The Lawsuits

[Infidel Dog]

Well if you had watched the whole video you claimed you scanned you'd know the DOJ investigation is still on, so I wouldn't be surprised if they already were looking at this:

  

23 minutes ago, Shady said:

Nothing to see here.

 

 

Edited December 3, 2020 by Infidel Dog

[Guest]

8 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Well if you had watched the whole video you claimed you scanned you'd know the DOJ investigation is still on, so I wouldn't be surprised if they already were looking at this:

  

 

I know if I was going to fix an election in the United States, I'd make sure all of my fake votes were hidden in suitcases under the table, so I could pull them out in full view of the security cameras.

[Infidel Dog]

That's the thing about some of these frauds. They're so brazen.

Nothing to see there though cause the noble BLMers and other activists who were manning those polls would never do anything like that, right?

Come to think of it though, I now get your point that nobody should be wonder anything about the Bolsonaro story because "Ha ha, somebody said Bolsonaro," but it is kind of an interesting story when you look into it - which your "ha ha"-ing it convinced me I had to do:

Quote

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro - who sometimes has embraced the label 'Trump of the Tropics' - said Sunday he´ll wait a little longer before recognizing the U.S. election victory of Joe Biden.

Speaking to reporters while casting a ballot in municipal races, he also echoed President Donald Trump's allegations of irregularities in the U.S. vote.

'I have my sources of information that there really was a lot of fraud there,' he said. 'Nobody talks about that. If it was enough to define (victory) for one or the other, I don't know.'

Asked if he would recognize Biden's victory, he said, 'I am holding back a little more.'

He also expressed doubts about Brazil's current electronic voting system, which he has suggested is vulnerable to fraud. 

He has urged the country to go back to a paper ballot system for the 2022 presidential election.

The conservative Brazilian leader has appealed to the same sort of right-wing populist base in Brazil that Trump has courted in the United States, and has welcomed comparisons to the U.S. president.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8998459/Brazils-Bolsonaro-alleges-fraud-US-presidential-election.html

 

[WestCanMan]

3 hours ago, Argus said:

She's clearly either a nutball or drunk, or both.

She's no prize but that's not a pre-requisite for being a witness to something. People have been convicted of murder based on the testimony of lesser people than that woman. Eye-Witness testimony still actually means something in a court of law.

By publicly shaming this woman I think that the media are trying to stop other people from testifying.

Ironically CNN et al will make a hero of an anonymous whistleblower and give them all the credibility in the world but when it comes to people who put their name & reputation on the line and risk a perjury charge by appearing in court it's time to shame people into silence.

[Guest]

10 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

That's the thing about some of these frauds. They're so brazen.

Nothing to see there though cause the noble BLMers and other activists who were manning those polls would never do anything like that, right?

Come to think of it though, I now get your point that nobody should be wonder anything about the Bolsonaro story because "Ha ha, somebody said Bolsonaro," but it is kind of an interesting story when you look into it - which your "ha ha"-ing it convinced me I had to do:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8998459/Brazils-Bolsonaro-alleges-fraud-US-presidential-election.html

 

Yeah, I daresay Georgia's full of BLM activists.

As for "ha ha"-ing, the Daily Mail provokes its fair share of that too.

Anyway, it doesn't matter, does it?  Now that there is absolutely rock solid evidence of massive election fraud, the election result will be overturned and Trump will get another four years.  You can mock me and all the others who refused to believe.  I hope you won't be too merciless with it.  We are only human, after all.

Edited December 3, 2020 by bcsapper

[Infidel Dog]

32 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

Yeah, I daresay Georgia's full of BLM activists.

Oh you didn't hear about that?

Actually I said BLM and other activists, but yes, organizations were set up to channel money from big money donors so they could set up activists to run the vote.

Here I'll give you a teaser about it. If you want you can read the rest. But who do think was laughing as the republican poll watchers were corralled hundreds of feet away or just ushered out. For that matter, who do you think was doing the ushering? Who do you think was putting up those bristol board barriers so nobody could see inside?

Quote

What these grants did was build structural bias into the 2020 election where structural bias matters most – in densely populated urban cores. It converted election offices in key jurisdictions with deep reservoirs of Biden votes into Formula One turnout machines. The hundreds of millions of dollars built systems, hired employees from activist groups, bought equipment and radio advertisements. It did everything that street activists could ever dream up to turn out Biden votes if only they had unlimited funding.

In 2020, they had unlimited funding because billionaires made cash payments to 501(c)(3) charities that in turn made cash payments to government election offices.

https://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2020/12/02/the-real-kraken-what-really-happened-to-donald-trump-in-the-2020-election-n1185494

Edited December 4, 2020 by Infidel Dog

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, bcsapper said:

At last!  Send it to Bill Barr and the DoJ immediately!

Was that comment really worth posting?

What do you think you're 'adding' to the discussion sapper? 

[Guest]

Just now, WestCanMan said:

Was that comment really worth posting?

What do you think you're 'adding' to the discussion sapper? 

I'm not adding, I'm mocking.

[Infidel Dog]

Because if you say "Ha Ha" you win, right?

I never got that. Oh well, prog logic, I guess.

Oh, BTW if you'd ever like to join us in the land of what really happened, you could try this one to explain how BLM and other Marxist thugs were hired to run the vote on election night.

Quote

The Capital Research Center has this deep dive into what the Center for Technology and Civil Life did in just Georgia. It starts with this:

This year, left-leaning donors Mark Zuckerberg and wife Priscilla Chan gave $350 million to an allegedly “nonpartisan” nonprofit, the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL), which in turn re-granted the funds to thousands of governmental election officials around the country to “help” them conduct the 2020 election.

 

Edited December 4, 2020 by Infidel Dog

[Guest]

8 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Oh you didn't hear about that?

Actually I said BLM and other activists, but yes, organizations were set up to channel money from big money donors so they could set up activists to run the vote.

Here I'll give you a teaser about it. If you want you can read the rest. But who do think was laughing as the republican poll watchers were corralled hundreds of feet away or just ushered out. For that matter, who do you think was doing the ushering? Who do you think was putting up those bristol board barriers so nobody could see inside?

https://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2020/12/02/the-real-kraken-what-really-happened-to-donald-trump-in-the-2020-election-n1185494

I got as far as this bit:

State legislatures are where the redistricting action is, and the GOP flipped three chambers red, gaining 192 state house seats and 40 state senate seats nationwide.

I see what you mean.  There might have been some voter fraud there.

[WestCanMan]

48 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

I know if I was going to fix an election in the United States, I'd make sure all of my fake votes were hidden in suitcases under the table, so I could pull them out in full view of the security cameras.

Those people didn't have all kinds of time to fix an election. There were 8, 10 and 12 hour pauses in the vote tallying which seems like a lot to outsiders, but to people on the ground trying to run a scam it's not a lot of time, especially with election observers there. This was a brief window of opportunity, and it's an example of 'haste makes waste'. They just screwed up and didn't cover their tracks properly.

Out of all the places where the Dems ran their voter fraud schemes do you think that at least one group wouldn't overlook something like this?

Maybe they didn't know about the cameras, maybe they thought that the cameras were off, maybe they didn't think that there would be an investigation, so the camera footage wouldn't matter. Plus they're Dems, so they're obviously not very bright. 

 

The MSM has been running a full-court press to legitimize the election since 9PM on election night, and they attempt to instantly de-legitimize any criticisms without paying them any attention, much like yourself. 

Everyone with at least half a brain knew that the Dems were planning on cheating by the number of voter-fraud-friendly systems they were trying to incorporate and how many times they've been caught cheating on the elections in the past. FYI they started working on mail-in ballots back in 2018, 2 years before the first signs of the plandemic. 

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

I'm not adding, I'm mocking.

We are constantly showing our character and the worth of our opinions when we post sapper. 

[Guest]

1 minute ago, Infidel Dog said:

Because if you say "Ha Ha" you win, right?

I never got that. Oh well, prog logic, I guess.

Oh, BTW if you'd ever like to join us in the land of what really happened, you could try this one to explain how BLM and other Marxist thugs were hired to run the vote on election night.

 

If I say "Ha Ha' it means I find it funny.

Usually, in arguments like these, funny equates with non-factual.

But I don't consider this a win/lose situation.  That's what the politicians are for.  They can win or lose.  I just enjoy the distraction.

As for your BLM question, I really don't know.  I could see it in Oregon or Washington State, but why would a state run by Republicans choose BLM activists to run their election?

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

We are constantly showing our character and the worth of our opinions when we post sapper. 

That's true.  It's why I mock.

[WestCanMan]

7 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

That's true.  It's why I mock.

While other people are engaging in adult discussion. 

Do you get it?

[Infidel Dog]

5 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

I got as far as this bit:

State legislatures are where the redistricting action is, and the GOP flipped three chambers red, gaining 192 state house seats and 40 state senate seats nationwide.

I see what you mean.  There might have been some voter fraud there.

Really? You didn't want to know any more after you read that? Figures.

That's OK, I'll tell you why that's interesting

If  Biden won more votes than any other candidate in American history including Obama why did his party do so dismal down ticket? Why did the Republicans do so well.

You'll say because everybody hated Trump more than they ignored Biden or something like that, I assume.

Very well, why did Trump also win more votes than any other candidate in history, including Obama but voters did vote down ticket for republicans?

I take it you don't want to know the answer there or you would have kept reading the article, but I'll tell you anyway.

It was because the activists running the vote saw Trump was blowing them out of the water in spite of the voting machine fix they were up until then relying on, so they told everybody the polls were shut down for the night corralled or expelled reluctant republican poll watchers and clicked it into plan B, or desperation mode calling for the ballot-stuffer backup recruits and other dirty tricksters.

[Infidel Dog]

Oh and here's a witness the new National Post of the left didn't want to tell you about:

 

[Guest]

10 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

While other people are engaging in adult discussion. 

Do you get it?

They're not.  They're trying to argue that there was fraud in the last election.  Enough to warrant changing the result. 

[Guest]

8 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Really? You didn't want to know any more after you read that? Figures.

That's OK, I'll tell you why that's interesting

If  Biden won more votes than any other candidate in American history including Obama why did his party do so dismal down ticket? Why did the Republicans do so well.

You'll say because everybody hated Trump more than they ignored Biden or something like that, I assume.

Very well, why did Trump also win more votes than any other candidate in history, including Obama but voters did vote down ticket for republicans?

I take it you don't want to know the answer there or you would have kept reading the article, but I'll tell you anyway.

It was because the activists running the vote saw Trump was blowing them out of the water in spite of the voting machine fix they were up until then relying on, so they told everybody the polls were shut down for the night corralled or expelled reluctant republican poll watchers and clicked it into plan B, or desperation mode calling for the ballot-stuffer backup recruits and other dirty tricksters.

No, it was because Trump tried to downplay the need for, and the legitimacy of, mail in ballots during a pandemic.  His followers believed him, and voted accordingly.  His detractors didn't, and also voted accordingly. 

It was really obvious.  It was expected.  It was no surprise at all. 

The numbers were no surprise either, given the general feelings towards Trump from both sides.

[OftenWrong]

15 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

No, it was because Trump tried to downplay the need for, and the legitimacy of, mail in ballots during a pandemic.  His followers believed him, and voted accordingly.  His detractors didn't, and also voted accordingly. 

It was really obvious.  It was expected.  It was no surprise at all. 

The numbers were no surprise either, given the general feelings towards Trump from both sides.

In your highly esteemed opinion...   

[OftenWrong]

9 hours ago, DogOnPorch said:

As you mentioned...spit on folks for years and then expect benevolence and forgiveness? They've got themselves a war instead. I'm a Canadian...and I'm pissed off. I can only imagine what's going-on in the minds of the more militant members of the Trump Train.

Interesting there has not been much reported, but also neither of the antifa or BLM protests, if they're still happening. I imagine they would be. Are not blacks still being shot? Or have they simply ensured that black officers do all the black people shooting.

 

[Argus]

2 hours ago, bcsapper said:

I know if I was going to fix an election in the United States, I'd make sure all of my fake votes were hidden in suitcases under the table, so I could pull them out in full view of the security cameras.

I'd also make sure to check off the box for the Democratic congressman and senator. I mean, it would be real good to have control of both so he can get stuff done, right? And they're on the same ballot. But for some reason they didn't think of that. ?

[Argus]

13 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

If  Biden won more votes than any other candidate in American history including Obama why did his party do so dismal down ticket? Why did the Republicans do so well.

You'll say because everybody hated Trump more than they ignored Biden or something like that, I assume.

Clearly. This election was all about getting rid of Trump. Too many people were sick of him. Even a lot of people who voted for Republican senators and congressmen, apparently.

Edited December 4, 2020 by Argus

[Guest]

37 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

In your highly esteemed opinion...   

Well, sure...

[Argus]

4 hours ago, Infidel Dog said:

Apparently there was no fraud nor could there be a possibility of any because the now flipped leftist National post has found a clip from a testimony on one witness (among many) who appears to be eccentric.

Well, and the guy in charge of defending the election from attacks said there was nothing (before he was fired) and the FBI director appointed by Trump said there was nothing, and the Attorney General, a fanatical Trump supporter said there was nothing, and the Republican election heads of various states say there was nothing.

And if you want more dumb witnesses at the Michigan clown show here they are.

https://www.thecut.com/2020/12/melissa-carone-trump-witness-michigan-trainwreck.html