Oleg Bach Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Sorry....he want's a world without "shit". When you start to get older - never fart with to much confidence and gusto...or you will have the world you don't want. Shit is to be contained...in specific areas and container that flush...as the hippies said - "get your shit together" It's called law and order. The term adultery is a perfect explanatory _ it's when you dump a cup of vinigar into a class of milk - you have adulterated the milk. We keep the shit seperate form the food where I come from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 When you start to get older - never fart with to much confidence and gusto...or you will have the world you don't want. Shit is to be contained...in specific areas and container that flush...as the hippies said - "get your shit together" It's called law and order. The term adultery is a perfect explanatory _ it's when you dump a cup of vinigar into a class of milk - you have adulterated the milk. We keep the shit seperate form the food where I come from. No, when you get older, regular movements are welcomed...much desired. As for Glenn Beck or any other yahoo on television, why can't these people just change the channel? What's the big frickin' deal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 No, when you get older, regular movements are welcomed...much desired. As for Glenn Beck or any other yahoo on television, why can't these people just change the channel? What's the big frickin' deal? Don't watch TV much these days but when I do - I surf - I change the channel - then keep changing it...some times I stop just to ensure myself that I am smarter than the people on CNN - then once that is confirmed ...I change the channel - unless I find someone on the screen that I can hate for a few minutes - Then I get tired of that and I change the channel - then sometimes ------------------------------------------------------------------ I SHUT THEM ALL OFF...pop - off goes the weasils! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Don't watch TV much these days but when I do - I surf - I change the channel - then keep changing it...some times I stop just to ensure myself that I am smarter than the people on CNN - then once that is confirmed ...I change the channel..... I guess for some people it's a deeper experience. They want to change the news program talent and writers instead of just changing the channel or turning it off. Maybe it just irks some people that Rush gets paid so much! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 I guess for some people it's a deeper experience. They want to change the news program talent and writers instead of just changing the channel or turning it off. Maybe it just irks some people that Rush gets paid so much! He's entertaining...I like him because of that - I really don't care other than hearing a voice when I am lazy and laying in bed smoking a smoke and having a coffee...can't take it seriously - I do think it's cute how the new up and coming talking heads who look down on their failed SAG members - and feel they have made it - and will say what the script commands - just can't stand them _ I know about actors and none have any ethics when it comes to "making it" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 He's entertaining...I like him because of that - I really don't care other than hearing a voice when I am lazy and laying in bed smoking a smoke and having a coffee...can't take it seriously Nope...it's just infotainment. Rush perfected early "talk radio" formats like KFI AM640 in Los Angeles by purposely exploiting strengths and weaknesses of the medium...he bombed on television. Beck is trying to go the other way. Kids today can't appreciate a well produced radio program or ball game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oleg Bach Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Nope...it's just infotainment. Rush perfected early "talk radio" formats like KFI AM640 in Los Angeles by purposely exploiting strengths and weaknesses of the medium...he bombed on television. Beck is trying to go the other way.Kids today can't appreciate a well produced radio program or ball game. Radio when it's done will has the greatest mental visual resolution - It's grand! I see better with my ears anyway - I have been a radio man for years - it was that damned short wave that turned me into a tin hat guy - that was years ago - what was considered flaking for the most part is now mainstream - ahead of my time? YEP - good nite BC - took the kids last beer - and now it's on to the bike to negotiate around all the hot young babes - might even stop along the way.....Your a good guy - I have an old friend called Blabbermouth on an American site - you two are a lot alike ...from the school of hard knocks _ like me - I was the principle - the author of my own hard knocks....I guess I am a control freak _ If I abuse me - I have control over it - where as if others do the smacking - it's unexceptable - Men who are vulnerable - yet tough - are interesting - and that's why I love ME! Before my mother died I asked her "mum, who do you love?" she would say ME.... I had great parents..free in mind and spirit...I am wealthy - typed but not read. Thanks America~ I do truely love your nation..because they have only shown me their best - and that is a friend! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 (edited) Radio when it's done will has the greatest mental visual resolution - It's grand! I see better with my ears anyway - I have been a radio man for years - it was that damned short wave that turned me into a tin hat guy - I hear that....my old man kept an old tube SW radio on his bed stand.....long wire antenna on the ceiling. Even with a regular AM radio it's cool to DX from far, far away (at night) when the magic happens. Good night Sir..... Edited August 23, 2009 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest American Woman Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Typical of the intolerant socialists, if they do not like what someone has to say they try and silence them. I may not agree with what you say but I will defend your right to say it, the lost mantra of the left buried with their moral compass. Sort of like when radio stations refused to play the Dixie Chicks' music, eh? Those damn Left intolerant socialist Bush supporters! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GostHacked Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 I agree.So how does it get to be about truth ? One way might be for reasonable people of right and left to say 'enough' and to decide that this circus sideshow is compromising our ability to discuss issues. It's a pipe dream, but one that is still obtainable. There is just no discussing anything with certain people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 If we take steps to apply an appropriate amount of ridicule then it may help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Topaz Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 Sort of like when radio stations refused to play the Dixie Chicks' music, eh? Those damn Left intolerant socialist Bush supporters! What happen to the Chicks shouldn't happen to either Dems or Republican supporters. They had death threatens and their kids had problems with other kids at school. The Bush supporters took it too far. So much for freedom of speech, which why US soldiers were dying and getting mained for in Iraq. Today, now that the public is learning more, they Chicks weren't that wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bush_cheney2004 Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 (edited) ....Today, now that the public is learning more, they Chicks weren't that wrong. Commercially, they were very wrong. Happy to take the money from a core country marketing machine, they bit the hand that fed them. Free speech has consequences...just look at what some Canadians are doing to Shona Holmes! Edited August 23, 2009 by bush_cheney2004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kimmy Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 That's just idiotic. It seems that you can only get somebody off the air by yelling 'racism !'. The level of debate has lowered too far. There's no way to yell 'stupid !'. You seem to be advocating on behalf of the view that getting something stupid off the air is in itself a worthwhile goal, and if denouncing it as stupid isn't working then denouncing it as racist is a reasonable alternative. Is that the case? -k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted August 23, 2009 Report Share Posted August 23, 2009 (edited) You seem to be advocating on behalf of the view that getting something stupid off the air is in itself a worthwhile goal, and if denouncing it as stupid isn't working then denouncing it as racist is a reasonable alternative. Is that the case? k, I don't think we have things on the air that are racist. I think that racism is a problem, but racist television programs aren't a problem. The problem is that [edit]our democratic system doesn't have a compass. Edited August 23, 2009 by Michael Hardner Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted August 26, 2009 Report Share Posted August 26, 2009 It doesn't matter. Why is it of primary importance that this guy was a communist ? Why can't we just talk about the ideas here. And if Beck says "I feel that Obama is a racist." that's not actionable. However, I have to ask: Why should America care one whit about what he FEELS ? Can we please have some facts ? So you have no problem if in fact this man still is a communist at heart?How about if he were a Nazi sympathizer?I just feel it's significant in that he holds a rather important position in the Obama administration.By the way,how many successful Communist countries have there been in human history?Has there been even one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Hardner Posted August 27, 2009 Report Share Posted August 27, 2009 So you have no problem if in fact this man still is a communist at heart?How about if he were a Nazi sympathizer?I just feel it's significant in that he holds a rather important position in the Obama administration.By the way,how many successful Communist countries have there been in human history?Has there been even one? I'm not paranoid enough to think that a politician is lying, and is actually a secret agent, as Beck seems to think. If communism isn't successful then why do we have to be afraid of it ? I think it's bad for everybody when paranoid entertainment is sold as news. How many people receive their information from these types of networks ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shady Posted August 27, 2009 Report Share Posted August 27, 2009 Glenn Beck exposes Color of Change co-founder Van Jones This is Obama's "green jobs Czar." This video is really chilling. It's obvious Obama's using the Czar method of appointment to by pass Senate confirmation. Because, frankly, there's no way some of these Czars would get even close to confirmed. Van Jones is an admitted communist, as recent as 1999. YouTube Hope n change? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted August 27, 2009 Report Share Posted August 27, 2009 Glenn Beck exposes Color of Change co-founder Van JonesThis is Obama's "green jobs Czar." This video is really chilling. It's obvious Obama's using the Czar method of appointment to by pass Senate confirmation. Because, frankly, there's no way some of these Czars would get even close to confirmed. Van Jones is an admitted communist, as recent as 1999. YouTube Hope n change? What is that Glen Beck tries to link the co-founder of the organization that is destroying him with something bad? You don't say Shady. And the daily Kos already has a response to beck 5 days ago. Have fun reading it. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/8/24/77...nder-Van-Jones- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted August 28, 2009 Report Share Posted August 28, 2009 I'm not paranoid enough to think that a politician is lying, and is actually a secret agent, as Beck seems to think.If communism isn't successful then why do we have to be afraid of it ? I think it's bad for everybody when paranoid entertainment is sold as news. How many people receive their information from these types of networks ? If you know anything at all about the history of Communist countries,past or present,you should be afraid.I'm not quite sure if you are implying that Communism has in fact been successful or not. Let me know if you eventually can name one successful example of Communism. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punked Posted August 28, 2009 Report Share Posted August 28, 2009 If you know anything at all about the history of Communist countries,past or present,you should be afraid.I'm not quite sure if you are implying that Communism has in fact been successful or not.Let me know if you eventually can name one successful example of Communism. Say Communism a few more times ok? I might get scared. Wait you sound crazy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted August 28, 2009 Report Share Posted August 28, 2009 If you know anything at all about the history of Communist countries,past or present,you should be afraid.I'm not quite sure if you are implying that Communism has in fact been successful or not.Let me know if you eventually can name one successful example of Communism. by your definition (whatever it may be), how is the People's Republic of China... not successful? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 by your definition (whatever it may be), how is the People's Republic of China... not successful? This is too easy.I don't mean to lecture you of course,but would it be fair to say that in order for a country to be successful it would include........a good record on human rights?China is indeed an economic powerhouse,now that they have embraced some aspects of capitalism.But surely you would agree they have a very long way to go in the area of human rights?In case you haven't noticed,protests against the Chinese government are not really tolerated that much. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waldo Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 This is too easy.I don't mean to lecture you of course,but would it be fair to say that in order for a country to be successful it would include........a good record on human rights?China is indeed an economic powerhouse,now that they have embraced some aspects of capitalism.But surely you would agree they have a very long way to go in the area of human rights?In case you haven't noticed,protests against the Chinese government are not really tolerated that much. no clearly - lecture away. Now that you've actually qualified your previously lacking definition, apparently your definition for success hinges on "human rights", notwithstanding, apparently, accepting rogue nation status... for "others". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ironstone Posted August 29, 2009 Report Share Posted August 29, 2009 no clearly - lecture away. Now that you've actually qualified your previously lacking definition, apparently your definition for success hinges on "human rights", notwithstanding, apparently, accepting rogue nation status... for "others". Do you honestly place so little value on human rights?On the other hand,there are nations where the people seem to genuinely love their leaders despite severe oppression.North Korea comes to mind,an even more oppressive place than China.Would you consider North Korea successful to rank higher than China?Shouldn't human beings count for something? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.9a49e1b2f22a6d34a345152c50044aa9.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.