sharkman

Hezbollah. Hamas. What is it with Iran? And they’ve been jonesing for nukes like nothing else, and that is definitely a problem. Not just because of Iran’s hate for Israel, but also because of the two aforementioned H’s. The most recent example is the billions Biden gave Iran, and then Hamas attacked, and as terrorists would. Once Iran has nukes in its stockpile, they will end up in Hamas’s hands, just like all of the other weaponry that does. Because of those in the inner circle of Iran’s leadership that will see to it that a stray nuke will go missing somehow, or a facility be found unsecured. Then should a nuke explode in Israel, Iran could claim innocence, or some other nonsense. Those bent on mass murder can be so creative, can’t they? This must never happen. And so it won’t. Israel is going to bomb Iran, taking out its nuclear capacity, just as they’ve done in times past. It’s inevitable, it’s a done deal. Count on it.

He doesn’t need to do any of that. He only has to do better than the disaster that has been Trudeau and he’ll get re-elected with a majority. Pay attention now. This is what happens when one party selects an empty suit with a brand name(Trudeau) to lead them and the suit thus wins elections until something serious happens.

I’’m not claiming any of that. You said there weren’t any government mandates to use bugs in food products. I said government mandates weren’t needed to start putting insects into food products and showed proof from 12 years ago. Once again you can’t see simple concepts that run counter to your programming.

Oh cdnfx, clean up in aisle 8!

They don't need to be mandated. The woke are so conditioned to be ahead of the 'curve'. Take Starbucks. They are using insect ingredients in at least one of their products. And if it's being reported that they are using it in one, you can be sure they are looking to advance that agenda. https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2012/03/30/149700341/food-coloring-made-from-insects-irks-some-starbucks-patrons Call it the tempest in the Frappuccino. Some Starbucks patrons have been distressed to learn that the chain's Strawberry and Creme Frappuccino owes its pink coloring to crushed insects.

The interview reminds me of a move that Trump has been using occasionally with the MSM. When he wants to get a piece of news or development reported by them, he inserts a...well actually I shouldn't describe it totally. Let's just say the media jumps on it, reporting on the item that he inserted. But, the detail that he wanted to be reported on gets included in the coverage just the same. This interview, which as you say is being attacked or 'discredited', is still getting out there nonetheless. All media attention draws views. The brainwashed aren't going to change their minds about anything ever, so what they think doesn't really matter. But it draws people who can still think critically about a given issue.

Wow, that’s an amazing amount of views. This one interview will do more for truth regarding Ukraine than the last 2 years of Western news coverage. Asleep Americans will start to wonder what’s going on over there, and why hasn’t their president so much as talked with Putin since before the war. Instead he keeps sending billions to Ukraine while the American border situation has become an emergency. Illegals are attacking and murdering citizens, California cities have become homeless camps, and no solutions for that are in sight. Plus, Biden’s failing memory is now impossible to hide. The man is a mess. The Dem party is in a panic to replace him. But they keep voting for those billions to Ukraine too. Come election time, Trump will have a field day with that Ukrainian aid. It’s now around 250 billion, depending on how much of the latest package ends up there. Every last penny of it added to the US debt which is currently 34.2 trillion. And now a trillion every year just to pay the interest.

Alex, I’ll take Poland signed a pact with germany a full 5 yrs before Russia’s 1939 pact, for 200.

Nonsense, just as I proved you were wrong earlier in the thread. You’ve got nothing so out come the childish insults…

One day you may discover that it’s okay to agree to disagree with your allies instead of attacking with tinfoil hat nonsense. Make me proud!

Yep, he has a track record that’s been analyzed. He also has some big skeletons in his closet. The leadership contest was a farce, believe whatever makes you happy. By the fall this will all be out and known anyway. Whatever your Schiit is, you obviously don’t know enough about the WEF.

And you are making the rookie mistake of judging a politician based on what they say instead of what they do. Learn from what the pros do…

Yes the liberals are a disaster. I’m not arguing to support the liberals post JT. I’m saying that the Tory party under Poilievre will still take the country down the same road, just driving the car on the right side of the road instead of the left. We need another alternative, regardless of how cdnfx feels about Poilievre.

He’s been to the WEF, just like JT and others in our government. Every person who goes there makes agreements that change their allegiances. Remember the conservative leadership contest? 3 people were all barred from the contest for fake reasons. They had met all of the requirements. Their platforms were all similar to Poilievre’s and would have taken votes away from him. The contest was fixed. I’m not saying the organizers of that election were WEF, but it’s easy to do favours, bribe here and there when our Media is so asleep. They don’t look into anything or conduct serious investigations these days. They just read what they are handed by their bosses.

I’m telling you guys, Poilievre is not what he’s presenting himself as, just like JT. He’ll turn to the left on issue after issue once elected.

“…with a f**kin pencil.”

I don’t know what the deal is about Taylor Swift, but all the hating on her seems nonsensical. Glad to see her with a win so the hate has no place to express itself. Other than that, I stopped watching professional sport a few years ago out of new found respect for reality.

That wasn’t speculation. I provided a link and everything.

So is your typical Dem aware that Trump’s legal situation keeps improving? https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/story?id=107151886 The judge overseeing former President Donald Trump's Georgia election interference case says that it's possible misconduct allegations leveled against Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis "could result in disqualification," and that a hearing on the matter will proceed as scheduled on Thursday. Things are also changing in New York and DC…

The system is obviously broken.

The timeline on this seems to bear out Putin’s version. Stalin signed the pact with Hitler in 1939. Poland signed their pact in 1934. There was a normalization of relations between Poland and Germany after that, and different forms of cooperation. How much of the Putin interview did you take in? Hopefully you are not simply getting this from your Twitter feed.

Okay, riddle me this. In 1934 Hitler signed a treaty with Poland called the, “German Polish Declaration of Non Aggression Pact”. Didn’t Germany sign the agreement with Stalin later? So Putin would technically not be wrong about that, or, what am I missing? Yes it’s clear that Hitler was not dealing honestly with Poland, too bad that Chamberlain was so easily duped.

Edit: On second thought, this thread is so full of lies, nonsense and antisemitic fantasies, I want no part of it.

I've watched the first hour. I'm not sure what Tucker was going for with his performance, but it was not his finest hour. It's hard to say what went on behind the scenes. Perhaps he was given limiting parameters in which to conduct the interview. I've noticed that the really good liars, or instead maybe the highly intelligent folks, the ones with a formidable intellect lets say. They can lie seamlessly. They can make you believe just about anything if you are not careful. I'm sure we can all pick our favorite politician to hate and agree that some people have turned deceiving the public into a fine art. Putin may well be such a one. From what I've seen of the interview thus far, I simply can't spot it when Putin is lying. It kind of reminds me of Obama. Such a smooth talker, making you feel good about yourself as he pulls the wool over your eyes. I am not armed with a knowledge of Russian history, but I doubt that Putin would be so stupid to tell whoppers that can so easily be proved wrong, so his discourse on his country’s history is probably at least close, eh?

No, the fantasy is that Joe and his dementia riddled mind will actually run. Drooling on his tie, grabbing young women and tripping all over the place. Also saying crazy schiit like president Obama is going to win this election. That would be the perfect red pill…