The Lawsuits

[BeaverFever]

52 minutes ago, Shady said:

Truth.

 

Really you can’t figure that out?  Do tje words “record turnout” or “population density” sound familiar? The number of counties has nothing to do with the number of votes.   

[BubberMiley]

Uh...because if there are 10 counties and one has a 1000 voters and the other nine have 10 voters, if Biden just wins the one urban county, he wins the election. There was a big urban/rural divide in the election and that's where you see the difference. You guys have just been taken advantage of because the meme writer knew you were really gullible, unable to look deeper beyond the meme, and like to be the victim.

So sorry for your loss.

[Infidel Dog]

Jenna Ellis says they have until January 6 to make their case.

https://populist.press/jenna-ellis-we-have-plenty-of-time-the-ultimate-date-is-jan-6-not-december-14/

She also says Congressman Mike Kelly's case before the Alito and the Supremes was only denied emergency injunctive relief. It is still pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.

Kelly, just getting a supreme to address his case has had a welcome side effect though.

It seems to be activating the GOP.

7 states have joined the Texas suit making it's way to the supreme court.

The Two Senators in the Georgia runoff were hesitant to come out in support of the lawsuits. Now they have:

GA SENS. DAVID PERDUE AND KELLY LOEFFLER ISSUE JOINT STATEMENT OF SUPPORT FOR TEXAS SCOTUS ELECTION LAWSUIT

And Ted Cruz has activated:

Ted Cruz Issues Rebuke Of Supreme Court Snubbing Republican Challenge In Pennsylvania

Kelly's suit getting attention from the supreme court got it going but the Texas lawsuit is the one that matters right now. 

Quote

Very few of the lawsuits that Trump’s legal team has filed since Election Day have really worried the left, but when Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit directly with the Supreme Court on Monday night they immediately began freaking out.  The reason why they are so alarmed is because they understand that this suit has the potential to flip the election.  The suit alleges that the states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin conducted their elections in ways that violated the U.S. Constitution, and if the Supreme Court agrees that would almost certainly mean that the Supreme Court would force the state legislatures of those states “to appoint a new set of presidential electors in a manner that does not violate the Electors Clause and the Fourteenth Amendment”.

http://themostimportantnews.com/archives/the-texas-lawsuit-is-on-the-docket-the-supreme-court-will-determine-the-fate-of-the-2020-election

And this one below is fun.

A Michigan State Rep threatened Trump voters with repercussions and called on the military to make it happen. A Marine replied. Turns out the rep is not as tough as she thought she was.

https://populist.press/michigan-house-rep-warns-trumpers-calls-on-her-soldiers-to-do-it-right-make-them-pay/

[366h34d]

14 hours ago, bcsapper said:

The SCOTUS have decided to be grownups.  I bet Trump never saw that coming.

Everyone else did.

That is why I start to untruth MSM and big tech,  it was injunctive relief.

[Infidel Dog]

11 hours ago, Shady said:

Truth.

 

Or as Rand Paul put it:

[Argus]

14 hours ago, sharkman said:

1)  A court hasn't paid attention.  Yet...

Really? Fifty judges, some appointed by Trump, just aren't paying attention?

14 hours ago, sharkman said:

2)  There are plenty of Republicans who are a part of the establishment first and conservative second,

Donald Trump has never been a conservative. Nor is he now. His history is an open book. It is a history of self-indulgence, laziness, gambling, cheating, serial adultery, strippers and prostitutes, bankruptcies, media whoring, and befriending and supporting prominent democrats, including the Clintons. To suggest people who oppose him aren't conservatives is ludicrous. It is the other way around. No real conservative would support Donald Trump.

14 hours ago, sharkman said:

3)  The news media has become an entertainment industry chasing market share rather than one that seeks the truth first and let the chips fall where they may. 

True enough. But if you look around in enough places you can find the truth regardless. Especially if you apply a little logic and critical thought to what people are saying. It's clear you're not doing that.

[366h34d]

13 hours ago, Shady said:

Truth.

 

https://www.npr.org/2020/11/18/935730100/how-biden-won-ramping-up-the-base-and-expanding-margins-in-the-suburbs

At the end, a very interesting election is being won by MSM and big tech

Edited December 9, 2020 by 366h34d

[Argus]

12 hours ago, sharkman said:

Apparently you aren't aware of what Texas did?

Every other day you guys come with an "AHA! WE HAVE THEM NOW!" story. And the instant it's shot down you simply latch onto another one. And when that's shut down you latch onto something else.

Two years from now you'll still be going "AHA! Look at this recently discovered secret video shot in a toilet in rural Delaware of a former poll worker confessing he left early on Tuesday, November 29th! PROOF! FRAUD!""

 

Edited December 9, 2020 by Argus

[Infidel Dog]

2 minutes ago, Argus said:

Donald Trump has never been a conservative.

Possibly not, but his policies of lower taxes, less regulation, personal rights, private property, strong borders and  rule of law are.

if you prefer the Biden/Harris ticket though you're welcome to them. Just don't try to tell us you're any part of right wing.

[Infidel Dog]

3 minutes ago, Argus said:

Every other day you guys come with an "AHA! WE HAVE THEM NOW!" story. And the instant it's shot down you simply latch onto another one. And when that's shut down you latch onto something else.

Two years from now you'll still be going "AHA! Look at this recently discovered secret video shot in a toilet in rural Delaware of a former poll worker confessing he left early on Tuesday, November 29th! PROOF! FRAUD!""

 

The only story that matters now is Jenna Ellis telling us it's not over until January 6.

In the meantime for those of us who know the "road to serfdom" begins if Biden/Harris are allowed to take over and the Dems are allowed to cheat again in the Georgia run-offs, it's like this:

[Argus]

2 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Possibly not, but his policies of lower taxes, less regulation, personal rights, private property, strong borders and  rule of law are.

Hmm, no real conservative would agree to lower taxes in the face of a huge deficit. And Trump clearly has no interest in the rule of law.

2 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

if you prefer the Biden/Harris ticket though you're welcome to them. Just don't try to tell us you're any part of right wing.

I prefer Biden/Harris to a crooked, lazy, ignorant, lying, adulterous, piece of human vomit, yes. Admittedly, that's a low bar. I'd prefer almost anyone to Trump, even that weasel Ted Cruz.

[Argus]

2 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

The only story that matters now is Jenna Ellis telling us it's not over until January 6.

In the meantime for those of us who know the "road to serfdom" begins if Biden/Harris are allowed to take over and the Dems are allowed to cheat again in the Georgia run-offs, it's like this:

There's no evidence the Democrats cheated in the first place. And only a lunatic would think a Republican governor, secretary of state and legislature would allow wholesale cheating in their state in favour of the opposition.

[sharkman]

20 minutes ago, Argus said:

Every other day you guys come with an "AHA! WE HAVE THEM NOW!" story. And the instant it's shot down you simply latch onto another one. And when that's shut down you latch onto something else.

Two years from now you'll still be going "AHA! Look at this recently discovered secret video shot in a toilet in rural Delaware of a former poll worker confessing he left early on Tuesday, November 29th! PROOF! FRAUD!""

 

You seem to be upset this morning.  I think I can tell when you’re worried about Trump... In which case I bid you a Texas sized GOOD MORNING!!

[Infidel Dog]

17 minutes ago, Argus said:

Hmm, no real conservative would agree to lower taxes in the face of a huge deficit. And Trump clearly has no interest in the rule of law.

I prefer Biden/Harris...

I don't think a Progressive Conservative pushing the pajama boy Andrew Scheer model of conservatism. has any right to lecture anybody else on what a "real conservative" is.

For one thing, I doubt there is such a thing. I'm with this guy:

Quote

Perhaps it would be well, most of the time, to use this word “conservative” as an adjective chiefly. For there exists no Model Conservative, and conservatism is the negation of ideology: it is a state of mind, a type of character, a way of looking at the civil social order.

The attitude we call conservatism is sustained by a body of sentiments, rather than by a system of ideological dogmata. It is almost true that a conservative may be defined as a person who thinks himself such. The conservative movement or body of opinion can accommodate a considerable diversity of views on a good many subjects, there being no Test Act or Thirty-Nine Articles of the conservative creed.

 https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/what-is-a-conservative/

The Ronald Reagan model of conservatism might not have always been faithful to the idea of lowering taxes but it believed in it. Basically it was bring more money in, improve the economy and the ship will with proper management, eventually right itself. Trump claimed to have a plan to deal with the deficit but stage one was get the recovery going better after Obama's recession.

Edited December 9, 2020 by Infidel Dog

[Boges]

56 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Or as Rand Paul put it:

Wow you're still peddling that? 

It wasn't a data dump. They were finally able to count Mail-In Ballots. The Republican Legislators passed laws saying that Absentee ballots could only be counted after in-person voting had been finished. 

It's almost like the put in a law that would allow them to claim fraud afterwards. 

[Boges]

It's deliciously ironic that Republican States are trying to get the SCOTUS to throw out the votes of the citizens of other states because their voting standards are different. 

I'm sure they'd be happy with a non-political third party organization taking care of elections like we have in Canada. 

[Argus]

32 minutes ago, sharkman said:

You seem to be upset this morning.  I think I can tell when you’re worried about Trump... In which case I bid you a Texas sized GOOD MORNING!!

Pretending someone is upset or mad is one of the oldest of internet cliche's usually used by someone who doesn't have an answer to what was being said.

[Argus]

31 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

I don't think a Progressive Conservative pushing the pajama boy Andrew Scheer model of conservatism. has any right to lecture anybody else on what a "real conservative" is.

I think I've made my negative opinion of Andrew Scheer and the lack of conservatism in his platform last election pretty obvious. But you being a foreigner didn't take part in those discussions so really ought not comment.

31 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

For one thing, I doubt there is such a thing. I'm with this guy:

 https://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/what-is-a-conservative/

Hmm.

"First, the conservative believes that there exists an enduring moral order."

Well, that let's Trump out. The man has no morals.

"This word order signifies harmony. "

Again, that let's Trump out.

In fact, there are NONE of those principles which would lead any thinking person to see Trump in them.

 

 

[366h34d]

49 minutes ago, Argus said:

Hmm, no real conservative would agree to lower taxes in the face of a huge deficit. And Trump clearly has no interest in the rule of law.

I prefer Biden/Harris to a crooked, lazy, ignorant, lying, adulterous, piece of human vomit, yes. Admittedly, that's a low bar. I'd prefer almost anyone to Trump, even that weasel Ted Cruz.

What had Trump done?

very funny, so you are fine with Biden stolen other man's wife and Harris "dating" other women's hushand ?

[sharkman]

5 minutes ago, Argus said:

Pretending someone is upset or mad is one of the oldest of internet cliche's usually used by someone who doesn't have an answer to what was being said.

I don't pretend.  Nor does introducing a faulty argument change the fact that you are worried this morning.  If I were you, I wouldn't worry.   Just learn to adjust to reality.  Spending the last 4 years insisting that Trump wasn't a legitimate president has ruined some people's perspective, don't let it ruin yours.

Some of us are going to insist that this election needs to be looked into.  If you can't allow a couple of months of this after spending 4 years of sulking, then I can't help you.

[Infidel Dog]

18 minutes ago, Boges said:

Wow you're still peddling that? 

It wasn't a data dump.

Yes it was. It absolutely was. I watched it on video with my own eyes. 

They told us the polls were shut down and counting would resume in the morning. But that isn't what happened. I know because I was watching.

After the poll watchers left or were pushed out that night new ballots started arriving and were counted. In Michigan street people started arriving at the TCF center in Detroit pulling carts or carrying sacks of stuffed ballots. In Georgia they lied about some broken water main, pushed everybody out of the counting room pulled wheeled cases from under a table and started counting. The woman in charge of that was earlier caught secretly slipping a USB to an operative who was earlier caught on video angrily discarding ballots. USBs are alleged to be involved in the corruption of voting machine counts.

But you want to tell us 'don't believe your lying eyes again.' It's becoming like a chant with you guys.

Edited December 9, 2020 by Infidel Dog

[Boges]

3 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

Yes it was. It absolutely was. I watched it on video with my own eyes. 

They told us the polls were shut down and counting would resume in the morning. But that isn't what happened. I know because I was watching.

After the poll watchers left or were pushed out that night new ballots started arriving and were counted. In Michigan street people started arriving at the TCF center in Detroit pulling carts or carrying sacks of stuffed ballots. In Georgia they lied about some broken water main, pushed everybody out of the counting room pulled wheeled cases from under a table and started counting. The woman in charge or that was earlier caught secretly slipping a USB to an operative who was earlier caught on video angrily discarding ballots. USBs are alleged to be involved in the corruption of voting machine counts.

But you want to tell us 'don't believe your lying eyes again.' It's becoming like a chant with you guys.

Funny how that wasn't compelling evidence in any Court, anywhere. 

The "Dump" of Biden votes from Mail-In Ballots that hadn't happened yet were expected. That's why I went to bed that night knowing the Trump lead was a mirage. 

Edited December 9, 2020 by Boges

[Infidel Dog]

It has yet to tried in a court that will take a serious look at all the evidence. 

We'll see what happens when it is.

Wanna see a mirage though?

Quote

According to Dr. Cicchetti, his calculations show the probability of Joe Biden winning the popular vote in the four states independently given President Trump’s early lead in those States as of 3 a.m. on November 4, 2020, is less than one in a quadrillion.

Professor Proves Probability of Biden Winning Is ‘Less Than One In A Quadrillion’

Now there's a real mirage for you. A quadrillion to one mirage.

Edited December 9, 2020 by Infidel Dog

[Boges]

10 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

It has yet to tried in a court that will take a serious look at all the evidence. 

We'll see what happens when it is.

Wanna see a mirage though?

Professor Proves Probability of Biden Winning Is ‘Less Than One In A Quadrillion’

Now there's a real mirage for you. A quadrillion to one mirage.

BS! They hadn't counted the Mail-In votes which were publicly available online before the election. We knew they were overwhelmingly Democratic. 

Edited December 9, 2020 by Boges

[Guest]

6 minutes ago, Infidel Dog said:

It has yet to tried in a court that will take a serious look at all the evidence. 

We'll see what happens when it is.

Wanna see a mirage though?

Professor Proves Probability of Biden Winning Is ‘Less Than One In A Quadrillion’

Now there's a real mirage for you. A quadrillion to one mirage.

Actually, it says one in a quadrillion to the fourth power.

Wow, you'd think that, with odds like those, the Supreme Court would at least give it a look.  Especially as they are mostly right wing, and three of them were put there for this very reason!