eyeball Posted January 3, 2018 Report Posted January 3, 2018 7 minutes ago, Argus said: A majority government can easily pass any damn law they want to. No, first you guys have to get rid of the Charter and SCC....the two most dangerous lefty Deep State Jihadist institutions on the planet. 1 Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Gingerteeth Posted January 3, 2018 Report Posted January 3, 2018 35 minutes ago, Argus said: They are the ones doing the study, or their underlings who will take direction from them. Government 'studies' generally come to whatever conclusion the government of the day wants them to. People with the education to do these studies will perform it. It's on you to prove the government is telling them what to conclude. Quote
PIK Posted January 3, 2018 Report Posted January 3, 2018 3 hours ago, Michael Hardner said: There is no law, it's a 'motion'. The idea that the government would/could easily pass a law that censors criticism of government (or religion for that matter) reveals a lack of understanding of politics and the law. If the motion is passed, it can easily become law. Quote Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.
Michael Hardner Posted January 3, 2018 Report Posted January 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Argus said: A majority government can easily pass any damn law they want to. Yes and no. The courts would strike down the laws that are envisioned in the worst-case scenarios. Anything restricting non-hate freedom-of-speech or criticizing the government for example. If there's any doubt, then let me submit my name as someone who would protest such laws. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
Argus Posted January 3, 2018 Report Posted January 3, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Gingerteeth said: People with the education to do these studies will perform it. It's on you to prove the government is telling them what to conclude. LOL! HAW HAW HAW! GUFFAW! Oh. You were... serious? The 'study' is being undertaken by the House of Commons Heritage Committee. It is led by... wait for it... Hedy Fry. It can be guaranteed to find that people are BURNING CROSSES IN FRONT OF MOSQUES even as we speak!!! Aaagh!! Aaaagh! Something desperate must be done! Immediately!!! Edited January 3, 2018 by Argus Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Gingerteeth Posted January 3, 2018 Report Posted January 3, 2018 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Argus said: LOL! HAW HAW HAW! GUFFAW! Oh. You were... serious? The 'study' is being undertaken by the House of Commons Heritage Committee. It is led by... wait for it... Hedy Fry. It can be guaranteed to find that people are BURNING CROSSES IN FRONT OF MOSQUES even as we speak!!! Aaagh!@ Aaaagh! Something desperate must be done! Immediately!!! You have no leg to stand on this issue as evidenced by your mental breakdown in your post. Either you can back up your claims or you, like an adult, can admit that you don't have an argument. Edited January 3, 2018 by Gingerteeth Quote
Argus Posted January 3, 2018 Report Posted January 3, 2018 1 hour ago, Michael Hardner said: Yes and no. The courts would strike down the laws that are envisioned in the worst-case scenarios. Anything restricting non-hate freedom-of-speech or criticizing the government for example. If there's any doubt, then let me submit my name as someone who would protest such laws. But the courts are notoriously liberal, and the courts and constitution (written by Liberals) permit violations of various freedoms in order to help minorities. You think they don't have didn't have freedom of speech in the UK and France? The courts allowed that to be overridden so as to nor cause offense to Muslims and other minorities. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Argus Posted January 3, 2018 Report Posted January 3, 2018 Just now, Gingerteeth said: You have no leg to stand on this issue as evidenced by your mental breakdown in your post. Either you can back up your claims or you, like an adult, can admit that you don't have an argument. Because I'm unthinking and unimaginative like you? Because I can't see a fairly easily foreseeable outcome? Wait and see, sunshine. Get your arguments ready to support the ban on speech which causes 'islamophobia'. Quote "A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley
Gingerteeth Posted January 3, 2018 Report Posted January 3, 2018 (edited) 2 hours ago, Argus said: Because I'm unthinking and unimaginative like you? Because I can't see a fairly easily foreseeable outcome? Wait and see, sunshine. Get your arguments ready to support the ban on speech which causes 'islamophobia'. Kind of a strange thing to say since I didn't make any unsubstantiated claims. Edited January 3, 2018 by Gingerteeth Quote
?Impact Posted January 3, 2018 Report Posted January 3, 2018 4 hours ago, PIK said: If the motion is passed, it can easily become law. Really? Really? Really, you really said that? Really? Quote
OftenWrong Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 14 hours ago, 9-18-1 said: You picked a good name for yourself. And you just keep changing yours, hot enough. Quote
9-18-1 Posted January 4, 2018 Author Report Posted January 4, 2018 5 minutes ago, OftenWrong said: And you just keep changing yours, hot enough. Again, you picked a good name because I have no idea what you are talking about. Quote
OftenWrong Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 1 minute ago, 9-18-1 said: Again, you picked a good name because I have no idea what you are talking about. Right... Sept 11 much? Quote
Michael Hardner Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 4 hours ago, Argus said: You think they don't have didn't have freedom of speech in the UK and France? The courts allowed that to be overridden so as to nor cause offense to Muslims and other minorities. I don't know of those cases. Did this happen after the Charlie Hebdo attack ? Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
9-18-1 Posted January 4, 2018 Author Report Posted January 4, 2018 33 minutes ago, OftenWrong said: Right... Sept 11 much? ...still have no idea what you are referencing. Three strikes and you're out. Quote
Guest Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 7 hours ago, PIK said: If the motion is passed, it can easily become law. If the motion is passed, I'll still ignore it. Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 What is "Islamophobia" ? It is not defined in Motion 103. If I post that "political Islam sucks", is that Islamophobia ? Do I have to pay Lucy the equivalent of 5 cents U.S. to find out ? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Guest Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 3 minutes ago, bush_cheney2004 said: What is "Islamophobia" ? It is not defined in Motion 103. If I post that "political Islam sucks", is that Islamophobia ? Do I have to pay Lucy the equivalent of 5 cents U.S. to find out ? You can say Islam sucks if you want. It's a perfectly valid opinion, and no-one's business but your own. (I'm not saying you would, just that you could) Quote
bush_cheney2004 Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 2 minutes ago, bcsapper said: You can say Islam sucks if you want. It's a perfectly valid opinion, and no-one's business but your own. (I'm not saying you would, just that you could) So can I rent a large billboard in Ottawa and make the same claim for all to see ? Or is that "discrimination" and "hate speech" ? Quote Economics trumps Virtue.
Guest Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 Just now, bush_cheney2004 said: So can I rent a large billboard in Ottawa and make the same claim for all to see ? Or is that "discrimination" and "hate speech" ? I'm okay with it. Quote
eyeball Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 12 hours ago, PIK said: If the motion is passed, it can easily become law. Don't worry PIK the Charter and SCC have your back. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
eyeball Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 5 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said: If I post that "political Islam sucks", is that Islamophobia ? No, but people might ask wtf you're babbling about. Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
eyeball Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 (edited) 5 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said: So can I rent a large billboard in Ottawa and make the same claim for all to see ? Unless I'm mistaken you'll have to rent that billboard from local First Nations, most jurisdictions AFAIK have banned billboards as eyesores but many First Nations still allow them. Please try, I suspect the can of worms such a billboard would open would be very very interesting one indeed. Edited January 4, 2018 by eyeball Quote A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.
Michael Hardner Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 7 hours ago, eyeball said: Please try, I suspect the can of worms such a billboard would open would be very very interesting one indeed. Again, the basis of the hysterical claims is that Western democracy is a flawed design. A few reasonable conservatives here are trying to give some space to their fringey cohorts by submitting some 'what if' scenarios. That's kind of them. I personally would show fringe leftist posters the door as I prefer discussions based in reality. Quote Click to learn why Climate Change is caused by HUMANS Michael Hardner
?Impact Posted January 4, 2018 Report Posted January 4, 2018 17 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said: What is "Islamophobia" ? It is not defined in Motion 103. If I post that "political Islam sucks", is that Islamophobia ? Do I have to pay Lucy the equivalent of 5 cents U.S. to find out ? Motion 103 is not a friggen law, how many times does one have to beat people over the head to understand that. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.