Moonbox

Something you howled about for months, and yet now that he's doing the opposite, here you are howling about that anyways. Because it's illegal? Because we're supposedly not enemies? It takes a special kind of fool to complain about a government not sticking up for our sovereignty, and then turn around and complain about them sticking up for our sovereignty.

It means there's no evidence that he did, and with no evidence or admission that he did, he can't be held responsible for it. That's how the Law works. It's possible that anyone has done horrible things. I'm merely trying to point out that there is more context to this story than "Reeee! SS!" and that a Ukrainian having lived under Soviet oppression would be motivated to fight against them. The balance of facts that we have here suggests that's what he did in WW2, and that the wasn't kicking down doors and burning Jewish temples. Either way, it's embarrassing. I think it's being blown out of proportion, but I still think he should have never spoken in the House. It's yet another gaffe in a long list that makes Trudeau look like a fool. Foreign governments have yet another reason not to take him seriously, and it's good fuel for the Tucker Carlson asslickers to slurp from Kremlin propaganda machine.

It's a clear indication that Trudeau didn't just manufacture a crisis as a distraction, which is what you seem to be suggesting. ? There's nothing to defend Trudeau for. This is a stunning example of your myopic partisanship. The amount of time you spent complaining about Chinese interference and Trudeau's inaction (which I agreed with you on) is in stark contrast to your criticism about his taking action this time. I can only imagine the howling you'd have done if the news came out about this and Trudeau hadn't done or said anything. It makes you look like a clown.

Surely you can appreciate that land taken generations ago (hundreds of years ago in this case) aren't issues that people generally concern themselves about elsewhere in the world. This is a peculiarity of the English colonies mostly. I wonder why? Good luck to the natives in Northern Ontario getting $100B (or anything even remotely approaching that) from the government. Section 1 of the Charter has us covered.

No, goof. I'm accusing you of saying that the news media wasn't paying any attention to this, when they've been reporting on it extensively. Aristides summed up your delusions nicely in his quote above. As for my investments, I am an investment professional. That's why your buffoon-takes on global economics are so cringe to me. You know almost literally nothing about these issues and it's painfully clear you're just reposting headlines you scrape off all of your Doom subs. ?

I understand that you have trouble articulating your opinions and your reasoning beyond slogans and sweeping generalizations about the bad guys the Left or wokism. ? It was the US Ambassador to Canada speaking openly - not a leak. Armed with that knowledge, you're favoring a narrative that Justin Trudeau may have made this up to distract people. Riiight. ? If you didn't waste so much of your day prattling about immigrants, superior cultures and their moral pre-eminence etc, maybe you'd get the benefit of the doubt. Knowing your past pet topics, and knowing how you've moaned at length about Chinese interference in Canada and how little Trudeau did about it, it's cringe to see you prevaricating on this particular case.

The foreign divisions in the Waffen SS numbered close to half a million. This is how the Germans integrated foreign volunteers, who mostly just wanted to oppose Bolshevism. In the case of the Ukrainians, they'd been mistreated and terrorized by the Russians for generations, and were fighting against that. The division in question was never charged at Nuremberg, and a Canadian commission concluded in 1986 that the whole group couldn't be criminally indicted - membership in it didn't justify prosecution or even implicate criminality. The way the news has covered this story is as if the guy was an SS police officer rounding up Jews or something, and that everyone was cheering for a war criminal.

Yes yes, bulging-eyed indignation - another boilerplate response.? Nobody cares who you decide is or isn't Canadian. Get over it, or whine more about it. US officials have already confirmed it was Five-Eyes intelligence which helped link India to the killing. The key point is that foreign governments shouldn't be sending agents to murder people in our country. Whether or not the guy was of appropriately white European descent Canadian enough for you is irrelevant.

Finding the news stories you said that media wasn’t reporting means that you have proven once again how much of a twitter zombie you are - repeating whatever shows up on your feed without actually critically thinking or checking it. Dumb dumb dumb.

Who cares? What gets you so butthurt about counter-protests? What's so exceptional about them?

No, this is just another example of you pissing your pants and squawking about LYING to anyone who disagrees with you. There's nobody on this forum whose perception of their own intelligence and knowledge is as wildly detached from reality as yours. ?

Uh huh, uh huh. January 6th was a deep-state conspiracy and the MAGA cult is totally reasonable and never gets out of hand. ?

Yeah man...totally. The right never complains about protests. ? I've never seen anyone whinging about tree huggers, Green Peace, BLM etc. "...but but the Right doesn't disturb the peace when they protest (or I justify it when they do, because I agree with them) and it's always the LEFT that causes problems." Real great take there Groot. ?

Protests are confrontational by their nature. As for masks, the leader of the anti-tranny protests has threatened that they're going to take names and retaliate against counter-protestors. Duh. As for irony, just review your thread title. You cannot have dialogue with (people who disagree with me) is nothing more than reassuring yourself of your own biases, especially when it's painted in such broad strokes.

Who you do or don't recognize as Canadian counts for less than nothing. Whether he was a good Canadian, a bad Canadian, or not even a Canadian at all, foreign agents murdering people in Canada should be the problem we're talking about. If you're unhappy about Chinese interference in Canadian politics, I don't understand how you can turn around here and prevaricate on India murdering people in broad daylight on Canadian soil. It's weird.

Do you not see any irony in your thread title, and OP?

Hovering over your name and then greenshotting and editing it is rambling? I could do it 40 more times and it would still only be a fraction of the time you waste here on any given day. You're an examplar of the angry internet NEET.

...and on-queue, you provide another spastic, rambling response to my one-liner. ?

Why would I be offended? I'm just pointing out what an angry deadbeat you are. Even when someone's posting respectfully, your default-state response is being a belligerent jackass. Speaking of pathetic: What personal trauma led to this? ?

Saudi Arabia never had the best interests of the US in mind. This is a fundamentalist theocracy - based on Islamic Law. Security for keeping the oil flowing was never more than a mutually beneficial arrangement. The media does pay attention to Saudi Arabian developments and its worsening relationship with the US. It reports on it regularly and 5 second google search would offer you dozens of articles on it from every major US newspaper. You would know that if you didn't get all of your news off of Twitter and you actually knew anything about the world beyond that. ?

That wasn't sealioning. Your arguments here on this topic are nonsense. It's the left's fault that this guy killed Muslims while ranting batshit right wing conspiracy theories, because Hilary said "deplorables" ?? ? Mandy didn't say anything rude to you here, but you offered this belligerent response nonetheless. How fitting.

Always funny watching you spit out boiler-plate conspiracy slogans. ?

Awkward....

We've heard this before from you. Last time you were telling us to wait for the end of January 2023. ? You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about - just another mindless twitter zombie, trawling for doom-porn.

Investors would have made more money buying the S&P 500 than following Michael Burry's stock-market warnings, said Charlie Bilello, chief market strategist at Creative Planning. The index had an "average 6-month annualized gain of 34%" in the periods following a selection of 2019-2023 Burry tweets, he said. "Don't make changes in your portfolio based on a tweet," he said in a post on X. https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-big-short-michael-burry-tweets-sp-500-investors-2023-9 Michael Burry Michael Burry Michael Burry. Sorry Sharkman. Don't base your worldview on tweets. ?