GostHacked

The sky is falling!!! We had lightning tonight. Sca-wy. Doesn't this sound very much like the late 1930's when people tried to ignore Hitler, you of all people should be aware of the similarity of the world situation. Comparing a cyclone (mother nature, not preventable) to Hitler in WWII (could have been prevented, but most of Europe gave into Hitler's demands to 'reunify' some countries back into Germany. Some countries that were never part of Germany. Even after Hitler took parts of Belguim, the former Checz Republic, and stormed Poland, Europe did little until it was too late and there was an all out brawl in Europe). I hope there was a point in your post. And mind for that matter.

Bush does not even have that kind of support in the United States, his home country. He has to travel half way around the world to find people that like him?

In a way it can. Since we are heading to a world type government (if you cannot see the convergence of Unions around the world, Europe, Africa and the soon to be NAU) I will have a vote in our next election. If you want to keep being an American and voting for Americans, then you best be voting for a guy like Ron Paul. Otherwise this new North American Union will take over and you and I can consider each other real brothers. And for this war on terror, our Canaidan policies are getting intertwined with American policies and when you fail, we fail as well. Economies tightly linked and all that. I hope you are able to see the bigger picture in all of this. Not to worry, I am not crazy about most of the members in the Canadian parliment as well. For Harper has done more to bow to the American bidding than most previous Prime Ministers. But as a person that has an interest in United States politics, I can say what I want to. And maybe, just maybe, some one else would see the bigger picture and say. 'GotHacked, you were totaly correct in everything you said.' Just lookin out for my brothers and sisters south of the 49th. It seems like your current leaders aren't doing much for you.

For Example http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2...7phenomenon.htm has an article that is over at CNN.com http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2007/...henom%e2%80%99/ Just to show you it is in fact the same article. So if you are going to leave out and ignore the 'Youtubers, bloggers and such', then you are going to be left in the dark about most things. But even the likes of CNN wants to silence this man. Even CNN is recognizing the power of Youtube and bloggers. Grass roots baby, grass roots.

You are not getting it at all Bush-Cheneystoneages, Ron Paul has been telling about the problems with the current money federal reserve system for over a decade now. Again showing consistancey in his words. His words are even more consistant than yours. And I guess going with the Devil (texan) you know is better than the Devil (texan) you don't know. Bush is from Texas too, correct?? If so, you are not making much sense to me. What you are tipping at is that Ron Paul should run as an Independant, like Ross Perot. But Ron Paul does not have the deep money pockets to run and win as an Independant for President, so he has been trying to get back to the way the Republican party was decades ago when it actually had respectful leaders that were not into nation building. Alex Jones has had many high profile guests on his show. Many that were in the know and now are comming out against the current policies and direction that the United States is heading. So how was that interview with Ron Paul on the Alex Jones show? I did not catch it, but I am looking for it now. I will post the link once I find it. Just for you Bush-Cheneystoneages.

This kind of garbage does not belong on this website. Unless there is a political angel in this thread, I don't see it.

Ron Paul has served 10 terms in office as a Republican. He has said those things over 10 years ago. So pinning him with the likes of Alex Jones (I consider Jones to be overzealous in his presentations) won't work if you actually know a thing or two about Alex Jones and ..or Ron Paul. This thread alone proves he has what it takes to become a great President. If no one was talking about him, then you can say what you want about him, or would you? You are right I cannot vote, so my opinion means shit to the likes of you Bush-Cheney1899. As you know Alex Jones just links the videos from other major MSM outlets. Kind of rehashing of what the MSM reports. Does it make it less legit because of it? Nope. Ron Paul might actually bring some respect back to the White House.

The Ducks just wanted the cup more than the Sens. The Sens came out strong in the start of every game, they played hard, then they sat the hell down. But my congrats goes to Ray Emmery two years ago, he was really a no body on the large scale of things, and now he must be happy to have played in the finals. Give this man time, he has so much potential to be a great goalie. The Ducks were just better and they won the Cup.

Spare me your adulation....Ron Paul would wilt like the Ottawa Senators when his oh so modern PrisonPlanet "videos" hit MSM. Can you vote in an American federal election? If not, it doesn't matter how well "informed" you are. Got any hot Stephane Dion videos on YouTube? You seem to have a connection to the Internet there, maybe find out for yourself? It's all there for the taking. Seize the day!

I bet that there were some with that attitude about the televised debate too. For people like me who have ditched cable TV, and TV in general, the Internet and sites like Youtube/GoogleVids offer much more at the click of a mouse, than a click of the ol TV remote. Read a paper now and then as well. Youtube cannot turn an election, but the people who watch it certainly can. Bush-Cheney1999, jump on the bandwagon, or you might get left behind like a dinosaur. If you don't like consistancy in a candidate then I will guess you are happy with the current status quo of blunders, inconsistencies and lies. Through many Internet polls (no time to search for them at the moment) Ron Paul has come out on top on most issues against the other Republican candidates. Get as informed as you can about a topic. And that means using traditional and modern sources of information. Ron Paul is not getting the epxosure or respect he deserves on TV. Fox's Hannity and Colmes (good cop bad cop duo) had Paul on a couple times and Hannity boggles my mind on his line of questioning. This is real journalism? CNN gave him some face time, and he comes across as more confident than any of the other candidates. He can back up everything he says. And a lot of what he says makes sense. Mind you, the line of questioning from Wolf Blitzer is rather lame, HANDS UP FOLKS !!!! What is this grade school?? A year down the line, all the candidates but Ron Paul will have changed their tunes and will say something else, flip floppin flappers... Ron Paul will still be consistent in his speeches. That makes a great leader, consistancy, courage and confidence. Take 9/11 away from Juliani and you have a worthless candidate who has to try marriage 3 times, and still may not get it right. Now that may not mean much to most, but to those who beleive in strong family values, Julliani has none of them that people are looking for in a leader. Also his time as a Prosecutor for the state of NY had some good points and bad points. Some of those bad points are comming back to haunt him now. McCain is another you can toss out without the rhetoric of 9/11 and fearmongering terrorism. I cannot say much about most of the other candidates, for I had never heard of Mitt Romney and some of the others before these debates. My opinions of them will be shaped by how they present themselves. So far Ron Paul is the only one that stands out in this crowd. A beam of light amongst the darkness. Actually, take 9/11/terrorism out of the debate altogether. Then let's see how much substance these candidates actually have.

Oh come on. Open your eyes. Just because 100% of Muslims aren't animalistic slaughterers, and 100% of Mennonites aren't hard, industrious, desirable citizens doesn't make the generalizations invalid.It's based on experience. I'd like to hear about those experiences, care to share with us??

Here is my angel on it. Muslim is the new 'black'. Before you were always hearing about the black community in urban centers across the United States. Crime, drug dealers pimps ect. You always had to watch out when around black people, for the 'threat' of one of them making a crime on you was drilled into the minds of people through the media, news, movies, whathaveyou. You get the same thing now. Look at all the bad guys in the movies, news and other media. Freakin Arabs are the bad guys, right? Always those 'nappy headed' muslim extreeeeeem terrorists now. So a whole religion and their one billion followers are slated as 'the new black'. I live in Ottawa as you can see. I encounter many of these Muslims on a daily basis here. I also see many blacks as well, from all over the world. I see many asians, and whites from all over. Do I fear any single one of these groups? No. There are nasties among every group. It is all a matter of perception and how it is presented to you. And you can blame the media/government for making you all stoned out on their dangerous message. One more thing. I am agnostic/athiest. So as an outsider of religion I tend to see things in a different light. I don't believe in a god, so I really don't care which one of yours is better either.

Ripping you is not important. We don't have JBTs...must be a Canadian thing. Guns are being cleaned at this moment in preparation for Dudley Doright breaking down the door (no-knock) for grow-ops. Hope you smoke one or two while you are at it,,, err blunts that is. You could sure use something to calm your edgy nerves. Wonder what has got you so frayed. Was it the innocent old lady you capped then planted evidence on?? That guilty concience not sitting well with you then it seems. For all this nastyness is a side effect of the dilemma you are in. I called checkmate long time ago, and you are still staring at the board thinking the game is not over. You know that you are wrong, but keep on beating that dead horse. Take my aluminum bat, your wood one seems to be wearing out.

The thing is about this man is he is consistent in his words. Can't say that for any of the other candidates up there. The guy just makes sense. Watch some of the other vids on youtube, and compare that to the other candidates, you are gonna find yourself a fan of him sooner or later.

NO and NO. Everyone get out of the sandbox now.

B MAx ... from your article... This story is over 15 years old. Care to show me something about him aquiring yellow cake in the years prior to the US invasion of Iraq in 2003?? Al-Tuwaitha was a nuclear research faclity and there was a couple reactors there. So, wow, this makes sense that yellow cake was found at these facilities after the Coalition won the first Gulf War back in the early 90s. buuuuuut speculation So, I guess it does not matter if the memo was forged, Niger had yellow cake and Saddam wanted it They keep talking about the 500 tonnes they found but Russia helped them make it pretty much useless, so it cannot be used for nuclear material for bombs. Yes Saddam was interested in obtaining many things, but with the sanctions in place and no fly zones on Iraq he was never able to. -- Joe Wilson went to Niger in 2002 then told the CIA of his findings. And he really found nothing to back up the Niger-Iraq-Yellow-Cake theory. Valerie Plame was outed in late 2003, so the outing of Plame to me was a stab at Wilson who may have been an errand boy turned wislteblower on the Iraq thing. And now they want to investigate Wilson for criminal activity??

You won't get any arguments here about the UN. The UN Army is not even signatory to it's own mandate. So they can do whatever the hell they want it seems. There were some fat cats in the US that benifited from the botched Oil for Food Programme as well. But this is getting off topic. We are talking about the Senate and Joe Wilson. The end result is the Niger yellow cake documents were forged. Is the IAEA part of the UN at all??

Your dead horse tack is irrelevant....police officers are allowed to protect themselves from assault with deadly weapons. I can imagine the court proceedings now: "Well your honor....since I knew that the warrant was baseless and there were no drugs in my house, I felt perfectly justified in shooting at the police officers. GostHacked said it was OK too." Back in the real world, On April 26, 2007, Smith and Junnier pleaded guilty to manslaughter, violation of oath, criminal solicitation, and making false statements. Smith additionally pleaded guilty to perjury.[11] Furthermore, the federal probe into the police department revealed that Atlanta police routinely lied to obtain search warrants, including often falsifying affidavits. {Wiki} Cops are alive...Granny is dead. Nice twist, but you have failed. You just made a case for my points in this thread. Thank you. 'Yes your Honour. Our actions of lying and deceit resulted in the negligence and an innocent woman had died because of it. Even when the cops admitted their mistakes you still want a Jury to decide..... shamefull.

Bush Cheney There was a reason I called checkmate a few posts back. Cops do not have the right to make shit up for a warrant. If the cops really had done their homework and gather legit evidence to obtain a NON-FABRICATED no-knock-warrant then maybe a criminal would be dead and not an innocent old woman. I can beat this dead horse some more, but it looks like you are getting tired of it, just going by the use of a bigger font you are using.

Bush Cheney So I guess I would have lost either way? Again I must point out and you still have not addressed it. FABRICATED REASONS TO OBTAIN A WARRANT. The cops lied. So in the end, it is their screw up that caused an innocent woman to be murdered. Did they just take that mans word for it? Did they case the place and gather evidence to prove that the now-fabricated proof for the warrent? Seems like the cops really failed in their duties here.

Ahhh the-point-the-finger-game now commences. This kind of thing is deplorable in any country it happens in. I hope no one cries for you if you happen to wind up dead for some cops incompitence and negligence. Which, as a cop can have really deadly results. Are you done playing Devil's Advocate now?

Do those people carry guns around with them on the job? Do they forcefully enter a persons home to get the reading on the meter? Or do those guys just knock on the door and ask? Those examples are downright shameful to compare to this incident. A No-knock policy can catch theives but in this case an innocent woman is dead for falsely fabricated evidence to obtain a warrent. Again something you seem to miss. They probably would have shot her anyways (speculation won't win this argument it seems) if she ran. OMG SHE IT GETTING AWAY .. TAKE HER DOWN. Police or criminals, if you are forcefully knocking down my door for whatever reason, expect to get hurt. Since I have no idea why the forcefull enterance is needed, but I know that I am in danger and I will protect myself with whatever means I have at my disposal. No gun? I have a nice aluminum bat which works quite well. You also forget the right to protect yourself and your right to be secure in your own home against just this kind of crap. Hey if the guns had batons, there would have ,... ah never mind.

Police officers fabricated evidence to get the warrant. Any response to this at all?

Still doesn't matter...granny started the chain of deadly force events...granny paid the price. I'm surprised it was only 39 shots. One bullet is a "hail" if it hits YOU. What part of 'fabricated' don't you understand? Nah, you are not winning and not convincing anyone here in this thread on it. The cops started the deadly events buy entering the wrong apartment. That little bit seems to escape you, the cops fudged things up from the start. Wrong on a wrong on a wrong and the cops tried to cover up their mistakes... but still some old woman is to blame for it all. I am calling checkmate.

I'm not sure what case you are referring to. The Nov 2006 case involved a legal no-knock warrant by three Atlanta narcotics officers, issued after officers purchased drugs from the same house. She did manage to shoot three of the officers. Way to go Granny...just chose the wrong people to shoot. If you go by this article that was origionaly posted Your move now.