Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, DogOnPorch said:

No...how would you fight terrorism?

Or would you?

Is there an acceptable number of casualties we as a culture can absorb and still accommodate Islam?

 

Probably not...didn't work for Japan or Germany either.   Now they are "accommodated".

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
Just now, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

Probably not...didn't work for Japan or Germany either.   Now they are "accommodated".

 

Islam's defenders don't wish to admit it...but accommodation of Islam does mean a certain level of casualties among the Infidels. How much depends on how bold the Muslim community has become in fulfilling the Quran's mandates.

 

Posted
1 minute ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Islam's defenders don't wish to admit it...but accommodation of Islam does mean a certain level of casualties among the Infidels. How much depends on how bold the Muslim community has become in fulfilling the Quran's mandates.

 

 

I wonder if those Muslims suffer from "infidelophobia" ?

  • Like 1

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted
Just now, bush_cheney2004 said:

 

I wonder if those Muslims suffer from "infidelophobia" ?

 

The Quran devotes much of its time telling Muslims how to treat the Infidel. There is also Omar's Law...aka the Pact of Omar which details the concept of Jizya among the Peoples of the Book...allowing them to keep their faith in a minor status if they pay into an Islamic protection racket.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pact_of_Umar

Cosa Nostra!

Posted
23 minutes ago, Bob Macadoo said:

OK so talk.....you seem to be reasonable.

There are terrorists out there who proclaim that their islamic faith directs them to inflict pain on innocents in some irrational game of tit for tat that they may believe will get them some sort of elightenment in the afterlife.

Now what?

If I knew I would probably be able to charge for my services.  Is there some rule that says one should have the solution before one discusses a problem?  Why do you have an objection to calling a muslim terrorist a muslim?  I really don't understand that at all. 

Posted
4 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

If I knew I would probably be able to charge for my services.  Is there some rule that says one should have the solution before one discusses a problem?  Why do you have an objection to calling a muslim terrorist a muslim?  I really don't understand that at all. 

 

Some would prefer absolute quiet as near as I can tell. No discussion of Islam at all. They seem to think Islam's aggressiveness is the result of modern Western bigotry. This does not explain why Charles Martel had the same problems with Islam...heh.

  • Like 1
Posted
59 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Islam allows extrajudicial killing under certain conditions...a huge departure from other religions.

So does the White House. What religion do they follow?

Posted
5 minutes ago, Omni said:

So does the White House. What religion do they follow?

America envisaged allowing all religions to practice as equals. Admirable. Plus atheism isn't a crime.

However, one of the young America's first conflicts was against the Islamic Barbary pirates who were busy raiding and taking slaves from Europe as well as from US shipping. So even back then...Islam = trouble.

The USMC wrote a tune about it.

Posted
1 minute ago, DogOnPorch said:

America envisaged allowing all religions to practice as equals. Admirable. Plus atheism isn't a crime.

However, one of the young America's first conflicts was against the Islamic Barbary pirates who were busy raiding and taking slaves from Europe as well as from US shipping. So even back then...Islam = trouble.

The USMC wrote a tune about it.

I didn't ask for a bunch BS deflection malarky, I asked a specific question re: extrajudicial killings. 

Posted

As for Islam: it is in Surah 5:32

We decreed upon the Children of Israel that whoever kills a soul unless for a soul or for corruption [done] in the land - it is as if he had slain mankind entirely. And whoever saves one - it is as if he had saved mankind entirely. And our messengers had certainly come to them with clear proofs. Then indeed many of them, [even] after that, throughout the land, were transgressors.

Corruption in the Land = Fasad...as detailed earlier.

Posted
2 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

I accept your surrender.

You're supposed to stop when you find yourself in a hole. But it's up to you.

Posted
58 minutes ago, DogOnPorch said:

 

Some would prefer absolute quiet as near as I can tell. No discussion of Islam at all. They seem to think Islam's aggressiveness is the result of modern Western bigotry. This does not explain why Charles Martel had the same problems with Islam...heh.

It is a puzzlement.  Why do some people insist on pretending there is nothing wrong with Islam?  I really have difficulty understanding that. It's so easy to show they are wrong. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. 

Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, bcsapper said:

It is a puzzlement.  Why do some people insist on pretending there is nothing wrong with Islam?  I really have difficulty understanding that. It's so easy to show they are wrong. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. 

 

It wasn't a one-off, either. Tours was just the first thwarted attempt for Islam to invade Europe. Spain had already fallen.

Lepanto is still my favorite from a military history POV. A naval affair...freeing of slaves...do-or-die. Some of the first use of cannon aboard ships...it has it all.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Lepanto

 

 

Edited by DogOnPorch
Posted
2 hours ago, WestCoastRunner said:

So calling out Muslims as terrorists is fighting terrorism?  You are so hypocritical 

They actually don't understand it actually creates it.

Posted
24 minutes ago, Omni said:

They actually don't understand it actually creates it.

What would you suggest we call Muslim terrorists?  Eric?  Manuel?

Posted

It doesn't solve anything it just allows you to look up from your navel to shake your fist at the sky.  I'm not much into useless acts of desperation.

If sitting around shooting fish in a barrel entertains you....'ave at 'er.

1 hour ago, bcsapper said:

It is a puzzlement.  Why do some people insist on pretending there is nothing wrong with Islam?  I really have difficulty understanding that. It's so easy to show they are wrong. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. 

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,900
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    Ana Silva
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • CDN1 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...