Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
31 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

What law? What charter? What about them?

Are you implying one of them  was breached by government? If so, what, exactly.

You have been asked this before and cannot provide any proper response, only your perceived response :)

OK.

https://www.macleans.ca/politics/ottawa/justin-trudeau-should-read-the-charter-of-rights/

https://www.jccf.ca/trudeau-warned-over-violating-charter-freedom-of-the-press/

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/14/trudeau-broke-ethics-law-in-snc-lavalin-case-watchdog-rules

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-canada-notwithstanding-clause-idUSL1N2T819Y

Pixie-Dust "may" survive the law suits, but his legacy will be reduced to the dirt he is.

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
On 10/21/2022 at 10:25 AM, West said:

Should Trudeau go on trial for war crimes? 

Congratulations on starting the dumbest thread of 2022.  Wow.  

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
4 hours ago, ExFlyer said:

Who said thousands?? Making stuff up again.... as usual.

Dissolve Parliament?

Leaders of truck convoy protests sought to overthrow government, national security adviser says

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-leaders-of-truck-convoy-protests-sought-overthrow-of-government/

The protests weren’t about that for the vast majority of people, and among the people who wanted to “overthrow the government, there was no proposal to use violence or subvert the parliamentary system.  

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Nationalist said:

 

OK.

1. Macleans - Southern Alberta Bible Camp, abortion.... Huh? Nothign  to do with EMA or truckers debacle

2. "excluding alternative media from his press conferences" - nothing to do with EMA or truckers debacle. Opinion piece from 2020 that got nowhere.

3. "violated the country’s ethics laws", nothing to do with charter or EMA or truckers debacle.

4. " known as the notwithstanding clause, allows a provincial government or Parliament to introduce an unconstitutional law which can override certain aspects of the charter for a period" from Dec 2021, again, nothing to do with EMA or truckers debacle.

So, keep digging because you dug the wrong hole for this topic.

So sad that you always lose the fact checking part. LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
33 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

The protests weren’t about that for the vast majority of people, and among the people who wanted to “overthrow the government, there was no proposal to use violence or subvert the parliamentary system.  

Regardless of how many, they overtook the real reason for the protest.

Also, the "vast majority" of Canadians did not support the action of the ....whatever it became , a debacle.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
4 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Regardless of how many, they overtook the real reason for the protest.

Also, the "vast majority" of Canadians did not support the action of the ....whatever it became , a debacle.

That’s nonsense.  The protesters were nonviolent and there were no serious threats or extremists, as indicated by the OPP.  Do you work for the Liberal PR team?

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Nationalist said:

Flyer...it's not as if they stormed the parliament and took over.

They have been trashed by the media for wanting Pixie-Dust out.

Hell I want Pixie-Dust out. Should I be jailed?

It's now illegal to oppose the government but we aren't supposed to call him a tyrant because that hurts the lefties feelings. 

  • Like 2
  • Downvote 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

That’s nonsense.  The protesters were nonviolent and there were no serious threats or extremists, as indicated by the OPP.  Do you work for the Liberal PR team?

Where did I say they were violent?? Don't make up stuff LOL

Look, just because your links were off base, don't have a hissy fit LOL

Anti Vax were overtaken by anti mandate then by freedom.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
7 minutes ago, West said:

It's now illegal to oppose the government but we aren't supposed to call him a tyrant because that hurts the lefties feelings. 

Who said, ever, that it is illegal to oppose government???  It happens every election. One party tries to overthrow the one in power. Every single federal election since Sept 20 1867.

You really do make shiit up eh? |LOL

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
30 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

 

OK.

1. Macleans - Southern Alberta Bible Camp, abortion.... Huh? Nothign  to do with EMA or truckers debacle

2. "excluding alternative media from his press conferences" - nothing to do with EMA or truckers debacle. Opinion piece from 2020 that got nowhere.

3. "violated the country’s ethics laws", nothing to do with charter or EMA or truckers debacle.

4. " known as the notwithstanding clause, allows a provincial government or Parliament to introduce an unconstitutional law which can override certain aspects of the charter for a period" from Dec 2021, again, nothing to do with EMA or truckers debacle.

So, keep digging because you dug the wrong hole for this topic.

So sad that you always lose the fact checking part. LOL

You asked...

Quote

What law? What charter? What about them?

Are you implying one of them  was breached by government? If so, what, exactly.

You have been asked this before and cannot provide any proper response, only your perceived response :)

I answered. Its not my fault you don't like the answer.

  • Like 1

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
40 minutes ago, West said:

It's now illegal to oppose the government but we aren't supposed to call him a tyrant because that hurts the lefties feelings. 

Yet here you are, panties twisted and raging about Trudeau, and somehow nobody's come to arrest you.  ?

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
1 hour ago, West said:

It's now illegal to oppose the government but we aren't supposed to call him a tyrant because that hurts the lefties feelings. 

Nope. It makes us ROTFL. Doing things like comparing Trudeau to a dictator and his response to the convoy as being on par with Tiananmen Square hurts Conservatives chances of being electable.

  • Like 3
  • Downvote 1

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Nationalist said:

You asked...

I answered. Its not my fault you don't like the answer.

Those are not answers to the question of the EMA and breach of charter and laws you say happened.

Those are rectal plucks with no applicability whatsoever.

You certainly are one of the best at deflection and sadly think you have made a point when in fact, you just skirt every request for proof because your are full of BS.

Edited by ExFlyer
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 1

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Those are not answers to the question of the EMA and breach of charter and laws you say happened.

Those are rectal plucks with no applicability whatsoever.

You certainly are one of the best at deflection and sadly think you have made a point when in fact, you just skirt every request for proof because your are full of BS.

https://farmersforum.com/biggest-case-in-canada-mainstream-media-ignores-vaccine-mandate-court-challenge/

Isn't this case still ongoing?

Its so lonely in m'saddle since m'horse died.

Posted
1 hour ago, ExFlyer said:

Those are not answers to the question of the EMA and breach of charter and laws you say happened.

Those are rectal plucks with no applicability whatsoever.

You certainly are one of the best at deflection and sadly think you have made a point when in fact, you just skirt every request for proof because your are full of BS.

This protest didn't even come close to meeting the threshold of the EA. It's why Trudeau was mocked on the world stage and why senators were about to slap it down before Trudeau decided to save himself the embarrassment and withdraw it. 

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted
1 hour ago, eyeball said:

Nope. It makes us ROTFL. Doing things like comparing Trudeau to a dictator and his response to the convoy as being on par with Tiananmen Square hurts Conservatives chances of being electable.

Yes when you invoke the War Measures act over lack of parking in downtown Ottawa you deserve the label as a dictator

  • Downvote 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Moonbox said:

Yet here you are, panties twisted and raging about Trudeau, and somehow nobody's come to arrest you.  ?

Coming from a guy raging about those darn unvaxxed getting a booth next to him at a restaurant

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, West said:

Coming from a guy raging about those darn unvaxxed getting a booth next to him at a restaurant

When did I do that?  Did you maybe make that up because you couldn't think of an intelligent response?  ?

There there.../headpat

Edited by Moonbox
  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 1

"A man is no more entitled to an opinion for which he cannot account than he does for a pint of beer for which he cannot pay" - Anonymous

Posted
7 hours ago, Nationalist said:

We're talking about the law and the Canadian Charter. Not the "perception" of CBC and its army of zombies.

So, again I ask. What law? What breach??

You are only making the noise a scream in a vacuum makes.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
36 minutes ago, West said:

This protest didn't even come close to meeting the threshold of the EA. It's why Trudeau was mocked on the world stage and why senators were about to slap it down before Trudeau decided to save himself the embarrassment and withdraw it. 

Says who? The testimony so far is only what was anticipated for the first weekend.

Crap did not occur till later.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/here-s-what-interim-ottawa-police-chief-bell-told-the-emergencies-act-commission-1.6122658

"Bell said one of the gaps in the city's intelligence was how the truckers and other anti-COVID-19 restriction and anti-government protesters would look to use Ottawa residents as a "leverage point."

"We've never experienced, and had no intelligence to indicate that it was actually going to be the leverage of the community and the activities of the protesters to use our community members through their activities, as the leverage point to be heard,"

"There wasn't any information that identified that, and that for me is what created the need, the emerging need for us to make sure that we had the action plans in place as we saw that emerge. Our communities were dramatically exposed to violent activity over that period of time,"

 

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But you are not entitled to your own facts.

Posted
9 minutes ago, ExFlyer said:

Says who? The testimony so far is only what was anticipated for the first weekend.

Crap did not occur till later.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/here-s-what-interim-ottawa-police-chief-bell-told-the-emergencies-act-commission-1.6122658

"Bell said one of the gaps in the city's intelligence was how the truckers and other anti-COVID-19 restriction and anti-government protesters would look to use Ottawa residents as a "leverage point."

"We've never experienced, and had no intelligence to indicate that it was actually going to be the leverage of the community and the activities of the protesters to use our community members through their activities, as the leverage point to be heard,"

"There wasn't any information that identified that, and that for me is what created the need, the emerging need for us to make sure that we had the action plans in place as we saw that emerge. Our communities were dramatically exposed to violent activity over that period of time,"

 

?.. 

Oh those anti vaxxers are both Neanderthals and a clever bunch eh

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Posted (edited)

So far Trudeau's approach seems to be to toss Sloly under the bus and try to give the illusions that parking violations justify shutting down a right to protest. No honor among thieves as the saying goes

Edited by West

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,833
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    maria orsic
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • VanidaCKP earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • maria orsic earned a badge
      First Post
    • Majikman earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • oops earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Politics1990 went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...