “The "'general tenor' of the show should then inform a viewer that [Carlson] is not 'stating actual facts' about the topics he discusses and is instead engaging in 'exaggeration' and 'non-literal commentary.' " “The Federal Judgr wrote: "Fox persuasively argues, that given Mr. Carlson's reputation, any reasonable viewer 'arrive[s] with an appropriate amount of skepticism' about the statement he makes." Judge Vyskocil, an appointee of President Trump's, added, "Whether the Court frames Mr. Carlson's statements as 'exaggeration,' 'non-literal commentary,' or simply bloviating for his audience, the conclusion remains the same — the statements are not actionable." https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917747123/you-literally-cant-believe-the-facts-tucker-carlson-tells-you-so-say-fox-s-lawye https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-york/nysdce/1:2019cv11161/527808/39/ OMG dude, you're making a mountain out of a molehill. This story is about women who had sex with a married man and then set out to make hundreds of thousands of dollars from it. The length and breadth of Tucker's "lie" is saying that they "approached Trump" when they actually just went to some media outlets to get big dough for their stories. Big deal. That's not even comparable to MSM outlets (including ours in Canada) saying "This guy is a gentle giant ? who was murdered by police for nothing" and then continuing to say that while riots were destroying entire communities. Do you understand the difference between 1) being wrong about whether or not two women approached Trump to extort money from him or whether they just sold their stories to the MSM, and 2) MSM outlets lying to incite violent rioting? Isn't it really bad for media outlets to fabricate reasons for rioting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) @bcsapper Ooh, Carlson wasn't entirely accurate about how 2 women tried to cash in on the lurid details of their affairs with a married man. Shocker. Again: How bad is it that the MSM outlets that you favour over Fox lied about Michael Brown for months in order to keep riots going? How does that compare? Are you an adult? Are you able to talk about this, or are you just gonna keep slithering? Edited March 11, 2023 by WestCanMan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: @bcsapper Ooh, Carlson wasn't entirely accurate about how 2 women tried to cash in on the lurid details of their affairs with a married man. Shocker. Again: How bad is it that the MSM outlets that you favour over Fox lied about Michael Brown for months in order to keep riots going? How does that compare? Are you an adult? Are you able to talk about this, or are you just gonna keep slithering? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 2 minutes ago, bcsapper said: Just answer the question, gutless wonder: How bad is it that the MSM outlets that you favour over Fox lied about Michael Brown for months in order to keep riots going? How does that compare? Are you an adult? Are you able to talk about this, or are you just gonna keep slithering? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 Chadlsey's own lawyer went on national television and in no uncertain terms accused the DOJ of committing a crime (withholding exculpatory evidence). This is a man whose livelihood depends on his license to practice law, either: 1) committing libel against the US Federal Gov't and putting his career and his freedom in jeopardy or 2) explaining that the DOJ had video evidence of Chadsley from inside capitol buildings which they refused to allow him access to for his trial. If that lawyer is telling the truth, this completely upends the US criminal justice system. The precedent will now be set for district attorneys to withhold exculpatory evidence from the accused at will. It means they can know beyond a shadow of doubt that the person that they have accused is innocent, and that evidence of that exists, and still put him on trial with a reasonable chance of getting a conviction. If Schumer and his evil dolt horde have some video evidence of Chadsley being the man that he was accused of being, why don't they show it? This was supposed to be a violent insurrection, aimed at overthrowing the gov't. They have all the evidence that they could possibly need at their fingertips, if it exists, so why don't they show it (with no sound effects added) instead of just alluding to it and saying "DON'T WATCH TUCKER!!!" It's worth noting that there are lots of people who are stupid enough to listen to comments like: "Don't watch the videos for yourself, just believe our narrative without evidence!" @bcsapper for example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 39 minutes ago, WestCanMan said: Just answer the question, gutless wonder: How bad is it that the MSM outlets that you favour over Fox lied about Michael Brown for months in order to keep riots going? How does that compare? Are you an adult? Are you able to talk about this, or are you just gonna keep slithering? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hodad Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 (edited) On 3/11/2023 at 7:11 AM, Mako said: Bottom line: Only one person was intentionally killed on Jan. 6. A cop panicked and killed an unarmed woman who never threatened anyone. A woman killed for trespassing. Only a storm trooper would defend that. Of course the election was stolen! The corporate media and social media lied to the people again and again. They lied Biden into the presidency. https://nypost.com/2022/03/30/media-avoided-the-ties-between-joe-biden-and-hunters-laptop/ https://tippinsights.com/shock-poll-8-in-10-think-biden-laptop-cover-up-changed-election/ You seem to live in some kind of MAGA fantasy land. Babbitt was NOT killed for trespassing. She was a certified loon at the vanguard of a howling mob that was *literally* breaking through barricaded doors to get to the legislators on the other side. Those officers were, again, literally, the last line of defense between our elected officials and the mob. It's difficult to imagine a more justified shooting, and indeed multiple investigations determined the that the officer acted appropriately. It's a shame when metal health issues and/or extreme stupidity lead to violence and death, but Babbitt absolutely earned her fate and her death may have saved many other lives. Edited March 12, 2023 by Hodad 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted March 11, 2023 Report Share Posted March 11, 2023 56 minutes ago, bcsapper said: *nothing, just posted another meme* What a gutless wonder you are, hey? All you can do is post memes from Occupy Democrats or some crap. The fact remains, all Tucker is accused of doing is saying “They approached Trump” when they really just went to newspapers to cash in. The MSM in the US told a bunch if lies to get riots going. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.