Jump to content

First a trickle....Now a flood

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, dialamah said:

I don't know, but the last time you made predictions about mandates never being lifted you were wrong.

Not really.

They are continually held over our heads like the sword of damocles.

Do you think the government is lying when they say they will require shots every 9 months and can change the definition of fully vaccinated whenever they want?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, dialamah said:

I don't know, but the last time you made predictions about mandates never being lifted you were wrong.   Keep that in mind when you are prophesying.

Yes, scare-mongering.  Mandates have not been imposed and the word "required" in the headline is misleading - regardless of what happens.  Media is supposed to present facts - not misleading headlines.  At the moment, here in BC, I can't get a fourth dose even if I wanted to.  Mandates seem pretty far fetched at this point.

They are still being imposed at the federal level, which means any federal employee, any federal service and wherever the fed has final say.

Here is a headline with the word “required”

Canadians required to get COVID shot every nine months

For those of you who do not habla-

Canadians will be required to get a booster shot every nine months for the foreseeable future, Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos told reporters.



  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:


Canadians will be required to get a booster shot every nine months for the foreseeable future, Health Minister Jean-Yves Duclos told reporters.



I wonder what the science is behind the 9 month thing.  Every study shows immunity wanes very quickly - within a few weeks to a few months after vaccination.

Perhaps they know that shooting yourself up with toxic spike protein every 2-3 months would be disastrous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, sharkman said:

And here we have the campaign to vax toddlers in the US.  WSJ actually prints that it seems political…



Good article, but still a bit weasel-y.


Scientists are also discovering that triple-vaccinated adults who were previously infected with the Wuhan variant have a weaker immune response to Omicron, leaving them more susceptible to reinfection. This phenomenon, called “immunological imprinting,” could explain why children who received three Pfizer shots were more likely to get reinfected.

It's not really a "phenomenon".  It's a well-known fact that this happens with repeated, unnecessary shots.  Especially leaky ones, like the 'Vid vaxes are.  The immune system starts to fail.  And this is exactly what we're seeing, as reported in this article, as well - multiple vaxxed adults contracting and dying from covid more than unvaxxed adults.

Which makes the whole "inject yourself with toxic spike every 9 months, or else" thing.....very suspicious.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2022 at 2:15 PM, Goddess said:

So far, the "conspiracy theorist" scientists are batting 100%.

CBC, CTV and Global, etc. - goose egg.

Yep. I remember when this forum called me a Nazi for explaining what I had learned over 20 years of on-the-job training.

But those folks sure are all quiet now.

Or maybe they died

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UK doctors lay it all on the line to keep children out of harm's way.

FDA meeting records show the WCH issued a global recall on the children's vaccines THE SAME MONTH the US approved the genetic products for 6 months-5 yrs of age.

Letter to the UK Gov from 76 Doctors: Comprehensive Reasons Why the US FDA Decision Authorizing COVID Vaccinations in Infants and Young Children Must Not Happen in the UK - Global ResearchGlobal Research - Centre for Research on Globalization




It is noteworthy that the Pfizer documentation presented to the FDA has huge gaps in the evidence provided:

  • The protocol was changed mid-trial. The original two-dose schedule exhibited poor immunogenicity with efficacy far below the required standard. A third dose was added by which time many of the original placebo recipients had been vaccinated.
  • There was no statistically significant difference between the placebo and vaccinated groups in either the 6–23-month age group or the 2-4-year-olds, even after the third dose. Astonishingly, the results were based on just three participants in the younger age group (one vaccinated and two placebo) and just seven participants in the older 2–4-year-olds (two vaccinated and five placebo). Indeed, for the younger age group the confidence intervals ranged from minus-367% to plus-99%. The manufacturer stated that the numbers were too low to draw any confident conclusions. Moreover, these limited numbers come only from children infected more than seven days after the third dose.
  • Over the whole time period from the first dose onwards (see page 39 Tables 19 and 20), there were a total of 225 infected children in the vaccinated arm and 150 in the placebo arm, giving a calculated vaccine efficacy of only 25% (14% for the 6-23 months, and 33% for 2-4s).
  • The additional immunogenicity studies against Omicron, requested by the FDA, only involved a total of 66 children tested one month after the third dose (see page 35).




It is noteworthy that Sweden and Norway are not recommending the vaccine for 5-11s and Holland is not recommending it for children who have already had COVID-19. The director of the Danish Health and Medicines Authority stated recently that with what is now known, the decision to vaccinate children was a mistake.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Canadian Dr's blog:  He breaks down the PHAC stats from April and May this year, quite well.

Importance of Vit. D and how the vaccines deplete the body of it.  He speculates that this is the reason why triple-vaxxed are dying in droves.


Dr David Grimes: Covid-19 & Vitamin D : Lack of benefit of vaccines in Canada

There appears to be mortality benefit from one or two vaccinations, but the benefit is lost in those with three vaccinations.
My understanding of this is that each vaccination creates an intense immune stimulation, its very purpose. However it is known that immune activation comsumes the essential Vitamin D, a molecule of which can be used only once and then it is irreversibly de-activated. It follows, but is as yet untested or unpublished, that successive vaccinations will consume Vitamin D and deficiency will result. Reduction of immunity will follow, including response to further vaccinations.
Vaccinations require Vitamin D, and so perhaps all we need is correction of widespread VItamin D deficiency to optimise natural immunity. This would reverse the apparent ineffectiveness of triple vaccination.
Vaccinations must be considered to be at least disappointing in their effectiveness. We have no controlled trials on which to judge effectiveness and safety, but observational data, such as from Canada, are disturbing. In many countries Covid-19 cases and deaths are higher at present than they were in 2021
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

TX_1~ABS:AT/TX_2~ABS~AT (nih.gov)


The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream lead by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies.[3,6,57] We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence.



Neither Anthony Fauci, the CDC, WHO nor any medical governmental establishment has ever offered any early treatment other than Tylenol, hydration and call an ambulance once you have difficulty breathing. This is unprecedented in the entire history of medical care as early treatment of infections is critical to saving lives and preventing severe complications. Not only have these medical organizations and federal lapdogs not even suggested early treatment, they attacked anyone who attempted to initiate such treatment with all the weapons at their disposal—loss of license, removal of hospital privileges, shaming, destruction of reputations and even arrest.[2] A good example of this outrage against freedom of speech and providing informed consent information is the recent suspension by the medical board in Maine of Dr.  Meryl Nass’ medical license and the ordering of her to undergo a psychiatric evaluation for prescribing Ivermectin and sharing her expertise in this field.[9,65] I know Dr, Nass personally and can vouch for her integrity, brilliance and dedication to truth. Her scientific credentials are impeccable. This behavior by a medical licensing board is reminiscent of the methodology of the Soviet KGB during the period when dissidents were incarcerated in psychiatric gulags to silence their dissent.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good article that explains why mass vaccinating with a leaky vaccine during a pandemic, drives variants and  infections.

The article is from 2015 - a great of example of "science we tossed out the window during covid".

Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens | PLOS Biology

Basically, the substandard, poor quality jabs turned the vaccinated into plague rats that drove the virus to mutate much faster than what would be normal and made them into a dangerous vector for transmission which amplified spread and risk.  Now, the plague rats outnumber the villagers.

It’s not the virus having an effect on vaccine function, it’s the leaky vaccine function having an effect on viral evolution and it’s not clear we’ve really even seen all the damage yet.  Leaky vaccines make disease hotter and more deadly because now, vaccines become a weapon for the virus, not a defense for the society.

If this is what's happening (and it appears more and more so to be the case), we need to know because it would have profound policy implications. It means vaccines should be banned, not mandated. It means boosters are a societal risk accelerator, not an attenuator.

It means that adults do not need to be shielded from school kids, it means that school kids need to be protected from vaccinated adults, including their teachers. It's a scary inversion of general disease pathways that has been created here.

Simplest way to test whether this well-known epidemiological hazard is happening, is to look at high vaccination areas and see how this is protecting them. If this is really a sterilizing vaccine, cases should drop year on year, once we adjust for testing levels and seasonal signal.  In fact, we’d expect cases to drop even in the absence of a sterilizing vaccine because of the recovered cohort with acquired immunity. Thus, if such adjusted cases were to rise instead, this would be a fairly strong signal. If they were to do so out of season, it might be stronger still. Unfortunately, this is JUST what we are seeing.

Cases in highly vaxxed UK and Israel are exploding. Some of this is testing, but using % positive as a rough proxy for test adjusted can help us here. Testing in both places is up about 2X on a per capita basis. but Israeli cases are 648/mm vs 161 same time last year. UK are 420 vs 16 and are now spiking well out of season.

This is the result you’d predict from leaky vaccine spread.

The FDA and NIH need to stop playing vaccine salesman and do their actual jobs.

They never looked at safety and they never looked at long term sterilizing immunity. If they pushed a seriously leaky vaccine into hundreds of millions, blame for this lies 100% at their feet.

The idea that boosters are a path out of this and can mitigate new variants needs to be instantly abandoned. If this is correct, they will only make it worse.  You cannot live getting a booster every 4 months to re-activate your immune system. It will grind you to dust and bury you under adverse events.

If the vaccinated are super spreaders and viral enhancers, the next booster should be actual covid. It’s the only way to protect the rest of us - from them. It would be a rich irony to see all those who have hectored and vilified the unvaxxed suddenly refuse to take the risk that would protect society, if it is revealed that they constitute the real threat.

Further reading:

This chicken vaccine makes its virus more dangerous | PBS NewsHour

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All I want to know at this point is, will the people at the top get arrested and charged.  Bonnie Henry.  Teresa Tam.  Big Pharma execs.  The WHO.  Whoever made the decisions to force pilots and medical people to either get the jab or lose their employment.  
There needs to be a blood bath…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, sharkman said:

All I want to know at this point is, will the people at the top get arrested and charged.

Lots of stuff happening at the legal level, as well. Doctors are starting to step up and demand answers and science from Public Health Officers all over the world.

I suspect it's because they are now seeing the results (adverse events/uptick in all-cause mortality/explosion of cancers, unexplained deaths/neurological disorders) of this disastrous mass forced vaccination that threw all known science right out the window.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some information on OAS - "original antigenic sin" - also known as antigenic fixation.

Antigenic fixation is extremely well-studied and known, especially around influenza. The OAS moniker gives you an idea of how long this field of study has been going on.

It basically works like this:  

Antigenic fixation/Hoskins effect/OAS is a simple evolutionary process driven by strong immune imprinting, such as that from narrow vector, leaky vaccines.

You learn one response and use it preferentially in learning others.

The covid vaccines have led to Omicron as being an OAS variant, creating an evolutionary gradient that selected for it.

There are some reasons to be particularly worried about how this will affect the future at a societal/herd immunity level, because this antigenic fixation generated by the widespread application of a badly leaky or even infection amplifying vaccine is quite different that what occurs in nature.  Instead of herd immunity, we now have herd immuno-fixation.

In fact, herd immunity from covid in highly vaccinated countries, is likely impossible now.

Most OAS is natural- just a property of human immune function in the face of pathogens that mutate a lot. We have seen this same thing with the flu. You build up a set of immune responses when you are young and fixate into them.

As you get old and your generalized responses attenuate, you rely upon these learned responses more and more. Old age and experience substitutes for for youth and a potent army of generalized immune responders. This is expected and normal.

But, a variant  may come along that is similar enough to something you had in the past to trigger the old response, but different enough to render that response ineffective.  And suddenly, the flu is very dangerous for you. You’re relying upon an ineffective antibody and cannot compensate with a generalized response. This is a big part of why flu gets so high risk for the elderly.

It has limited overall social effects as the fixations of each person are widely varied and depend upon what pathogens they were exposed to in the past. It is this heterogeneity of herd immune characteristics that prevents strong selectors for far reaching OAS variants from emerging.

This is a VERY important concept because the herd is diverse.  Everyone gets some degree of OAS for influenza. But we get different OAS, because we had different exposures when we were young.  Different flus, in different places and different times.

This means that when some new viral mutation finds similarity with a certain kind of imprinted immunity and preys upon OAS, the effects are limited to small groups.

This keeps large risks firewalled and prevents pandemics.

But in a situation like covid where 70-90% of populations ALL got the same narrow inoculum exposure from a leaky (non-sterilizing) vaccine, that's NOT going to be the case. Fixation is homogenous. Everyone’s immune system pony has been taught the Same. One. Trick.

This may have very serious implications.

What it means if we have a large segment that are immuno-fixated in identical fashion with a non-sterilizing inoculum:

It means that now if there is a mutation that finds a way to take advantage of this specific fixation, it has a HUGE cohort to infect.  What might previously have been 2-5% of population at risk - is now 70-90%. And that changes everything. Now, one bad throw of the evolutionary dice and you have an instant pandemic where none was possible before.

We all saw how quickly Omicron chased the vaccination campaigns. This was not a coincidence. It was driven BY the selective pressure of the vaccines that took what looks to be a throwback variant that did not evolve from delta, but rather diverged from it all the way back at the original pre-alpha ancestor and surged it to sudden global prominence.  

Omicron is so divergent from other SARS-COV2 variants that some are arguing it is an entirely different serotype.  (READ here:  Towards SARS-CoV-2 serotypes? | Nature Reviews Microbiology  ).

If you have a large pool of hosts that all have the same fixation, then you have a large number of individual labs in which to have such a mutation occur.

The emergence of such variants is inherently a function of underlying mutation rate of the virus (which is high in covid strains) X the number of potential hosts and if the “win” state for virus is the same in all those hosts, then, in effect, all the labs are working on the same problem. You’ve effectively crowd sourced it to 70-90% of the population.

Then some mutation chances on a high replication strategy and it goes like wildfire because so many are similarly susceptible.

It's the “perfect storm.”

You now have FAR more hosts in which to have random chances occur, all selecting for a mutation that attacks one specific weakness and that weakness is in most of the population, so once it’s out, there is no stopping it.

And if this fixation prevents the hosts from developing strong new immunities based on these novel pathogens, this becomes.....OUCH. You get wave after wave of mutations until you wipe out the susceptible population.

There is a lot here that we still do not know and this is not a proven hypothesis, but this does appear a serious potential issue.

I'm not sure we’ve ever seen anything like it before in human evolutionary history.





Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have an idea - Since "monkeypox" isn't keeping people in line, rushing for boosters, let's keep the fear porn going:

OOOooooooo.... scary "Ninja". I guess the letters and numbers bA-5 whatever aren't scary enough.

This New ‘Ninja’ COVID Variant Is the Most Dangerous One Yet (yahoo.com)

Let's look at are some of the claims being made here. Because they are disastrously wrong.  (Please keep in mind everything I've posted in this thread already.  It is established science, established virology.)


The BA.5 subvariant of the basic Omicron variant appears to be more contagious than any previous form of the virus. It’s apparently better at dodging our antibodies, too—meaning it might be more likely to cause breakthrough and repeat infections.

No one is seeing evidence that this is terribly true - outside of the vaccinated. It’s not at all clear that BA.5 is inherently more contagious, more “ninja".  It’s just increasingly vaccine advantaged because we antigenically fixated the herd with a leaky vaccine that trained intensely for narrow, non-sterilizing immunity. Of course the virus did this. It’s the evolutionary gradient such a vaccine creates. No other outcome was possible or plausible.  So yes, of course people are getting infected again and again. That’s what antigenic fixation does. It turns your immune system into a one trick pony unable to adapt to changing pathogens.  Our own Sock Boy PM is evidence of this.

Once you are fixated, new adaptive responses are not learned. That means that this is 100% wrong:


Vaccines and boosters are still the best defense. There are even Omicron-specific booster jabs in development that, in coming months, could make the best vaccines more effective against BA.5 and its genetic cousins.

We already know it doesn’t work. If live virus cannot overcome the antigenic fixation, neither can a vaccine, especially as it’s going to be based on variant strains that are well out of date by the time it’s released and just fixate patients further.  We already know that variant specific boosters don’t work. They tried them. It did not elicit novel response. 

mRNA vaccines inhibit learning to produce antibodies - there is no sterilizing immunity being achieved by them.

See UK data and attached screenshot with pertinent part:

Weekly Flu and COVID-19 Report_w42 (publishing.service.gov.uk)

These new “variant boosters” are just marketing hype. They’re going to be approved without clinical trials based on being “known to be safe” and “eliciting biomarker response.” 


They’re just going to see if the boosters generate **some** predetermined antibody response. Of course they will. But what we do not know is:

  1. do those antibodies have any effect on current covid strains?

  2. do they provide any sort of sterilizing immunity? (Doubtful, as the others have not)

  3. and if not, are they just going to drive more and deeper OAS/ADE? (likely because that’s what leaky vaccines do)

Adding to this mess is the issue that boosters seem to be eliciting greater adverse event response than the original 2 dose course. (IMPORTANT: this is not going to be assessed before these are approved. It’s been removed from the trial protocols.)



High levels of at least partial immunity from vaccines and past infection continue to prevent the worst outcomes—mass hospitalization and death. But globally, raw case numbers are surging, with serious implications for potentially millions of people who face a growing risk of long-term illness.

Equally worrying, the latest wave of infections is giving the coronavirus the time and space it needs to mutate into even more dangerous variants and subvariants. “The development of variants now is a freight train,” Irwin Redlener, the founding director of Columbia University’s National Center for Disaster Preparedness, told The Daily Beast.

In other words, unstoppable.


This is indeed precisely the case, but it’s vaccines and boosters causing it. It is becoming incredibly obvious in the UK data - and Canadian data - that the boosted are getting covid at multiple times the rate of the unvaxxed. And the extent of that greater susceptibility was accelerating when they stopped publishing this data. (See UK data screenshot.)

Vaccines, at least at one point, provided some reduction in death risk perhaps on the order of 50% (at least before counting side effects, but NOTE: that this has never, ever, ever been a sufficient amount of efficacy for ANY vaccine, until now.) But if you quadruple cases, that’s still twice the deaths overall.



BA.5’s widespread mutations made the subvariant less recognizable to all those antibodies we’ve built up from vaccines, boosters and past infection. BA.5 has been able to slip past our immune systems, ninja-style, contributing to the rising rate of breakthrough cases and reinfections.

This comes as no surprise to epidemiologists who’ve warned for many months now that persistently high case-rates—which they largely attribute in part to a stubborn anti-vax minority in many countries—would facilitate ever more infectious and evasive variants and subvariant. The more infections, the more chances for significant mutations.


^^^ Stunningly stupid ^^^

This variant was selected for and preys upon the vaxxed and boosted. They are the ones getting it, spreading it, and suffering from it. It has become highly clear in nearly every sound data series.

US over 70’s are near 100% vaxxed and highly boosted. Yet their hospital rate is more than double (+130%) year on year despite an objectively milder variant. We’re already approaching the summer highs from last year despite being 6-7 weeks away from a likely peak. 

So, sorry, but it’s not the “unvaxxed” doing this. This is the predictable and inevitable outcome of generating herd level antigenic fixation with narrow, leaky vaccines.

This is WHY we do not use them.

low levels.JPG

uk data.JPG

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In case you're wondering what the "N" antibodies are that they are testing for levels in the UK data, (I was wondering, too ?)   N stands for nucleocapsid. This is a structural protein that forms complexes with the RNA of viruses like covid.

The reason to track it is:  if you get vaccinated with any of the currently existing covid-19 vaccines, they teach you to respond to and attack S-1 proteins - the infamous spike. This is what you learn, express, and carry antibodies for. So, if you test a vaccinated person for S antibodies, you’ll find them.

But you will NOT find antibodies to N proteins. Those will ONLY be found in those who got covid, recovered, and acquired resistance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites




A report that was quietly published by the UK Government, just hours before Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced his resignation, reveals that Covid-19 deaths have risen dramatically among the triple vaccinated population in England over the past couple of months whilst declining drastically among the unvaccinated population.

With the most recent figures showing the vaccinated population in England accounted for a shocking 94% of all Covid-19 Deaths in April and May, and 90% of those deaths were among the triple/quadruple vaccinated population.


Back in March 2022, the UK Health Security Agency announced that from April 1st 2022, they would no longer publish the vaccination status of Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths in England.

At the time, the UKHSA claimed this was because the UK Government had ended free universal Covid-19 testing and this therefore affected their “ability to robustly monitor Covid-19 cases by vaccination status”.

However, this was a lie.

The UK Health Security Agency had been looking for an excuse for months to stop publishing the data because it clearly showed the vaccinated population were suffering immense immune system damage, with case, hospitalisation, and death rates per 100,000 highest among the fully vaccinated population.




The most recent Government of Canada figures show that there were 521 Covid-19 deaths between 6th and 12th June, and the vaccinated population accounted for 485 of them, with a shocking 242 deaths among the quadruple vaccinated population, meaning they accounted for 50% of Covid-19 deaths among the vaccinated in the second week of June 2022.

These aren’t the kind of figures you would expect to see if the Covid-19 injections really are up to 95% effective at preventing death, are they?



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Long COVID after breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection | Nature Medicine

NOTE: BTI = breakthrough infection



At 6 months after infection, we show that, beyond the first 30 days of illness, compared to contemporary controls, people with BTI exhibited a higher risk of death (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.75, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.59, 1.93) and incident post-acute sequelae (HR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.46, 1.54), including cardiovascular, coagulation and hematologic, gastrointestinal, kidney, mental health, metabolic, musculoskeletal and neurologic disorders. The results were consistent in comparisons versus the historical and vaccinated controls. Compared to people with SARS-CoV-2 infection who were not previously vaccinated (n = 113,474), people with BTI exhibited lower risks of death (HR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.74) and incident post-acute sequelae (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82, 0.89). Altogether, the findings suggest that vaccination before infection confers only partial protection in the post-acute phase of the disease; hence, reliance on it as a sole mitigation strategy may not optimally reduce long-term health consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection.


More bad news, doubles, triples and quads - when they get it, there is a consistently HIGHER risk of long-hauler syndrome, as compared to pure un-injected.  Accumulation of spike protein (which your body does not stop producing, post-vax, as there is no mechanism in the jabs to stop it) probably accounts for these findings.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

COVID-19 vaccine surveillance report - week 11 (publishing.service.gov.uk)

It's looking more and more like the virologists and epidemiologists who said the vaccines would tragically elicit a negative immunity rate with repeated inoculations were correct. ?  This makes me incredibly sad.  And angry.

This data shows just how little benefit “vaccination” holds for people who need protection the most: elderly persons in the UK, specifically persons over 80.

The elderly are the most overrepresented category for Covid deaths: (See screenshot)

The data is clearly showing:

  • Vaccination invites Covid infections, instead of protecting against them

  • Elderly persons double-vaccinated about a year ago, have THREE TIMES the death rate of the unvaccinated due to destroyed immunity

  • Booster provides only 27% protection from death (based on a 60 day past-infection interval). This protection is declining and in due time will become NEGATIVE, mirroring the situation with double-vaccinated

  • Vaccines provide no protection from Long Covid in the elderly

The above link from UKHSA Report for Weeks 7-10 shows:

  • About 95% of over-80s in the UK are vaccinated. (Page 17).

  • In weeks 7-10 of 2022, 664 unvaccinated over-80 persons had Covid.
    In the same period, 32,597 vaccinated persons over-80 had Covid (Page 41)

  • That means that even though 5% of UK’s elderly are unvaccinated, only 2% of Covid cases are unvaccinated.

  • In other words, vaccinated elderly persons are 2.2 TIMES more likely to get Covid than their unvaccinated peers. This means that instead of making them protected from Covid, vaccines make them TWICE more vulnerable to getting sick.

This is a pre-print article, but worth a read:  Six-month sequelae of post-vaccination SARS-CoV-2 infection: a retrospective cohort study of 10,024 breakthrough infections (medrxiv.org)   For older people (past 60), vaccination does NOT prevent long Covid either.  The pertinent information is in lines 36-43 of the above pre-print.



36 Associations between prior vaccination and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection were

37 marked in those < 60 years-old, whereas no robust associations were observed in those ≥ 60

38 years-old. In summary, COVID-19 vaccination is associated with lower risk of several, but

39 not all, COVID-19 sequelae in those with breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection. These

40 benefits of vaccination were clear in younger people but not in the over-60s. The findings 

41 may inform service planning, contribute to forecasting public health impacts of vaccination

42 programmes, and highlight the need to identify additional interventions for COVID-19

43 sequelae.



We need to start demanding:

Dear government, will you please leave us alone and legalize early treatments that always worked?


Now that the majority of the population has negative immunity, we are going to be on a covid breakthrough infection carousel until the population dies.  It's gonna be a b#*@ch.  This has to stop.?

uk data.JPG

Edited by Goddess
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If 56% of women had a side effect from taking a medicine, and the manufacturer never disclosed the side effect, wouldn’t that company be in major trouble?

Well it happened with the Covid vaccines.  It was never disclosed, and it was swept under the rug.


“ …those post-menopause or who use certain long-term contraceptives, for example — the study suggests many experienced breakthrough or unexpected bleeding after their Covid shots.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/16/2022 at 12:47 PM, sharkman said:

If 56% of women had a side effect from taking a medicine, and the manufacturer never disclosed the side effect, wouldn’t that company be in major trouble?

Well it happened with the Covid vaccines.  It was never disclosed, and it was swept under the rug.


“ …those post-menopause or who use certain long-term contraceptives, for example — the study suggests many experienced breakthrough or unexpected bleeding after their Covid shots.”

The vaccines were never tried and tested for fertility issues.

The fact that they are having such an impact on women's cycles shows they DO have an effect on fertility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That above report from the UK government, I think it was released while they were in an uproar over the Boris scandal.  Anyway, in this link it’s shown how 91% of COVID deaths in 2022 (in Britain) are of the fully vaxxed.

And if you, the alert reader, is starting to get a sinking feeling about this, remember.  You are about 2 years too late to do anything about it.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deborah Brix making headlines last weekend for finally admitting what blacklisted scientists have known all along:

"I knew these vaccines were not going to protect against infection and I think we overplayed the vaccines...."

Get that?  She KNEW.  But consciously chose to LIE.

Many of the other side are now backing away from old positions.

So why the aggressive shift away from this?

Because the data is falling apart. Prevalence is exploding and it’s nearly all in the vaxxed. The signs of OAS and leaky vaxx driven viral evolution to become advantaged by herd level antigenic fixation are everywhere and so are the signs of large and severe side effect profiles that are getting worse by the dose.

So are signs of immune suppression.

There are signs of everything but........efficacy.

The whole story is falling to pieces end to end - in the UK, in Canada, in the US, in Israel . The true blue zealots are trying one more run for masks and mandates, but they are starting to look real, real clownish.?

The data is too clear and the smarter rats are getting the hell off this ship before the waters close over it for good.

Of course now most of the Branch Covidians are claiming “the data is all meaningless now” as though this is some new thing or that “90% of patients in hospital with covid are not for covid” is some phenomenon that suddenly emerged.

But this was true last summer too. It has long been obvious to those of us who actually "followed the science".....or rather - the complete LACK of it.

At one time, incidence was made to look higher than it was due to rising testing, making sample rates explode. But now it’s the opposite.  We’re catching fewer and fewer cases in the reporting and the data STILL looks awful.  US cases are 3X what they were last year at this time and hospitalization and deaths nearly 2X.  % positive on tests is 3.5X what it was.

So now all the folks who hectored us to “follow the data” want to abandon it because it’s telling a story they do not like.

It’s what the guilty do when they run out of excuses and dodges and the bright lights start landing on what they did.

So.....they find some new moral parade (CLIMATE CHANGE EMERGENCY!  ALERT!!  ALERT!!)  to distract from questions about just where the last one they band-wagoned wound up.

“We were lied to by big pharma!” is going to be the low energy path out and there is A LOT of energy here to be released.

The time is HERE NOW where the damage is too big to hide from the middle. It's going to start to move fast now as it gets more and more out in the open. And fooled people are ANGRY people.

They are going to want answers. They are going want someone to blame.

Human nature being what it is, the ones who screeched "case counts" every 15 minutes and vilified people who chose not to be part of this experiment - even going to so far as demanding they lose their jobs and livelihoods and be denied medical care and left to die in freezer trucks........they will now jump on the Climate Change Emergency bandwagon (Haha!  Wait til you see the leaked video of CNN exec who actually ADMITS they are going to do this, already doing it) and totally HOPE WE ALL FORGET HOW UTTERLY MORALLLY BANKRUPT AND WITHOUT HUMAN COMPASSION AND EMPATHY THEY REALLY ARE.

Further reading:

Judges rule against provincial health officers in B.C. and Alberta | True North (tnc.news)


  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of 29 Pregnant Women That Reported an Adverse Event After Pfizer's COVID-19 Inoculation, Only One Had a Baby That Lived (substack.com)



For a long time I have been arguing that our children need to be left out of the massive conflicts over the science underpinning COVID-19. In my opinion, adults can conduct their own risk-benefit analyses regarding whether they want to receive one of the current COVID-19 inoculations. However, far too many adults are making these decisions based on pseudo-science, data from flawed studies, misinformation, and outright disinformation being propagated by physicians and public health officials, many of whom are unqualified to opine on anything in the field of vaccinology. I have never felt comfortable about these injections being used in ‘children, adolescents and young-adults of child-bearing age’. This was the precise terminology I used in a parent’s guide to COVID-19 vaccines that I wrote more than one year ago.


The data in this document were accumulated up until February 28, 2021. Notably, on page 9, safety concerns based on the US Pharmacovigilance Plan included “missing information” on “Use in Pregnancy and lactation”. Here are the data that were available at that time regarding outcomes in pregnant women that had received Pfizer’s COVID-19 inoculation; this is quoted from the top of table 6 (I have italicized and/or bolded the most important points)…

Pregnancy cases: 274 cases including:

• 270 mother cases and 4 foetus/baby cases representing 270 unique pregnancies (the 4 foetus/baby cases were linked to 3 mother cases; 1 mother case involved twins).

• Pregnancy outcomes for the 270 pregnancies were reported as spontaneous abortion (23), outcome pending (5), premature birth with neonatal death, spontaneous abortion with intrauterine death (2 each), spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and normal outcome (1 each). No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted).

Apparently, outcomes will never be known for 88% (238/270) of the adverse event reports that involved pregnancies. Why was the follow-up rate on these cases so abysmal?



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
    • Most Online

    Newest Member
    Mark Partiwaka
  • Recent Achievements

    • gatomontes99 went up a rank
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • phoenyx75 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Venandi went up a rank
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...