Moonbox

It's wasn't random. You were (yet again) demonstrating your unique talent for belligerent stupidity: Which is retarded, and when it was pointed out, you responded with: When you just demonstrated you didn't. Way to go! ??

Then why did you say this? Fixed this for you:

90% of my time here is less than 1% of yours. Do you know how stupid you look saying this when you've blown past my 15 year post tally in 8 months? Of course you don't. ???

No, muppet, it says: b. Supply challenges that largely reflect developments at the global level account for another 35% of the rise in inflation. You are a LIAR! ?

Why are you following me?

No, it says right there that 85% of inflation has to do with foreign factors and the supply chain, so your clueless bullshitting faceplants right out the gate. Trudeau can't have been responsible for ~50% of the inflation as you repeatedly claimed if 85% of it were from things he has basically no control over. Dumb dumb dumb.

I don't think you're right. I don't like what I've seen from PP yet, but I suspect he was mostly making the noises the dumb apes wanted to hear so he could get the base behind him before going more mainstream like Harper. I would be zero percent surprised if we end up with Harper 2.0 when he wins the election, and without a major gaffe there's basically no chance the Liberals win again IMO.

No they weren't, because: a. Around 50% of the increase in inflation observed since the end of 2019 can be ascribed to global or foreign factors. These include US inflation, commodity prices and movements in the exchange rate. b. Supply challenges that largely reflect developments at the global level account for another 35% of the rise in inflation. Trudeau can't control US inflation, commodity prices or movements in the exchange rate. Since we're not a communist command economy, he also can't do much about supply chains. This is all the proof we need that you're a clueless buffoon, ranting about shit for which you have no understanding or knowledge. ?

No muppet, what I know is that you're clueless on this topic, that you pull numbers out of your ass and that a quick citation from actual economists proves how full of shit you are. Everything else in this thread is just more of your performative jackassery. ?

No, 50 percent is due to foreign factors like: US inflation, commodity prices and movements in the exchange rate. Another 35% is due to: Supply challenges that largely reflect developments at the global level account for another 35% of the rise in inflation. You're not going to convince me you're not a clueless buffoon by insisting that you're winning, over and over. Remember: ? Sure, we'd not doubt have less inflation if Justin had spent less. The problem you have is that you've squawked, complained and claimed half or more of it is his fault, which is retarded.

Once again: a. Around 50% of the increase in inflation observed since the end of 2019 can be ascribed to global or foreign factors. These include US inflation, commodity prices and movements in the exchange rate. b. Supply challenges that largely reflect developments at the global level account for another 35% of the rise in inflation. Your muppet logic here, obviously, is that because they said that global/foreign factors like inflation, commodity prices and exchange rates account for 50% of the inflation in 2022, then the other 35% they attribute to supply chain issues are strictly 100% internal and cannot be global (even though our supply chains are very much global) ?. Even better though, we then have to accept that the supply chain is something that we (or rather the government) can control, which unless we're a communist centralized economy is definitely not the case. Dumb dumb dumb.

Why are you following muppet? I knoW I liVE renT-fRee in you brain...?

Hello thou of no brain.

It was in Scotiabanks quote: a. Around 50% of the increase in inflation observed since the end of 2019 can be ascribed to global or foreign factors. These include US inflation, commodity prices and movements in the exchange rate. US inflation pushed Canadian inflation up with it, because we buy a lot of shit from the US, because the economy is...global, you know? See how dumb you look when you think you've made a good point, but really fallen on your face and knocked out your own teeth? ?

Uh huh, yep. For sure. Someone posting a sword picture means they need to be tracked down and deported immediately. ?

No muppet: 50% to global factors like inflation, commodity prices and exchange rates. 35% to global supply chain problems, because our supply chains are...*gasp* global. The english, as you say, is fairly clear, but your obstinate stupidity and belligerence forces you to dig your heels in and argue even when caught cornered and clueless...like how the Roman Empire apparently didn't have standing armies. I'll always remember that gem too. ??

Trudeau has been a disaster coming out of the lockdowns, but however smart Freeland may or may not be, she's a too-iconic part of the current government to be perceived as anything more than maintaining the status-quo. Running with her at the helm would be akin to Hilary Clinton in 2016. Canadians want something different.

No, I mean the supply challenges that account for 35% of last year's inflation. You know...this part...again... b. Supply challenges that largely reflect developments at the global level account for another 35% of the rise in inflation Note that it doesn't say "Canadian Controlled". Watching you squirm around this point is so pathetic. Dumb dumb dumb.

It listed exactly the sort of things it included, and it definitely didn't say that last part. Wrong again, muppet. That's absolutely not what that means, and just another retarded attempt to dissemble and deflect from how much of a clueless fool you've shown yourself on this topic. I'd love your autistic take on how the Canadian government was meant to deal with factory shutdowns in China and massive backlogs in the port of Los Angeles...these are 100% Canadian issues, after all....?

Not what it said. Again: a. Around 50% of the increase in inflation observed since the end of 2019 can be ascribed to global or foreign factors. These include US inflation, commodity prices and movements in the exchange rate. b. Supply challenges that largely reflect developments at the global level account for another 35% of the rise in inflation. Can't get any clearer than that, so what's frying your brain here? ?

a. Around 50% of the increase in inflation observed since the end of 2019 can be ascribed to global or foreign factors. These include US inflation, commodity prices and movements in the exchange rate. b. Supply challenges that largely reflect developments at the global level account for another 35% of the rise in inflation. Keep digging those heels in. Dumb dumb dumb...

If only you were capable of turning your gaze inward, and seeing what your no-life ranting here looks like. Alas, you've the emotional maturity of an 4 year old. ?

Why would I be mad? You're funny to watch in action, getting a boner and exalting in PP "OWNING" a clueless nobody from a local newspaper as if it's impressive. ?

I can do math too. 9+2 = 11. "Now you don't have to do it." ? Your problem is you're making the numbers up, which makes the "math" you're doing meaningless. No it didn't. ? It's said that 85% were external and global issues: a. Around 50% of the increase in inflation observed since the end of 2019 can be ascribed to global or foreign factors. These include US inflation, commodity prices and movements in the exchange rate. b. Supply challenges that largely reflect developments at the global level account for another 35% of the rise in inflation. https://www.scotiabank.com/ca/en/about/economics/economics-publications/post.other-publications.inflation-reports.causes-of-inflation--december-5--2022.html Funny you say that, immediately after proving how much of an open and shameless liar you are. Dig those heels in some more, clown.

What? Now Russia really really really REALLY means it? ?