Bob Macadoo

.....that there are children and a husband who don't deserve any of this.......

I thought the point of this thread was to rabidly defend horrific acts by comparing them to actors you have no sympathy for. I suppose though if you aren't getting a response that might mean there is no defense for it and sycophantically agreeing with you is a waste of typing. Now if only you took the same approach.

.....that wasn't the lesson to take from this all.

.....to prove what I'm not sure. That there is someone in the changeroom that likes nudity & sex (me...I could take it or leave it) and prefers sex with women. Better tell your daughter about lesbians before it's too late. I assume as well you have an equally paranoid fear of all those naked gay men in the changeroom with your son.

Don't tell me you put any money on the Mavs covering the spread. They need to rebuild.....around what.....who knows.

....and Steph Curry is the greatest ever. Did you just start watching sports 2 years ago?Halladay & Alomar off the top of my head. I'd have to look to see if Bell, Fernandez, Delgado, and Joey rate higher.

Don't be a hypocrite and you won't be exposed.

Yeah they have. New year, same problem though. Lowry/DD/Ross go in the witness protection program. They wouldn't know a textbook pick n' roll if they fell over it. The dump passes to JV are embarassing.

GSW scores their 3's by inside out and skip passing. Perimeter checking and high post bumping would have eliminated these light touch movements. To balance that however the amount of off hand shielding done by Jordan/Pippen would sit them on the bench today.

How is your daughter now "compromised"? In what way? Was she assured perpetual virginity until this horrific situation? Is she on some road to depravity that is beyond your influence? For that matter if this sod is such a concern for you why is it OK for them to be naked in front of your son? Are you not worried he will be sodomized? Or is it you think so little of your delicate flower in comparison?

So they wouldn't claim expenses when they were entitled........but claiming an expense when you are dead is OK? Doug better be careful I believe Rob may begin one of those Amityville type hauntings........his soul can't be freed as he benefited from taxpayer money......*shudder*

So did Chris Alexander until he got elected and had to promote the party vitriol on TV.....a la Paul Calandra. How Lisa Raitt and Leitch are going to pass off the "the PMO made me say that...." line of pretzel logic to ascend as the "moderate style" party leader is beyond me. So far Chong, Leitch, Raitt, Bernier are all also rans.......maybe they can draft Wisconsin's Paul Ryan.

UWO & UWindsor could reject the offer.....universities reject scholarship donations all the time based on stipulations put on the money. The court shouldn't have quashed it, let the universities denounce the money publically if they wish......

No but I'm willing to give Preston Manning one.....he contributed a little more than dinosaurs can only be 3000 years old......to coincide withAdam/Eve.

.....and officers refuse to police those neighbourhoods.....even when direct radicalization has been identified to them. Those are standards I would think.

I'm pretty shallow.....the glass wall in my Superstore has a great choice and I haven't been to the Beer Store since. I'm happy with this decision......I need to get my Scotch here now.....when's that legislation?

Brussels would suggest the answer is yes.

Why don't we just lay them off after 10 years......newbies out of police college are qualified and hungry.

I'll tell you straight up and risk suspension.......if you can't feel the passive mocking as opposed to interpreting it as defending the argument I pity you. The debate stopped multiple posts ago. That's all this site is......from our resident state controlled media expert.....to our favourite anti-melanin tax clerk......there are 3 posts of debate before someone is just feigning debate and begins mocking the opposition.

Well he did say he could shoot his supporters.....I think envy and wrath are high on his list too although those aren't on tablets.

....and? Who else should be richer up there other than miners,etc. with their danger pay? I've already said town councillors shouldn't. Only TO cops don't live in the city; they move to where other middle income earners go. They like a larger house. Some living 1hr+ outside of TO and accept the commute. Canada doesn't have a large ghettoization/gang related crime problem like those cities down south hence why there isn't that risk. I would argue there have been more constables killed/severely injured on duty outside of cities rather than in. That would be due to the risks I've already described.

I'm not insulted.....probably condescending is more apropos.

Well you are convinced that Trump's multiple bankruptcies should have no bearing on his suitability to be President as that would be like being prejudicial of those who are seasonal pogey grifters......you then would have no hesitation voting for a seasonal logger for Prime Minister. It has no bearing on his ability to inspire/lead right?

You mean you'd vote for a logger from Miramichi as PM if he collected pogey every season? That's mighty turn the other cheek of you.

My friend who works an isolated community says it was harder than when he worked in a city detachment. Meth addiction is rampant, mental instability and familial feuds are handled without back-up. He's expected to be a community leader and enforcer. He's RCMP and can't wait to get his transfer in.In my opinion police in either community face similar difficult duties but I would argue councillors in Timmins have far less responsibility, fiduciary and socially than a city councillor......their benefit reflects this.