Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

ffs . . . . there's threads for your religion.  Chuck Anthony has his thumb up his ass by not 'moderating' this thread.

This went further into religion because I was talking about liberal policies which are against the Bible.  I am sorry if it disturbed you.  It was not meant to offend anyone.   Since my beliefs are based on what the Bible teaches, I must refute liberal ideology on that basis.  There is no other answer to it.  If you say I can't speak if it has reference to the Bible or religion  then you are effectively denying my freedom of religion and freedom of speech.  It can't be a free society if conversations cannot include all points of view, including religious ones.  If we do that, we become like China, exactly what many of us oppose.  That would be totalitarianism and speech control.

Just because there is a thread for religion that doesn't mean one cannot mention the subject under other headings.  If my point is relative to the topic, I should be allowed to speak it and others show their agreement by replying to it.  But you can't always box religion into a certain category if it is related to the topic at hand somehow.  Again that is speech control and denial of freedom.

Edited by blackbird
Posted
On 12/30/2021 at 6:06 PM, Army Guy said:

This is a double edge sword here, the average joe does not care where it is built, but the cost is it cheap. The market drives demand, and until the market decides we do not want cheap shit, it is going to keep pouring in...Greed is the other side of the coin, big money to be made with cheap labor, lack of laws like in the trade mark field, etc, and we are not getting rid of greed anytime soon. The government use to sponsor by made in Canada all the time...over the tv and  radio not any more, shit we can not even sell our own oil across the country. 

Problem is all the appliances made now are pure crap.  

Posted (edited)

 There are lots of Marxist leaning people in Canada.  The government is full of them.  The Liberals have even been pushing for a way to control people's speech on social media by using the Canadian Radio Television Commission to control social media companies to control people's speech on the internet.  As usual the Liberals tie their sinister new laws in with some law that sounds benign like helping or protecting Canadian culture and heritage.

Edited by blackbird
Posted
19 minutes ago, blackbird said:

 There are lots of Marxist leaning people in Canada.  The government is full of them.  The Liberals have even been pushing for a way to control people's speech on social media by using the Canadian Radio Television Commission to control social media companies to control people's speech on the internet.  As usual the Liberals tie their sinister new laws in with some law that sounds benign like helping or protecting Canadian culture and heritage.

Why? Because of the useful idiots called Canadians whom have allowed it to happen. Canada has become a country full of socialists and communists and those same buffoons now run and rule over Canada. Our dear Marxist PM of Canada leader is a communist. Comrade Fidel Castro was is daddy. It's too bad that Castro Trudeau was not born in Cuba. He would probably be the Marxist leader of Cuba today. Just where he wants to be. 

Here in Marxist Canada, we are not even allowed to have a conservative TV channel on the airwaves like the Americans have with FOX NEWS. That is because the CRTC is run by a bunch of socialists and communists. Even those so called conservative party's that we have here in Canada are all liberals disguised as conservatives. Disgusting indeed. ?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
6 hours ago, G Huxley said:

What is the death penalty applied for crimes that weren't committed but human sacrifice?

Are you familiar with the ancient concept of a scapegoat?

the death penalty being used on innocent people isn't human sacrifice

you're just being silly

Posted (edited)
53 minutes ago, G Huxley said:

How is it not human sacrifice?

how is it human sacrifice?

not all wrongful executions are human sacrifice

you seem to be confusing human sacrifice for any time that someone is wrongfully executed

false equating them to be the same thing

 

you made the claim that it is human sacrifice

you have to back it up

I have repeatedly backed up my point

you cannot do the same

Edited by Yzermandius19
Posted

The google definition of sacrifice:

"an act of slaughtering an animal or person or surrendering a possession as an offering to God or to a divine or supernatural figure."

Witch burnings would qualify.



 

Posted (edited)
31 minutes ago, G Huxley said:

The google definition of sacrifice:

"an act of slaughtering an animal or person or surrendering a possession as an offering to God or to a divine or supernatural figure."

Witch burnings would qualify.
 

no it wouldn't

witch burnings were not an offering to God

it was to punish witches

therefore it does not qualify

your own definition does not back up your position

Edited by Yzermandius19
Posted (edited)
14 hours ago, taxme said:

Why? Because of the useful idiots called Canadians whom have allowed it to happen. Canada has become a country full of socialists and communists and those same buffoons now run and rule over Canada. Our dear Marxist PM of Canada leader is a communist. Comrade Fidel Castro was is daddy. It's too bad that Castro Trudeau was not born in Cuba. He would probably be the Marxist leader of Cuba today. Just where he wants to be. 

Here in Marxist Canada, we are not even allowed to have a conservative TV channel on the airwaves like the Americans have with FOX NEWS. That is because the CRTC is run by a bunch of socialists and communists. Even those so called conservative party's that we have here in Canada are all liberals disguised as conservatives. Disgusting indeed. ?

Marxism, Socialism, wokeness, progressivism is flourishing in Canada and most are asleep and aren't even aware or they openly support it.   

The people in some central American countries and Cuba were asleep at the wheel too and many supported the Communist revolutionaries.  They paid the price with tens of thousands of lives lost and their freedom gone.  They now live in poverty.  In Venezuela the people thought they were being wise when they elected Socialists.  The Socialists destroyed the economy.  Socialists then turned around and took away everyone's freedom and brutally imposed totalitarianism.  Now the people are starving and trying to flee. 

Quote 

Economics: Why is it that reporters keep scratching their heads about Venezuela's descent into extreme poverty and chaos? The cause is simple. Socialism. End it and you will end the misery.

When the New York Times wrote about Venezuela's ongoing collapse a year ago, it described how the country was suffering "painful shortages … even of basic foods," and how "electricity and water are being rationed, and huge areas of the country have spent months with little of either."

Here is how the Times explained the reason for Venezuela's dire situation: "The growing economic crisis (was) fueled by low prices for oil, the country's main export; a drought that has crippled Venezuela's ability to generate hydroelectric power; and a long decline in manufacturing and agricultural production."

There's no mention — not one — of the fact that Hugo Chávez tried to turn Venezuela into a socialist paradise, policies that his successor Nicolás Maduro has continued. The Times' coverage is par for the course.  Unquote  

What Caused Venezuela's Collapse Is No Mystery — Except To Economically Illiterate Journalists | Investor's Business Daily (investors.com)

Of course the left wing media try to put a different spin on.  We live in a world of lies.

Edited by blackbird
Posted

'Marxism' had its influence effectively die in the 20th century and it's just use as a scarecrow these days.

"There's no attempt made by the reporter to say who is right."

That statement reveals a misunderstanding of how 'reporting' is done... and the bogeyman continues to scare the zealots.

BOO.
 

Posted (edited)
20 hours ago, Nefarious Banana said:

You, once again, have polluted another thread with your religion.  Nine page thread here. You hi-jacked it early on page three.  Yes, there are threads on religion . . . . . any chance you could use one of them?

No.  The world view people hold is closely related to their beliefs in God and the Bible.  You will find that most climate change alarmists, all Communists, and most Socialists do not believe in God or the Bible.  The fact is most secularists, Marxists, Communists, Socialists, oppose Biblical Christianity, God, and the Bible because it exposes their error and unbelief.  Humans by nature are corrupt and choose darkness rather than the light which God has given us in his word, the Bible.  So the Bible and religious discussion is entirely relevant to politics and world affairs.  Secondly, nobody is forcing you to believe anything on a forum.  You have the freedom to refute anything.

Here is a link of a video you can watch discussing the climate change issue in connection with world views.  My honest belief is that the Bible and biblical Christianity present the proper world view.  It can't be separated or excluded from world affairs, climate change or politics.  Saying one should only mention the Bible or something in a religious context on a certain thread is denying freedom of speech to everyone and trying to relegate them to the fringes.  It is a form of censorship. That is not how freedom of speech works.

A Biblical Approach to Climate Change (part 1) - Media Center - creation.com

Edited by blackbird
Posted
1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said:

'Marxism' had its influence effectively die in the 20th century and it's just use as a scarecrow these days.

"There's no attempt made by the reporter to say who is right."

That statement reveals a misunderstanding of how 'reporting' is done... and the bogeyman continues to scare the zealots.

BOO.
 

When I was on a high school course in literature, the instructor, who was previously a journalist, told us every journalist is biased one way or another.  It is just a fact of life.

Posted
24 minutes ago, blackbird said:

 Saying one should only mention the Bible or something in a religious context on a certain thread is denying freedom of speech to everyone and trying to relegate them to the fringes.  It is a form of censorship. That is not how freedom of speech works.

Nice try at deflection . . . . 

Censorship of your reams religious  propaganda into every post of yours on any subject?

As mentioned before, use/make a thread in the Religious forum.  

Posted
45 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

People on THIS site actually cite these people as a legit source - only because they hate Trudeau so they MUST be great right ?

And now we are finally answering the OP - we allow propaganda like China's because we are FREE.

[DROPS MIC... GRABS PIZZA SLICE ON WAY OUT THE DOOR]

Seems to me you claimed to be conservative, but you sure put a lot of energy into defending Trudeau.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, blackbird said:

Seems to me you claimed to be conservative, but you sure put a lot of energy into defending Trudeau.

When did it become illegitimate to criticize a political partisan for the lame opposition and criticisms that are often directed at the party in power?  More importantly though where is the justification for believing and claiming your critics are by default partisan supporters of your opposition?

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted
12 hours ago, Yzermandius19 said:

no it wouldn't

witch burnings were not an offering to God

it was to punish witches

therefore it does not qualify

your own definition does not back up your position

 

Who were witch burnings for, but god and his will?

Human sacrifice was also often used to punish those who were sacrificed.

It qualifies. 

If it looks like a duck and it quacks like a duck it most probably is a duck.

Witch burnings are human sacrifice.

Posted
24 minutes ago, eyeball said:

1j. When did it become illegitimate to criticize a political partisan for the lame opposition and criticisms that are often directed at the party in power? 
2. More importantly though where is the justification for believing and claiming your critics are by default partisan supporters of your opposition?

1. Right ?
2. Right ?

Those of use who think Trudeau is substandard expect Conservatives to do better than calling him 'Communist'...  

Posted (edited)
50 minutes ago, eyeball said:

When did it become illegitimate to criticize a political partisan for the lame opposition and criticisms that are often directed at the party in power?  More importantly though where is the justification for believing and claiming your critics are by default partisan supporters of your opposition?

 

21 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

1. Right ?
2. Right ?

Those of use who think Trudeau is substandard expect Conservatives to do better than calling him 'Communist'...  

Trudeau should stick with Bhangra dancing.  He's better at that than anything else.

Edited by blackbird

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,830
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    TRUMP2016
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • BlahTheCanuck earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • BlahTheCanuck earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • CDN1 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • oops earned a badge
      One Year In
    • DUI_Offender went up a rank
      Grand Master
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...