Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

https://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-news/heavy-smoke-from-train-derailment-stops-highway-16-traffic

I am certain that the average anti-pipeline demonstration is nothing but a mindless, knee-jerk reaction to some media sponsored campaign of taking advantage of their ignorance, but they have once again scored a direct hit on Canada with a major crude derailment.   FORTUNATELY, it happened between towns this time.  What these idiots do not seem to comprehend is that pipelines have an extremely good record for public  safety and environmental impact, and one that with modern technology can be improved even further (acoustic signature monitoring for physical threats and initiation of leakage).  Railroads have a terrible safety record, just not something that the media is being bribed to highlight.  Following Lac Megantic, Canada upped the standard of design of the former "111" rail tankers to a new level, and they are now somewhat safer, but the people who narrowly missed being roasted in rural SK yesterday probably don't see it as much comfort.

What the current version of whatever this "climate change" movement might be, it is totally ignorant of the fact that petroleum in a carbon fuel based society is going to be around for a very long time, and if you block its transport by safe means, it will get transported by less safe means.  Rail lines also run THROUGH most towns and cities along their way (since that is why the towns and cities came to exist - as nodes along our transportation networks) whereas pipelines are normally routed around (with obvious feed into cities for natural gas network).

When will Canadians pull their collective head out of their ass and THINK for a change (thus, of course, not re-elect complete idiots)??

Edited by cannuck
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, cannuck said:

When will Canadians pull their collective head out of their ass and THINK for a change (thus, of course, not re-elect complete idiots)??

Maybe when conservatives figure out how to turn things on their head by taking credit for raising the alarm about climate change and finding a way to blame lefties for causing it.

So what if pipelines are safer than rail. It's the fossil fuels they're carrying that's at issue. The problem is that they're not being left in the ground.  In any case, with the new awareness dawning on conservatives that trade to China should be tied to human rights why the rush to get oil to tidewater?  

Edited by eyeball
  • Like 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted

Its possible to have a safe pipeline. The two are not impossible. I also I prefer trees to people. They are not as sappy and they have established good roots in this country.

They provide homes for many, shelter in time of  need and a place where dogs can express themselves.

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
On 12/10/2019 at 1:05 PM, eyeball said:

So what if pipelines are safer than rail. It's the fossil fuels they're carrying that's at issue. The problem is that they're not being left in the ground.  In any case, with the new awareness dawning on conservatives that trade to China should be tied to human rights why the rush to get oil to tidewater?  

Hey, you over there in left field.   Read the writing on the wall:  NOBODY is going to stop using oil until there is actually a viable replacement - and that is still a very long way off.   So, whether you like it or not, oil is going to be shipped, 15 or so million barrels a day.  So ship it safely is what an intelligent answer would be.  Barking at the moon is kind of silly.  Burning down innocent people's homes, towns or even just their farm fields is idiotic (and oh so Liberal).

Edited by cannuck
Posted
Just now, cannuck said:

Hey, you over there in left field.   Read the writing on the wall:  NOBODY is going to stop using oil until there is actually a viable replacement - and that is still a very long way off.   So, whether you like it or not, oil is going to be shipped, 15 or so million barrels a day.  So ship it safely is what an intelligent answer would be.  Barking at the moon is kind of silly.

Hey yourself.  NOBODY is going to use or produce oil ever again without a lot of resistance. Get used to it.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
3 minutes ago, cannuck said:

LMFAO!!!  That was a good one.

Thanks.

  • Like 1

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
5 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

When all oil is gone . . . . that's when changes will come.  Not until then.  Get used to it.

Never going to happen, plenty of hydrocarbons in the solar system. There's more oil on Titan than all there ever was on Earth.

Posted
18 minutes ago, Nefarious Banana said:

When all oil is gone . . . . that's when changes will come.  Not until then.  Get used to it.

No.

I said now watch what you say they'll be calling you a radical,
a liberal, oh fanatical criminal

Posted
1 minute ago, Nefarious Banana said:

What's the source of your hydrocarbons/oil information ?

NASA.  There are lakes of hydrocarbon on Titan each of which is more than the entire proven reserves on Earth, as surveyed by Cassini-Huygens.

image_2937e-Ligeia-Mare.jpg

Posted
1 hour ago, cannuck said:

Hey, you over there in left field.   Read the writing on the wall:  NOBODY is going to stop using oil until there is actually a viable replacement - and that is still a very long way off.   So, whether you like it or not, oil is going to be shipped, 15 or so million barrels a day.  So ship it safely is what an intelligent answer would be.  Barking at the moon is kind of silly.  Burning down innocent people's homes, towns or even just their farm fields is idiotic (and oh so Liberal).

Maybe thats is what should happen, stop taking oil out of the ground ,stop importing it, stop producing it just for a month....and whom ever is left alive in the country can turn the taps back on, betcha there would be no whining then of course we could always burn tree huggers to keep warm, their full of mostly shit and hot air, so they burn fast... .

  • Like 1

We, the willing, led by the unknowing, are doing the impossible for the ungrateful. We have now done so much for so long with so little, we are now capable of doing anything with nothing.

Posted (edited)

Canada is the only country in the world destroying its own petroleum industry, this is only Canada's problem, the rest of the world simply rolls on without silly Canadians.

Edited by Dougie93
Posted
3 hours ago, Dougie93 said:

Canada is the only country in the world destroying its own petroleum industry, this is only Canada's problem, the rest of the world simply rolls on without silly Canadians.

Not quite true, the OTHER socialist paradise that the Liberals/liberals would like to make us resemble has pretty much destroyed theirs as well (of course, I mean Venezuela).

Posted
2 minutes ago, cannuck said:

Not quite true, the OTHER socialist paradise that the Liberals/liberals would like to make us resemble has pretty much destroyed theirs as well (of course, I mean Venezuela).

The Venezuelans are exporting a huge amount of oil, Venezuela has no problems getting its oil to market, the problem in Venezuela is hyperinflation.

Posted

their production is WAY down because the government got rid of all of the non-party people in PDVSA, thus their exports are in the toilet and refineries don't have the cash to do maintenance, and nobody there who can, so terrible fuel shortages.  You can't even get a valid Q&Q cargo survey since they can't pay the independents and the PDVSA labs have no reagents and little working analytical equipment.  Who ever is telling you they have no problems hasn't got a frigging clue.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rrapier/2019/01/29/charting-the-decline-of-venezuelas-oil-industry/#4ded89e74ecd

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,017
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    taylor66
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...