Moonbox

Awkward....

We've heard this before from you. Last time you were telling us to wait for the end of January 2023. ? You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about - just another mindless twitter zombie, trawling for doom-porn.

Investors would have made more money buying the S&P 500 than following Michael Burry's stock-market warnings, said Charlie Bilello, chief market strategist at Creative Planning. The index had an "average 6-month annualized gain of 34%" in the periods following a selection of 2019-2023 Burry tweets, he said. "Don't make changes in your portfolio based on a tweet," he said in a post on X. https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-big-short-michael-burry-tweets-sp-500-investors-2023-9 Michael Burry Michael Burry Michael Burry. Sorry Sharkman. Don't base your worldview on tweets. ?

Nobody can string together right-wing buzzwords like you. Marxis-Nihilist-Groomers! LOL! ?

A dubious conclusion based on nothing but your random musings. The wide disparity in wealth by state within the US should throw your conclusion out the door, but you're working backwards here. You formed your conclusion to start, and now you're just looking for whatever you can find to fit it.

I can equally argue that countries with small populations are often poor. The correlation you draw is a rather useless observation, beyond the obvious reality that overpopulation beyond what resources can support is bad.

Saudi Arabia is OPEC's most important member. Russia has been cooperating with them for decades on rigging oil prices. Nope, lol. Go review how much the BRICS (barring Russia) trade with the US, vs amongst each other. Once again you're hilariously uninformed - a twitter zombie parroting whatever's showing up on your feed lately. Michael Burry Michael Burry. Dumb.

WEF is real. It's just not what you've deluded yourself into thinking it is. The Saudi and Russian oil move? What about this do you figure is novel, or new? They've been increasing and decreasing oil production to manipulate prices for longer than I've been alive. OPEC is an oil cartel, and keeping prices artificially high is what they do. ?

Fifteen minute cities, electronic tracking microchips, mind-control vampires from Zeta-Reticuli AND quantum computers something something WEF. ?

Who said it was irrelevant? ?

Your argument is wrong, and you can go look at places like Mongolia or, say, Nauru to show you how wrong it is.

Because the referendum was run by the Russians, and a Russian-run vote is about as worthwhile as it is in North Korea. The result is the same every time, no matter what. Putin/Great Leader wins every time. How dumb are you to believe this is worth anything?

Yes they did, smooth-brain. Russian troops were on the ground, supported by Russian tanks, Russian missile launchers, Russian helicopters etc. That's why the referendums were discredited around the world. Nobody acknowledged them as legit, because the conditions for a legitimate referendum were impossible. It's hard to understate how absent your critical thinking skills are. There are few people on this forum less capable of original thought than you. You don't do anything but repeat what the clowns you follow on youtube say, and as long as it's something you LIKE, then that's your reality, no matter how ****ing nonsensical it is.

Nobody cares if you disagree "strongly". You're not making an articulate argument.

Zelensky, brainlet. You've been calling Zelensky a Nazi the whole time, which is awkward because he's a Jew. They held a referendum under Russian occupation. Russia doesn't hold free elections for their own people, so in what bizarre clownworld do you suppose they're holding free elections in occupied Ukrainian territory? The 2020 US election was stolen, according to Nationalist, but referendums in territories under armed occupation by repressive dictatorships are TOTALLY LEGIT. This is the sort of assbrain logic you deliver daily here.

It's not the the things you "know" that are the problem, it's the things you think you know, but just ain't so. The irony of Tucker Carlson rambling about the MSM/Biden "cult" recently, and then you coming here to parrot the same nonsense is lost on you, as it always is. How very cultish of you to drone on repeating exactly what you're told to believe. ?

Those aren't all voters, and therein lies what's been a long and storied problem for the NDP and the Liberals as compared to the Conservatives. Providing an often ill-informed opinion is a lot easier than actually informing yourself and actually getting away from your screen and voting.

If that were true, we'd have seen you do it. Instead, you natter ceaselessly about how everyone else is to blame for his overt aggression. There are two sides to every story, but the one you're promoting is the same one that North Korea, Syria, Iran and China. These stalwarts of truth and liberty are the ones you're lined up with. Well done. ?

If you literally did it, I can say you literally did it. That's what's up with that. ? You quote the sources that tell you what you want to hear, and nothing else. Tucker Carlson isn't the news. His former company had to have lawyers try to argue that no reasonable person would consider his show "news", but there you were anyways, quoting it as such. Redacted isn't the news either. That's just a couple of bullshit vbloggers that affirm your mind-warped world view. You've spent 99.999% of your energy criticizing anyone BUT Russia and Vladimir Putin. A milksop token "it's all of their faults" doesn't wipe away a year of the parroting you've done for Vladimir Putin. You sure did. IIRC it was the news wing funded by the Islamic Iranian Republican guard. It was telling you what you wanted to hear, and that's all the critical thinking that went into it before you posted it. ?

I'm not saying anything about PP other than that it would take monumental stupidity and foolishness to lose the next election. You grossly overestimate how well-informed and motivated the average voter is, and particularly the younger generations who have/will come to tire and grow dis-illusioned with him. I suspect they'll just not bother going to the polls at all. Jaghmeet Singh is unelectable. The one thing you can always count on for conservatives, is that they generally show up at the polls.

It's not BS, because you've literally been quoting Iran and Syrian news outlets on this sub-forum. You're just too foolish and misinformed to acknowledge the inherent contradictions of your viewpoints. Russia invaded Ukraine, but anyone but Russia's fault. The Islamic Republic of Iran is bad, but you'll reference their propaganda if you like what it's saying. We're all cultists, but you're the one constantly referencing the same sources over and over (like Redacted and Tucker Carlson) and repeating everything they say. We should never underestimate the power of low-IQ to confuse itself. You're like psychology exhibit.

Anyone can post links about anything, doofus. The quality of your links is what matters, and yours are coming straight out of Russia, Iran and snake oil salesmen like Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones. You're too dimwitted to know the difference between info and reality. The funniest thing about you is that you still don't realize that the slurp you're guzzling from Tucker Carlson is aligned with fundamentalist dictatorships like Iran. It's hilariously dumb.

I think it's only going to get worse for the Liberals in the next two years. Justin is so absolutely tone-deaf and clueless on most of the issues that the Conservatives could put @Army Guy's hamster as the leader and they'd probably in. Pierre Poilievre just has to be a normal HUMAN and not say anything scary, and it'll be another Ignatieff-style loss for the Liberals.

I've never referenced or posted anything from CNN or MSNBC. I don't watch/read either. You, on the other hand, repost stuff from Russia Today, Iran and Syria, and regularly spit out whatever Tucker Carlson's most recently dumped into your mouth. Your 70-IQ takes on HiSToRy are good for laughs, but not much else. ???

It's not fake news if it says things that he LIKES. It's only fake news if it says stuff that is true he DOESN'T LIKE. ? Dumb dumb dumb.