CdnFox

Then why did I have to explain it to you? The ones I already presented and in fact also the ones I borrowed from you and you're still crybabying about because you look like a twat? There right where i left them the first time kiddo

No I'm not come up there exactly where I left them before Yours too. Which I also used to prove my point It is truly pathetic and desperate to be a sea lion. I've proven my point a dozen times over with facts, numbers and even graphs, and even pulled from data YOU provided to prove it LOL what a sad and bitter little man you are Life in canada, even in vancouver, was affordable under harper. Even by 2015 it was expensive but affordable. Now, it isn't. The average couple eanring average wages wouldn't be able to buy a home suitable for raising a family and it's much harder to afford food. THat's life under the libs. Cry harder, that won't change.

So your claim is that the federal government does not set or influence Environmental Policy, land or natural resource use? Kid. I'm well aware you're not particularly well versed politics and there's no particular shame in that. But even you must be aware of this stage in your life at the federal government does in factplay a primary role in all of those things.

You're referring to Exflyer? I mean.... you're not wrong but odd time to bring it up.

No not really. The reasoning for moving to clean energy is the fact that they can't get enough energy in the old school way it's not altruistic. Supplementing their existing systems with solar is also an inexpensive way to stretch out what they've got. You do the same thing, but for them it's even more important because they simply don't have access to the power they need But at the end of the day they're still the biggest polluters. For ages they've been increasing their pollution output by the same amount of Canada's entire output once every 15 18 months. If a guy cheated on his wife with 10 women this month and only eight women next month and tried to be proud of the fact that he's leading the world in Transitioning to non-adultry, either the world or his wife is going to buy that

Short but that's not hard if you're actually trying. The problem is people like you who are more interested in protecting their little faith times and taxing everyone the poorest of Canadians. The primary regulators for those things are the federal government. They were not responsible for those trade barriers And regardless it's what has to be done. Of course you would ,that's why you keep voting the people who pass the most red tape and regulation into office. I mean, you trusted the carbon tax to solve global warming 😆😆😆😆 But the whole point is to remove them from the process by reducing regulation and their involvement. If they do less their chances of screwing things up diminish. So everyone's happy.

Based on recent military actions what would ACTUALLY happen is the us would try to bomb our maple syrup supplies and miss, and then grant us the right to charge for passage to any ship transiting the straight of georgia.

They also lead the world in pollution. So there you go

But it was you who won. You had 11 years to basically do whatever you wanted with global warming with a global warming friendly government in power. And you went with the carbon tax and that turned out to be a massive failure and it trashed the economy That was your plan. And it failed

The libs are supposedly admitting it but I noticed that every action they take in fact tends to move us further away It was crystal clear that the pipeline country's and other investors were prepared to take Canada seriously if we got rid of the bad legislation that prevents business, specifically the no pipeline bill and the tanker ban And carney left them in place deliberately. He created his magic fairyland bill which nobody believes in to give the appearance that he was going to play ball with them but they didn't believe it for one second. And even the ones who did believe it are now in the minority Energy industry losing confidence new pipeline will be deemed a national priority: Survey | Globalnews.ca He's pretending but he's still doing the things necessary to prevent that kind of business from happening

You and I have both mentioned it in various threads. I just don't understand how other people can see this and not be severely concerned

The pendulum tends to swing. For a long time the government in power refused to do anything about immigration issues even though it was a major problem for a lot of people. They even encouraged it and claimed anyone who didn't like it was a bad person In order to address that the people voted in somebody who was considerably stronger in that regard and now things have gone the other way. That tends to be what happens politically regardless of the topic, if you allow a problem to fester unaddressed then you tend to get an 'overcorrection' the other way to 'right the ship' so to speak. It's not great poitics. It's better when gov'ts address problems and concerns and take them seriously instead of polarizing them and creating a flash point This will eventually swing back the other way and hopefully the next gov'ts of either stripe will work towards more moderate solutions that address the issues.

This certainly isn't the first time it's been brought up. And Embridge for example was quite direct, stating that they would not consider projects in canada under the current regulatory framework. PP campaigned when he became leader on the idea of getting rid of the beurocracy and 'gatekeepers'. The liberals have choked the life out of businesses federally with excessive regulation, and there's a few provinces who's gov'ts are almost as bad. If we actually got rid of the unnecessary regulation and inter provincial trade barriers canada would boom economically and would be vastly less dependent on international trade

So we can't even speak about it unless our new chinese masters agree. Well. This is going great so far isn't it?

Aw muffin, can't thnk of a rebuttal so you rely on insults again? LOLOL Triggered leftie is triggered The kick in the teeth is that's how much left canada... how much more on top of that would have COME to canada had the liberals had pro business and investment policies? They've probably cost us closer to 1.5 - 2 trillion between what we lost and what we could have had.

This war isn't doing well for him politically, that's for sure.

They won't though. For so much practical but for an awful lot of people they just don't have 45 minutes to sit at a public charger and wait for their vehicle to be done. They've got kids or other commitments and if they can't charge it home then they won't charge at all. The technology we've got pills and niche but it's just not mature yet. It's just not a replacement for ice vehicles due to its limitations. A segment of the population, say 30% or so, we'll find it beneficial, and another 5% or so we'll go with it even though it's a bad fit for them for moral reasons. But we need to invent something a little bit better that's a little bit more like filling a car with gas as far as time and convenience goes

No.... nothing i said was remotely close to that. Dude it's Wednesday, no drinkie drinkie till the weekend!

Obviously. Your repetitive posting behavior proves that. You're brutally intimidated and this is how insecure people react to that. Every time you do it everyone knows you're petrified

The 'belief' element where you believe you are communicating with another entity seems to have a much different effect on the brian. Interstingly that's true even if the person isn't a devout believer, it's more about the INTENT than whether you really believe the god exists. Brains are fascinating things. You should get one, they're totally cool.

Loser leftie takes a break from shaking fist at cloud to disparage his betters

Neither. It was a dumb metaphor to begin with. Guess the mass is excited but achieves nothing. What you do is enter into negotiations with a focus on mutual benefits and areas where you can agree that you can become stronger. You also look for give and take, things at Canada can give up that makes the US situation better and things that America can give up that makes Canada better The whole elbows up and elbows down thing was childish and designed to appeal to people that were fairly low brow people economically to begin with. These are the people that supported Trudeau

Yup. Like I said, your behavior is similar to that of a Chihuahua. Barks like crazy and hides under the furniture when the big dogs show up because it's constantly petrified and feels inadequate. Piddles on the floor as a sign of submission while still yapping like crazy because if it's insecurities I'm not the first to point this out to you, neither is goddess, others have said the same sort of thing. Rational adults don't simply repost loser loser loser a million times in post over a million times. It just never happens. Rational adults don't wake up every morning and run around putting down arrows on the people they don't like as fast as possible. That is both neurotic behavior and childish. And you can't even help yourself. It's completely compulsive with you. Everybody sees it.

I have cited you are wrong many times. What you're doing now is asking me to repeat the sites over and over again because it's all you've got left. I pointed out that a number of my points came from your cites At this point you just look like a complete child. Whining and crying like a baby. This is the fifth time you've been "so done with me" That's been shown a number of times now including by your own data life was expensive but Affordable under harper Under the liberals and Justin/Carney it is utterly unaffordable. Except for carney and his half million dollars worth of airline food. He seems to be 'struggling' through

PFFFFT !!! What do actual industry exec's know about the industry?!?!? They can't compare to LINKSOUL"S level of knowledge!!! LOL!