US Supreme Court strikes down Roe V. Wade

[Yzermandius19]

8 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Let's face it - this has absolutely zero to do with saving children.  If it did - there wouldn't be hundreds of millions of children all over the world dying from starvation and other easily remedied factors.

This has everything to do with how men view women.

I believe most men despise women.

So they must control and regulate every action women take in every aspect of life. 

I know this because late-term abortions are exceedingly rare.  Yet men believe that 8 or 9 month pregnant women just wake up one day and decide, "You know, I don't want a baby after all."

That's not what happens.  It's probably the most gut-wrenching, heart-breaking, agonizing decision these few women ever have to make.

This decision will not end with controlling abortion.  Mark my words.  

I'll let you men on this thread continue to assert your views on all the things women should or should not be doing, or should or should not be allowed to do or decide.

most men don't despise women

toxic feminity over 9000

all children not living lives of luxury is not a sign that people don't care about children

your view of reality is delusional af

[Goddess]

3 minutes ago, sharkman said:

That is such a sad view to cling to.  

I know.

But history shows me its true.

The rate of domestic violence and men murdering women tells me its true.

 

[Yzermandius19]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I know.

But history shows me its true.

your paranoia makes you think it’s true but it's not

history shows that hasn't been true in the western world for quite a while now

this ain't Saudi Arabia

Edited June 27, 2022 by Yzermandius19

[sharkman]

3 minutes ago, Goddess said:

I know.

But history shows me its true.

The rate of domestic violence and men murdering women tells me its true.

 

It’s far more true to say that messed up people commit violent acts.  Men are just better at violence than women.  

[Goddess]

7 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

this ain't Saudi Arabia

Not yet.

But a lot of men would like to see that.

Thankfully, Women have fought hard (and died) to be seen and treated as adult humans by men and been partly successful.

I expect this will backslide. A lot. In the next few years.

Clarence Thomas did say he wanted to re-visit more rulings about women's rights.

 

Edited June 27, 2022 by Goddess

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, sharkman said:

Men are just better at violence than women.

Ummm-hmmmm.

Yet I'm called paranoid and delusional for noticing it.

[dialamah]

1 minute ago, Goddess said:

Not yet.

But a lot of men would like to see that.

Thankfully, Women have fought hard (and died) to be seen and treated as adult humans by men and been partly successful.

I expect this will backslide. A lot. In the next few years.

 

No doubt starting with the freedom of men to kill women who've lost the "man's" baby, whether through miscarriage or abortion.

[Dougie93]

Just now, Goddess said:

Ummm-hmmmm.

Yet I'm called paranoid and delusional for noticing it.

if you bypass the process, then you are inciting war

you won't sway the men with emotionalist appeals

we are the warfighters, so our concern is avoiding a war

but if feminists want to start a war, my money is on the men to win that fight in the end

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, dialamah said:

No doubt starting with the freedom of men to kill women who've lost the "man's" baby, whether through miscarriage or abortion.

At best, it will "understandable" why a man would kill his partner who miscarries.

A light slap on the wrist.

Ahhhhh, back to the days of yore.

[dialamah]

1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:

if you bypass the process, then you are inciting war

you won't sway the men with emotionalist appeals

we are the warfighters, so our concern is avoiding a war

but if feminists want to start a war, my money is on the men to win that fight in the end

No way would conversation, empathy, compassion or compromise be indulged in by men!  War is the only answer!

[Goddess]

2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

but if feminists want to start a war, my money is on the men to win that fight in the end

Yup.

That's how it goes in the Islamic countries.

The women talk back - they get killed.

[Goddess]

Thomas calls for overturning precedents on contraceptives, LGBTQ rights | The Hill

As I said, this is just the beginning of a whole new era of oppression for women.

[Dougie93]

Just now, Goddess said:

Yup.

That's how it goes in the Islamic countries.

The women talk back - they get killed.

we won, nary a shot fired, with a 6-3 majority at the SCOTUS

decades of slow and steady jurisprudence, to win by democratic process

it is the Communist feminist left which is threatening violence

that will be their undoing, is alls I said

 

[Goddess]

It's disturbing to me that so many men are so invested in this debate.  Why?  Does the ruling affect them at all?

There is an inherent danger in telling male society that they have the right to control women and their bodies.  I expect rapes will skyrocket even higher.

The only time it may affect them a little bit is when their 11 year old daughter or granddaughter gets raped at Sunday school and then dies in child-birth because her little body is not ready for forced birth.

They will forget they demanded this.

Edited June 27, 2022 by Goddess

[Yzermandius19]

23 minutes ago, Goddess said:

Not yet.

But a lot of men would like to see that.

no, they wouldn't

it ain't happening

you're projecting your own toxicity on men

[Goddess]

1 minute ago, Yzermandius19 said:

no, they wouldn't

it ain't happening

you're projecting your own toxicity on men

No.  Just paying attention to history.  And countries where women are controlled and regulated.

[Yzermandius19]

4 minutes ago, Goddess said:

No.  Just paying attention to history.  And countries where women are controlled and regulated.

which isn't in the west

opposition to abortion is not about controlling women

it's about supporting unborn children's right to life

no matter how hard you claim otherwise

your caricature only applies to 8% of men and 9% of women

Edited June 27, 2022 by Yzermandius19

[dialamah]

5 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

no, they wouldn't

it ain't happening

you're projecting your own toxicity on men

Given that at least one Justices is already floating the idea of controlling the right to access contraception, along with removing same sex marriage, I think you are foolish for thinking it couldn't happen.

[Dougie93]

21 minutes ago, dialamah said:

No way would conversation, empathy, compassion or compromise be indulged in by men!  War is the only answer!

there will be no conversation, empathy, compassion, nor compromise

with the atheist Communist enemies of freedom

[Yzermandius19]

1 minute ago, dialamah said:

Given that at least one Justices is already floating the idea of controlling the right to access contraception, along with removing same sex marriage, I think you are foolish for thinking it couldn't happen.

not a thing

Thomas just wants to kick that to the state level

same with abortion

quit strawmanning

Edited June 27, 2022 by Yzermandius19

[dialamah]

2 minutes ago, Yzermandius19 said:

which isn't in the west

opposition to abortion is not about controlling women

it's about supporting unborn children's right to life

no matter how hard you claim otherwise

your caricature only applies to 8% of men and 9% of women

And the controlling of women elsewhere is covered in altruistic BS - usually something along the lines of "women need protecting" from men who can't control their urges.  It's all for the women's benefit, they claim. 

[dialamah]

Just now, Yzermandius19 said:

not a thing

Thomas just wants to kick that to the state level

same with abortion

quit strawmanning

And the same States that will outlaw abortion will take the opportunity to eliminate even more rights.

[Dougie93]

9 minutes ago, Goddess said:

It's disturbing to me that so many men are so invested in this debate.  Why?  Does the ruling affect them at all?

again, it's all about states rights

when states rights breakdown, that will be civil war again

so we are trying to stave off having to go to war

abortion is not the issue

 

[Yzermandius19]

Just now, dialamah said:

And the controlling of women elsewhere is covered in altruistic BS - usually something along the lines of "women need protecting" from men who can't control their urges.  It's all for the women's benefit, they claim. 

that's elsewhere

not here

and it's not coming here

[dialamah]

Just now, Yzermandius19 said:

that's elsewhere

not here

and it's not coming here

Let's hope not.