Compensating Khadr

[eyeball]

11 hours ago, Rue said:

No need,  your incoherent, illogical  and nonsensical comments speak for themselves

There's nothing incoherent illogical or nonsensical at all about describing the terrorism that took place on 9/11 as an act of retaliation - which I was clearly referring too. Your attempt to appear baffled is as pathetic as it is childish.  But what the hey, who am I to argue against the possibility you really are as stupid as a sack of hammers?    

Quote

No American or Canadian retaliated against Kadr othewise he'd be dead. He's not only alive and well but  laughing at you and what you stand for.

Is this something you're considering?  The fact he's alive and well really really seems to get your goat.

[Rue]

This coming from someone who can't come up with a list of molested Middle East nations because he has more important things to do and is baffled when he is asked to provide the list even though I  take the time to ask.again ..with great care and concern...and  you have no patience for moi? Hey now. That's not nice..

Now your latest allegation is 9-11 was retaliation by Middle East terrorists, presumably after linking it to your other responses, because they were "molested" by  Canada is interesting, I always thought Barry Gibb,  the remaining Be Gee brother was behind it.

Have you cleared your theory with Hot Enough? He's convinced it was evil American conspirators  who engaged in a false flag conspiracy operation using a magic fart because he saw images of Beyoncé in some red chips that told him this. He claims he has scientific experience to see things in red chips.

Did you speak with him? . You see  if he's right, your retaliation theory that it was ME molestation victims lashing back probably  contradicts his Yankee conspiracy theory. Get together with him and see if you can sort that out.

Hey what about those dancing Israelis? Remember them? Did you ask Hudson or Marcus or Taxme or GhostHacked about them before you came up with your retaliation theory?

Maybe Ghost thinks it was bloodthirsty Jews who find terrorism funny who did it.

I spoke with Barry Gibb. He admitted it. he also had help from Barry Manilow which makes sense since Barry as you know is one of those New York Jews. Also Neil Diamond, Babs Stresidan, Jerry Steinfeld. and last but not least Josh Brolin because he's the son-in-law of Babs.

Also Gary Bettman. There' a clear pattern.. .

 

 

 

 

Edited July 27, 2017 by Rue

[PIK]

8 hours ago, eyeball said:

There's nothing incoherent illogical or nonsensical at all about describing the terrorism that took place on 9/11 as an act of retaliation - which I was clearly referring too. Your attempt to appear baffled is as pathetic as it is childish.  But what the hey, who am I to argue against the possibility you really are as stupid as a sack of hammers?    

Is this something you're considering?  The fact he's alive and well really really seems to get your goat.

He should be happy that he is alive. Americans saved his ass after he killed one, if they are so evil,they would have let him die. Harper brings him home and the 1st thing he does is sue the government. He was in battle against us and he is now a millionaire. Wait till trudeau sends our soldier to Mali on his little peacekeeping run. Our soldiers will be up against REAL CHILD SOLDIERS ,so do we pay everyone we catch and talk to 10m dollars????

[Army Guy]

On ‎25‎/‎07‎/‎2017 at 11:09 AM, jacee said:

That's quite the non sequiter.

And irrelevant since he was a child under the control of adults who threatened him with death if he didn't do what he was told.

Bullshit, The day of his capture none of his parents were around, both were hundreds of kms away.... The man in charge of Omars protection decided getting into a fire fight with American SF soldiers was more important, than watching the little boy Omar.....wait a 15 year old, considered to be a Man in Afghanistan at age 12....While he was under this mans protection for months Omar could have simply walked off during this time....But he did not he liked what he was doing, playing terrorist for a world reknown terrorist group.....

Perhaps you can provide a quote where as you claim his father threatened him with death.....

[jacee]

On 25/07/2017 at 10:36 AM, capricorn said:

BS.

http://www.macleans.ca/news/canada/who-is-the-real-omar-khadr/

This traitor had plenty of opportunities to escape the grip of his father but he repeatedly failed to do so. He preferred to continue his jihadist errands unsupervised and failed to surrender when he could have on many occasions.

This is BS at its stinkiest that he was threatened with death if he defied his father.

In your quote above, did you notice the word "sent"? His father "sent" him?

Think about that.

When he was captured, he was in the care of the man who died near him, who likely threw the grenade, an AlQuaeda friend of his father's.

He did what he was told by his father. We do not and cannot ever demand that children 'escape' their parents. He was always under supervision.

His father threatened his older brother to do as he was told or he'd die a suicide bomber.

Omar did what he was told, to survive.

[hot enough]

8 hours ago, Army Guy said:

The day of his capture none of his parents were around, both were hundreds of kms away.... The man in charge of Omars protection decided getting into a fire fight with American SF soldiers was more important, than watching the little boy Omar....

The Americans were the illegal invaders, the war criminals, the terrorists, trying to harm the people of Afghanistan, just as they had been doing since the 1970s, using them as pawns, quite content with the deaths of millions of them to advance US evil. 

Edited July 27, 2017 by hot enough

[hot enough]

18 hours ago, eyeball said:

There's nothing incoherent illogical or nonsensical at all about describing the terrorism that took place on 9/11 as an act of retaliation -

It is all three; incoherent, illogical and nonsensical to describe something for which there is no evidence. When all the evidence points to a complete frame job. The FBI says no OBL, yet you have still heard all the US government liars advancing that nonsense, when they all promised proof/evidence, and none was ever given. 

But the lying USA, the lying western nations, don't even want to go near the "retaliation" idea, yet they seem to think they were justified in their retaliation, which was just US war crimes and terrorism, which, you must note, was, AGAIN, a huge mess of US/western lies, STILL REPEATED everywhere. 

This is all the ultimate in incoherent, illogical and nonsensical behavior. 

Edited July 27, 2017 by hot enough

[jacee]

3 hours ago, Army Guy said:

Bullshit, The day of his capture none of his parents were around, both were hundreds of kms away.... The man in charge of Omars protection decided getting into a fire fight with American SF soldiers was more important, than watching the little boy Omar.....wait a 15 year old, considered to be a Man in Afghanistan at age 12....While he was under this mans protection for months Omar could have simply walked off during this time....But he did not he liked what he was doing, playing terrorist for a world reknown terrorist group.....

Perhaps you can provide a quote where as you claim his father threatened him with death.....

The man you're referring to was right there with Omar until he was shot and killed. Only Omar survived.

Army Guy, in NO world do we demand that children defy their parents. Nowhere. No way.

It's disgusting that grown men on here demand that a kid do that.

He did what his father told him, what he had to do to survive.

Add:

The Khadr's first trip to Afghanistan was during the Soviet invasion. Khadr senior became radicalized at that time, like many others, funded, armed and supplied by the USA.

Edited July 27, 2017 by jacee

[drummindiver]

On 26/07/2017 at 10:42 AM, Omni said:

Gitmo, Gulag, same thing. I don't want either on my soil.

And it's not, because Canadians have demonstrated repeatedly they don't have the stomach for doing what's right. 

[Omni]

4 minutes ago, drummindiver said:

And it's not, because Canadians have demonstrated repeatedly they don't have the stomach for doing what's right. 

So you think illegal prisons is "doing what's right" gotcha.

[jacee]

33 minutes ago, drummindiver said:

And it's not, because Canadians have demonstrated repeatedly they don't have the stomach for doing what's right. 

And that's a very good thing.

If you think Guantanamo is "right", you aren't Canadian. You aren't even American, because they don't have the balls to have it in their own country either.

Anybody who thinks violating people's rights and subjecting them to torture is "right" is a f'kng animal, a terrorist imo. 

They are so pumped up on lies and hate propaganda they aren't even human anymore ... just like violent terrorists.

Edited July 27, 2017 by jacee

[Rue]

4 hours ago, hot enough said:

The Americans were illegal invaders, war criminals, terrorists, trying to harm the people of Afghanistan, just as they had been doing since the 1970s, using them as pawns, quite content with the deaths of millions of them to advance US evil. 

Lol that script. Appy to the CBC or Rolling Stone Magazine. Go get em Che.

Edited July 27, 2017 by Rue

[Rue]

2 hours ago, jacee said:

And that's a very good thing.

If you think Guantanamo is "right", you aren't Canadian. You aren't even American, because they don't have the balls to have it in their own country either.

Anybody who thinks violating people's rights and subjecting them to torture is "right" is a f'kng animal, a terrorist imo. 

They are so pumped up on lies and hate propaganda they aren't even human anymore ... just like violent terrorists.

You use the word violent terrorist to mean what exactly do you even know?  Other then to accuse the US or Canada of it do you even know what it means?

[jacee]

1 hour ago, Rue said:

You use the word violent terrorist to mean what exactly do you even know?  Other then to accuse the US or Canada of it do you even know what it means?

Hate.

On both sides, terrorism is about propagating hatred against particular peoples.

It's not the goal, it's just the tool to divide and conquer peoples.

Keep us hating and living in fear of the 'other'.

While they make out like bandits sucking out resources and wealth.

Terrorism is propagating hatred, inciting - and arming - violence.

Usually for greedy purpose.

Follow the money.

Ka-ching!

Edited July 27, 2017 by jacee

[hot enough]

2 hours ago, Rue said:

You use the word violent terrorist to mean what exactly do you even know?  Other then[sic] to accuse the US or Canada of it do you even know what it means?

Of course Jacee knows. Everyone knows. The US has been doing terrorism since before its inception and it really got going post 1898. 

Quote

The Leading Terrorist State

By Noam Chomsky

Truthout, November 3, 2014

 

“It’s official: The U.S. is the world’s leading terrorist state, and proud of it.”

That should have been the headline for the lead story in The New York Times on Oct. 15, which was more politely titled “CIA Study of Covert Aid Fueled Skepticism About Helping Syrian Rebels.”

The article reports on a CIA review of recent U.S. covert operations to determine their effectiveness. The White House concluded that unfortunately successes were so rare that some rethinking of the policy was in order.

The article quoted President Barack Obama as saying that he had asked the CIA to conduct the review to find cases of “financing and supplying arms to an insurgency in a country that actually worked out well. And they couldn’t come up with much.” So Obama has some reluctance about continuing such efforts.

The first paragraph of the Times article cites three major examples of “covert aid”: Angola, Nicaragua and Cuba. In fact, each case was a major terrorist operation conducted by the U.S.

Angola was invaded by South Africa, which, according to Washington, was defending itself from one of the world’s “more notorious terrorist groups” – Nelson Mandela’s African National Congress. That was 1988.

By then the Reagan administration was virtually alone in its support for the apartheid regime, even violating congressional sanctions to increase trade with its South African ally.

Meanwhile Washington joined South Africa in providing crucial support for Jonas Savimbi’s terrorist Unita army in Angola. Washington continued to do so even after Savimbi had been roundly defeated in a carefully monitored free election, and South Africa had withdrawn its support. Savimbi was a “monster whose lust for power had brought appalling misery to his people,” in the words of Marrack Goulding, British ambassador to Angola.

The consequences were horrendous. A 1989 U.N. inquiry estimated that South African depredations led to 1.5 million deaths in neighboring countries, let alone what was happening within South Africa itself. Cuban forces finally beat back the South African aggressors and compelled them to withdraw from illegally occupied Namibia. The U.S. alone continued to support the monster Savimbi.

In Cuba, after the failed Bay of Pigs invasion in 1961, President John F. Kennedy launched a murderous and destructive campaign to bring “the terrors of the earth” to Cuba – the words of Kennedy’s close associate, the historian Arthur Schlesinger, in his semiofficial biography of Robert Kennedy, who was assigned responsibility for the terrorist war.

The atrocities against Cuba were severe. The plans were for the terrorism to culminate in an uprising in October 1962, which would lead to a U.S. invasion. By now, scholarship recognizes that this was one reason why Russian Premier Nikita Khrushchev placed missiles in Cuba, initiating a crisis that came perilously close to nuclear war. U.S. Defense Secretary Robert McNamara later conceded that if he had been a Cuban leader, he “might have expected a U.S. invasion.”

American terrorist attacks against Cuba continued for more than 30 years. The cost to Cubans was of course harsh. The accounts of the victims, hardly ever heard in the U.S., were reported in detail for the first time in a study by Canadian scholar Keith Bolender, “Voices From the Other Side: an Oral History of Terrorism Against Cuba,” in 2010.

The toll of the long terrorist war was amplified by a crushing embargo, which continues even today in defiance of the world. On Oct. 28, the U.N., for the 23rd time, endorsed “the necessity of ending the economic, commercial, financial blockade imposed by the United States against Cuba.” The vote was 188 to 2 (U.S., Israel), with three U.S. Pacific Island dependencies abstaining.

https://chomsky.info/the-leading-terrorist-state/

 

[jacee]

15 minutes ago, hot enough said:

Of course Jacee knows. Everyone knows. The US has been doing terrorism since before its inception and it really got going post 1898. 

 

"The article quoted President Barack Obama as saying that he had asked the CIA to conduct the review to find cases of “financing and supplying arms to an insurgency in a country that actually worked out well. And they couldn’t come up with much.” 

That about covers it.

Useless but PROFITABLE fake wars.

Terrorism against people,

Only for profit.

Edited July 27, 2017 by jacee

[hot enough]

5 hours ago, drummindiver said:

And it's not, because Canadians have demonstrated repeatedly they don't have the stomach for doing what's right. 

Torture chambers may be alright with you, dd, you've exhibited your "moral base" a number of times. 

Quote

 

 

[hot enough]

2 hours ago, Rue said:

Lol that script. Appy to the CBC or Rolling Stone Magazine. Go get em Che.

Always just Rue, supplying bullchit. You can't deny away US/UK/Israeli war crimes and terrorism with Rue bullchit.

[taxme]

On 7/25/2017 at 3:25 AM, bush_cheney2004 said:

Canada's state broadcaster (CBC) is now going after opposition critics of the huge Omar Khadr war criminal payout by labeling them as disloyal traitors.

 

 

Liberals calling others disloyal traitors? It would appear these days that liberals are the biggest gang of traitors on earth. They never show any real loyalty to Canada or Canadians. They do like to show their loyalty to the rest of the world though. Bring them all in and let's destroy everything Canadian is their theme song. The CBC is nothing more than a propaganda Pravda mouth piece outfit for the liberal party of Canada. Why Harper did not get rid of that anti-white pro multicultural pro refugee outfit is beyond me. Harper had the chance and he blew it. The only thing I like about the CBC is the weather girl. Her name is Joanna Wagstaff. I think that she is sexy and hot looking. Just saying.  

[Omni]

5 minutes ago, taxme said:

Her name is Joanna Wagstaff. I think that she is sexy and hot looking. Just saying.  

And that of course is the limit of your discussion, how hot the blond is. Do you even understand weather? Of course not.

[taxme]

18 minutes ago, Omni said:

And that of course is the limit of your discussion, how hot the blond is. Do you even understand weather? Of course not.

At least I am not looking at the men at the CBC like you probably do. Which one do you like? But hey, whatever turns your crank.  

Ya, I know something about the weather. When that wet stuff that comes down on a cloudy day from the sky above it either will come down in the form of rain or snow, and that will depend on the temperature outside. Pretty smart, eh? Do you know the difference between rain and snow? Of course not. 

[Omni]

3 minutes ago, taxme said:

Ya, I know something about the weather

I suggest then you stick to the weather. Beyond that, nah.

[taxme]

7 minutes ago, Omni said:

I suggest then you stick to the weather. Beyond that, nah.

I would like to suggest to you that you just go away because you never have anything to say that has any common sense or has any logic in it. Just snowflake dribble. 

[Omni]

17 minutes ago, taxme said:

I would like to suggest to you that you just go away because you never have anything to say that has any common sense or has any logic in it. Just snowflake dribble. 

I'll try from time to time to simplify the things I say for your edification

[drummindiver]

D

Edited July 28, 2017 by drummindiver