Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, LonJowett said:

So you're saying Trump should implement the sanctions against Russia that Congress demanded? Do you think he should condemn Russian interference? Do you think he should apologize for misleading the American people by saying Russian  interference was a hoax? Are sad you can't delete my questions rather than answer them? :lol:

Trump's ego will not allow him to concede that Russia had anything to do with his winning. And it's patently obvious he would not have won without Russian interference. He barely squeaked by in a few key states with small majorities. Remove all those Russian hacked emails which leaked out week after week, along with a mass of dishonest, pro trump social media activity and it's almost certain she'd have won those states - and the election.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
4 hours ago, ?Impact said:

The latest accuser of Donald Trump's inappropriate sexual assaults is Rachel Crooks. Meanwhile 62 million self righteous hypocrites look the other way.

 

Worked even better for Bill Clinton...strongly endorsed by NOW no matter how many assaults were alleged.

Four More Years !

  • Like 1

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
Just now, ?Impact said:

Clinton's transgressions were more like those of Patrick Brown.

 

American liberals and progressives don't know or give a crap about "Patrick Brown"....they only wanted "their guy" to win no matter how many women he assaulted.

  • Like 1

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
8 hours ago, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

American liberals and progressives don't know or give a crap about "Patrick Brown"....they only wanted "their guy" to win no matter how many women he assaulted.

You're mistaken again. Trump wasn't their guy at all.

Oliver: Now why did you get two tickets to Chicago when you know that I wanted to spend my honeymoon in Saskatchewan?

Stanley: Well, the man said there was no such place as sus - -Swee - Sas...

Posted (edited)

http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/20/media/internet-research-agency-unwitting-trump-supporters/index.html

Pretty interesting piece wherein CNN visits the dupes who were played by the Russians in 2016.  2/3 realize what happened but not good ol' Florine Goldfarb, God bless her :D 

Edited by Michael Hardner

 

Looks like someone has a new patronizing catch phrase !

Michael Hardner

Posted (edited)

The counter memo was released today, although it is heavily redacted. There are however many things it makes clear, one of the most glaring is that the Steel dossier did not reach the FBI counterintelligence team investigating Russia's interference in the election until mid-September 2016 or seven weeks after launching the investigation so the Trump lie that it was the basis for the investigation is full of crap. Additionally the FISA application for the surveillance of Carter Page happened after had already left the Trump team, so the other Trump lie that they tapped his phones is full of even more stinky crap.

Edited by ?Impact
Posted (edited)
On 21/02/2018 at 6:35 PM, Michael Hardner said:

http://money.cnn.com/2018/02/20/media/internet-research-agency-unwitting-trump-supporters/index.html

Pretty interesting piece wherein CNN visits the dupes who were played by the Russians in 2016.  2/3 realize what happened but not good ol' Florine Goldfarb, God bless her :D 

In addition to that manipulation, CNN failed to mention that the "Not My President" protest after the election was also set up by the same Russian group. CNN themselves participated substantially in that one. Nicely played.

Oh and Florine Goldfarb - just an old lady who didn't know the Russians were behind it. Her life is now in danger, thanks to CNN. She is 76 years old.

Elderly Trump Supporter Woman Exposed To Vicious Harassment Following CNN Report

Edited by OftenWrong
added link
Posted
2 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

In addition to that manipulation, CNN failed to mention that the "Not My President" protest after the election was also set up by the same Russian group.

There were many not my President rallies. There are Russian links to the Nov 12th one in NYC, and the Nov 19th one in North Carolina only.

Posted
3 minutes ago, ?Impact said:

There were many not my President rallies. There are Russian links to the Nov 12th one in NYC, and the Nov 19th one in North Carolina only.

The report by Mueller was already discussed in this thread.

To which you never responded. Memory getting bad?

  • Confused 1
Posted

In the latest ridiculously embarrassing comment, Trump refers to immigrants as "snakes", Perhaps the dolt forgot he is married to one. No wonder she oftern looks so troubled when she has to appear in public with him. 

Posted
12 hours ago, ?Impact said:

The counter memo was released today, although it is heavily redacted. There are however many things it makes clear, one of the most glaring is that the Steel dossier did not reach the FBI counterintelligence team investigating Russia's interference in the election until mid-September 2016 or seven weeks after launching the investigation so the Trump lie that it was the basis for the investigation is full of crap. Additionally the FISA application for the surveillance of Carter Page happened after had already left the Trump team, so the other Trump lie that they tapped his phones is full of even more stinky crap.

Sounds like you are well-versed in some kind of American soap-opera. I remember a bunch of people here, probably yourself included insisting that Trump would not release the memo. Well, here it is only a couple of weeks later. I've been trying to find out what the big hoo-hah is all about, but there's not much discussion about it in the media. Instead, they've reverted to publishing popularity polls instead. Seems this highly anticipated memo is another nothing-burger, I guess.

"We'll get him next time..."

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, OftenWrong said:

 nothing-burger

Even with the many parts that Trump redacted, and the fact he declassified it late on a Saturday to have it slip by unnoticed, this memo proves he is a liar many times over.

Edited by ?Impact
Posted
8 minutes ago, ?Impact said:

Even with the many parts that Trump redacted, and the fact he declassified it late on a Saturday to have it slip by unnoticed, this memo proves he is a liar many times over.

Trump redacted what exactly? I would think it was redacted by the CIA or FBI. Are they no longer trustworthy, or is it just when it's not convenient to the anti-Trump narrative.
Also, so what if it's Saturday. Seems to be that pushing anti-American propaganda is a full-time job.

But you are free to grovel for excuses...

Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, ?Impact said:

Even with the many parts that Trump redacted, and the fact he declassified it late on a Saturday to have it slip by unnoticed, this memo proves he is a liar many times over.

You'd be interested on how many times that happens, and not just by Trump. Many previous leaders did it. It even happens on the state/municipality levels.

 

Edited by GostHacked
Posted
3 hours ago, OftenWrong said:

Trump redacted what exactly? I would think it was redacted by the CIA or FBI. Are they no longer trustworthy, or is it just when it's not convenient to the anti-Trump narrative.
Also, so what if it's Saturday. Seems to be that pushing anti-American propaganda is a full-time job.

Anti-American? Those are weasel words.

Oliver: Now why did you get two tickets to Chicago when you know that I wanted to spend my honeymoon in Saskatchewan?

Stanley: Well, the man said there was no such place as sus - -Swee - Sas...

Posted
1 minute ago, ?Impact said:
  1. Redacting
  2. Timing release of bad news for weekend lull
  3. Lying
  4. All of above

I get it, but Trump is new to this game and has some time to catch up the amount of times his predecessor did it.

Posted (edited)
On 2/25/2018 at 12:04 PM, OftenWrong said:

Poor little Omni is always waiting for the next "big thing". How's that working out for ya?

Very well. Seems you never have to wait long.

Yep, never long. Yet another contradiction. This one on paper.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/trump-signs-report-rejecting-own-views-on-trade-canada-1.3819431

WASHINGTON -- Donald Trump's views on trade have been clobbered in a report released by the White House -- and signed by none other than the president of the United States himself.

Edited by Omni
Posted

Trump now says he would have gone into the school in Florida even if he didn't have a weapon to confront the shooter. Isn't this the same guy who managed to wiggle his way out of military service because of a story about...."bone spurs"? He would have been given a gun to go into Viet Nam.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      11,015
    • Most Online
      2,945

    Newest Member
    agackibal
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...