Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

To be determined, that's one of the reasons I used the word, might.

Perhaps, but this attack may be the event that triggers a coordinated NATO response to ISIS instead of the piecemeal "coalition" approach. Russia just makes it more complicated.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

  • Replies 697
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

So, I hear a lot of people here and on my TV screen talking about a whole bunch of things. Go bomb somebody. Reconsider changing C51. Reconsider the refugees.

So what? Ignore useless chatter. I do.

I demand that my country not do anything until someone can confirm that the actions we take will make things better and not worse.

So, send the Liberal Party or Trudeau an email.

And as I've pointed out multiple times, someone amongst the group of countries we consider "allies" is helping ISIS. And I believe that intelligence exists about who that someone is and we don't want to take them on because we don't want to offend them. Unless and until someone is going to be honest about wtf is really going on, fighting ISIS is like spitting in the wind.

Look, if your government with all its resources can't figure it out, do you really think you can do it from the keyboard of a PC in your basement?

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Posted

I'm done talking to you - feel free to amuse yourself with someone else for a while.

He does have a point in that oil is their main source of financial support.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

He does have a point in that oil is their main source of financial support.

Indirectly....oil production, distribution, and consumption is more complicated than that.

The Saudis have their own problems with domestic terrorism.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Perhaps, but this attack may be the event that triggers a coordinated NATO response to ISIS instead of the piecemeal "coalition" approach. Russia just makes it more complicated.

If it can be established that it was ISIS that made the attack. You won't get everyone on board if you can't. The events of the past week and a half might be what it takes to get Russia and NATO working together.

"Never trust a man who has not a single redeeming vice". WSC

Posted

It’s obvious that this happened because someone feels completely excluded, completely at war with innocents, at war with a society, and our approach has to be ”where do those tensions come from”.

Posted

It’s obvious that this happened because someone feels completely excluded, completely at war with innocents, at war with a society, and our approach has to be ”where do those tensions come from”.

Try here.

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted

So, I hear a lot of people here and on my TV screen talking about a whole bunch of things. Go bomb somebody. Reconsider changing C51. Reconsider the refugees.

So what? Ignore useless chatter. I do.

I demand that my country not do anything until someone can confirm that the actions we take will make things better and not worse.

So, send the Liberal Party or Trudeau an email.

And as I've pointed out multiple times, someone amongst the group of countries we consider "allies" is helping ISIS. And I believe that intelligence exists about who that someone is and we don't want to take them on because we don't want to offend them. Unless and until someone is going to be honest about wtf is really going on, fighting ISIS is like spitting in the wind.

Look, if your government with all its resources can't figure it out, do you really think you can do it from the keyboard of a PC in your basemenf

I think somebody does know but because they are allies (Turkey? Saudi Arabia?), nobody wants to take them on.

It's well known that Turkey doesn't like the Kurds and doesn't like Assad; so is not especially motivated to take on ISIS.

Unlimited economic growth has the marvelous quality of stilling discontent while preserving privilege, a fact that has not gone unnoticed among liberal economists.

- Noam Chomsky

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

- Upton Sinclair

Posted

If it can be established that it was ISIS that made the attack. You won't get everyone on board if you can't. The events of the past week and a half might be what it takes to get Russia and NATO working together.

ISIS wants allied forces on the ground to fulfill their ideology and caliphate objectives.

More attacks will follow to goad governments into military action.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

If it can be established that it was ISIS that made the attack. You won't get everyone on board if you can't. The events of the past week and a half might be what it takes to get Russia and NATO working together.

Russia and Iran are already anti-ISIS but they support Assad in Syria. Turkey and Saudi Arabia are anti-Assad. The western allies seem to be hoping everyone will lose. That's why it's such a mess.

Unlimited economic growth has the marvelous quality of stilling discontent while preserving privilege, a fact that has not gone unnoticed among liberal economists.

- Noam Chomsky

It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.

- Upton Sinclair

Posted

ISIS wants allied forces on the ground to fulfill their ideology and caliphate objectives.

The only reason ISIS continues to hold territory is because there are no allied forces on the ground. Put in one armored division and ISIS' control will reduced to a few isolated strongholds with heavy civilian populations to hide behind. Put in an infantry division and they'll lose even those.

Why would you think they would WANT alliance ground forces?

"A liberal is someone who claims to be open to all points of view — and then is surprised and offended to find there are other points of view.” William F Buckley

Posted
....Why would you think they would WANT alliance ground forces?

Because that is how the new Caliphate will be established...by slaying its enemies Qu'ran style. I didn't say it was rational thought....I am not a suicidal terrorist.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

If it can be established that it was ISIS that made the attack. You won't get everyone on board if you can't. The events of the past week and a half might be what it takes to get Russia and NATO working together.

I hope that the fears of western countries will help us all to defeat these terrorist Attacks. It's sad to acknowledge that ISIS has indeed triggered fears and I know that we shouldn't react out of fear but when we have so many innocent civilians die, it can't be dismissed.

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

No I do know. I read and know more than you assume. I'm just not willing to do the work for lazy posters.

Basically they are disillusioned people with no purpose.

Not true. A lot of them come from well to do families. I don't think you can wrap it up nicely into one thing or another. It's like saying why do people murder? Lotsa reasons of course.

It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands

Posted (edited)

Not true. A lot of them come from well to do families. I don't think you can wrap it up nicely into one thing or another. It's like saying why do people murder? Lotsa reasons of course.

Since when do disillusioned individuals not come from well to do families. That is an assumption on your part and it's not something I suggested.

Edited by WestCoastRunner
I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Posted

I think bombing ISIS and killing a lot of civilians as collateral is a much harsher and more violent response than closing Western borders to immigration from Islamic countries. I don't know why people are so willing to go out and kill other people, mostly civilians, as a response to try to stamp out terrorism (which is plainly impossible to do, anyway), but are utterly unwilling to consider securing our borders so that (most) terrorists simply can't get into Western countries in the first place. Suggesting that we go forth and bomb people indiscriminately is mainstream, but suggesting any review of our immigration system is "bigoted" and "racist".

Oh well, I'm sure the irrationality will go on and on until the death toll is in the millions not in the hundreds.

Posted

So we stand by and let them kill our families?

Taliban and Al Qaeda are still around 14 years later. ISIS exists because of Iraq.

I don't know, but doesn't sound like bombs are really effective in all this.

In fact, they've made things worse, no?

It's kind of the worst thing that any humans could be doing at this time in human history. Other than that, it's fine." Bill Nye on Alberta Oil Sands

Posted

The only reason ISIS continues to hold territory is because there are no allied forces on the ground. Put in one armored division and ISIS' control will reduced to a few isolated strongholds with heavy civilian populations to hide behind. Put in an infantry division and they'll lose even those.

Why would you think they would WANT alliance ground forces?

Agreed. We have to remember what "war" actually means and be prepared to fight one until we win.

Posted

Which nearby nation has ISIS not attacked yet ? Israel.....ever wonder why ?

Oh geez, b_c, now you'll have some posters alleging that Isreal is responsible for the attacks.

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Posted

I think bombing ISIS and killing a lot of civilians as collateral is a much harsher and more violent response than closing Western borders to immigration from Islamic countries. I don't know why people are so willing to go out and kill other people, mostly civilians...

When has this been unacceptable in the past ? "Civilians" are already dying.

Economics trumps Virtue. 

 

Posted

Taliban and Al Qaeda are still around 14 years later. ISIS exists because of Iraq.

I don't know, but doesn't sound like bombs are really effective in all this.

In fact, they've made things worse, no?

No I don't know. I'm one of the ignorant Canadians who are taking a stand against terrorism.

I love to see a young girl go out and grab the world by the lapels. Life's a bitch. You've got to go out and kick ass. - Maya Angelou

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,908
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    miawilliams3232
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Benz earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Videospirit earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Barquentine earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • stindles earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stindles earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...