Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

All the liberals have to do was keep a balanced budget, have somebody not named trudeau, and i think they would be knocking at a majority.

They may be doing it without you advice. I think the Tories have to come to grips with his disliked the Tories are outside their base.

Posted

Yup, they gave him a theme to run on.

In all seriousness, people are just sick of harper. I think a different leader would have been much more successful as the tories had a balanced budget, big trade agreements and the theme of people keeping more of what they earn.

And yet the Tories stuck with him, despite the improbability of a fourth term. And yet, when the best was clearly there 12 to 18 months ago, when even loyalists like Kenney seemed to be building support for a leadership run, they were overawed by Harper, and chose one man over the interests of the party.

All parties suffer this flaw to some extent, but the Tories have a real problem with authoritarian party management, much as the government is run that way. I agree that some policies were good, but even when they were they were so framed in partisan terms, that it poisoned them.

Frankly I think defeat would be good for the Tories. They need to find a leader, and hopefully a bit of backbone, because government of one man is bound completely to the voters' view of them, and policies become practically irrelevant.

Posted (edited)

Yesterday was a stat...I think it was said earlier in this thread that they weren't polling yesterday, hence no poll.

Frankly I think they should have spent the money on the overtime.

Edited by Smeelious
Posted (edited)

JT is in Conservative ridings and SJH is too, and he's not talking about 'Justin' any more, which sounds like the party polls are mirroring what we are seeing in the public ones and the nice hair ads did not work.

Edited by SpankyMcFarland
Posted (edited)

Could a Nate Silver be anywhere near as accurate in this country? I THINK the Liberals are going to win the popular vote (as in get the biggest percentage) but that is about as far as I am willing to guess.

Edited by SpankyMcFarland
Posted

JT is in Conservative ridings and SJH is too, and he's not talking about 'Justin' any more, which sounds like the party polls are mirroring what we are seeing in the public ones and the nice hair ads did not work.

I think they did work. I think they set the bar so low that Trudeau couldn't help but beat expectations.

Posted

I think they did work. I think they set the bar so low that Trudeau couldn't help but beat expectations.

Probably this.

Undoubtedly it backfired. Too bad JT didn't come out and say that it isn't easy to make priorities.

They did need a way to say "Hey look this guy is just running on the legacy of his father" without actually invoking the legacy of his father. JT himself had to run on the legacy of his father without actually invoking his father. (He did so once, and the polls went nuts.)

Primarily I think that the Liberal party has actually agreed to support this candidate, instead of constant infighting that has been present in the Liberal party since JC retired. The result, coupled with the country generally being sick of Harper's Conservatives, is what we are seeing: The Liberals resurgent.

I think the Conservatives are in for a bit of a headache over the next few years while trying to find the right candidate to replace Harper. Honestly I don't see anyone able to fill his shoes.

Posted

Probably this.

I think the Conservatives are in for a bit of a headache over the next few years while trying to find the right candidate to replace Harper. Honestly I don't see anyone able to fill his shoes.

Harper has not left much space for aspiring leaders in his party. Look at the British Conservatives, lining up to replace Cameron who has only just won his second election.

Posted

Frankly I think defeat would be good for the Tories. They need to find a leader, and hopefully a bit of backbone, because government of one man is bound completely to the voters' view of them, and policies become practically irrelevant.

Most certainly. It is reminiscent of what happened to the Liberals after Adscam. Today, it appears to me the Liberal Party is out of purgatory and has found new life.

"We always want the best man to win an election. Unfortunately, he never runs." Will Rogers

Posted

The deficit has also returned to a small surplus which means that the debt will start getting lower again. Trudeau wants to spend excess money on a problem that cant be fixed by us if its even a problem at all. Unless trudeau can convince china to fire up its printing press and buy more resources.

The problem is with interest rates. If those rise significantly then this country is in trouble.

The whole planet will be in trouble if that happens.

A government without public oversight is like a nuclear plant without lead shielding.

Posted

Harper has not left much space for aspiring leaders in his party. Look at the British Conservatives, lining up to replace Cameron who has only just won his second election.

There are a few. Kenney is certainly hot for the job, and I don't think it's a stretch to see Raitt or Ambrose making a id.

Posted

Good news for Conservatives if Trudeau wins the election. Ontario always votes for a premier of the opposite party from the one leading Ottawa. If Trudeau wins, then you'll have a Conservative Ontario government soon enough.

Posted

Good news for Conservatives if Trudeau wins the election. Ontario always votes for a premier of the opposite party from the one leading Ottawa. If Trudeau wins, then you'll have a Conservative Ontario government soon enough.

I'm thinking that's going to be rather small consolation to Federal Tories.

Posted

Good news for Conservatives if Trudeau wins the election. Ontario always votes for a premier of the opposite party from the one leading Ottawa. If Trudeau wins, then you'll have a Conservative Ontario government soon enough.

I would pretty much take any government than Kathleen Wynne.

Posted

There are a few. Kenney is certainly hot for the job, and I don't think it's a stretch to see Raitt or Ambrose making a id.

The tories need someone likeable. The only person i see with that would be snagging brad wall out of sk.

"Stop the Madness!!!" - Kevin O'Leary

"Money is the ultimate scorecard of life!". - Kevin O'Leary

Economic Left/Right: 4.00

Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.77

Posted

The tories need someone likeable. The only person i see with that would be snagging brad wall out of sk.

It would probably help. But when I see so many tory supporters constantly impugning the work ethic of non-tories, or declaring that progressives are just a bunch of 'entitled' twerps, and that climate change is just hysterical nonsense, it doesn't inspire me with good will toward the Conservative ideology. I have voted Conservative in the past, and up until this election had no issue doing so again in the future. But seeing so many mean-spirited views expressed by Tory supporters here and elsewhere has made me seriously rethink if I'd ever vote for them. They sound just like republicans who would pass a law dictating what someone on food stamps can buy for food.

Posted

The tories need someone likeable. The only person i see with that would be snagging brad wall out of sk.

While Wall might be a reasonably good choice, there's no real tradition in Canada of Premiers becoming PM. It might be a tough hill to climb.

Posted

The tories need someone likeable. The only person i see with that would be snagging brad wall out of sk.

He speaks only one of two official languages - without French his candidacy would be hopeless.

When the people have no tyrant, their public opinion becomes one.

...... Lord Lytton

Posted

bring back a semblance of the Progressive Conservatives... the party/policy that Stephen Harper turfed!

Justin Trudeau at a Nepean campaign stop yesterday: "We don’t need to convince them {Progressive Conservatives} to leave the Conservative Party, we just need to show them how Stephen Harper’s party has left them.

Posted

Looks like Harper will not be getting a majority. This means that Harper will probably resign and the party will swing back towards the center. MacKay may come back to run. There is a Progressive Conservative out there who has been the leader of the PC Party, has major contacts in Quebec and the Mulroney Clan. He speaks pretty good French and understands how to use Quebec.

In 1998, Charest was persuaded by the Conservative base to move to Quebec to shore up the support and undermine the separatists. He did so on the promise of support if he ever decided to come back to federal politics. Well, the separatists have been marginalized and Jean may decide to cash in his chits.

I would not be at all surprised to see Charest suddenly start to organize a base in Quebec.

Note - For those expecting a response from Big Guy: I generally do not read or respond to posts longer then 300 words nor to parsed comments.

Posted

Looks like Harper will not be getting a majority. This means that Harper will probably resign and the party will swing back towards the center. MacKay may come back to run. There is a Progressive Conservative out there who has been the leader of the PC Party, has major contacts in Quebec and the Mulroney Clan. He speaks pretty good French and understands how to use Quebec.

In 1998, Charest was persuaded by the Conservative base to move to Quebec to shore up the support and undermine the separatists. He did so on the promise of support if he ever decided to come back to federal politics. Well, the separatists have been marginalized and Jean may decide to cash in his chits.

I would not be at all surprised to see Charest suddenly start to organize a base in Quebec.

Charest is done. I cannot see how he would ever return to politics, or who would want him.

Similarly Mackay is done, destroyed by his own mediocrity and a not-very-subtle political assassination by the PMO.

I could possibly see someone like Moore or maybe even Baird returning, but I can't see Mackay coming back. He would not be acceptable to the Reform wing of the party (and neither, for that matter, would Charest). Whoever takes over the helm is going to have to be someone who can bridge the gap.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Tell a friend

    Love Repolitics.com - Political Discussion Forums? Tell a friend!
  • Member Statistics

    • Total Members
      10,903
    • Most Online
      1,403

    Newest Member
    LinkSoul60
    Joined
  • Recent Achievements

    • Barquentine went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dave L earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Ana Silva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Scott75 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Political Smash went up a rank
      Rising Star
  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...