Jump to content

First a trickle....Now a flood


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

The Ontario government is bought and paid for by “big pharma”?  
 

This sounds like a conspiracy theory.  Any evidence?

How about you read some of the studies and medical journal articles here first and then we go from there?

It's no longer a conspiracy that governments were lied to by Big Pharma and for whatever reason (power and money?), are reluctant to give up the narrative, in spite of mountains of evidence. that the vaccines are not  performing anywhere near to what was promised and in fact - are making things worse.

Try to keep up.

Read the studies and articles I've posted here.

Then we'll talk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

How about you read some of the studies and medical journal articles here first and then we go from there?

It's no longer a conspiracy that governments were lied to by Big Pharma and for whatever reason (power and money?), are reluctant to give up the narrative, in spite of mountains of evidence. that the vaccines are not  performing anywhere near to what was promised and in fact - are making things worse.

Try to keep up.

Read the studies and articles I've posted here.

Then we'll talk.

 

Read and believe the conspiracy theories, then we can have a discussion about big pharma evidence of buying the Ontario Government?  
 

Hmmm….   Yeah, nah  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TreeBeard said:

 

Read and believe the conspiracy theories, then we can have a discussion about big pharma evidence of buying the Ontario Government?  
 

Hmmm….   Yeah, nah  

 

Peer-reviewed studies from experts at the top of their fields and real world data are "conspiracy theories" to you? ?

Wow.

You really are one of the brain-washed lazy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Peer-reviewed studies from experts at the top of their fields and real world data are "conspiracy theories" to you? ?

Wow.

You really are one of the brain-washed lazy.

I like the studies.  I just don’t believe conspiracy theorists’ takes on the studies and how they interpret them to conclude things about BIG PHARMA taking over the world, or whatever. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

I just don’t believe conspiracy theorists’ takes on the studies

If hundreds of peer-reviewed studies and real world data is presented that contradicts what the official narrative is or what a CBC headline says, though, you go with the CBC headline.

When we're told that the vax would stop spread and infection, hospitalization and death and it's increasingly obvious that is not the case - is it really a conspiracy theory?  Or are you just rejecting evidence because it disagrees with what you "want" to believe?  At what point do you admit you were lied to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

If hundreds of peer-reviewed studies and real world data is presented that contradicts what the official narrative is or what a CBC headline says, though, you go with the CBC headline.


I should believe your conclusions?  Based on your belief in  some really whacky conspiracies, I tend to doubt anything you post. 

I prefer looking at the sources of the studies and their conclusions, not what conspiracy theorists say the study means.  
 

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

When we're told that the vax would stop spread and infection, hospitalization and death and it's increasingly obvious that is not the case - is it really a conspiracy theory?  Or are you just rejecting evidence because it disagrees with what you "want" to believe?  At what point do you admit you were lied to?

You saying the vaccine didn’t help reduce the spread of COVID is a perfect example of conspiracy nonsense. Thank you for providing it!
 

Actual studies, and health authorities, say the opposite.  
http://www.bccdc.ca/health-info/diseases-conditions/covid-19/covid-19-vaccine/measuring-vaccination-impact-coverage

 

Now you will say that BIG PHARMA has the BC government in their pocket cuz of mysterious reasons, and we can’t trust the BC Centre for Disease Control. 
 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

You saying the vaccine didn’t help reduce the spread of COVID is a perfect example of conspiracy nonsense. Thank you for providing it!

Read the posts in this thread regarding immune imprinting and OAS.  It's established science.  Established virology, immunology.

It's the only thing that explains what is currently going on amongst the vaccinated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So.....second chick at work (triple-vaxxed) just went home sick and barfing.

She will test for covid, as she tests regularly - almost every day.

If she tests positive again, this will be the third round of covid she's had in the last few months.

The other chick - this is the second time she's had it in the last 3 months.  Also triple-vaxxed.  Going into the 6th week of her being off work.

Both are in their mid-30's.

How's those vaccines working out for y'all?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Goddess said:

How's those vaccines working out for y'all?

Overall, really well, if you look at the studies and conclusions of the experts.   Unless you believe in the conspiracies and that a coworker puking means that vaccines don’t work.  Then you probably would conclude that vaccines are ineffective.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TreeBeard said:

if you look at the studies and conclusions of the experts.

Please.  Post the studies and experts, as I have done here.

Until you read and respond to the studies and articles presented in this thread, I'm going to conclude you have nothing to offer except outdated propaganda cliches, because you haven't posted one stitch of evidence to support your views, which if you read this thread - are way out of date a la UK data, Canadian data, US data. Israeli data, every sound data set across the world.

The vaccinated are getting sicker and sicker and repeatedly getting infected with covid at multiple times the rate of the unvaccinated.  The only explanation for that is presented here - OAS, autogenic fixation, Hoskins effect - the well-known and understood immune imprinting. 

The virus is doing exactly what viruses do when masses of people are vaccinated with a leaky, non-sterilizing vaccine and what's happening to the people vaccinated with this sub-par vaccine is exactly what happens to people when they are vaccinated with a leaky, non-sterilizing vaccine - getting sicker and sicker, with immune systems failing and now crunching into the negative numbers.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

Overall, really well, if you look at the studies and conclusions of the experts.   Unless you believe in the conspiracies and that a coworker puking means that vaccines don’t work.  Then you probably would conclude that vaccines are ineffective.  

I think the reason you don't want to read any real science in this thread is because you know you won't understand it. ?  This is why you rely on MSM headlines and outdated statements from Public Health that don't quote any studies or experts.

I have tried to explain the articles and what is happening in the simplest language I could.

Dont' be afraid.  It's not that difficult to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TreeBeard said:

I’m afraid to know the truth.  Another refrain of conspiracy theorists.  

Well, for some reason you are afraid to read and respond to the expert, peer-reviewed studies and articles here, so.....

Not sure why you're here on this thread.  Kindly stop derailing it, if you aren't interested in reading the studies and are just here to call me a conspiracy theorist.

I have provided scientific explanations and studies that explain why the vaccines are not working and why vaccinated people are contracting and spreading covid at multiple times the rate of unvaxxed people, evidenced by real world data from all around the world.

If your'e just here to name-call and ignore the information, please move on.  There are plenty of MSM sites that would suit you better.

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You may need a subscription to read this article, so I have provided the commentary.

The Great Vaccine Scare Reaches Fever Pitch (theepochtimes.com)

The Great Vaccine Scare Reaches Fever Pitch
Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
 
The topic of vaccines has always been controversial, but it reached a fever pitch during the COVID-19 pandemic, when it became sacrilegious to speak out against them, or even question their safety and efficacy.
In 2021, investigative journalist Paul Thacker became a target of what he calls “the Great Vaccine Scare — hysteria about any and all vaccine criticism,”1 after he wrote an article published in The BMJ, titled, “COVID-19: Researcher Blows the Whistle on Data Integrity Issues in Pfizer’s Vaccine Trial.”2
The article, it should be noted, was thorough, accurate and “based on dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings and emails.”3
It was so well done that it earned Thacker a nomination as a finalist for the Steve Connor Award for Investigative Science Journalism, presented by the Association of British Science Writers (ABSW). An ABSW judge described the article as, “A very good story on a sensitive issue that was reported responsibly, it very clearly spells out why the story mattered.”4
 
Fact Checkers Pounce, Label Factual Info ‘Misinformation’
Thacker’s investigation details a series of problems with laboratory management and quality control checks by Pfizer subcontractor Ventavia Research Group, which was testing Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine.
Regional director Brook Jackson, formerly employed by Ventavia, said she witnessed falsified data, unblinded patients, inadequately trained vaccinators and lack of proper follow-up on adverse events that were reported. After notifying Ventavia about her concerns repeatedly, she made a complaint to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration — and was fired the same day.5 Other former Ventavia employees spoke of similar issues. According to Thacker’s report:6
“One said that she had worked on over four dozen clinical trials in her career, including many large trials, but had never experienced such a “helter skelter” work environment as with Ventavia on Pfizer’s trial ... She added that during her time at Ventavia the company expected a federal audit but that this never came.
After Jackson left the company problems persisted at Ventavia, this employee said. In several cases Ventavia lacked enough employees to swab all trial participants who reported covid-like symptoms, to test for infection.
Laboratory confirmed symptomatic covid-19 was the trial’s primary endpoint, the employee noted. (An FDA review memorandum released in August this year states that across the full trial swabs were not taken from 477 people with suspected cases of symptomatic covid-19.) ‘I don’t think it was good clean data,’ the employee said of the data Ventavia generated for the Pfizer trial. ‘It’s a crazy mess.’”
Soon after Thacker’s investigative piece was published in BMJ, it was “fact checked” by a group called Lead Stories, which referred to the investigation as a “hoax alert” in the related URL. Along with “correcting” statements that Thacker did not make, Lead Stories disparaged the investigation for “missing context,” but as investigative reporter Matt Taibbi explained, “‘Missing context’ has become a term to disparage reporting that is true but inconvenient.”7
Lead Stories took further issue with The BMJ investigation because it was shared by people such as Dr. Robert Malone and Robert F. Kennedy, who themselves have been targeted by fake fact checkers. Taibbi added:8
“The real issue with Thacker’s piece is that it went viral and was retweeted by the wrong people. As Lead Stories noted with marked disapproval, some of those sharers included the likes of Dr. Robert Malone and Robert F. Kennedy. To them, this clearly showed that the article was bad somehow, but the problem was, there was nothing to say the story was untrue.”
Thacker also called the “fact check” against his BMJ investigation “insane,” telling Taibbi, “Here’s what they do. They’re not fact checking facts. What they’re doing is checking narratives. They can’t say that your facts are wrong, so it’s like, ‘Aha, there’s no context.’ Or, ‘It’s misleading.’ But that’s not a fact check. You just don’t like the story.”9 Meanwhile, writing in The Disinformation Chronicle, Thacker explained:10
“After The BMJ published my investigation, we ran into a political buzzsaw from Facebook, which labeled the article “misinformation” even though they could find no factual errors. Facebook’s awkward political response spurred editors at The BMJ to send Mark Zuckerberg an open letter11 complaining about his “inaccurate, incompetent and irresponsible” fact check.”
 
Harassment for Voicing Vaccine Concerns Now Commonplace
Anyone who dares to question or criticize vaccinations is at risk of being harassed in today’s climate. Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a consultant cardiologist and chairman of public health collaboration in the U.K., is among those targeted for sharing science relating to COVID-19 shot side effects. Malhotra has earned some notoriety for speaking about the underlying factors that make certain people more vulnerable to COVID-19 — namely lifestyle-related diseases driven by poor diet.12
This aspect of prevention via a long-term healthy lifestyle, which could save lives in future pandemics, is another tenet that’s ignored by the dominant narrative. However, in June 2022, Malhotra was invited to speak at a “side event during a meeting of the British Medical Association.”13
“Just so we’re all clear — because people seem to freak out,” Thacker wrote, “Malhotra was NOT giving a talk FOR the British Medical Association (BMA). It was a talk for some international physicians, who happened to have their meeting during a BMA event.”14 The talk was based on the importance of evidence-based medicine and included information about historical corruption in the pharmaceutical industry.
The talk was not about vaccine side effects, per se, but Malhotra did mention a preprint article that found Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 shots are associated with an increased risk of serious adverse events of special interest.15 The excess risk of these adverse events exceeded the risk reduction for COVID-19 hospitalization compared to the placebo group.
Malhotra received praise for his talk, and the next day was presented with a Champion of Preventive Medicine award by the chair of the BMA, who had also attended Malhotra’s talk. Soon after, the harassment started. According to Thacker:16
“Just so that we’re all clear — because people seem to freak out — Malhotra was NOT given a British Medical Association award. The person who gave it to him, just happens to also be Chair of the BMA.
Malhotra later tweeted a photo of himself receiving the award ... and that’s when panic set in and hysteria began — good night, and good luck — like something out of a movie. Running around with their hair on fire, several prominent physicians began texting Malhotra to take down his tweet, which he then did.”
BMA then issued a statement about the kerfuffle, to ensure all were aware that Malhotra’s award was not a BMA award, and his views were not endorsed by the BMA.17
“If you’re reading this and scratching your head wondering how a tweet could rip a hole in the vaccine universe, thank yourself for not falling under the spell of vaccine magic where minor denunciations must be warded off with counter enchantments and press release potions,” Thacker wrote. “‘There’s a lot of money and many careers behind these vaccines,’ Malhotra told me.”18
Inconvenient Science Silenced by Twitter
Former New York Times reporter Alex Berenson was also a victim of vaccine hysteria: His Twitter account was suspended when he posted this scientifically accurate information:19
“It doesn’t stop infection. Or transmission. Don’t think of it as a vaccine. Think of it — at best — as a therapeutic with a limited window of efficacy and terrible side effect profile that must be dosed IN ADVANCE OF ILLNESS. And we want to mandate it? Insanity.”
Berenson filed a lawsuit against Twitter for labeling the tweet as misleading and canceling his account. The case has since been resolved, with Twitter acknowledging that the tweets should not have led to a suspension. When his account was reinstated, Berenson tweeted the exact same message, which this time escaped Twitter’s “misinformation” flag.
Dr. Meryl Nass was similarly censored by Twitter after she tweeted the findings of a preprint study by Israeli scientists, which looked into the immunogenicity and efficacy of a fourth COVID-19 mRNA shot.20 It showed that while antibody titers were high, efficacy was low — “strong evidence,” she tweeted, “that titers are useless at predicting efficacy.” In a show of the hypocrisy of vaccine hysterics, Thacker explained:21
“Nass told me she does not understand how she desecrated vaccine magic. ‘I guess you have to ask Twitter that,’ she emailed me. However, her sacrilege seems to involve repeating the study’s conclusions that antibody titers do not correlate with vaccine protection.
Oddly enough, former CDC Director Tom Frieden made this exact same point22 last September to The BMJ, ‘We don’t know that antibody level is what determines protection.’”
 
Politics Put Ahead of Science in Booster Rollout
In another disturbing example of the narrative taking priority over science, Dr. Marion Gruber, director of the FDA’s Office of Vaccines Research & Review (OVRR) and OVRR deputy director Dr. Philip Krause both left their positions near the end of 2021, citing frustration that the CDC is involved in decisions that should be left up to the FDA, and that the White House announced booster shots were coming before the FDA had finished its reviews of the booster shots.23,24
Both Gruber and Krause were authors of an article published in The Lancet, which stated, “the currently available evidence does not show the need for widespread use of booster vaccination in populations that have received an effective primary vaccination regimen.”25
Harvard professor Martin Kulldorff, a member of the FDA’s Drug Safety and Risk Management Advisory Committee, was also punished by the CDC — which removed him from its advisory committee on vaccines — when he stated a COVID-19 clinical trial should not have been paused. Twitter then censored him when he tweeted that people with prior natural COVID-19 infection and children do not need COVID-19 shots.26
Steve Kirsch, executive director of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation, has also been vilified for speaking out against vaccines, and he has proof, in the form of a timeline of changes made to his Wikipedia page, which went from describing him as a “good guy,” including his 2003 humanitarian award, to painting him as a “menace to society.” “Because I’m a threat, it’s important to discredit me,” he wrote.27,28
When an exposé by The New York Times revealed in February 2022 that the CDC hasn’t published most of the data it’s been collecting during the pandemic,29 the CDC stated it was due to fear that the information might be misinterpreted.30
“Let’s be clear,” Kirsch wrote. “The only way the vaccine data could be interpreted as ineffective by us ‘misinformation spreaders’ is if the data shows the vaccines don’t work ... The truth is the data didn't support their narrative so they hid it. Do you think they would hide the data if it showed the vaccines worked? Of course not! ... CDC admits it withheld data from the public because they didn’t want to create vaccine hesitancy.”31
In these unprecedented times, it’s clear that government agencies and the media are intent on sharing only the official narrative — not the truth about COVID-19 shots.
“Of course, none of the science writers working at mainstream outlets — New York Times Science Desk, Nature Magazine, Scientific American, Science Magazine and UnDark Magazine — have done an Edward R. Murrow and spoken out in alarm and dismay about this state of fear and paranoia,” Thacker noted. “Oh no! Most science writers are too busy doing their scicomm — helping and supporting the government to promote their position on vaccine policies.”32
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Epoch Times, LMAO.

From Media Bias Fact Check. 

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. 

I'll return to ignoring your "expert sources".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dialamah said:

The Epoch Times, LMAO.

From Media Bias Fact Check. 

A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact-checked on a per-article basis. 

I'll return to ignoring your "expert sources".

 

“Here’s what they do. They’re not fact checking facts. What they’re doing is checking narratives. They can’t say that your facts are wrong, so it’s like, ‘Aha, there’s no context.’ Or, ‘It’s misleading.’ But that’s not a fact check. You just don’t like the story.”

I posit that the narrative "You will not get covid if you get the vaccines.  You will not die of covid if you get the vaccines.  Life will go back to normal when 70% of people get the vaccines.  No, wait, 80%.  Whoopsy, it's actually 90%.  Oh darn, looks like everybody has to get it and also it doesn't actually prevent you from getting or spreading covid.  Now you need a booster.  Oh crap, now 2 boosters.  Guess what - now you need boosters for the rest of your life."..................was the propaganda and conspiracy.

You bought that load of crap and now you come here, smugly smiling and touting "Mmmmmmm!  This crap tastes great!"

You funny.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Research papers showing devastating effects on innate immune system and neurotoxicity:

1.  Innate immune suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations: The role of G-quadruplexes, exosomes, and MicroRNAs - PubMed (nih.gov)

2.  Worse Than the Disease? Reviewing Some Possible Unintended Consequences of the mRNA Vaccines Against COVID-19 | International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research (ijvtpr.com)

(This one authored by Stephanie Seneff, MIT researcher):

Quote

Stephanie Seneff is a Senior Research Scientist at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.  She received the B.S. degree in Biophysics in 1968, the M.S. and E.E. degrees in Electrical Engineering in 1980, and the Ph.D degree in Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in 1985, all from MIT.  For over three decades, her research interests have always been at the intersection of biology and computation 

3.  Amyloidogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein | Journal of the American Chemical Society (acs.org)

This demonstrates prion-like capabilities of the spike protein.

4.  SARS-CoV-2 Proteins Interact with Alpha Synuclein and Induce Lewy Body-like Pathology In Vitro - PubMed (nih.gov)

This shows upregulation of alpha synuclein and increased risk to Parkinson's disease.

5. SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interacts with and activates TLR41 | Cell Research (nature.com)

This is an important paper showing that the spike protein activates toll like receptor 4, which leads to a strong inflammatory response.

6. SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 subunit induces neuroinflammatory, microglial and behavioral sickness responses: Evidence of PAMP-like properties - ScienceDirect

This shows that spike subunit S1 alone is neurotoxic.

7. Frontiers | Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) up to 15 Months Post-Infection (frontiersin.org)

Shows spike still present 15 months post-infection.

8. SARS-CoV-2 S1 Protein Persistence in SARS-CoV-2 Negative Post-Vaccination Individuals with Long COVID/ PASC-Like Symptoms | Research Square

Spike still present several months after vaccination.

 

 

Edited by Goddess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know how you can tell when the weight of evidence in this thread is starting to sink in with people?

They stop coming around, or stop posting in it.  Big Mike Hardner hasn’t posted since page one.  Boges demanded links showing a connection between vaccines and getting Covid or vaccine injuries, and I gave him a link to this thread.

He went silent after that…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sharkman said:

You know how you can tell when the weight of evidence in this thread is starting to sink in with people?

They stop coming around, or stop posting in it.  Big Mike Hardner hasn’t posted since page one.  Boges demanded links showing a connection between vaccines and getting Covid or vaccine injuries, and I gave him a link to this thread.

He went silent after that…

Yes, the couple that do show up - Dialamah and TreeBeard - have absolutely zero to say about the studies, have stated outright that they refuse to read them, have zero studies to post themselves and then call me a "conspiracy theorist".

Laughable.  When I explain the well-known development of immune imprinting/OAS in layman's terms, provide the actual scientific papers that explain it, provide data from public health agencies all around the world that show this is happening and was to be expected........it's not me that's buying into conspiracy theories.  THEY have bought into the biggest one ever.  And the fact they do it out of sheer intellectual laziness is shameful.

Boges declaring his intention to jab his 2 year old as many times as the government tells him to, when so many countries have stopped the jabs in children and he has zero interest in finding out why they stopped or looking at any of the myocarditis issues......just damn.  My heart sank and I feel sorry for the little guy.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Yes, the couple that do show up - Dialamah and TreeBeard - have absolutely zero to say about the studies, have stated outright that they refuse to read them, have zero studies to post themselves and then call me a "conspiracy theorist".

Frustrating, isn't it?

All you can do is hope somebody else notices. I notice. Apparently Sharkman does. So hang in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I chalk it up to this:

 

 

The Demon Haunted World is such a terrific book (PDF).

 

The situation is similar to Ukraine. You learn that there are germ labs set-up in that lovely place by us...and that we've been training, supporting and nurturing Nazis...banning anything Russian as unpatriotic and 'disinformation'...but we're the good guys....damn it.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/24/2022 at 2:49 PM, Goddess said:

More and more scientists and doctors are conducting studies regarding the covd jabs and information is coming out at breakneck speed.  It will be harder for governments and public health officers to deny what is going on.

This study was conducted by top folks in their field.  Co-authored by Sander Greenland, who wrote more than a few of the most widely used epidemiology textbooks.

Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA Vaccination in Randomized Trials by Joseph Fraiman, Juan Erviti, Mark Jones, Sander Greenland, Patrick Whelan, Robert M. Kaplan, Peter Doshi :: SSRN

It's starting to look like more and more experts in the fields of epidemiology, virology, immunology and biology are willing to "cross the Fauci, get the ouchy", as they have been saying.

I'm attaching the study's abstract.  Basically the detailed tables at the end of the study show:

  • For every 6.4 people that Moderna kept out of the hospital for covid, it inflicted 15.1 serious adverse events.
  • For every 2.3 people that Pfizer kept out of the hospital for covid, it inflicted 10.1 serious adverse events.

Cost/Benefit analysis is supposed to be the bedrock of medicine's foundation.  Up til recently, practitioners and researchers have been forced to do a different cost/benefit analysis and saw the risk of speaking out as too high relative to the benefits. The winged monkeys and their useful idiots have been savage in relentlessly attacking anyone who dared to speak of the risks and balancing them with the gains. The "zero-covid uber bullies" have preached burning the village to save it and I believe the average person has not been ready to hear a different narrative anyways, given the steady diet of fear and "case numbers" screeched at us every 15 minutes for more than 2 years.

No system where the true experts are afraid to speak can function for long.  But us "little people" need to start paying attention to these studies.  Push windows, move the debate and shield those brave enough to speak out.

It's discourse or dictatorship.

The price of the former is hearing people say things you don't like.  The price of the latter is everything else.

Choose wisely.

Trudeau rules and dictates by popular opinion.  If you want him to start paying attention to the science, then you have to MAKE HIM.  He cannot lead.  He follows.  But he will only do so if pushed and he will do so desperately because he is late to the pivot.  He will pretend to be righteously indignant.

We are beginning a slow, painful recovery from derangement, but that's how recovery works.

We need to give Pfizer an all-expense paid trip to under the bus of emerging truth because the truth is too vast to be engulfed by this massive lie.

Otherwise:

 

Capture.JPG

Event 201 plandemic exercise was where this Covid nonsense all began. It is still on the internet to be read. It was Bill Gates to hell that gave us the Covid lie and hoax. Gates to hell committed and created one of the biggest crimes against humanity and he is still pushing the Covid lie and hoax today. The big pharma globalists wanted to get the world vaccinated and make billions from it was the real name of the game. There have been many not so nice scumbags that have made plenty of money from this Covid lie and hoax, and Billy Gates to hell did pretty good also in making lots of money. 

We are starting to just now learn more and more each day that this Covid lie and hoax was nothing more than a pile of big pharma globalist created bull crap. It's not Covid that is maiming or killing people, it is the vaccines that are doing all of that. There are plenty of sad stories out there of what has really happened too many people who took the jabs. They were not pretty stories. Taking booster jabs will only make things worse. 

Trudeau is a communist like dictator who is doing the job of what his globalist masters like WEF Klaus the Schwabster want him to say and do. Little does the buffoon know that he is just their little puppet on a string and when they are finished with him they will cut his puppet strings and he will fall to the ground hard.

The buffoon has become a useful idiot for the WEF globalists like so many other lying politicians, the MSM lying media, and those so called health experts have. They do not really know as to what they have sown and what they will reap if these WEF globalist scum get their way. Comrade Stalin had a couple of words for those ass kissers. He called them a bunch of ass kissing useful idiots. 

Conspiracy's do exist and it will be those that refuse to believe in conspiracy's who will pay a heavy price one day for their stupidity and ignorance. Believe it or not.  ?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,741
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    timwilson
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • User earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • User earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • User went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Videospirit went up a rank
      Explorer
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...