Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, West said:

Pat King is probably the most likely imo. Why I say that is the other organizers distanced themselves once he was found on camera uttering threats toward Trudeau.

Tamara Leich will be out next week she just needed time to work on a plan home after the SS locked down her bank account. 

Tamara Leich is one of the first ones who  should of had her bank account frozen lol.. so bravo to them for that.

PROUD NDP SUPPORTER. #SINGHOUT

Posted
3 minutes ago, Jack9000 said:

One of the Leaders of the illegal   activity  in Ottawa is it that hard for you to understand?

Alleged illegal activity. The act of protesting isn't illegal. In fact its integral to a healthy democracy.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Zeitgeist said:

  We’ll do what we can and make peace with God, others, and ourselves.  

"I ......... (full name), do swear (or for a solemn affirmation, "solemnly affirm") that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth the Second, Queen of Canada, Her heirs and successors according to law. So help me God."

Posted
24 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

I have no official mandate from DND of course

but with whatever authority I might have as an RCR Battleschool instructor

I promote you to Private ( Basic )

right now

Gotta love the regs!  : )

Posted
24 minutes ago, West said:

Alleged illegal activity. The act of protesting isn't illegal. In fact its integral to a healthy democracy.

there is no ALLEGED . Emergency act said it's illegal and that's the law weather you like it or not lol

PROUD NDP SUPPORTER. #SINGHOUT

Posted
6 minutes ago, Jack9000 said:

there is no ALLEGED . Emergency act said it's illegal and that's the law weather you like it or not lol

Aside, I think Jack (Layton) wouldn't be happy with that individual and his accomplishments. Actually I think he would have some not so pleasant words for him. Maybe time for an upgrade?

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
19 minutes ago, Jack9000 said:

there is no ALLEGED . Emergency act said it's illegal and that's the law weather you like it or not lol

I dont think you understand it bro. We will just leave it there.

  • Like 3
Posted

Ukraine declared state of emergency for 30 days, facing possible full-scale Russian military invasion. Just a perspective.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
10 minutes ago, myata said:

Ukraine declared state of emergency for 30 days, facing possible full-scale Russian military invasion. Just a perspective.

When all is set and done tax payers will be on the hook for the politicians decisions to suspend human rights. That's what's most tragic 

Posted
1 minute ago, West said:

When all is set and done tax payers will be on the hook for the politicians decisions to suspend human rights. That's what's most tragic

From the get go of this democracy it was designed to be that: the elites rule wisely (with occasional, or more regular) blunders; the peasants, pay: for the elites and the blunders. A happy package. They say it's a massive improvement on a feudal system. Is has to be for this reason that senior PS officials in this country (never heard it elsewhere) commonly referred to as "czars", "mandarins" and such.

If it's you or them, the truth is equidistant

Posted
1 minute ago, myata said:

From the get go of this democracy it was designed to be that

there is a wide gulf between liberal democracy and illiberal democracy

illiberal democracy is like Ancient Greece

black balled

tyranny of the majority

that is the brand of democracy being practiced in Canada right now

 

Posted

Russia is another illiberal democracy

but even the Soviet Union was a illiberal democracy

in Russian';  "Soviet" means "Council"

in theory, in the USSR, you would elect a local Soviet, and they would elect to the national Soviet

what happened tho ?

how did the representative elected Soviet ( Councils ) lose control ?

Answer: the Bolsheviks declared a permanent state of "emergency"

which lasted decades, right up until 1991

Posted
18 minutes ago, West said:

When all is set and done tax payers will be on the hook for the politicians decisions to suspend human rights. That's what's most tragic 

Yea though that's just the cost of democracy. Same with holding elections. When you compare it against the cost of corruption, it's not that much. 

Posted

much as Trudeau is taking the heat for it

in terms of who is the architect of our now indefinite state of "emergency" ?

who came up with this idea ?

I would assume it is actually former Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair, now Minister of Public Safety

this is his style, this is what he did for Harper at the G7 in Toronto, this is the exact same model now

 

Posted (edited)

If the Governor General of Canada receives 998,000 emails expressing a no confidence vote, she will act. Include your name and province.   Include “No Confidence Vote” in the subject line.  Be not afraid to exercise your Charter rights.

Her Excellency The Right Honourable Mary Simon

[email protected]
 

 

Edited by Zeitgeist
Posted

literally Pre Crime coming next

Trudeau's 'anti-hate' bill will allow people to PREEMPTIVELY report Canadians for 'hate speech'

Proposed hate speech legislation would allow people to take others to court if they suspect that someone will post content deemed hateful online.

Proposed hate speech legislation would allow people to take others to court if they suspect that someone will post content deemed hateful online.

Bill C-36 states that "a person may, with the Attorney General's consent, lay an information before a provincial court judge if the person fears on reasonable grounds that another person will commit (a) an offence under section 318 [advocating genocide] or subsection 319" [inciting or promoting hate, promoting hatred].

https://thepostmillennial.com/trudeaus-anti-hate-bill-will-allow-people-to-preemptively-report-canadians-for-hate-speech

Posted
10 minutes ago, Dougie93 said:

literally Pre Crime coming next

Trudeau's 'anti-hate' bill will allow people to PREEMPTIVELY report Canadians for 'hate speech'

Proposed hate speech legislation would allow people to take others to court if they suspect that someone will post content deemed hateful online.

Proposed hate speech legislation would allow people to take others to court if they suspect that someone will post content deemed hateful online.

Bill C-36 states that "a person may, with the Attorney General's consent, lay an information before a provincial court judge if the person fears on reasonable grounds that another person will commit (a) an offence under section 318 [advocating genocide] or subsection 319" [inciting or promoting hate, promoting hatred].

https://thepostmillennial.com/trudeaus-anti-hate-bill-will-allow-people-to-preemptively-report-canadians-for-hate-speech

Muslims become a protected class whereby slandering the prophet can get you fined.  

Posted (edited)

one important tip I will share with you

bear in mind that the police right now are often acting well outside of their authority

literally assaulting & extorting people on the street with no law backing that up

no law gives them the authority to act like the thugs they are now

they can't just go around barking orders at and/or grabbing people who are not breaking the law

so if you are confronted by the police

ask these very specific questions and try to get it all on camera

"what authority do you have to do what you are doing right now ?"

"What law am I supposedly breaking that you are ostensibly enforcing right now ?"

get that on the record if you can, it will matter in court

Edited by Dougie93
Posted
1 minute ago, Dougie93 said:

one important tip I will share with you

bear in mind that the police right now are often acting well outside of their authority

literally assaulting & extorting people on the street with no law backing that up

no law gives them the authority to act like the thugs they are now

they can't just go around barking orders at and/or grabbing people who are not breaking the law

so if you are confronted by the police

ask these very specific questions and try to get it all on camera

"what authority do you have to do what you are doing right now ?"

"What law am I supposedly breaking that you are ostensibly enforcing right now ?"

get that on the record if you can, it will matter in court

It's telling that the police services so far refuse body cams, unlike the majority of large cities in the USA.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Faramir said:

So many liberals want to go toe to toe with Russia, even though we are suffering equal oppression here in Canada.

literally

the tactics used in Ottawa are exactly the same as the ones the MVD employs in Russia

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,912
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    AlembicoEMR
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...