Bob Macadoo

Kind of like some other verbose commenter on here.

I get confused by your statement. Why shouldn't a Timmins cop make a comparable wage to TO? Is it because he doesn't patrol Jane/Finch? Neither do 90% of TO cops. I would suggest patrolling Timmins is more dangerous than the majority of TO. More work too. Less back-up, no specialization units, no admin staff, etc. I would suggest that although housing is cheaper, everything else is more expensive.Just so you know its not TO pay that drives cop prices.....its the affluent suburbs who give in. Just as police unions organize....municipalities have the same ability.

Heinz goes even farther down the rabbit hole

Many can. That's what happens when you are spending other people's money (market credit) you just hoodwink another set of investors. First rule of business.....pay yourself first.....screw everyone else second. I think they call that the vulture rule. Many do go through many bankruptcies......there's always another sucker around the corner......and he says he's not a politician. The only thing different was you used to not be an open philanderer in politics, in business it was viewed with pride, then Bill changed all that.

My Weston stores only have French's flavoured (hot, garlic, etc.) and not regular........goddamn Galen is pulling shenanigans again.

It's a damned if you do/don't scenario. You can't stack the deck, legislation-wise, else unions would sue you....and win. You can't dispense with arbitration, else deal with the fall-out of lock-out/strike. The list of arbitrators, with their proclivities, is open for all to see. There are arbitrators who weight local agreements higher than provincial ones......there is nothing that says you need to evenly distribute arbitrator jobs......stop paying the "weak" ones, in your opinion, and they will realign.

You aren't finding clerks on the List. Clerks don't often work OT, nor are they entitled to manager performance bonuses. How many RCMP officers would be on the list? As for your PMs I'll bet the 80k is their base, what is the top up they can earn? Which is what I said, but more appropriately placed it at the feetof the political masters (red, blue or orange) but it has nothing to due with payrates in contracts and everything to do with inability to deal with vacation scheduling, sick leave, project scheduling, etc., hence the OT requirement.

So if only military recruiting stations were targeted then we could lower our vigilance?

So it's dispensible because you don't have to worry about your life? Guess Pride parade shouldn't print up your name tag.

Really? Do you have a cite for this? I question it. Any employee who works minimum +20% per annum overtime at 1.5x to 2x will be grossing >100k. Guess what; first responders are forced to work this way due to the coverage required and the human capital mismanagement by your "mid-level" managers because they are not given autonomy for critical decisions by their senior managers as they are behooved to political decisions. All 'round the mulberry bush....the monkey chased the......

No but you can't get even get a ticket to decorum if you don't. We understand you drink from the C.-A. Kool-aid on this one......patronizing nicknames aren't a big deal.

Is it that right type of terrorism if he went to that recruiting office because he was declined for enlistment and he was retaliating?

There is no political advantage to do that. If it occurs one will say 'Nothing to do with them, that's all Alta.' If it doesn't occur one will say 'Commitment NOT met.' I doubt that. You don't create a mocking handle of the PM wanting him to achieve political success.

Oh contraire sir....not so much name but mix. The "no name" brands are higher in acidity I find and the consistancy requires you to add another thickener (paste) to account for it. Better to spend a little more. I know we're not talking foie gras here but ingredients matter.

....in of itself no but it is a valuable ingredient for sauces in cooking, especially barbecue. Quicker than boiling down the vinegar yourself.

You say to-may-to I say to-mah-to......let's call the whole thing off.

On another note.....these free marketers believe it will solve all. Why not let her serve in her nun's habit next to those who choose cleavage believing they are serving an "experience" rather than food. By market indications the nun will move onto greener pastures within the week with the crumbs she'll make next to her high rolling colleagues with their fat wads.

That's an easy position to have since you know it would never exist. Those individuals have easy redress to that situation as its acceptable to patriachal society for a person serving t-bones to show her rack but T-4s would be taboo.

That is the post of the day.

Actually WCR advocates for sexualization......only in their own choice of projection and not induced by any external influence. I actually listen to sides of arguments.

Exactly but BG presented it with his sarcastic opening to cock block the usual suspects.....and it seems to have worked.

Then I'm ready to have my taxes done by a lass with tassels on......I need to escape from dealing with the CRA.......as I'm sure most Cdns are.

Don't spoil what? He started this thread to short circuit the usual crowd......and it seems to have worked.......barely a peep from the boiler plate statements. I'm surprised there isn't an outcry that BG is using another form of censorship (sarcasm) to promote hate.

How many though compared to Myanmar? That's the real measure......maybe Trudeau & Harper should just flop it out so we'll just know once and for all.

Wow....facetweeting millenials do more than "like" something and emphasized domestic purchasing power of a product they probably use the most....achieved change......and you poo poo......no wonder they don't care about sweet f'all.