The Lawsuits

[Shady]

7 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

Ah, you think the whole pardon thing is going to work.  Well, it'll be interesting to watch, anyway.

Pardon for what?  Has he been charged with something?

[Infidel Dog]

Patriots had a good day. Trump rallied the troops in Georgia and Antifa got the crap kicked out of them again - this time by American flags:

 

[Guest]

1 hour ago, Shady said:

Pardon for what?  Has he been charged with something?

Not yet.  That's why preemptive has become the word of the month.

[Shady]

10 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

Not yet.  That's why preemptive has become the word of the month.

Preemptive pardon for what?  What hasn’t he been charged with yet?

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Shady said:

Preemptive pardon for what?  What hasn’t he been charged with yet?

He hasn't been charged with anything yet. 

That's what makes all the talk of preemptive pardons for Trump, Giuliani, their families, financial advisers, tennis partners, old school chums, etc., so intriguing!

[Shady]

14 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

He hasn't been charged with anything yet. 

That's what makes all the talk of preemptive pardons for Trump, Giuliani, their families, financial advisers, tennis partners, old school chums, etc., so intriguing!

What’s he suppose to be charged with?

[Guest]

29 minutes ago, Shady said:

What’s he suppose to be charged with?

That's my point.  If there was nothing, there wouldn't be any need for any preemptive pardons.

It's going to be so much fun!

[Shady]

14 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

That's my point.  If there was nothing, there wouldn't be any need for any preemptive pardons.

It's going to be so much fun!

The only person talking about preemptive pardons is you.  It’s already fun, you people are deranged and hilarious! 

[Infidel Dog]

4 hours ago, Shady said:

The intro was awesome.  5000+ people chanting we love you.  Biden will never get that.

I went back and watched it from the beginning. That was all pretty good. I don't think anybody doubts that Trump stands behind Loeffler and Perdue now. I was a little disappointed none of them called for a legislative hearing publicly but at the end of the day we were left with this:

[Shady]

34 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

I went back and watched it from the beginning. That was all pretty good. I don't think anybody doubts that Trump stands behind Loeffler and Perdue now. I was a little disappointed none of them called for a legislative hearing publicly but at the end of the day we were left with this:

During the 2016 primary, I didn’t like Trump very much.  I more of a Rubio supporter.  But Trump has grown on me, and his opponents have been so insane and deranged that they’ve succeeded in pushing me completely into his camp.  They’ve probably succeeded in doing that to a lot of people.  That’s probably one of the reasons he received 11 million more votes this time around.

[Michael Hardner]

Voting for someone because they bother people whom I don't like sounds like a vain and terrible reason to vote for someone.

 

 

[BubberMiley]

6 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

I went back and watched it from the beginning. That was all pretty good. I don't think anybody doubts that Trump stands behind Loeffler and Perdue now. I was a little disappointed none of them called for a legislative hearing publicly but at the end of the day we were left with this:

Yes, this is proof voting doesn't work anyway. The fix is in. No use risking covid if it won't make a difference anyway. What's the point?

[BubberMiley]

7 hours ago, Shady said:

The only person talking about preemptive pardons is you.  It’s already fun, you people are deranged and hilarious! 

So when the pre-emptive pardons happen, you won't mind apologizing for calling the people who were right deranged?

Flynn already has a "preemptive pardon" for any crimes that might relate to his treasonous collusion with Russia.

[Shady]

4 hours ago, BubberMiley said:

So when the pre-emptive pardons happen, you won't mind apologizing for calling the people who were right deranged?

Flynn already has a "preemptive pardon" for any crimes that might relate to his treasonous collusion with Russia.

Right.  Just like Trump wasn’t going to leave the White House right?  You people are insane.  Seek professional help.  Flynn was pardoned of the fake crime he was charged with.  There’s no such thing as a preemptive pardon.  You have no idea what you’re talking about.  

[Infidel Dog]

To be fair...

Quote

President Gerald Ford pardoned his predecessor, Nixon, for any crimes he might have committed related to the Watergate scandal. President Jimmy Carter preemptively pardoned hundreds of thousands of men who avoided the draft during the Vietnam War.

President George H.W. Bush pardoned former Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger and former CIA official Duane Clarridge before they were tried on charges tied to the Iran-Contra scandal. The two have been charged, but Bush pardoned them before their trials were set to begin.

 

https://www.freep.com/story/news/politics/2020/12/02/can-trump-pardon-himself-can-pardons-reversed-power-explained/3792550001/

However there is legal argument as to whether or not a President can pardon himself. It's in the link.

If he could though, I wouldn't blame Trump if he did Preemptively pardon himself and others connected to him. The Communists, pardon me, Democrats have shown a propensity to witch hunt, try, and even convict the innocent. See Flynn.

[Infidel Dog]

5 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Voting for someone because they bother people whom I don't like sounds like a vain and terrible reason to vote for someone.

 

 

What about investigating the charges against the innocent who appear to be getting unjustly harassed then supporting him because you know more about the case.

Take Flynn for example. Never heard of him until the swamp creeptures started witch hunting him and got him unjustly convicted of a crime.

I'd vote for him for anything he ran for now. After looking into his history he seems like a top-line, capable guy.

[Guest]

5 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

What about investigating the charges against the innocent who appear to be getting unjustly harassed then supporting him because you know more about the case.

Take Flynn for example. Never heard of him until the swamp creeptures started witch hunting him and got him unjustly convicted of a crime.

I'd vote for him for anything he ran for now. After looking into his history he seems like a top-line, capable guy.

He actually seems like a despicable moron, but that's just based on his comments since he was pardoned.

Like you said, never heard of him otherwise.

[Infidel Dog]

But see, anybody could say the same thing about you, not knowing anything about you.

But perhaps if they looked into it they might think even you might be worthy of a vote for something. Perhaps a city councilor of some such thing.

It's the principle of acquiring knowledge by investigation we're talking about. And that's the problem with leftist witch-hunting. Sooner or later somebody is going to look into it and you're going to have kind of a knowledge-based, Streisand effect reaction.

Whatever your political based prejudice chooses to have you believe about Flynn you can't prove him guilty of anything, so that makes the guys who witch-hunted him the bad guys and by default it makes Flynn the good guy.

Edited December 6, 2020 by Infidel Dog

[Guest]

5 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

But see, anybody could say the same thing about you, not knowing anything about you.

But perhaps if they looked into it they might think even you might be worthy of a vote for something. Perhaps a city councilor of some such thing.

It's the principle of acquiring knowledge by investigation we're talking about. And that's the problem with leftist witch-hunting. Sooner or later somebody is going to look into it and you're going to have kind of a knowledge-based, Streisand effect reaction.

They could if I had a twitter account and used it to say dumb things.  They wouldn't have to know anything else about me.

I'm sure Flynn would make a perfectly execrable city councillor, but hey, if they vote for him, they get what they deserve.

And if they don't vote for him, maybe he can get someone to suspend the Constitution, impose martial law and give him the job anyway.

[Infidel Dog]

6 hours ago, bcsapper said:

They could if I had a twitter account and used it to say dumb things.  They wouldn't have to know anything else about me.

You're pretty sure nothing you've said on this social media site might damn you, are you?

Because I've heard it said your recent pathetic attempts at humor or as I heard them called, "trolling" were kind of dumb. 

Maybe you should be happy we don't have a swamp or a cancel culture to witch-hunt you here like they did to Flynn. You know glass houses and all that. 

Edited December 7, 2020 by Infidel Dog

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

You're pretty sure nothing you've said on this social media site might damn you, are you?

Because I've heard it said your recent pathetic attempts at humor or as I heard them called them "trolling" were kind of dumb. 

Maybe you should be happy we don't have a swamp or a cancel culture to witch-hunt you here like they did to Flynn. You know glass houses and all that. 

Yeah, that was all fake news.

[Infidel Dog]

OK, that one, wasn't bad.

[Guest]

14 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

Patriots had a good day. Trump rallied the troops in Georgia and Antifa got the crap kicked out of them again - this time by American flags:

 

One of the good things about having nothing but contempt for either side is that every punch is fun, regardless of who throws it.  Keep posting these if you get them.

[Infidel Dog]

I get in trouble for posting them unless I have something clever to say about them. Antifa always gets thumped when it's a fair fight, so I don't always have something novel to say about it.

This one was always my favorite though:

 

[Guest]

10 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

I get in trouble for posting them unless I have something clever to say about them. Antifa always gets thumped when it's a fair fight, so I don't always have something novel to say about it.

This one was always my favorite though:

 

You have to be a member, but judging from the comments I've seen it on Reddit.  Hit the guy with the rod and then pulled out of hitting the lady once he saw who it was.