Dougie93 Posted December 4, 2019 Report Share Posted December 4, 2019 You shouldn't listen to us NCO's, Canadians, you should listen to your senior officers, Diversity Is Your Strength, Transgendered Woke Army is 79th of 137th in land power : Wow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ProudConservative Posted December 4, 2019 Report Share Posted December 4, 2019 5 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: You shouldn't listen to us NCO's, Canadians, you should listen to your senior officers, Diversity Is Your Strength, Transgendered Woke Army is 79th of 137th in land power : Wow. O come on Doug. Don't be so negative! Meet the new drill sergeant. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cannuck Posted December 4, 2019 Report Share Posted December 4, 2019 1 hour ago, Army Guy said: This is how our liberal government is living up to it's promises on military spending....come on, even you liberal voters can see there is something wrong here... Clearly they can't see anything wrong, or see much of anything at all or they wouldn't vote liberal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted December 4, 2019 Report Share Posted December 4, 2019 3 minutes ago, ProudConservative said: O come on Doug. Don't be so negative! Meet the new drill sergeant. Â Whose negative ? Better that a queer steps on a land mine, more power to him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ProudConservative Posted December 4, 2019 Report Share Posted December 4, 2019 Just now, Dougie93 said: Whose negative ? Better that a queer steps on a land mine, more power to him. Queer is not a nice word  You Meanie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 1 minute ago, ProudConservative said: Queer is not a nice word  You Meanie. LGBT . . . Q Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ProudConservative Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: LGBT . . . QÂ Transgender means inbetween. Some don't want to be a boy or girl... Some want to be exactly in the middle, forcing you to guess. Edited December 5, 2019 by ProudConservative Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 Just now, ProudConservative said: Transgender means inbetween. So don't want to be a boy or girl... Some want to be exactly in the middle, forcing you to guess.  No need to guess anymore, President Trump has banned them from serving in the US military and the Supreme Court has ruled it to be constitutional  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ProudConservative Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 Just now, Dougie93 said: No need to guess anymore, President Trump has banned them from serving in the US military and the Supreme Court has ruled it to be constitutional  But that's discrimination Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 Just now, ProudConservative said: But that's discrimination There have always been barriers to serving in the US military. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ProudConservative Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: There have always been barriers to serving in the US military. If they can pass the physical challenges... Than why shouldn't the be in the military? Some of them are more capaple than the average soldier. Just because they have boobs, doesn't disqualify them. Edited December 5, 2019 by ProudConservative Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 Just now, ProudConservative said: If they can pass the physical challenges... Than why shouldn't the be in the military? Some of them are more capaple than the average soldier. They are degenerates, it's bad for morale. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ProudConservative Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Dougie93 said: They are degenerates, it's bad for morale. But our major says we need to support our LGBT community in this interview. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 Just now, ProudConservative said: But our major says we need to support our LGBT community in this interview. There's no ban on gays serving in the US military, only Trannies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ProudConservative Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Dougie93 said: There's no ban on gays serving in the US military, only Trannies. There should be. We should get rid of the LGB in the military and not just the LGBT. Guys don't want to be hit on by other guys, who don't have a girl around. Edited December 5, 2019 by ProudConservative Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 Just now, ProudConservative said: There should be. I don't have a problem with gays, Transgenders are not gay, they are mentally ill. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ProudConservative Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 Just now, Dougie93 said: I don't have a problem with gays, Transgenders are not gay, they are mentally ill. Homosexuality is a manufactured illness, just like Transgenderism. One is more severe than the other, but they are both bad for the military. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 Just now, ProudConservative said: Homosexuality is a manufactured illness, just like Transgenderism. One is more severe than the other, but they are both bad for the military. Gay only matters on your own time, what you do on your own time is not my concern, transgendered is a problem on army time, that's why they are banned. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ProudConservative Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 1 minute ago, Dougie93 said: Gay only matters on your own time, what you do on your own time is not my concern, transgendered is a problem on army time, that's why they are banned. They're only banned in the US, and not in Canada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 Just now, ProudConservative said: They're only banned in the US, and not in Canada The Canadian military is dead, it's of no consequence, just disband it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 America will defend Canada from any conventional military threat, Canada does not need armed forces. Focus on what Canada can do, the RCMP and the Coast Guard, Canada's military is a facade, it's fake, stop flushing money down this sinkhole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WestCanMan Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 9 hours ago, Argus said: China's navy is already bigger than the US. They've built 83 ships in just the last eight years and are continuing construction. By way of comparison the British navy is made up of 75 ships. Canada has about 15. Totally, and the thing about military hardware is that new stuff always trumps old stuff, so it's not a 1 v 1 comparison. EG, the Soviets had half of the tanks on the planet back when I was in the military, but they weren't in the habit of decommissioning old tanks from the WWII era. The old tanks are still useful to some extent, but ten 1944 tanks can't take on a single Abrams M1A1. China also spends a ton of money on cyber warfare. I heard it said that they spend almost as much on that as their conventional warfare. I heard it said that their guys outnumber the NSA guys by 40-1, and they have them running in circles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dougie93 Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 1 minute ago, WestCanMan said: EG, the Soviets had half of the tanks on the planet back when I was in the military, but they weren't in the habit of decommissioning old tanks from the WWII era. The old tanks are still useful to some extent, but ten 1944 tanks can't take on a single Abrams M1A1. The Abrams wasn't the primary MBT against the Soviets, the M60 was the primary, the bulk of the Soviet armor was T-62 and T-72 The Soviets were also going to use tactical nuclear weapons to clear the way in the Fulda Gap and North German plain. The Soviet plan was sound, to reach the Rhine in two weeks, it's not a given that we could have stopped them, particularly if a surprise attack.  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Army Guy Posted December 5, 2019 Author Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 2 hours ago, Cannucklehead said: Look at the numbers. We are 79 out of 137 in land strength.  79 out of 137 countries...man that is impressive when competing against what countries again Sebia, Crotia, Congo then yes I say that was good, but we are a G-7 nation and should atleast own equipment made in the last 10 to 15 years...most of our logistic trucks sit rotting in fields because they are no longer road worthy , they have been like that for 10 plus years, we are just receiving replacements for one type of veh, the MLVW....while the other 3 types are still waiting for funding to buy new ones...the ones that are running are short on parts, and are in rough shape...it was not so long ago that in the media a RCR BN reported it could not afford to exercise with it's LAV fleet because of costs to run them, and restrictive budgets...You see your numbers don't add up...sorry Quote LAND STRENGTHCombat Tank value includes Main Battle Tanks (MBTs), light tanks, and tank destroyers (no distinction is made between tracked and wheeled types). Armored Fighting Vehicles (AFV) value includes APCs, IFVs, MRAPs, and Armored Cars. Rocket Projectors only include self-propelled forms. Also consider Armor and Artillery throughout the military history of Canada (external link). Based on what we are being judged on lets take a look, we have 20 leoII6M, who were all rode hard and put away wet in Afghanistan, some rebuilt from being blown up by IED's ....then we have 60 LeoIIA4, (1990 tech , bought used , built between 85to 92) just for a point of reference, German owns and operates LeoIIA7 plus which is only 5 generations ahead of ours....Our IFV's most common is the LAV 6.0 which are not really new, they cut the LAV III in HALF then welding on a LAV 6.0 bottom onto the LAV III top because we could not afford the same LAV's we sold Saudi Arabia....and they are built in Ontario...although we are buying some 350 new built to make up for shortfalls in other variants we had from the original buy of lav III...we did purchase what they call TPAV, what a POS veh that is, it only carries 4 or 5 troops depends how you stuff them in, is prone to tipping and makes crew sea sick because it rocks like a boat, only armed with a MG, what a waste of tax payers money ( chosen by our political leaders at the time) not by DND ......next IFV we operate is the M113 or what we call the TLAV made in 1950'2 and has been upgraded ever since....Our MRAPS vehs left over from Afghanistan are in war stocks... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cannucklehead Posted December 5, 2019 Report Share Posted December 5, 2019 6 minutes ago, Army Guy said: 79 out of 137 countries...man that is impressive when competing against what countries again Sebia, Crotia, Congo then yes I say that was good, but we are a G-7 nation and should atleast own equipment made in the last 10 to 15 years...most of our logistic trucks sit rotting in fields because they are no longer road worthy , they have been like that for 10 plus years, we are just receiving replacements for one type of veh, the MLVW....while the other 3 types are still waiting for funding to buy new ones...the ones that are running are short on parts, and are in rough shape...it was not so long ago that in the media a RCR BN reported it could not afford to exercise with it's LAV fleet because of costs to run them, and restrictive budgets...You see your numbers don't add up...sorry Based on what we are being judged on lets take a look, we have 20 leoII6M, who were all rode hard and put away wet in Afghanistan, some rebuilt from being blown up by IED's ....then we have 60 LeoIIA4, (1990 tech , bought used , built between 85to 92) just for a point of reference, German owns and operates LeoIIA7 plus which is only 5 generations ahead of ours....Our IFV's most common is the LAV 6.0 which are not really new, they cut the LAV III in HALF then welding on a LAV 6.0 bottom onto the LAV III top because we could not afford the same LAV's we sold Saudi Arabia....and they are built in Ontario...although we are buying some 350 new built to make up for shortfalls in other variants we had from the original buy of lav III...we did purchase what they call TPAV, what a POS veh that is, it only carries 4 or 5 troops depends how you stuff them in, is prone to tipping and makes crew sea sick because it rocks like a boat, only armed with a MG, what a waste of tax payers money ( chosen by our political leaders at the time) not by DND ......next IFV we operate is the M113 or what we call the TLAV made in 1950'2 and has been upgraded ever since....Our MRAPS vehs left over from Afghanistan are in war stocks... That is my point. They need to seriously start fixing that because if they send our troops overseas with nothing but rifles I am going to make a new lake in Ontario with my tears.  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.