Moonbox

It listed exactly the sort of things it included, and it definitely didn't say that last part. Wrong again, muppet. That's absolutely not what that means, and just another retarded attempt to dissemble and deflect from how much of a clueless fool you've shown yourself on this topic. I'd love your autistic take on how the Canadian government was meant to deal with factory shutdowns in China and massive backlogs in the port of Los Angeles...these are 100% Canadian issues, after all....?

Not what it said. Again: a. Around 50% of the increase in inflation observed since the end of 2019 can be ascribed to global or foreign factors. These include US inflation, commodity prices and movements in the exchange rate. b. Supply challenges that largely reflect developments at the global level account for another 35% of the rise in inflation. Can't get any clearer than that, so what's frying your brain here? ?

a. Around 50% of the increase in inflation observed since the end of 2019 can be ascribed to global or foreign factors. These include US inflation, commodity prices and movements in the exchange rate. b. Supply challenges that largely reflect developments at the global level account for another 35% of the rise in inflation. Keep digging those heels in. Dumb dumb dumb...

If only you were capable of turning your gaze inward, and seeing what your no-life ranting here looks like. Alas, you've the emotional maturity of an 4 year old. ?

Why would I be mad? You're funny to watch in action, getting a boner and exalting in PP "OWNING" a clueless nobody from a local newspaper as if it's impressive. ?

I can do math too. 9+2 = 11. "Now you don't have to do it." ? Your problem is you're making the numbers up, which makes the "math" you're doing meaningless. No it didn't. ? It's said that 85% were external and global issues: a. Around 50% of the increase in inflation observed since the end of 2019 can be ascribed to global or foreign factors. These include US inflation, commodity prices and movements in the exchange rate. b. Supply challenges that largely reflect developments at the global level account for another 35% of the rise in inflation. https://www.scotiabank.com/ca/en/about/economics/economics-publications/post.other-publications.inflation-reports.causes-of-inflation--december-5--2022.html Funny you say that, immediately after proving how much of an open and shameless liar you are. Dig those heels in some more, clown.

What? Now Russia really really really REALLY means it? ?

The calculations aren't the issue, it's the numbers you pull out of your ass and wave around that make them meaningless. I recall the Scotiabank report dunking on your previous bullshitting about inflation, because you don't actually know anything about how it works. No, because as we already know, Trudeau wasn't responsible for most of the inflation...which was global...as per the Scotiabank report. ?

Okay. Keep regurgitating your Twitter feed headlines in the meantime. ?

They weren't predicting anything. They were saying what as happening at the time - the Russian army melting away and retreating. As for my prediction, it was obviously premature, and hopeful, but I wouldn't count on it being wrong yet.

Who is Don Urquhart? Have you ever heard of him? Has anyone? We know he's leftwing because...what? Because that's what all the viral headlines say about this "epic" takedown? ? I don't know and can't find anything about the guy other than he's only been in the country 2 years and he runs a local news and classified ads site. Regardless, let's just accept that he's a pinko lefty. In this case, PP's PR team and security let through an absolute nobody to tee PP up with moronic softball questions, while he was eating an apple on camera. Okay. ?

Your hand-waving math would only make sense if the dental plan was what caused the inflation, which it didn't. Every single person who'll receive these benefits is way better off for it, and this isn't even a debatable point.

I said that as the Russian army was tucking its tail between its legs and fleeing hundreds of kilometers of territory in Kherson and Kharkiv provinces, against an army less than 1/4 its size. Most of that post was about how pathetic and dysfunctional the Russia state apparatus (and their army) was, and continues to be. They conscripted hundreds of thousands of peasant-soldiers to hide behind trenches and minefields. The Russian army, great superpower that it supposedly is, has done nothing since then but lose territory to an army with no airforce and equipped with Europe and NATO's surplus equipment. ?

No, it's not eaten up by inflation, and you can't just wave your hands around again and pretend this is so. It's absolutely helpful for the poorer people who can't afford dental, and dental is something they should be provided with. If we don't want to be paying welfare for them, then we should help make sure they have teeth. Nobody is hiring you if your mouth is a hellscape.

You do realize this is almost certainly a staged interview, right? That being said, there's no question that PP is a better communicator than Trudeau, avoiding the shallow grandiloquence and bromidic nothing-speak of the latter.

More sulking and impotent frustration. Don't say retarded things if you don't want to be quoted saying retarded things. Thanks for coming out. ??

So when it does get formed, what purpose will this dud of a response have served? No territory? ?

No. I see that the Russian invasion has been a colossal failure, that it failed most of its objectives, and that it's continuing to lose territory it's claimed to annex. The latest election in Europe saw the nationalist party lose, so...?

Jagmeet was always unelectable. He has a huge hammer, but he knows he is just going to break things if he uses it. When Trudeau goes down, the centrist voters will either not vote, or they'll go to PP and his slick updated image. They're not going to go to the guy every bit as airheaded, out-of-touch and clueless as the outgoing PM, especially when he wears a turban. ?‍♂️

Nationalist doesn't even really understand what nationalism is. For him, Nationalism is clueless populism and just a bunch of REeeeee!

Considering Ukraine has (at worst) stalemated Russia with NATO's hand-me-downs and a tiny fraction of its overall hardware, I'd guess YES? Coalitions aren't stealing election. REeee ELECITON STOLEN is a good coping mechanism for you though, isn't it? When reality doesn't match your viewpoint, you just make up a different one, r-ri-right!? Nationalism? Maybe - just not the kind that you hope to see. ?

I get why the quote function upsets you, but it's not my fault you're too dumb to stop contradicting and making an ass out of yourself. I understand that you don't know anything beyond what you slurp from Tucker Carlson, or direct from the Kremlin. Here's the full quote again. Yep, you still look like a fool. Ranting about CNN doesn't somehow make it any less stupid. "I never cheered any of this" followed by "I hope the Russians utterly destroy Ukraine." ??

No, you said you hoped they did. ?

As opposed to you...howling about the stolen election conspiracy and Trump losing in 2020. ? Regardless, what does that have to do with the Polish nationalist government falling this week? The European Union is failing, you say...as it expands its membership and pro-EU governments keep getting elected. You make a fool out of yourself every time your fingers hit your keyboard.

Who cares? If winning the most votes is what matters, then Hilary Clinton would have been president in 2016. ?