Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Maybe there is a strategic direction to all this, replacing one leader with a more reasonable one. Let's hope there is some thinking going on that will get the soldiers out of there. I don't see the Taliban as a big international problem right now.

Posted

Maybe there is a strategic direction to all this, replacing one leader with a more reasonable one. Let's hope there is some thinking going on that will get the soldiers out of there. I don't see the Taliban as a big international problem right now.

"I can explain it. I did it for my country."

---Sirhan Sirhan

Posted

So if Obama, representing one of the nations at the negotiating table, was on a trip to .... lets say Canada, and a Taliban suicide bomber took him out on parliament hill, would that be OK?

I mean what is fair for one should be fair for the other. Should it not?

At this point, there is no 'fair' anymore. Wars are rarely nation against nation with clearly marked uniforms and stipulated rules of engagement.

We already know that terrorists don't play 'fair' by western rules of engagement so the real question is whether or not western nations still bound by the same rules of law as nation against nation wars.

I say no, but instead of an anything-goes attitude, I think it's time to clearly define 'war on terror' and create its own rules of engagement.

It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands

Posted

Folks,

Stop trolling and stop your personal banter.

We do not have time for a meeting of the flat earth society.

<< Où sont mes amis ? Ils sont ici, ils sont ici... >>

Posted

If there is a war and the leader of the opposition forces is an obstacle to a peaceful resolution, I can see blowing him up.

Posted

Folks,

Stop trolling and stop your personal banter.

Which posts are you considering trolling? It would be nice to provide an example so as to show members what trolling is. That's the last I'll say on this matter here ...

Posted

C.I.A = Keystone spys.

Toronto, like a roach motel in the middle of a pretty living room.

Posted

Spies. They've been keeping an eye on the pipeline have they? Well, good for them.

Better safe than sorry, that's what I always say.

Posted

The USA has just revealed that they have assassinated the leader of the Taliban by an American drone in Pakistan:

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/05/taliban-leader-killed-drone-strike-160521204020111.html

The Taliban are currently involved in peace talks with the puppet government of Afghanistan to reach some kind of solution. The USA has decided to enter a sovereign nation (Pakistan) without permission, to assassinate a person who is considered to be the leader of a group who is in the middle of negotiating a resolution to a war that the USA started

It sounds to me very much as though you're upset that the leader of the Taliban was killed. Are you sympathetic to the Taliban and their religious and social aims?

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted (edited)

IAs for US sending drone strikes into Pakistan, it's an act of war and counter to THE most very basic and fundamental international law. Then again, the US is basically at de facto war with Pakistan anyways. The ISI, Bin Laden, habouring the Taliban and al-Qaeda, and now this?

US drone strikes in Pakistan are done with the knowledge and assistance of the Pakistanis. The Pakistanis simply can't admit it to the public.

Edited by Argus

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

US drone strikes in Pakistan are done with the knowledge and assistance of the Pakistanis. The Pakistanis simply can't admit it to the public.

Do you have any evidence of this?

"All generalizations are false, including this one." - Mark Twain

Partisanship is a disease of the intellect.

Posted

Do you have any evidence of this?

Who do you think is providing them with the target lists?! Do you really think the CIA has a lot of great sources among the fanatic, backward tribes of Pakistan's borders?

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-24649840

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted (edited)

ya ya... we could resurrect older threads for some fun but... that CIA coup that did establish the Shah, also set in place the framework for the eventual Iranian Revolution and the, as I said, taking out of the Shah of Iran and setting the Middle-East on a path towards radical Fundamentalist Islam. But I do relish your want to put that all off to just, "an early bunch of CIA cowboys"!

.

Absolutely right!

"At the start of the confrontation, American political sympathy was forthcoming from the Truman Administration.[19] In particular, Mosaddegh was buoyed by the advice and counsel he was receiving from American Ambassador in Tehran, Henry F. Grady. However, eventually American decision-makers lost their patience, and by the time a Republican Administration came to office fears that communists were poised to overthrow the government became an all-consuming concern (these concerns were later dismissed as "paranoid" in retrospective commentary on the coup from US government officials). Shortly prior to the 1952 presidential election in the United States, the British government invited CIA officer Kermit Roosevelt, Jr., to London to propose collaboration on a secret plan to force Mosaddegh from office.[20] This would be the first of three "regime change" operations led by Allen Dulles (the other two being the successful CIA-instigated 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état and the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion of Cuba).

Under the direction of Kermit Roosevelt, Jr., a senior Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer and grandson of former US President Theodore Roosevelt, the American CIA and British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) funded and led a covert operation to depose Mosaddegh with the help of military forces disloyal to the democratically elected government. Referred to as Operation Ajax,[21] the plot hinged on orders signed by Mohammad Reza to dismiss Mosaddegh as prime minister and replace him with General Fazlollah Zahedi a choice agreed on by the British and Americans"

Edited by kactus
Posted (edited)

It didn't 'establish the Shah'. The Shah had been on the throne since 1941...no gaps.

What you can't accept is Iranians involved in an Iranian coup.

Nonesense! Shah and Farah fled the country many times during his reign.... Edited by kactus

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,927
    • Most Online
      1,554

    Newest Member
    BTDT
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...